Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 3/2020

Open Access 01-03-2020 | Original Research

Annual Spending per Patient and Quality in Hospital-Owned Versus Physician-Owned Organizations: an Observational Study

Authors: Vivian Ho, PhD, Leanne Metcalfe, PhD, Lan Vu, BS, Marah Short, MS, Robert Morrow, MD

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 3/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Recent studies that compared patient spending in hospital-owned physician practices versus physician-owned groups did not compare quality of care. Past studies had incomplete measures of physician-hospital integration, or lacked patient-level data.

Objective

To measure the association between physician-hospital integration and both spending and quality using patient-level data and explicit physician-hospital contracting information.

Design

Retrospective review of claims data from 2014 through 2016. Adjustments were made for patient, physician, and regional characteristics.

Patients

Patients aged 19 to 64 enrolled in a Blue Cross Blue Shield Texas Preferred Provider Organization in the four largest metropolitan areas in Texas who could be attributed to a physician practice based on claims.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Annual spending per patient was compared for patients treated by a physician practice that is billing through a hospital, versus billing through an independent physician practice; spending was also subdivided by BETOS category, by site and type of care, and percent of patients with positive spending by subcategory. Quality measures included readmission within 30 days of discharge for hospitalized patients, appropriate care for diabetic patients, and screening mammography for women ages 50–64.

Results

Estimates suggest that patients in a preferred provider organization incur spending which is 5.8 percentage points higher when treated by doctors in hospital-owned versus physician-owned practices (95% CI 1.7 to 9.9; p = 0.006). Spending is significantly higher for durable medical equipment, imaging, unclassified services, and outpatient care. The spending difference appears attributable to greater service utilization rather than higher prices. There was no consistent difference in care quality for hospital-owned versus physician-owned practices.

Conclusions and Relevance

We find that financial integration between physicians and hospitals raises patient spending, but not care quality. Given that higher spending raises the price of health insurance, policy makers should carefully consider policies that limit consolidation of hospitals and physicians.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
17.
go back to reference Ho V, Allen TK, Kim U, Keenan WP, Ku-Goto M-H, Sanderson M. Measuring the Cost Implications of the Collaborative Accountable Care Initiative in Texas. Am J Manag Care. 2016;22(9):304–310. Ho V, Allen TK, Kim U, Keenan WP, Ku-Goto M-H, Sanderson M. Measuring the Cost Implications of the Collaborative Accountable Care Initiative in Texas. Am J Manag Care. 2016;22(9):304–310.
18.
go back to reference To access the Appendix, click on the Appendix link in the box to the right of the article online. To access the Appendix, click on the Appendix link in the box to the right of the article online.
23.
go back to reference Board on Health Care Services; Institute of Medicine. Geographic Adjustment in Medicare Payment: Phase I: Improving Accuracy. 2nd ed. (Edmunds M, Sloan FA, eds.). Washington D.C.: National Academies Press; 2011. Board on Health Care Services; Institute of Medicine. Geographic Adjustment in Medicare Payment: Phase I: Improving Accuracy. 2nd ed. (Edmunds M, Sloan FA, eds.). Washington D.C.: National Academies Press; 2011.
31.
go back to reference White H. A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica. 1980;48:817–830.CrossRef White H. A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica. 1980;48:817–830.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Huber PJ. The Behavior of Maximum Likelihood Estimates under Non-standard Conditions. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. Vol 1; 1967:221–233. Huber PJ. The Behavior of Maximum Likelihood Estimates under Non-standard Conditions. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. Vol 1; 1967:221–233.
Metadata
Title
Annual Spending per Patient and Quality in Hospital-Owned Versus Physician-Owned Organizations: an Observational Study
Authors
Vivian Ho, PhD
Leanne Metcalfe, PhD
Lan Vu, BS
Marah Short, MS
Robert Morrow, MD
Publication date
01-03-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 3/2020
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05312-z

Other articles of this Issue 3/2020

Journal of General Internal Medicine 3/2020 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine