Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 12/2013

01-12-2013 | Gastrointestinal

Appendiceal length as an independent risk factor for acute appendicitis

Authors: Perry J. Pickhardt, Joshua Suhonen, Edward M. Lawrence, Alejandro Muñoz del Rio, B. Dustin Pooler

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 12/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To determine if appendiceal lengths differ between adults with acute appendicitis and asymptomatic controls.

Methods

In vivo appendiceal length at computed tomography (CT) in 321 adults with surgically proven appendicitis was compared with that in 321 consecutive asymptomatic adult controls. CT length was derived using curved multiplanar reformats along the long axis. Gross pathological length provided external validation for appendectomy cases.

Results

Appendiceal length at CT correlated well with appendicitis specimens (mean length, 6.8 cm vs 6.6 cm; 79 % within 1.5 cm). For asymptomatic controls, mean CT appendiceal length was 7.9 cm, longer in men (8.4 ± 3.8 vs 7.4 ± 3.1 cm; P = 0.02), matching closely historical normative post-mortem data. The mean and standard deviation of appendiceal length at CT were significantly greater among negative controls than in the positive appendicitis group (7.9 ± 3.5 vs 6.8 ± 1.9 cm; P = 0.03). Of appendicitis cases, 90 % (288/321) fell within the range 4.0–10.0 cm, compared with 59 % (189/321) of negative controls (P < 0.001). Among controls, a fivefold increase in appendixes >10 cm and a twofold increase in appendixes <4 cm were observed. Half (9/18) of long appendicitis cases showed tip appendicitis at CT.

Conclusions

“Intermediate” appendiceal lengths (4–10 cm) are more frequently complicated by acute appendicitis, whereas both “long” (>10 cm) and “short” (<4 cm) lengths are more frequently observed in unaffected adults.

Key Points

• “Long” (>10 cm) appendices are more frequently observed in asymptomatic adults.
• In cases of acute appendicitis, 90 % measure 4–10 cm in length.
• Measurement of appendiceal length at computed tomography correlates well with gross pathology.
• Tip appendicitis is more common among long appendixes.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV (1990) The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 132:910–925PubMed Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV (1990) The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 132:910–925PubMed
2.
go back to reference Raja AS, Wright C, Sodickson AD et al (2010) Negative appendectomy rate in the era of ct: an 18-year perspective. Radiology 256:460–465PubMedCrossRef Raja AS, Wright C, Sodickson AD et al (2010) Negative appendectomy rate in the era of ct: an 18-year perspective. Radiology 256:460–465PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Pickhardt PJ, Lawrence EM, Pooler BD, Bruce RJ (2011) Diagnostic performance of multidetector computed tomography for suspected acute appendicitis. Ann Intern Med 154:789–796, W-291PubMedCrossRef Pickhardt PJ, Lawrence EM, Pooler BD, Bruce RJ (2011) Diagnostic performance of multidetector computed tomography for suspected acute appendicitis. Ann Intern Med 154:789–796, W-291PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Jeffrey RB, Laing FC, Townsend RR (1988) Acute appendicitis—sonographic criteria based on 250 cases. Radiology 167:327–329PubMed Jeffrey RB, Laing FC, Townsend RR (1988) Acute appendicitis—sonographic criteria based on 250 cases. Radiology 167:327–329PubMed
5.
go back to reference Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA (1997) Sensitivity and specificity of the individual CT signs of appendicitis: experience with 200 helical appendiceal CT examinations. J Comput Assist Tomogr 21:686–692PubMedCrossRef Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA (1997) Sensitivity and specificity of the individual CT signs of appendicitis: experience with 200 helical appendiceal CT examinations. J Comput Assist Tomogr 21:686–692PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Rybkin AV, Thoeni RF (2007) Current concepts in imaging of appendicitis. Radiol Clin North Am 45:411–422, viiPubMedCrossRef Rybkin AV, Thoeni RF (2007) Current concepts in imaging of appendicitis. Radiol Clin North Am 45:411–422, viiPubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference van Randen A, Lameris W, van Es HW et al (2010) Profiles of US and CT imaging features with a high probability of appendicitis. Eur Radiol 20:1657–1666PubMedCrossRef van Randen A, Lameris W, van Es HW et al (2010) Profiles of US and CT imaging features with a high probability of appendicitis. Eur Radiol 20:1657–1666PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Keyzer C, Gevenois AG (2011) Imaging of acute appendicitis in adults and children. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg Keyzer C, Gevenois AG (2011) Imaging of acute appendicitis in adults and children. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg
9.
go back to reference Bryant JD IV (1893) The relations of the gross anatomy of the vermiform appendix to some features of the clinical history of appendicitis. Ann Surg 17:164–180PubMedCrossRef Bryant JD IV (1893) The relations of the gross anatomy of the vermiform appendix to some features of the clinical history of appendicitis. Ann Surg 17:164–180PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Collins DC (1932) The length and position of the vermiform appendix: a study of 4,680 specimens. Ann Surg 96:1044–1048PubMedCrossRef Collins DC (1932) The length and position of the vermiform appendix: a study of 4,680 specimens. Ann Surg 96:1044–1048PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Buschard K, Kjaeldgaard A (1973) Investigation and analysis of the position, fixation, length and embryology of the vermiform appendix. Acta Chir Scand 139:293–298PubMed Buschard K, Kjaeldgaard A (1973) Investigation and analysis of the position, fixation, length and embryology of the vermiform appendix. Acta Chir Scand 139:293–298PubMed
12.
go back to reference Solanke TF (1970) Position, length, and content of vermiform appendix in Nigerians. Br J Surg 57:100–102PubMedCrossRef Solanke TF (1970) Position, length, and content of vermiform appendix in Nigerians. Br J Surg 57:100–102PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ et al (2007) CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med 357:1403–1412PubMedCrossRef Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ et al (2007) CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med 357:1403–1412PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA (1997) Distal appendicitis: CT appearance and diagnosis. Radiology 204:709–712PubMed Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA (1997) Distal appendicitis: CT appearance and diagnosis. Radiology 204:709–712PubMed
16.
go back to reference Gray GF, Wackym PA (1986) Surgical pathology of the vermiform appendix. Pathol Annu 21:111–144PubMed Gray GF, Wackym PA (1986) Surgical pathology of the vermiform appendix. Pathol Annu 21:111–144PubMed
17.
go back to reference Collins DC (1948) Present concepts in the management of both chronic and acute appendicitis; with a report on 12,813 consecutive appendectomies. J Int Coll Surg 11:154–170PubMed Collins DC (1948) Present concepts in the management of both chronic and acute appendicitis; with a report on 12,813 consecutive appendectomies. J Int Coll Surg 11:154–170PubMed
18.
go back to reference Tate JJT, Dawson JW, Chung SCS, Lau WY, Li AKC (1993) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy - prospective randomized trial. Lancet 342:633–637PubMedCrossRef Tate JJT, Dawson JW, Chung SCS, Lau WY, Li AKC (1993) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy - prospective randomized trial. Lancet 342:633–637PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Lewis FR, Holcroft JW, Boey J, Dunphy JE (1975) Appendicitis—critical review of diagnosis and treatment in 1,000 cases. Arch Surg 110:677–684PubMedCrossRef Lewis FR, Holcroft JW, Boey J, Dunphy JE (1975) Appendicitis—critical review of diagnosis and treatment in 1,000 cases. Arch Surg 110:677–684PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Ives EP, Sung S, McCue P, Durrani H, Halpern EJ (2008) Independent predictors of acute appendicitis on CT with pathologic correlation. Acad Radiol 15:996–1003PubMedCrossRef Ives EP, Sung S, McCue P, Durrani H, Halpern EJ (2008) Independent predictors of acute appendicitis on CT with pathologic correlation. Acad Radiol 15:996–1003PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Andre JB, Sebastian VA, Ruchman RM, Saad SA (2008) CT and appendicitis: evaluation of correlation between CT diagnosis and pathological diagnosis. Postgrad Med J 84:321–324PubMedCrossRef Andre JB, Sebastian VA, Ruchman RM, Saad SA (2008) CT and appendicitis: evaluation of correlation between CT diagnosis and pathological diagnosis. Postgrad Med J 84:321–324PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, Mostafavi AA, McCabe CJ (1998) Effect of computed tomography of the appendix on treatment of patients and use of hospital resources. N Engl J Med 338:141–146PubMedCrossRef Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, Mostafavi AA, McCabe CJ (1998) Effect of computed tomography of the appendix on treatment of patients and use of hospital resources. N Engl J Med 338:141–146PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference van Randen A, Bipat S, Zwinderman AH, Ubbink DT, Stoker J, Boermeester MA (2008) Acute appendicitis: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of CT and graded compression US related to prevalence of disease. Radiology 249:97–106PubMedCrossRef van Randen A, Bipat S, Zwinderman AH, Ubbink DT, Stoker J, Boermeester MA (2008) Acute appendicitis: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of CT and graded compression US related to prevalence of disease. Radiology 249:97–106PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Marudanayagam R, Williams GT, Rees BI (2006) Review of the pathological results of 2660 appendicectomy specimens. J Gastroenterol 41:745–749PubMedCrossRef Marudanayagam R, Williams GT, Rees BI (2006) Review of the pathological results of 2660 appendicectomy specimens. J Gastroenterol 41:745–749PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Collins DC (1995) A study of 50,000 specimens of the human vermiform appendix. Surg Gynecol Obstet 101:437–445 Collins DC (1995) A study of 50,000 specimens of the human vermiform appendix. Surg Gynecol Obstet 101:437–445
26.
go back to reference Collins DC (1963) 71,000 human appendix specimens—final report summarizing forty years’study. Am J Proctol 14:265–281PubMed Collins DC (1963) 71,000 human appendix specimens—final report summarizing forty years’study. Am J Proctol 14:265–281PubMed
27.
go back to reference Golalipour MJ, Arya B, Azarhoosh R, Jahanshahi M (2003) Anatomical variations of vermiform appendix In South-East Caspian Sea (Gorgan-Iran). J Anat Soc India 52:141–143 Golalipour MJ, Arya B, Azarhoosh R, Jahanshahi M (2003) Anatomical variations of vermiform appendix In South-East Caspian Sea (Gorgan-Iran). J Anat Soc India 52:141–143
28.
go back to reference Mangi AA, Berger DL (2000) Stump appendicitis. Am Surg 66:739–741PubMed Mangi AA, Berger DL (2000) Stump appendicitis. Am Surg 66:739–741PubMed
29.
go back to reference Paul UK, Naushaba H, Alam J, Begum T, Rahman A, Akhter J (2011) Length of vermiform appendix: a postmortem study. Bangladesh J Anat 9:10–12 Paul UK, Naushaba H, Alam J, Begum T, Rahman A, Akhter J (2011) Length of vermiform appendix: a postmortem study. Bangladesh J Anat 9:10–12
Metadata
Title
Appendiceal length as an independent risk factor for acute appendicitis
Authors
Perry J. Pickhardt
Joshua Suhonen
Edward M. Lawrence
Alejandro Muñoz del Rio
B. Dustin Pooler
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 12/2013
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-013-2948-1

Other articles of this Issue 12/2013

European Radiology 12/2013 Go to the issue