Skip to main content
Top

05-03-2024 | Appendectomy | Original Article

Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy using new surgical procedure versus conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy

Authors: Fei Liu, Quan Lv, Chun-Yi Wang, Zi-Wei Li, Xu-Rui Liu, Dong Peng

Published in: Updates in Surgery

Login to get access

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the clinic outcomes between new single-port laparoscopic appendectomy (NSLA) and conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy (CTLA) for patients with acute appendicitis. Patients who were diagnosed with acute appendicitis and underwent appendectomy were retrospectively collected from a single clinical center from September 2021 to June 2023. Baseline characteristics, surgical information, and postoperative information were compared between the NSLA group and the CTLA group. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to find out the predictors of overall complications. A total of 296 patients were enrolled from a single clinical medical center. There were 146 (49.3%) males and 150 (50.7%) females. There were 54 (18.2%) patients in the NSLA group and 242 (81.8%) patients in the CTLA group. After data analysis, we found the patients in the NSLA group had a shorter postoperative hospital stay (P < 0.01) than the CTLA group. The other outcomes including intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.167), operation time (P = 0.282), nature of the appendix (P = 0.971), and overall complications (P = 0.543) were not statistically different. After univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis, we found that age (P = 0.018, OR = 1.039, 95% CI = 1.007–1.072), neutrophil percentage (P = 0.018, OR = 1.070, 95% CI = 1.011–1.132), and fever (P = 0.019, OR = 6.112, 95% CI = 1.340–27.886) were the predictors of overall complications. However, the surgical procedure (NSLA versus CTLA) was not a predictor of overall complications (P = 0.376, OR = 1.964, 95% CI = 0.440–8.768). Compared with CTLA, there was no significant increase in postoperative overall complications with NSLA, making it a safe and feasible new surgical procedure. More studies are needed to evaluate the long-term results.
Literature
16.
go back to reference Chen Y, Guo S, Liu Y, Yuan J, Fan Z (2022) Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy using a needle-type grasping forceps compared with conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy for patients with acute uncomplicated appendicitis: a single-center retrospective study. J Int Med Res 50(8):3000605221119647. https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605221119647CrossRefPubMed Chen Y, Guo S, Liu Y, Yuan J, Fan Z (2022) Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy using a needle-type grasping forceps compared with conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy for patients with acute uncomplicated appendicitis: a single-center retrospective study. J Int Med Res 50(8):3000605221119647. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1177/​0300060522111964​7CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Khan MN, Fayyad T, Cecil TD, Moran BJ (2007) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: the risk of postoperative infectious complications. JSLS 11(3):363–367PubMedPubMedCentral Khan MN, Fayyad T, Cecil TD, Moran BJ (2007) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: the risk of postoperative infectious complications. JSLS 11(3):363–367PubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Isik A, Demiryilmaz I, Yilmaz I et al (2016) Effectiveness of manual knotting at laparoscopic appendectomy. Gazi Med J 27:19–20 Isik A, Demiryilmaz I, Yilmaz I et al (2016) Effectiveness of manual knotting at laparoscopic appendectomy. Gazi Med J 27:19–20
Metadata
Title
Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy using new surgical procedure versus conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy
Authors
Fei Liu
Quan Lv
Chun-Yi Wang
Zi-Wei Li
Xu-Rui Liu
Dong Peng
Publication date
05-03-2024
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Updates in Surgery
Print ISSN: 2038-131X
Electronic ISSN: 2038-3312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-024-01775-w