Skip to main content
Top
Published in: General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 10/2019

01-10-2019 | Aortic Valve Replacement | Original Article

External suture annuloplasty for mild to moderate and moderate aortic regurgitation due to an isolated type Ic lesion

Authors: Minoru Matsuhama, Satoshi Arimura, Kenichi Sasaki, Hiroaki Semba, Yuko Kato, Shinya Suzuki, Tokuhisa Uejima, Junji Yajima, Takeshi Yamashita, Takashi Kunihara

Published in: General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery | Issue 10/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

Whether mild to moderate and moderate aortic regurgitation should be corrected surgically during other cardiovascular surgeries remains controversial. We evaluated the effectiveness of external suture annuloplasty in such cases.

Methods

Among 95 patients undergoing aortic valve repair between December 2013 and March 2018, five patients with mild to moderate and moderate aortic regurgitation due to aortic annulus dilatation (type Ic lesion) underwent surgery for mitral regurgitation and/or thoracic aortic aneurysm. Aortic valves were repaired with external suture annuloplasty alone with a mean Hegar dilator size of 20.4 ± 0.8 (20.0–22.0) mm at the same time and were followed up echocardiographically.

Results

There were no cases of mortality or major morbidity. Intraoperative direct measurement revealed ventriculoaortic junction size of 25.0 ± 0.8 (24.0–27.0) mm. The average cardiopulmonary bypass time and aortic cross-clamping time were 139 ± 46 (76–205) min and 105 ± 38 (58–172) min, respectively. Postoperative transthoracic echocardiogram during hospitalization showed trivial aortic regurgitation in all cases, with average ventriculoaortic junction size, aortic valve area, and peak and mean transvalvular gradient of 19.1 ± 0.7 (18.0–20.3) mm, 2.24 ± 0.48 (1.60–3.00) cm2, 6.4 ± 1.9 (4.0–9.2) mmHg, and 3.5 ± 1.1 (2.1–5.2) mmHg, respectively. Ventriculoaortic junction size was significantly decreased (P < 0.05). There have been no changes in ventriculoaortic junction size (P = 0.32) or other echocardiographic findings for 24 ± 6 (17–36) months after surgery.

Conclusions

Although concomitant with other cardiac surgeries, mild to moderate and moderate aortic regurgitation could be repaired without clinically relevant additional surgical duration. External suture annuloplasty is a useful, safe, and secure treatment choice for type Ic lesion-induced aortic regurgitation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Meester C, Pasquet A, Gerber BL, Vancraeynest D, Noirhomme P, Khoury GE, et al. Valve repair improves the outcome of surgery for chronic severe aortic regurgitation: a propensity score analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148:1913–20.CrossRefPubMed Meester C, Pasquet A, Gerber BL, Vancraeynest D, Noirhomme P, Khoury GE, et al. Valve repair improves the outcome of surgery for chronic severe aortic regurgitation: a propensity score analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148:1913–20.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Vohra HA, Whistance RN, Hechadi J, de Kerchove L, Fuller H, Noirhomme P, et al. Long-term outcomes of concomitant aortic and mitral valve repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148:454–60.CrossRefPubMed Vohra HA, Whistance RN, Hechadi J, de Kerchove L, Fuller H, Noirhomme P, et al. Long-term outcomes of concomitant aortic and mitral valve repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148:454–60.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Malas T, Saczkowski R, Sohmer B, Ruel M, Mesana T, de Kerchove L, et al. Is aortic valve repair reproducible? Analysis of the learning curve for aortic valve repair. Can J Cardiol. 2015;31:1497.e15–22.CrossRef Malas T, Saczkowski R, Sohmer B, Ruel M, Mesana T, de Kerchove L, et al. Is aortic valve repair reproducible? Analysis of the learning curve for aortic valve repair. Can J Cardiol. 2015;31:1497.e15–22.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Committee for Scientific Affairs, The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery, Masuda M, Okamura M, Doki Y, Endo S, et al. Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery in Japan during 2014: annual report by the Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;64:665–97.CrossRef Committee for Scientific Affairs, The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery, Masuda M, Okamura M, Doki Y, Endo S, et al. Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery in Japan during 2014: annual report by the Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;64:665–97.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Boodhwani M, de Kerchove L, Glinuer D, Poncelet A, Rubay J, Astarci P, et al. Repair-oriented classification of aortic insufficiency: impact on surgical techniques and clinical outcomes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;137:286–94.CrossRefPubMed Boodhwani M, de Kerchove L, Glinuer D, Poncelet A, Rubay J, Astarci P, et al. Repair-oriented classification of aortic insufficiency: impact on surgical techniques and clinical outcomes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;137:286–94.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Glacer N, Jacson V, Holzmann MJ, Franco-Cereceda A, Sartipy U. Prosthetic valve endocarditis after surgical aortic valve replacement. Circulation. 2017;136:329–31.CrossRef Glacer N, Jacson V, Holzmann MJ, Franco-Cereceda A, Sartipy U. Prosthetic valve endocarditis after surgical aortic valve replacement. Circulation. 2017;136:329–31.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Grubitzsch H, Schaefer A, Melzer C, Wernecke KD, Gabbieri D, Konertz W. Outcome after surgery for prosthetic valve endocarditis and the impact of preoperative treatment. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148:2052–9.CrossRefPubMed Grubitzsch H, Schaefer A, Melzer C, Wernecke KD, Gabbieri D, Konertz W. Outcome after surgery for prosthetic valve endocarditis and the impact of preoperative treatment. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148:2052–9.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Kunihara T. Annular management during aortic valve repair: a systematic review. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;64:63–71.CrossRefPubMed Kunihara T. Annular management during aortic valve repair: a systematic review. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;64:63–71.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Rankin JS, He X, O’Brien SM, Jacobs JP, Welke KF, Filardo G, et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk model for operative mortality after multiple valve surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;95:1484–90.CrossRefPubMed Rankin JS, He X, O’Brien SM, Jacobs JP, Welke KF, Filardo G, et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk model for operative mortality after multiple valve surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;95:1484–90.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Shuhaiber J, Isaacs AJ, Sedrakyan A. The effect of center volume on in-hospital mortality after aortic and mitral valve surgical procedures: a population-based study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;100:1340–6.CrossRefPubMed Shuhaiber J, Isaacs AJ, Sedrakyan A. The effect of center volume on in-hospital mortality after aortic and mitral valve surgical procedures: a population-based study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;100:1340–6.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Rankin JS, Hammill BG, Ferguson TB Jr, Glower DD, O’Brien SM, DeLong ER, et al. Determinants of operative mortality in valvular heart surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;131:547–57.CrossRefPubMed Rankin JS, Hammill BG, Ferguson TB Jr, Glower DD, O’Brien SM, DeLong ER, et al. Determinants of operative mortality in valvular heart surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;131:547–57.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Vassileva CM, Li S, Thourani VH, Suri RM, Williams ML, Lee R, et al. Outcome characteristics of multiple valve surgery: comparison to single valves. Innovations. 2014;9:27–32.CrossRefPubMed Vassileva CM, Li S, Thourani VH, Suri RM, Williams ML, Lee R, et al. Outcome characteristics of multiple valve surgery: comparison to single valves. Innovations. 2014;9:27–32.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Lee R, Li S, Rankin JS, O’Brien SM, Gmmie JS, Perterson ED, et al. Fifteen-year outcome trends for valve surgery in North America. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;91:677–84.CrossRefPubMed Lee R, Li S, Rankin JS, O’Brien SM, Gmmie JS, Perterson ED, et al. Fifteen-year outcome trends for valve surgery in North America. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;91:677–84.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Khelil N, Sleilaty G, Palladino M, Fouda M, Escande R, Debauchez M, et al. Surgical anatomy of the aortic annulus: landmarks for external annuloplasty in aortic valve repair. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;99:1220–6.CrossRefPubMed Khelil N, Sleilaty G, Palladino M, Fouda M, Escande R, Debauchez M, et al. Surgical anatomy of the aortic annulus: landmarks for external annuloplasty in aortic valve repair. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;99:1220–6.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Schäfers HJ, Raddatz A, Schmied W, Psych D, Takahashi H, Miura Y, et al. Reexaming remodeling. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;149:S30–6.CrossRefPubMed Schäfers HJ, Raddatz A, Schmied W, Psych D, Takahashi H, Miura Y, et al. Reexaming remodeling. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;149:S30–6.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Kunihara T. Toward standardization of valve-sparing root replacement and annuloplasty. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;66:685–91.CrossRefPubMed Kunihara T. Toward standardization of valve-sparing root replacement and annuloplasty. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;66:685–91.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Ouzonian M, Rao V, Manlhiot C, Abraham N, David C, Feindel CM, et al. Valve-sparing root replacement compared with composite valve graft procedures in patients with aortic root dilation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:1838–47.CrossRef Ouzonian M, Rao V, Manlhiot C, Abraham N, David C, Feindel CM, et al. Valve-sparing root replacement compared with composite valve graft procedures in patients with aortic root dilation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:1838–47.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP 3rd, Guyton RA et al. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:e57–185.CrossRefPubMed Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP 3rd, Guyton RA et al. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:e57–185.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Miyahara S, Omura A, Sakamoto T, Nomura Y, Inoue T, Minami H, et al. Impact of postoperative cusp configuration on midterm durability after aortic root implantation. J Heart Valve Dis. 2013;22:509–16.PubMed Miyahara S, Omura A, Sakamoto T, Nomura Y, Inoue T, Minami H, et al. Impact of postoperative cusp configuration on midterm durability after aortic root implantation. J Heart Valve Dis. 2013;22:509–16.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Schäfers HJ, Schmied W, Psych D, Marom G, Aicher D. Cusp height in aortic valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;146:269–74.CrossRefPubMed Schäfers HJ, Schmied W, Psych D, Marom G, Aicher D. Cusp height in aortic valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;146:269–74.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Capps SB, Elikins RC, Fronk DM. Body surface area as a predictor of aortic and pulmonary valve diameter. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;119:975–82.CrossRefPubMed Capps SB, Elikins RC, Fronk DM. Body surface area as a predictor of aortic and pulmonary valve diameter. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;119:975–82.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Kunihara T, Arimura S, Sata F, Giebels C, Schneider U, Schäfers HJ, et al. Aortic annulus does not dilate over time after aortic root remodeling with or without annuloplasty. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;155:885–94.CrossRefPubMed Kunihara T, Arimura S, Sata F, Giebels C, Schneider U, Schäfers HJ, et al. Aortic annulus does not dilate over time after aortic root remodeling with or without annuloplasty. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;155:885–94.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Schneider U, Hofmann C, Aicher D, Takahashi H, Miura Y, Schäfers HJ. Suture annuloplasty significantly improves the durability of bicuspid aortic valve repair. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;103:504–10.CrossRefPubMed Schneider U, Hofmann C, Aicher D, Takahashi H, Miura Y, Schäfers HJ. Suture annuloplasty significantly improves the durability of bicuspid aortic valve repair. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;103:504–10.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Hwang HY, Kim KH, Ahn H. Attitude after a mild aortic valve lesion during rheumatic mitral valve surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;147:1540–6.CrossRefPubMed Hwang HY, Kim KH, Ahn H. Attitude after a mild aortic valve lesion during rheumatic mitral valve surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;147:1540–6.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Vaturi M, Porter A, Adler Y, Shapira Y, Sahar G, Vidne B, et al. The natural history of aortic valve disease after mitral valve surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33:2003–8.CrossRefPubMed Vaturi M, Porter A, Adler Y, Shapira Y, Sahar G, Vidne B, et al. The natural history of aortic valve disease after mitral valve surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33:2003–8.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Choudhary SK, Talwar S, Juneja R, Kumar AS. Fate of mild aortic valve disease after mitral valve intervention. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;122:583–6.CrossRefPubMed Choudhary SK, Talwar S, Juneja R, Kumar AS. Fate of mild aortic valve disease after mitral valve intervention. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;122:583–6.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
External suture annuloplasty for mild to moderate and moderate aortic regurgitation due to an isolated type Ic lesion
Authors
Minoru Matsuhama
Satoshi Arimura
Kenichi Sasaki
Hiroaki Semba
Yuko Kato
Shinya Suzuki
Tokuhisa Uejima
Junji Yajima
Takeshi Yamashita
Takashi Kunihara
Publication date
01-10-2019
Publisher
Springer Singapore
Published in
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery / Issue 10/2019
Print ISSN: 1863-6705
Electronic ISSN: 1863-6713
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-019-01119-1

Other articles of this Issue 10/2019

General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 10/2019 Go to the issue