Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 5/2013

01-05-2013 | Author's Reply

Answer to the Letter to the Editor of A. Gardner concerning “Loss of apical vertebral derotation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: 2-year follow-up using multi-planar reconstruction computed tomography” (by G. Cui, K. Watanabe, Y. Nishiwaki, N. Hosogane, T. Tsuji, K. Ishii, M. Nakamura, Y. Toyama, K. Chiba, M. Matsumoto; Eur Spine J (2012) Jun;21(6):1111–20. doi:10.1007/s00586-012-2633-0)

Author: K. Watanabe

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 5/2013

Login to get access

Excerpt

We thank Dr. Gardner for the interest in our work and the letter to the editor. In the letter, Dr. Gardner commented that the correction loss in Cobb angle should be less significance, since the value was within the range of error based on the previous reports [14]. In our study, the mean correction loss between the Cobb angle of immediate after surgery and that of postoperative 2 years was 2.5 ± 1.5º [5]. The loss was significant when analyzed using paired t test. However, the change had no clinical impact when evaluated by SRS-22 scores. Based on our previous study, the coefficient of variations for intra-observer measurement was 2.3 % for the MT curve [6] using a digital measurement software on appropriately adjusted X-ray films [7, 8], and by selecting the same end vertebra in each patient at different time course [9]. In this study, we also used CT scans to demonstrate the correction loss in the axial plane and, in doing so, we tried to minimize measurement errors caused by patient positioning during CT examination using the relative AVR (rAVR), which was defined as the difference between the axial rotation angle of the upper instrumented vertebra and the apical vertebra. As a result, we also found a small but significant time-interval difference in rAVR. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Adam CJ, Izatt MT, Harvey JR, Askin GN (2005) Variability in Cobb angle measurements using reformatted computerized tomography scans. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:1664–1669CrossRef Adam CJ, Izatt MT, Harvey JR, Askin GN (2005) Variability in Cobb angle measurements using reformatted computerized tomography scans. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:1664–1669CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Carman DL, Browne RH, Birch JG (1990) Measurement of scoliosis and kyphosis radiographs. Intraobserver and interobserver variation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:328–333PubMed Carman DL, Browne RH, Birch JG (1990) Measurement of scoliosis and kyphosis radiographs. Intraobserver and interobserver variation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:328–333PubMed
3.
go back to reference Dutton KE, Jones TJ, Slinger BS, Scull ER, O’Connor J (1989) Reliability of the Cobb angle index derived by traditional and computer assisted methods. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 12:16–23PubMed Dutton KE, Jones TJ, Slinger BS, Scull ER, O’Connor J (1989) Reliability of the Cobb angle index derived by traditional and computer assisted methods. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 12:16–23PubMed
4.
go back to reference Goldberg MS, Poitras B, Mayo NE, Labelle H, Bourassa R, Cloutier R (1988) Observer variation in assessing spinal curvature and skeletal development in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 13:1371–1377CrossRef Goldberg MS, Poitras B, Mayo NE, Labelle H, Bourassa R, Cloutier R (1988) Observer variation in assessing spinal curvature and skeletal development in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 13:1371–1377CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Cui G, Watanabe K, Nishiwaki Y, Hosogane N, Tsuji T, Ishii K, Nakamura M, Toyama Y, Chiba K, Matsumoto M (2012) Loss of apical vertebral derotation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: 2-year follow-up using multi-planar reconstruction computed tomography. Eur Spine J 21:1111–1120PubMedCrossRef Cui G, Watanabe K, Nishiwaki Y, Hosogane N, Tsuji T, Ishii K, Nakamura M, Toyama Y, Chiba K, Matsumoto M (2012) Loss of apical vertebral derotation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: 2-year follow-up using multi-planar reconstruction computed tomography. Eur Spine J 21:1111–1120PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Watanabe K, Kawakami N, Nishiwaki Y, Goto M, Tsuji T, Obara T, Imagama S, Matsumoto M (2007) Traction versus supine side-bending radiographs in determining flexibility: what factors influence these techniques? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:2604–2609CrossRef Watanabe K, Kawakami N, Nishiwaki Y, Goto M, Tsuji T, Obara T, Imagama S, Matsumoto M (2007) Traction versus supine side-bending radiographs in determining flexibility: what factors influence these techniques? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:2604–2609CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Aubin CE, Bellefleur C, Joncas J, de Lanauze D, Kadoury S, Blanke K, Parent S, Labelle H (2011) Reliability and accuracy analysis of a new semiautomatic radiographic measurement software in adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:E780–E790CrossRef Aubin CE, Bellefleur C, Joncas J, de Lanauze D, Kadoury S, Blanke K, Parent S, Labelle H (2011) Reliability and accuracy analysis of a new semiautomatic radiographic measurement software in adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:E780–E790CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kuklo TR, Potter BK, O’Brien MF, Schroeder TM, Lenke LG, Polly DW Jr (2005) Reliability analysis for digital adolescent idiopathic scoliosis measurements. J Spinal Disord Tech 18:152–159PubMedCrossRef Kuklo TR, Potter BK, O’Brien MF, Schroeder TM, Lenke LG, Polly DW Jr (2005) Reliability analysis for digital adolescent idiopathic scoliosis measurements. J Spinal Disord Tech 18:152–159PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Gstoettner M, Sekyra K, Walochnik N, Winter P, Wachter R, Bach CM (2007) Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the Cobb angle: manual versus digital measurement tools. Eur Spine J 16:1587–1592PubMedCrossRef Gstoettner M, Sekyra K, Walochnik N, Winter P, Wachter R, Bach CM (2007) Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the Cobb angle: manual versus digital measurement tools. Eur Spine J 16:1587–1592PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Answer to the Letter to the Editor of A. Gardner concerning “Loss of apical vertebral derotation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: 2-year follow-up using multi-planar reconstruction computed tomography” (by G. Cui, K. Watanabe, Y. Nishiwaki, N. Hosogane, T. Tsuji, K. Ishii, M. Nakamura, Y. Toyama, K. Chiba, M. Matsumoto; Eur Spine J (2012) Jun;21(6):1111–20. doi:10.1007/s00586-012-2633-0)
Author
K. Watanabe
Publication date
01-05-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 5/2013
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2640-1

Other articles of this Issue 5/2013

European Spine Journal 5/2013 Go to the issue