Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Reproductive Health 1/2007

Open Access 01-12-2007 | Study protocol

Antenatal screening and the gendering of genetic responsibility

Author: Kate Reed

Published in: Reproductive Health | Issue 1/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The objective of this study is to explore men's and women's perceptions of antenatal blood screening. The study will assess the impact of these perceptions on decision-making regarding diagnostic testing and selective abortion, and on parental feelings of genetic responsibility. By exploring gender and antenatal screening in this way, the research aims to contribute to our understanding of lay perceptions of genetic screening and increase our knowledge of the decision-making process in screening.

Research design

This qualitative study will be based on semi-structured interviews with twenty pregnant women and twenty male partners in the post-industrial city of Sheffield, UK. All interviews will be taped, transcribed and analysed thematically using NVIVO, a qualitative software package.

Discussion

The findings of this study have relevance to existing debates on the social and ethical implications of reproductive genetics. A better understanding of male and female perceptions of the screening process could improve guidance and practice in antenatal screening and genetic counselling. It will also inform and contribute to the development of theory on gender and genetic screening.
Literature
4.
go back to reference Press N, Browner CH: Why women say yes to prenatal diagnosis. Soc Sci Med. 1997, 45 (7): 979-989. 10.1016/S0277-9536(97)00011-7.CrossRefPubMed Press N, Browner CH: Why women say yes to prenatal diagnosis. Soc Sci Med. 1997, 45 (7): 979-989. 10.1016/S0277-9536(97)00011-7.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Sandelowski M: Separate but less unequal: Fetal ultrasonography and the transformation of expectant mother/fatherhood. Gender and Society. 1994, 8: 230-245. 10.1177/089124394008002006.CrossRef Sandelowski M: Separate but less unequal: Fetal ultrasonography and the transformation of expectant mother/fatherhood. Gender and Society. 1994, 8: 230-245. 10.1177/089124394008002006.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Delphy C: 'Mothers' Union?. Trouble and Strife. 1992, 24: 12-19. Delphy C: 'Mothers' Union?. Trouble and Strife. 1992, 24: 12-19.
7.
go back to reference Rapp R: Testing Women, Testing the Fetus. 2000, London: Routledge Rapp R: Testing Women, Testing the Fetus. 2000, London: Routledge
8.
go back to reference Jordan PL: Laboring for relevance: Expectant and new fatherhood. Nursing Research. 1990, 39: 11-16. 10.1097/00006199-199001000-00003.CrossRefPubMed Jordan PL: Laboring for relevance: Expectant and new fatherhood. Nursing Research. 1990, 39: 11-16. 10.1097/00006199-199001000-00003.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Reed K: New Directions in Social Theory: Race, Gender and the Canon. 2006, London: Sage Reed K: New Directions in Social Theory: Race, Gender and the Canon. 2006, London: Sage
10.
go back to reference Oakley A: Interviewing women: a contradiction in terms. Doing Feminist Research. Edited by: Roberts H. 1981, London: Routledge, 30-61. Oakley A: Interviewing women: a contradiction in terms. Doing Feminist Research. Edited by: Roberts H. 1981, London: Routledge, 30-61.
11.
go back to reference Bryman A: Social Research Methods. 2001, Oxford: Oxford University Press Bryman A: Social Research Methods. 2001, Oxford: Oxford University Press
12.
go back to reference Roulston K: Close encounters if the 'CA' kind: a review of literature analysing talk in research interviews. Qualitative Research. 2006, 6: 515-534. 10.1177/1468794106068021.CrossRef Roulston K: Close encounters if the 'CA' kind: a review of literature analysing talk in research interviews. Qualitative Research. 2006, 6: 515-534. 10.1177/1468794106068021.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Reed K: Worlds of Health. 2003, Praeger: Connecticut Reed K: Worlds of Health. 2003, Praeger: Connecticut
15.
go back to reference Ray L, Reed K: Community, mobility and racism in a semi-rural area: Comparing minority experience in East Kent. Ethnic and Racial Studies. 28: 212-234. 10.1080/01419870420000315825. Ray L, Reed K: Community, mobility and racism in a semi-rural area: Comparing minority experience in East Kent. Ethnic and Racial Studies. 28: 212-234. 10.1080/01419870420000315825.
16.
go back to reference Daly J, Lumley J: Bias in qualitative research designs. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2002, 26 (4): 299-300. 10.1111/j.1467-842X.2002.tb00174.x.CrossRefPubMed Daly J, Lumley J: Bias in qualitative research designs. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2002, 26 (4): 299-300. 10.1111/j.1467-842X.2002.tb00174.x.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Lazarus E: What do women want? Issues of choice, control and class in pregnancy and childbirth. Medical Anthropology Quarterly. 1994, 8: 25-46. 10.1525/maq.1994.8.1.02a00030.CrossRef Lazarus E: What do women want? Issues of choice, control and class in pregnancy and childbirth. Medical Anthropology Quarterly. 1994, 8: 25-46. 10.1525/maq.1994.8.1.02a00030.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Rowe RE, Garcia J: Social class, ethnicity and attendance for antenatal care in the United Kingdom: a systematic review. Journal of Public Health Medicine. 2003, 25: 113-119. 10.1093/pubmed/fdg025.CrossRefPubMed Rowe RE, Garcia J: Social class, ethnicity and attendance for antenatal care in the United Kingdom: a systematic review. Journal of Public Health Medicine. 2003, 25: 113-119. 10.1093/pubmed/fdg025.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Mason D: Explaining Ethnic Differences. 2003, Bristol: Policy Press Mason D: Explaining Ethnic Differences. 2003, Bristol: Policy Press
21.
go back to reference Cannon LW, Higgenbotham E, Leung MLA: Race and class bias in qualitative research on women. Gender and Society. 1988, 2: 449-462. 10.1177/089124388002004003.CrossRef Cannon LW, Higgenbotham E, Leung MLA: Race and class bias in qualitative research on women. Gender and Society. 1988, 2: 449-462. 10.1177/089124388002004003.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference McKeganey NP, Bloor MJ: On the retrieval of sociological descriptions: respondent validation and the critical case of ethnomethodology. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy. 1981, 1: 58-69.CrossRef McKeganey NP, Bloor MJ: On the retrieval of sociological descriptions: respondent validation and the critical case of ethnomethodology. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy. 1981, 1: 58-69.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Glaser BG, Strauss AL: The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. 1967, New York: Aldine Glaser BG, Strauss AL: The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. 1967, New York: Aldine
24.
go back to reference Charmaz K: The grounded theory method: an explication and interpretation. Contemporary Field Research: A Collection of Readings. Edited by: Emerson RM. 1983, Boston: Little, Brown Charmaz K: The grounded theory method: an explication and interpretation. Contemporary Field Research: A Collection of Readings. Edited by: Emerson RM. 1983, Boston: Little, Brown
25.
go back to reference Duster T: Backdoor to Eugenics. 1990, London: Routledge Duster T: Backdoor to Eugenics. 1990, London: Routledge
Metadata
Title
Antenatal screening and the gendering of genetic responsibility
Author
Kate Reed
Publication date
01-12-2007
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Reproductive Health / Issue 1/2007
Electronic ISSN: 1742-4755
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-4-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2007

Reproductive Health 1/2007 Go to the issue