Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 3/2012

01-03-2012 | Colorectal Cancer

Anterior-entry Abdominoperineal Resection: A Variation in the Method of Perineal Dissection

Authors: Marko Simunovic, MD, Jehonathan Pinthus, MD, Angela J. Coates, MEd, Franco DeNardi, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 3/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

For patients with rectal cancer, there is a greater risk of a positive radial margin or local tumor recurrence when an abdominoperineal versus low anterior resection is performed, or when tumors are in an anterior versus nonanterior location. In response, clinical leaders have encouraged perineal dissection in the prone position or in concert with a coccygectomy. We describe anterior-entry abdominoperineal resection, which may minimize the need for such maneuvers and negative patient outcomes.

Methods

Anterior-entry abdominoperineal resection was provided by one surgeon to 10 patients over an 18-month period. Pelvic dissection used total mesorectal excision techniques. Anteriorly, in men, the perineal dissection occurred between the external anal sphincter and the bulbospongiosus and transversus perinei superficialis muscles. Initial entry into the pelvis occurred anteriorly under direct vision. Rectal specimen quality was graded out of 5 using Quirke methods.

Results

There were 8 male and 2 female subjects with a median age of 65 years. Eight of 10 tumors had some component of an anterior location. Seven patients received preoperative radiation. The radial margin was positive in 1 case. Median Quirke score for quality of the surgical specimen was 5 of 5.

Conclusions

Anterior-entry abdominoperineal resection follows anatomic planes in the perineum and demands initial entry into the pelvis anteriorly and under direct vision. It may minimize rates of positive radial margins, may be especially suited for tumors with a locally advanced anterior component, and in many patients may avoid the need for perineal dissection in the jackknife position.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Miles WE. A method of performing abdominoperineal excision for carcinoma of the rectum and of the terminal portion of the pelvic colon. Lancet. 1908;172:1812–3.CrossRef Miles WE. A method of performing abdominoperineal excision for carcinoma of the rectum and of the terminal portion of the pelvic colon. Lancet. 1908;172:1812–3.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Tekkis PP, Heriot AG, Smith J, Thompson MR, Finan P, Stamatakis JD. Comparison of circumferential margin involvement between restorative and nonrestorative resections for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. 2005;7:369–74.PubMedCrossRef Tekkis PP, Heriot AG, Smith J, Thompson MR, Finan P, Stamatakis JD. Comparison of circumferential margin involvement between restorative and nonrestorative resections for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. 2005;7:369–74.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Shibab OC, Brown G, Daniels IR, Heald RJ, Quirke P, Moran BJ. Patients with low rectal cancer treated by abdominoperineal excision have worse tumors and higher involved margin rates compared with patients treated by anterior resection. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53:53–6.CrossRef Shibab OC, Brown G, Daniels IR, Heald RJ, Quirke P, Moran BJ. Patients with low rectal cancer treated by abdominoperineal excision have worse tumors and higher involved margin rates compared with patients treated by anterior resection. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53:53–6.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Nagtegaal ID, Quirke P. What is the role for the circumferential margin in the modern treatment of rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:303–310.PubMedCrossRef Nagtegaal ID, Quirke P. What is the role for the circumferential margin in the modern treatment of rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:303–310.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Quirke P, Steele R, Monson J, et al. Effect of the plane of surgery achieved on local recurrence in patients with operable rectal cancer: a prospective study using data from the MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG-CO16 randomised clinical trial. Lancet. 2009;373:821–8.PubMedCrossRef Quirke P, Steele R, Monson J, et al. Effect of the plane of surgery achieved on local recurrence in patients with operable rectal cancer: a prospective study using data from the MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG-CO16 randomised clinical trial. Lancet. 2009;373:821–8.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Quirke P. Training and quality assurance for rectal cancer: 20 years of data is enough. Lancet. 2003;4:695–702.CrossRef Quirke P. Training and quality assurance for rectal cancer: 20 years of data is enough. Lancet. 2003;4:695–702.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference West NP, Finan PJ, Anderin C, Lindholm J, Holm T, Quirke P. Evidence of the oncologic superiority of cylindrical abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3517–22.PubMedCrossRef West NP, Finan PJ, Anderin C, Lindholm J, Holm T, Quirke P. Evidence of the oncologic superiority of cylindrical abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3517–22.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Holm T, Ljung A, Häggmark T, Jurell G, Lagergren J. Extended abdominoperineal resection with gluteus maximus flap reconstruction of the pelvic floor for rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2007;94:232–8.PubMedCrossRef Holm T, Ljung A, Häggmark T, Jurell G, Lagergren J. Extended abdominoperineal resection with gluteus maximus flap reconstruction of the pelvic floor for rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2007;94:232–8.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference West NP, Anderin C, Smith KJ, Holm T, Quirke P. Multicentre experience with extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2010;97; 588–99.PubMedCrossRef West NP, Anderin C, Smith KJ, Holm T, Quirke P. Multicentre experience with extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2010;97; 588–99.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Raychaudhuri B, Cahill D. Pelvic fasciae in urology. Ann R Coll Surg. 2008;90:633–7.CrossRef Raychaudhuri B, Cahill D. Pelvic fasciae in urology. Ann R Coll Surg. 2008;90:633–7.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Stoker J. Anorectal and pelvic floor anatomy. Best Pract Clin Gastroenterol. 2009;23:463–75.CrossRef Stoker J. Anorectal and pelvic floor anatomy. Best Pract Clin Gastroenterol. 2009;23:463–75.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Strassburg J, Junginger T, Trinh T, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based indication for neoadjuvant treatment of rectal carcinoma and the surrogate endpoint CRM status. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008;23:1099–107.PubMedCrossRef Strassburg J, Junginger T, Trinh T, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based indication for neoadjuvant treatment of rectal carcinoma and the surrogate endpoint CRM status. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008;23:1099–107.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Anterior-entry Abdominoperineal Resection: A Variation in the Method of Perineal Dissection
Authors
Marko Simunovic, MD
Jehonathan Pinthus, MD
Angela J. Coates, MEd
Franco DeNardi, MD
Publication date
01-03-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 3/2012
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-2016-5

Other articles of this Issue 3/2012

Annals of Surgical Oncology 3/2012 Go to the issue