Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Research article

Applying behavioural science to increase uptake of the NHS Health Check: a randomised controlled trial of gain- and loss-framed messaging in the national patient information leaflet

Authors: Natalie Gold, Caroline Durlik, Jet G. Sanders, Katherine Thompson, Tim Chadborn

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The NHS Health Check (NHSHC) is a national programme for the prevention of non-communicable diseases. Patients aged 40–74 without an existing cardiovascular-related condition should be invited quinquennially. Uptake is lower than anticipated. We assessed the impact on uptake of two new behaviourally-enhanced leaflets (with the current national leaflet as a control), enclosed with the invitation letter: the first trial on the leaflet.

Methods

A double-blind three-armed randomized controlled trial was conducted. The new leaflets were shorter (two pages, instead of four); one was loss-framed (‘don’t miss out’) and the other was gain-framed (‘make the most of life’). The participants were patients from 39 practices in Lewisham and 17 practices in NE Lincolnshire, who were allocated to interventions using a random-number generator and received one of the leaflets with their invitation letter from April–September 2018. The outcome measure was uptake of an NHSHC by November 2018. The trial was powered to detect a 2% effect.

Results

Uptake was 17.6% in the control condition (n = 3677), 17.4% in the loss-framed condition (n = 3664), and 18.2% in the gain-framed condition (n = 3697). Leaflet type was not a significant predictor of NHSHC uptake in a logistic regression that controlled for demographic variables, with GP practice as a random effect. Statistically significant predictors of uptake included location (higher uptake in Lewisham), age (increased age was associated with increased attendance) and sex (higher uptake in females). The Bayes Factor comparing the null to a hypothesis of differences between conditions was 416, which is extreme evidence in favour of the null hypothesis.

Conclusion

There was no evidence for a meaningful effect of either a loss-framed or gain-framed behaviourally-informed leaflet type on uptake, which is surprising, given that behaviourally informed letters have improved uptake of NHSHCs. It is possible that people do not pay attention to leaflets that are enclosed with letters, or that the leaflet continues to support informed decision-making but this does not affect uptake.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03524131. Registered May 14, 2018. Retrospectively registered.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Public Health England. NHS health check best practice guidance. London: HMSO; 2016.
2.
Hippisley-Cox J, et al. Predicting cardiovascular risk in England and Wales: prospective derivation and validation of QRISK2. BMJ. 2008;336(7659):1475–82.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
3.
Usher-Smith JA, et al. NHS Health Check Programme rapid evidence synthesis. Cambridge: The Primary Care Unit, University of Cambridge; 2017.
4.
National Health Service. The NHS long term plan. London: NHS England; 2019.
5.
6.
7.
Mytton OT, et al. The current and potential health benefits of the National Health Service Health Check cardiovascular disease prevention programme in England: a microsimulation study. PLoS Med. 2018;15(3):e1002517.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
8.
Public Health England. NHS Health Check implementation review and action plan. London: Public Health England; 2013.
9.
Sallis A, et al. The effectiveness of an enhanced invitation letter on uptake of National Health Service Health Checks in primary care: a pragmatic quasi-randomised controlled trial. BMC Fam Pract. 2016;17:35.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
10.
Sallis A, et al. Pre-notification and reminder SMS text messages with behaviourally informed invitation letters to improve uptake of NHS Health Checks: a factorial randomised controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1162.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
11.
Sallis A, et al. Increasing uptake of National Health Service Health Checks in primary care: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial of enhanced invitation letters in Northamptonshire, England. J Public Health. Advance access publication. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​pubmed/​fdz134.
12.
13.
14.
Department of Health. NHS Health Check screening letter and leaflet: qualitative research. 2009.
15.
Kellar I, et al. Evaluation of an informed choice invitation for type 2 diabetes screening. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;72(2):232–8.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Mathieu E, et al. Informed choice in mammography screening: a randomized trial of a decision aid for 70-year-old women. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(19):2039–46.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Marteau TM, et al. Impact of an informed choice invitation on uptake of screening for diabetes in primary care (DICISION): randomised trial. BMJ. 2010;340:c2138.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
18.
Hewitson P, et al. Primary care endorsement letter and a patient leaflet to improve participation in colorectal cancer screening: results of a factorial randomised trial. Br J Cancer. 2011;105(4):475.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
19.
Bicchieri C. Norms in the wild: How to diagnose, measure, and change social norms. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016.
20.
Hallsworth M, et al. The behavioralist as tax collector: using natural field experiments to enhance tax compliance. J Public Econ. 2017;148:14–31.CrossRef
21.
Hallsworth M, et al. Provision of social norm feedback to high prescribers of antibiotics in general practice: a pragmatic national randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;387(10029):1743–52.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
22.
Agerström J, et al. Using descriptive social norms to increase charitable giving: the power of local norms. J Econ Psychol. 2016;52:147–53.CrossRef
23.
Strecher VJ, et al. The role of self-efficacy in achieving health behavior change. Health Educ Q. 1986;13(1):73–91.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Kozica S, et al. Initiating and continuing behaviour change within a weight gain prevention trial: a qualitative investigation. PLoS One. 2015;10(4):e0119773.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
25.
26.
Jenkinson CE, et al. Patients’ willingness to attend the NHS cardiovascular health checks in primary care: a qualitative interview study. BMC Fam Pract. 2015;16(1):33.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
27.
Burgess C, et al. Influences on individuals’ decisions to take up the offer of a health check: a qualitative study. Health Expect. 2015;18(6):2437–48.PubMedCrossRef
28.
29.
Chipchase L, Waterall J, Hill P. Understanding how the NHS Health Check works in practice. Pract Nurs. 2013;24(1):24-29.CrossRef
30.
Harte E, et al. Reasons why people do not attend NHS Health Checks: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis. Br J Gen Pract. 2018;68(666):e28–35.PubMedCrossRef
31.
32.
Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science. 1981;211(4481):453–8.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Rothman AJ, et al. The strategic use of gain- and loss-framed messages to promote healthy behavior: how theory can inform practice. J Commun. 2006;56:S202–20.CrossRef
34.
Rothman AJ, Salovey P. Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: the role of message framing. Psychol Bull. 1997;121(1):3.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Rouder JN, et al. Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychon Bull Rev. 2009;16(2):225–37.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Wagenmakers, E.J., et al., Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: the case of psi: comment on Bem (2011). 2011.CrossRef
37.
Dienes Z. How Bayes factors change scientific practice. J Math Psychol. 2016;72:78–89.CrossRef
38.
McNamara DS, et al. Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction. 1996;14(1):1–43.CrossRef
39.
O’Reilly T, McNamara DS. Reversing the reverse cohesion effect: good texts can be better for strategic, high-knowledge readers. Discourse Process. 2007;43(2):121–52.CrossRef
40.
Ozuru Y, Dempsey K, McNamara DS. Prior knowledge, reading skill, and text cohesion in the comprehension of science texts. Learn Instr. 2009;19(3):228–42.CrossRef
41.
Gidlow C, et al. Method of invitation and geographical proximity as predictors of NHS Health Check uptake. J Public Health. 2014;37(2):195–201.CrossRef
42.
Fox R. Informed choice in screening programmes: do leaflets help? A critical literature review. J Public Health. 2006;28(4):309–17.CrossRef
43.
Mann E, et al. Impact of informed-choice invitations on diabetes screening knowledge, attitude and intentions: an analogue study. BMC Public Health. 2010;10(1):768.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
44.
Jepson RG, et al. Patient perspectives on information and choice in cancer screening: a qualitative study in the UK. Soc Sci Med. 2007;65(5):890–9.PubMedCrossRef
45.
Raynor D, et al. A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative research on the role and effectiveness of written information available to patients about individual medicines. Health Technol Assess. 2007;11(5):1-160.
46.
47.
Stokamer CL, et al. Randomized controlled trial of the impact of intensive patient education on compliance with fecal occult blood testing. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(3):278–82.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
48.
McDermott L, et al. Enhanced invitations using the question-behavior effect and financial incentives to promote Health Check uptake in primary care. Ann Behav Med. 2018;52(7):594–605.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
49.
Gallagher KM, Updegraff JA. Health message framing effects on attitudes, intentions, and behavior: a meta-analytic review. Ann Behav Med. 2011;43(1):101–16.CrossRef
50.
O’Keefe DJ, Jensen JD. The relative persuasiveness of GainFramed and loss-framed messages for encouraging disease detection behaviors: a meta-analytic review. J Commun. 2009;59:296–316.CrossRef
51.
Bosone L, Martinez F. When, how and why is loss-framing more effective than gain- and non-gain-framing in the promotion of detection behaviors? Int Rev Soc Psychol. 2017;30(1):184–92.CrossRef
52.
Apanovitch AM, McCarthy D, Salovey PJHP. Using message framing to motivate HIV testing among low-income, ethnic minority women. Health Psychol. 2003;22(1):60.PubMedCrossRef
53.
O’Keefe DJ, Jensen JD. The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed loss-framed messages for encouraging disease prevention behaviors: a meta-analytic review. J Health Commun. 2007;12(7):623–44.PubMedCrossRef
54.
55.
Labeit A, Peinemann F, Baker R. Utilisation of preventative health check-ups in the UK: findings from individual-level repeated cross-sectional data from 1992 to 2008. BMJ Open. 2013;3(12):e003387.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
56.
Gidlow CJ, et al. Randomised controlled trial comparing uptake of NHS Health Check in response to standard letters, risk-personalised letters and telephone invitations. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):224.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
57.
58.
59.
Attwood S, Morton K, Sutton S. Exploring equity in uptake of the NHS Health check and a nested physical activity intervention trial. J Public Health (Oxf). 2016;38(3):560–8.CrossRef
60.
Suggs LS. A 10-year retrospective of research in new technologies for health communication. J Health Commun. 2006;11(1):61–74.PubMedCrossRef
61.
Gustafson DH, et al. CHESS: 10 years of research and development in consumer health informatics for broad populations, including the underserved. In: Consumer Health Informatics. Int J Med Inform. 2002;65(3):169–77.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Applying behavioural science to increase uptake of the NHS Health Check: a randomised controlled trial of gain- and loss-framed messaging in the national patient information leaflet
Authors
Natalie Gold
Caroline Durlik
Jet G. Sanders
Katherine Thompson
Tim Chadborn
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7754-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Public Health 1/2019 Go to the issue

Research article

A population-based approach to integrated healthcare delivery: a scoping review of clinical care and public health collaboration

Correspondence

How to conduct good quality research on violence against children with disabilities: key ethical, measurement, and research principles

Research article

Over-indebtedness and its association with sleep and sleep medication use

Research article

Efficacy of an incentive intervention on secondary prophylaxis for young people with rheumatic fever: a multiple baseline study

Research article

Measles seroprevalence after reactive vaccination campaigns during the 2015 measles outbreak in four health zones of the former Katanga Province, Democratic Republic of Congo

Research article

Risk factors for malnutrition among school-aged children: a cross-sectional study in rural Madagascar