Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 2/2018

01-06-2018 | Original Article

Apical vertebral derotation and translation (AVDT) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using screws and sublaminar bands: a safer concept for deformity correction

Authors: Giovanni Andrea La Maida, Donata Rita Peroni, Marcello Ferraro, Andrea Della Valle, Claudio Vitali, Bernardo Misaggi

Published in: European Spine Journal | Special Issue 2/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the efficacy and safety of a new deformity correction philosophy treatment for AIS called apical vertebral derotation and translation (AVDT).

Methods

It is a retrospective study of prospectively collected data concerning two different scoliosis correction techniques used in our department. A total of 81 patients (22M, 59F) with a mean age of 15.5 years and minimum follow-up of 2 years were reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the correction technique: 36 patients underwent single-rod derotation using all screws construct (AS), while 45 patients underwent apical vertebral derotation and translation using screws and sublaminar bands (SB).

Results

The mean improvement of the MT curve was 70% in the AS group and 60.6% in the SB group, while the mean improvement of the TL/L curve was 65.5 and 72.4%, respectively. PT increased in both groups after surgery with a mean amount of 2.5° in the AS group and only 1° in the SB group. We observed also a greater amount of cervical lordosis reduction in the AS group (4.5°) compared with the SB group (only 1°). The SB group had less operative time and less blood loss.

Conclusion

There was no significant difference between the two groups at the final follow-up and both techniques led to an excellent correction in the frontal plane; in the sagittal plane, the AVDT technique seemed to give less sagittal imbalance with better cervical profile; the surgical procedure is easy with less operative time, less blood loss and less risk of potential complications.

Graphical abstract

These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Harrington PR (1962) Treatment of scoliosis. Correction and internal fixation by spine instrumentation. Am J Orthop 44-A:591–610 Harrington PR (1962) Treatment of scoliosis. Correction and internal fixation by spine instrumentation. Am J Orthop 44-A:591–610
2.
go back to reference Luque ER (1982) Segmental spinal instrumentation for the correction of scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 163:192–198 Luque ER (1982) Segmental spinal instrumentation for the correction of scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 163:192–198
3.
go back to reference Cotrel Y, Dubousset J (1985) New segmental posterior instrumentation of the spine. Orthop Trans 9:118 Cotrel Y, Dubousset J (1985) New segmental posterior instrumentation of the spine. Orthop Trans 9:118
4.
go back to reference Suk SI, Lee CK, Min HJ et al (1994) Comparison of Cotrel-Dubousset pedicle screws and hooks in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. Int Orthop 18:341–346CrossRefPubMed Suk SI, Lee CK, Min HJ et al (1994) Comparison of Cotrel-Dubousset pedicle screws and hooks in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. Int Orthop 18:341–346CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Cho SK et al (2004) Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hook instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 29:2040–2048CrossRefPubMed Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Cho SK et al (2004) Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hook instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 29:2040–2048CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Vora V, Crawford A, Babekhir N et al (2007) A pedicle screw construct gives an enhanced posterior correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis when compared with other constructs: myth or reality. Spine 32:1869–1874CrossRefPubMed Vora V, Crawford A, Babekhir N et al (2007) A pedicle screw construct gives an enhanced posterior correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis when compared with other constructs: myth or reality. Spine 32:1869–1874CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Suk SI, Lee CK, Kim WJ et al (1995) Segmental pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 20:1399–1405CrossRefPubMed Suk SI, Lee CK, Kim WJ et al (1995) Segmental pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 20:1399–1405CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Suk SI, Kim WJ, Kim JH et al (1999) Restoration of thoracic kyphosis in the hypokyphotic spine: a comparison between multiple-hook and segmental pedicle screw fixation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Spinal Disord 12:489–495CrossRefPubMed Suk SI, Kim WJ, Kim JH et al (1999) Restoration of thoracic kyphosis in the hypokyphotic spine: a comparison between multiple-hook and segmental pedicle screw fixation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Spinal Disord 12:489–495CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Sucato DJ, Agrawal S, O’Brien MF et al (2008) Restoration of thoracic kyphosis after operative treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a multicenter comparison of three surgical approaches. Spine 33(24):2630–2636CrossRefPubMed Sucato DJ, Agrawal S, O’Brien MF et al (2008) Restoration of thoracic kyphosis after operative treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a multicenter comparison of three surgical approaches. Spine 33(24):2630–2636CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Clement JL, Chau E, Kimkpe C et al (2008) Restoration of thoracic kyphosis by posterior instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, comparative radiographic analysis of two methods of reduction. Spine 33(14):1579–1587CrossRefPubMed Clement JL, Chau E, Kimkpe C et al (2008) Restoration of thoracic kyphosis by posterior instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, comparative radiographic analysis of two methods of reduction. Spine 33(14):1579–1587CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Ilharreborde B, Even J, Lefevre Y et al (2010) Hybrid constructs for tridimensional correction of the thoracic spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis—a comparative analysis of universal clamps versus hooks. Spine 35(3):306–314CrossRefPubMed Ilharreborde B, Even J, Lefevre Y et al (2010) Hybrid constructs for tridimensional correction of the thoracic spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis—a comparative analysis of universal clamps versus hooks. Spine 35(3):306–314CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Jiang J, Qian B, Qiu Yong et al (2017) The azygos vein in at potential risk of injury from malpositioning of left thoracic pedicle screw in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scolosis patients. Spine 42(15):E920–E925CrossRefPubMed Jiang J, Qian B, Qiu Yong et al (2017) The azygos vein in at potential risk of injury from malpositioning of left thoracic pedicle screw in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scolosis patients. Spine 42(15):E920–E925CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Bekki H, Harimaya K, Matsumoto Y et al (2016) The position of the aorta relative to the vertebrae in patients with Lenke type 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 41(7):585–590CrossRefPubMed Bekki H, Harimaya K, Matsumoto Y et al (2016) The position of the aorta relative to the vertebrae in patients with Lenke type 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 41(7):585–590CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Apical vertebral derotation and translation (AVDT) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using screws and sublaminar bands: a safer concept for deformity correction
Authors
Giovanni Andrea La Maida
Donata Rita Peroni
Marcello Ferraro
Andrea Della Valle
Claudio Vitali
Bernardo Misaggi
Publication date
01-06-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue Special Issue 2/2018
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5626-9

Other articles of this Special Issue 2/2018

European Spine Journal 2/2018 Go to the issue