Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal for Equity in Health 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Antibiotic | Research

Inequalities in the health survey using validation question to filter insufficient effort responding: reducing overestimated effects or creating selection bias?

Authors: Jingjing Lu, Feng Wang, Xiaomin Wang, Leesa Lin, Weiyi Wang, Lu Li, Xudong Zhou

Published in: International Journal for Equity in Health | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The presence of insufficient effort responding participants (IERPs) in a survey can produce systematic bias. Validation questions are commonly used to exclude IERPs. Participants were defined as IERPs if responding inconsistently to two matched validation questions, and non-insufficient effort responding participants (non-IERPs) if responding consistently. However, it has not been tested whether validation questions themselves could result in selection bias.

Methods

This study was a cross-sectional survey conducted in Guangxi, China. Participants’ intentions to use antibiotics for their children when they have self-limiting diseases, including sore throat, cold, diarrhea, and fever, were measured. The Chi-square tests were used to compare the socio-economic status (SES) between non-IERPs and IERPs. Logistic regression was adopted to test the association between intentions to misuse antibiotics and groups (non-IERPs, IERPs with high SES, and IERPs with low SES).

Results

Data with 3264 non-IERPs and 1543 IERPs were collected. The results showed IERPs had a lower education level (χ2 = 6.100, p = 0.047) and a higher proportion of rural residence (χ2 = 4.750, p = 0.030) compared with non-IERPs. Rural IERPs reported significantly higher rates of intentions to misuse antibiotics when their children have a sore throat (OR = 1.32; 95% CI = 1.11,1.56; p < 0.01), cold (OR = 1.33; 95%CI = 1.13,1.58; p < 0.01), diarrhea (OR = 1.46; 95%CI = 1.20,1.77; p < 0.001), and fever (OR = 1.22; 95% CI = 1.04,1.43; p < 0.05) compared with non-IERPs. IERPs living in urban areas reported significantly lower rates of intentions to use antibiotics when their children have a sore throat (OR = 0.76; 95%CI = 0.62,0.93; p < 0.01) compared with non-IERPs. IERPs with lower levels of education reported significantly higher rates of intentions to use antibiotics when their children have a sore throat (OR = 1.19; 95%CI = 1.02,1.39; p < 0.05), cold (OR = 1.43; 95% CI = 1.23,1.66; p < 0.001), diarrhea (OR = 1.38; 95%CI = 1.15,1.64; p < 0.01), and fever (OR = 1.25; 95% CI = 1.09,1.44; p < 0.01) compared with non-IERPs. IERPs with higher education levels reported significantly lower rates of intentions to use antibiotics when their children have a sore throat (OR = 0.72; 95% CI = 0.56,0.94; p < 0.05), cold (OR = 0.66; 95% CI = 0.51,0.86; p < 0.01), and fever (OR = 0.74; 95% CI = 0.60,0.92; p < 0.01) compared with non-IERPs. IERPs with low-income reported significantly higher rates of intentions to use antibiotics when their children have a cold (OR = 1.36; 95% CI = 1.13,1.64; p < 0.01) and diarrhea (OR = 1.30; 95% CI = 1.05,1.62; p < 0.05) compared with non-IERPs.

Conclusions

Using validation questions to exclude IERPs can result in selection bias in which participants with lower socio-economic standing and poor antibiotic use intentions were disproportionately excluded.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Crede M. Random responding as a threat to the validity of effect size estimates in correlational research. Educ Psychol Meas. 2010;70(4):596–612.CrossRef Crede M. Random responding as a threat to the validity of effect size estimates in correlational research. Educ Psychol Meas. 2010;70(4):596–612.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Oppenheimer DM, Meyvis T, Davidenko N. Instructional manipulation checks: detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2009;45(4):867–72.CrossRef Oppenheimer DM, Meyvis T, Davidenko N. Instructional manipulation checks: detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2009;45(4):867–72.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Berry DTR, Wetter MW, Baer RA, et al. MMPI-2 random responding indices: validation using a self-report methodology. Psychol Assess. 1992;4(3):340–5.CrossRef Berry DTR, Wetter MW, Baer RA, et al. MMPI-2 random responding indices: validation using a self-report methodology. Psychol Assess. 1992;4(3):340–5.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Wise SL. An investigation of the differential effort received by items on a low-stakes computer-based test. Appl Meas Educ. 2006;19(2):95–114.CrossRef Wise SL. An investigation of the differential effort received by items on a low-stakes computer-based test. Appl Meas Educ. 2006;19(2):95–114.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Osborne JW, Blanchard MR. Random responding from participants is a threat to the validity of social science research results. Front Psychol. 2011;1:1–7.CrossRef Osborne JW, Blanchard MR. Random responding from participants is a threat to the validity of social science research results. Front Psychol. 2011;1:1–7.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Zijlstra WP, van der Ark LA, Sijtsma K. Outliers in questionnaire data: can they be detected and should they be removed? J Educ Behav Stat. 2011;36:186–212.CrossRef Zijlstra WP, van der Ark LA, Sijtsma K. Outliers in questionnaire data: can they be detected and should they be removed? J Educ Behav Stat. 2011;36:186–212.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Greene RL. The MMPI-2: an interpretive manual. 2nd ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 2000. Greene RL. The MMPI-2: an interpretive manual. 2nd ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 2000.
8.
go back to reference Baer RA, Ballenger J, Berry DT, et al. Detection of random responding on the MMPI-A. J Pers Assess. 1997;68(1):139–51.PubMedCrossRef Baer RA, Ballenger J, Berry DT, et al. Detection of random responding on the MMPI-A. J Pers Assess. 1997;68(1):139–51.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Baer RA, Kroll LS, Rinaldo J, et al. Detecting and discriminating between random responding and Overreporting on the MMPI-A. J Pers Assess. 1999;72(2):308–20.CrossRef Baer RA, Kroll LS, Rinaldo J, et al. Detecting and discriminating between random responding and Overreporting on the MMPI-A. J Pers Assess. 1999;72(2):308–20.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Pinsoneault TBA. Variable response inconsistency scale and a true response inconsistency scale for the Jesness inventory. Psychol Assess. 1998;10(1):21–32.CrossRef Pinsoneault TBA. Variable response inconsistency scale and a true response inconsistency scale for the Jesness inventory. Psychol Assess. 1998;10(1):21–32.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lucas RE, Baird BM. Global self-assessment. In: Eid M, Diener E, editors. Handbook of multimethod measurement in psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2005. p. 29–42. Lucas RE, Baird BM. Global self-assessment. In: Eid M, Diener E, editors. Handbook of multimethod measurement in psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2005. p. 29–42.
12.
go back to reference Golbeck A, Paschal A, Jones A, et al. Correlating reading comprehension and health numeracy among adults with low literacy. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;84(1):132–4.PubMedCrossRef Golbeck A, Paschal A, Jones A, et al. Correlating reading comprehension and health numeracy among adults with low literacy. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;84(1):132–4.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Shen M, Hu M, Liu S, et al. Assessment of the Chinese resident health literacy scale in a population-based sample in South China. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1):637.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Shen M, Hu M, Liu S, et al. Assessment of the Chinese resident health literacy scale in a population-based sample in South China. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1):637.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Wang X, Peng D, Wang W, et al. Massive misuse of antibiotics by university students in all regions of China: implications for national policy. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2017;50(3):441–6 S0924857917302017.PubMedCrossRef Wang X, Peng D, Wang W, et al. Massive misuse of antibiotics by university students in all regions of China: implications for national policy. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2017;50(3):441–6 S0924857917302017.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Walls BD, Wallace ER, Brothers SL, et al. Utility of the Conners' adult ADHD rating scale validity scales in identifying simulated attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and random responding. Psychol Assess. 2017;29(12):1437–46.PubMedCrossRef Walls BD, Wallace ER, Brothers SL, et al. Utility of the Conners' adult ADHD rating scale validity scales in identifying simulated attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and random responding. Psychol Assess. 2017;29(12):1437–46.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Huang JL, Bowling NA, Liu M, et al. Detecting insufficient effort responding with an infrequency scale: evaluating validity and participant reactions. J Bus Psychol. 2015;30(2):1–13.CrossRef Huang JL, Bowling NA, Liu M, et al. Detecting insufficient effort responding with an infrequency scale: evaluating validity and participant reactions. J Bus Psychol. 2015;30(2):1–13.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Johnson JA. Ascertaining the validity of individual protocols from web-based personality inventories. J Res Pers. 2005;39(1):103–29.CrossRef Johnson JA. Ascertaining the validity of individual protocols from web-based personality inventories. J Res Pers. 2005;39(1):103–29.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Rogelberg SG, Fisher GG, Maynard DC, et al. Attitudes toward surveys: development of a measure and its relationship to respondent behavior. Organ Res Methods. 2001;4(1):3–25.CrossRef Rogelberg SG, Fisher GG, Maynard DC, et al. Attitudes toward surveys: development of a measure and its relationship to respondent behavior. Organ Res Methods. 2001;4(1):3–25.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Castro R. Inconsistent respondents and sensitive questions. Field Methods. 2013;25(3):283–98.CrossRef Castro R. Inconsistent respondents and sensitive questions. Field Methods. 2013;25(3):283–98.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Meade AW, Craig SB. Identifying careless responses in survey data. Psychol Methods. 2012;17(3):437–55.PubMedCrossRef Meade AW, Craig SB. Identifying careless responses in survey data. Psychol Methods. 2012;17(3):437–55.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Huang JL, Liu M, Bowling NA. Insufficient effort responding: examining an insidious confound in survey data. J Appl Psychol. 2015;100(3):828–45.PubMedCrossRef Huang JL, Liu M, Bowling NA. Insufficient effort responding: examining an insidious confound in survey data. J Appl Psychol. 2015;100(3):828–45.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Gervais RO, Tarescavage AM, Greiffenstein MF, et al. Inconsistent responding on the MMPI-2-RF and uncooperative attitude: evidence from cognitive performance validity measures. Psychol Assess. 2017;30(3):410–5.PubMedCrossRef Gervais RO, Tarescavage AM, Greiffenstein MF, et al. Inconsistent responding on the MMPI-2-RF and uncooperative attitude: evidence from cognitive performance validity measures. Psychol Assess. 2017;30(3):410–5.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Groves RM, Fowler FJ, Couper MP, et al. Survey methodology. New Jersey: Wiley; 2004. Groves RM, Fowler FJ, Couper MP, et al. Survey methodology. New Jersey: Wiley; 2004.
Metadata
Title
Inequalities in the health survey using validation question to filter insufficient effort responding: reducing overestimated effects or creating selection bias?
Authors
Jingjing Lu
Feng Wang
Xiaomin Wang
Leesa Lin
Weiyi Wang
Lu Li
Xudong Zhou
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1475-9276
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-019-1030-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

International Journal for Equity in Health 1/2019 Go to the issue