Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Review

Antibiotic prophylaxis in foot and ankle surgery: a systematic review of the literature

Authors: Mr Ravi Krishān Modha, Chris Morriss-Roberts, Madeleine Smither, Jonathan Larholt, Ian Reilly

Published in: Journal of Foot and Ankle Research | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

With the advent of bacterial resistance, it is important now more than ever to evaluate use of antibiotic chemoprophylaxis in foot and ankle surgery. Within this area of the body there may be less dissection, surgery time with smaller incisions and importantly smaller sizes of implanted fixation as compared to other bone and joint procedures. Our objective was to systematically evaluate the quality of evidence behind existing guidelines.

Methodology

A systematic literature search was performed: MEDLINE, CINHAL, EMBASE and the Cochrane library from 1990 up to March 2018. To avoid omitting any studies on the subject, Google Scholar was also used. The inclusion criterion were studies exploring perioperative antibiotic use, postoperative infection rates in elective foot and ankle surgery and studies associated with this subject evaluating antibiotic use in clean elective foot and ankle surgery. The exclusion criterion being studies upon contaminated or dirty surgery or those which were inclusive of procedures proximal to the foot and ankle.

Results

Overall 11 studies met the inclusion criteria. From the grading of evidence, 2 level one and 4 level two studies were recognised. These studies ranked relatively highly in comparison to 5 studies that were graded as level three and level four tiers of evidence. Results of SSI rates found within this systematic review ranged from 0% to 9.4% of overall postoperative infections encountered after foot and ankle surgery in the studies analysed.

Conclusion

Whilst fragmented, aspects of antibiotic chemoprophylaxis are established fields in elective surgery with a growing body of evidence. Evidence for antibiotic use however, specifically within elective foot and ankle surgery, is lacking. This systematic review is a seminal paper which delivers an impression of the most influential literature within the field of foot and ankle surgery, with the aim being to entice conclusions and guide future research.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kessel AS, Sharland M. The new UK antimicrobial resistance strategy and action plan. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2013;346:f1601. Kessel AS, Sharland M. The new UK antimicrobial resistance strategy and action plan. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2013;346:f1601.
2.
go back to reference NICE, Surgical site infection: prevention and treatment of surgical site infection, clinical guideline 74. 2008. NICE, Surgical site infection: prevention and treatment of surgical site infection, clinical guideline 74. 2008.
3.
go back to reference Bratzler DW, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2013;70(3):195–283.CrossRef Bratzler DW, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2013;70(3):195–283.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Network, S.I.G., SIGN guideline 104: antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery. 2014. Network, S.I.G., SIGN guideline 104: antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery. 2014.
5.
go back to reference Fernández AH, Monge V, Garcinuno M. Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis: effect in postoperative infections. Eur J Epidemiol. 2001;17(4):369–74.CrossRef Fernández AH, Monge V, Garcinuno M. Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis: effect in postoperative infections. Eur J Epidemiol. 2001;17(4):369–74.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Yeap JS, et al. Prophylactic antibiotics in orthopedic surgery: guidelines and practice. Med J Malays. 2006;61(2):181. Yeap JS, et al. Prophylactic antibiotics in orthopedic surgery: guidelines and practice. Med J Malays. 2006;61(2):181.
9.
go back to reference Dunn JC, et al. Current Evidence Regarding Routine Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Hand Surgery. HAND. 2017;0(0):1558944717701241. Dunn JC, et al. Current Evidence Regarding Routine Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Hand Surgery. HAND. 2017;0(0):1558944717701241.
10.
go back to reference Munns JJ, Awan HM. Trends in carpal tunnel surgery: an online survey of members of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand. J Hand Surg. 2015;40(4):767–771. e2.CrossRef Munns JJ, Awan HM. Trends in carpal tunnel surgery: an online survey of members of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand. J Hand Surg. 2015;40(4):767–771. e2.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Maher AJ. Patient reported outcomes six months following surgical treatment of end stage hallux rigidus in a community based podiatric surgery service. Foot. 2017;30:32–7.CrossRef Maher AJ. Patient reported outcomes six months following surgical treatment of end stage hallux rigidus in a community based podiatric surgery service. Foot. 2017;30:32–7.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Zanetti G, Giardina R, Platt R. Intraoperative redosing of cefazolin and risk for surgical site infection in cardiac surgery. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001;7(5):828.CrossRef Zanetti G, Giardina R, Platt R. Intraoperative redosing of cefazolin and risk for surgical site infection in cardiac surgery. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001;7(5):828.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Harmer J. Antibiotic Prophylaxis. College of Podiatry. Podiatry Now. 2016;19(2):10–13. Harmer J. Antibiotic Prophylaxis. College of Podiatry. Podiatry Now. 2016;19(2):10–13.
14.
go back to reference Russell, R., et al., Issues and Challenges in Conducting Systematic Reviews to Support Development of Nutrient Reference Values: Workshop Summary: Nutrition Research Series, Vol. 2. 2009. Russell, R., et al., Issues and Challenges in Conducting Systematic Reviews to Support Development of Nutrient Reference Values: Workshop Summary: Nutrition Research Series, Vol. 2. 2009.
15.
go back to reference Moher D, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic reviews. 2015;4(1):1.CrossRef Moher D, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic reviews. 2015;4(1):1.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kable AK, Pich J, Maslin-Prothero SE. A structured approach to documenting a search strategy for publication: a 12 step guideline for authors. Nurse Educ Today. 2012;32(8):878–86.CrossRef Kable AK, Pich J, Maslin-Prothero SE. A structured approach to documenting a search strategy for publication: a 12 step guideline for authors. Nurse Educ Today. 2012;32(8):878–86.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Harris JD, et al. Development of a valid and reliable knee articular cartilage condition–specific study methodological quality score. Orthop J Sports Med. 2014;2(2) 2325967113512606.CrossRef Harris JD, et al. Development of a valid and reliable knee articular cartilage condition–specific study methodological quality score. Orthop J Sports Med. 2014;2(2) 2325967113512606.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Butterworth P, et al. The use of prophylactic antibiotics in podiatric foot and ankle surgery. Infection Dis Health. 2017;22(1):6–11.CrossRef Butterworth P, et al. The use of prophylactic antibiotics in podiatric foot and ankle surgery. Infection Dis Health. 2017;22(1):6–11.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Akinyoola AL, Adegbehingbe OO, Odunsi A. Timing of antibiotic prophylaxis in tourniquet surgery. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2011;50(4):374–6.CrossRef Akinyoola AL, Adegbehingbe OO, Odunsi A. Timing of antibiotic prophylaxis in tourniquet surgery. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2011;50(4):374–6.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Deacon JS, Wertheimer SJ, Washington JA. Antibiotic prophylaxis and tourniquet application in podiatric surgery. J Foot Ankle Surg. 1996;35(4):344–9.CrossRef Deacon JS, Wertheimer SJ, Washington JA. Antibiotic prophylaxis and tourniquet application in podiatric surgery. J Foot Ankle Surg. 1996;35(4):344–9.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Dounis E, et al. Regional intravenous versus systemic intravenous prophylactic administration of third-generation cephalosporins (ceftazidime and ceftriaxone) in elective foot surgery. Foot. 1995;5(3):133–6.CrossRef Dounis E, et al. Regional intravenous versus systemic intravenous prophylactic administration of third-generation cephalosporins (ceftazidime and ceftriaxone) in elective foot surgery. Foot. 1995;5(3):133–6.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Zgonis T, Jolly GP, Garbalosa JC. The efficacy of prophylactic intravenous antibiotics in elective foot and ankle surgery. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2004;43(2):97–103.CrossRef Zgonis T, Jolly GP, Garbalosa JC. The efficacy of prophylactic intravenous antibiotics in elective foot and ankle surgery. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2004;43(2):97–103.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Nichols RL. Preventing surgical site infections: a surgeon's perspective. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001;7(2):220.CrossRef Nichols RL. Preventing surgical site infections: a surgeon's perspective. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001;7(2):220.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference De Lalla F. Antibiotic prophylaxis in orthopedic prosthetic surgery. J Chemother. 2001;13(sup 4):48–53.CrossRef De Lalla F. Antibiotic prophylaxis in orthopedic prosthetic surgery. J Chemother. 2001;13(sup 4):48–53.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Akalin HE. Surgical prophylaxis: the evolution of guidelines in an era of cost containment. J Hosp Infect. 2002;50:S3–7. Akalin HE. Surgical prophylaxis: the evolution of guidelines in an era of cost containment. J Hosp Infect. 2002;50:S3–7.
26.
go back to reference Deny A, et al. Epidemiology of patients with MSSA versus MRSA infections of orthopedic implants: retrospective study of 115 patients. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016;102(7):919–23.CrossRef Deny A, et al. Epidemiology of patients with MSSA versus MRSA infections of orthopedic implants: retrospective study of 115 patients. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016;102(7):919–23.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Mangwani J, et al. Role of prophylactic antibiotics in lesser toe fusion surgery: a prospective randomised controlled trial. Foot Ankle Surg. 2017;23(1):50–2.CrossRef Mangwani J, et al. Role of prophylactic antibiotics in lesser toe fusion surgery: a prospective randomised controlled trial. Foot Ankle Surg. 2017;23(1):50–2.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Tantigate D, et al. Timing of antibiotic prophylaxis for preventing surgical site infections in foot and ankle surgery. Foot Ankle Int. 2017;38(3):283–8.CrossRef Tantigate D, et al. Timing of antibiotic prophylaxis for preventing surgical site infections in foot and ankle surgery. Foot Ankle Int. 2017;38(3):283–8.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Davies S, Gibbens N. UK five year antimicrobial resistance strategy 2013 to 2018. London: Department of Health; 2013. Davies S, Gibbens N. UK five year antimicrobial resistance strategy 2013 to 2018. London: Department of Health; 2013.
30.
go back to reference NICE, Clostridium difficile infection risk with broad spectrum antibiotics. ESMBP1, 2015(Manchester, United Kingdom: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence). NICE, Clostridium difficile infection risk with broad spectrum antibiotics. ESMBP1, 2015(Manchester, United Kingdom: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence).
31.
go back to reference Yoda T, et al. A randomized prospective study of oral versus intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis against postoperative infection after sagittal split ramus osteotomy of the mandible. Chemotherapy. 2000;46(6):438–44.CrossRef Yoda T, et al. A randomized prospective study of oral versus intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis against postoperative infection after sagittal split ramus osteotomy of the mandible. Chemotherapy. 2000;46(6):438–44.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Schwarz M, et al. Efficacy of oral ofloxacin for single-dose perioperative prophylaxis in general surgery--a controlled randomized clinical study. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2001;386(6):397–401.CrossRef Schwarz M, et al. Efficacy of oral ofloxacin for single-dose perioperative prophylaxis in general surgery--a controlled randomized clinical study. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2001;386(6):397–401.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Schwartz BF, Swanzy S, Thrasher BJ. A randomized prospective comparison of antibiotic tissue levels in the corpora cavernosa of patients undergoing penile prosthesis implantation using gentamicin plus cefazolin versus an oral fluoroquinolone for prophylaxis. J Urol. 1996;156(3):991–4.CrossRef Schwartz BF, Swanzy S, Thrasher BJ. A randomized prospective comparison of antibiotic tissue levels in the corpora cavernosa of patients undergoing penile prosthesis implantation using gentamicin plus cefazolin versus an oral fluoroquinolone for prophylaxis. J Urol. 1996;156(3):991–4.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Dayton P, et al. American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons’ clinical consensus statement: perioperative prophylactic antibiotic use in clean elective foot surgery. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015;54(2):273–9.CrossRef Dayton P, et al. American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons’ clinical consensus statement: perioperative prophylactic antibiotic use in clean elective foot surgery. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015;54(2):273–9.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Kurup H. Is Teicoplanin an effective perioperative prophylaxis combination in forefoot surgery? Foot Ankle Surg. 2016;22(2):101. Kurup H. Is Teicoplanin an effective perioperative prophylaxis combination in forefoot surgery? Foot Ankle Surg. 2016;22(2):101.
37.
go back to reference Reyes C, Barnauskas S, Hetherington V. Retrospective assessment of antibiotic and tourniquet use in an ambulatory surgery center. J Foot Ankle Surg. 1997;36(1):55–62.CrossRef Reyes C, Barnauskas S, Hetherington V. Retrospective assessment of antibiotic and tourniquet use in an ambulatory surgery center. J Foot Ankle Surg. 1997;36(1):55–62.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Antibiotic prophylaxis in foot and ankle surgery: a systematic review of the literature
Authors
Mr Ravi Krishān Modha
Chris Morriss-Roberts
Madeleine Smither
Jonathan Larholt
Ian Reilly
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1757-1146
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-018-0303-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 1/2018 Go to the issue