Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Neurology 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Aneurysm | Research article

Endovascular treatment of vertebral and basilar artery aneurysms with low-profile visualized intraluminal support device

Authors: Quanlong Hong, Wenqiang Li, Jing Ma, Peng Jiang, Yisen Zhang

Published in: BMC Neurology | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The Low-profile Visualized Intraluminal Support (LVIS) device is a self-expanding, nitinol, single-braid, closed-cell device that was recently developed for endovascular embolization of intracranial aneurysms. However, current knowledge regarding the use of LVIS devices to treat vertebral and basilar artery aneurysms is limited. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of the LVIS device for treating vertebral and basilar artery aneurysms.

Methods

Between January 2015 and December 2017, patients with vertebral and basilar artery aneurysms treated using LVIS stents were enrolled in this study. We analyzed patients’ demographic, clinical and aneurysmal characteristics, procedural details, complications, and angiographic and clinical follow-up results.

Results

We identified 63 patients with 64 vertebral and basilar artery aneurysms who underwent treatment with (n = 59) or without (n = 5) LVIS stenting, including 10 patients with ruptured aneurysms. Forty-one aneurysms were located at the vertebral artery, and 23 at the basilar artery. Intraprocedural-related complications developed in three (4.8%) patients, while none of these patients developed morbidities or died during follow-up. Three patients developed post-procedural complications (4.8%). Two patients experienced ischemic events immediately post-procedure. A minor permanent morbidity developed in one of the two patients (1.6%). The mortality rate was 1.6%, for that the patient died of brainstem hemorrhage after 1 month of follow-up. At a mean follow-up of 12.5 months, 39/43 (90.7%) patients had stable or improved aneurysms, and four (9.3%) had recanalized.

Conclusions

LVIS device of vertebral and basilar artery aneurysms may be an acceptable safety profile and may represent a reasonable treatment option in the short-term. Long-term and larger cohort studies are necessary to validate our results.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
9.
go back to reference Zhang Y, Lv M, Zhao C, Zhang Y, Yang X, Wu Z. Endovascular treatment of ruptured vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysms: review of 40 consecutive cases. Neurol India. 2016;64(Suppl):S52–61.PubMed Zhang Y, Lv M, Zhao C, Zhang Y, Yang X, Wu Z. Endovascular treatment of ruptured vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysms: review of 40 consecutive cases. Neurol India. 2016;64(Suppl):S52–61.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Li W, Wang Y, Zhang Y, et al. Efficacy of LVIS vs. Enterprise stent for endovascular treatment of medium-sized intracranial aneurysms: a hemodynamic comparison study. Front Neurol. 2019;10:522.CrossRef Li W, Wang Y, Zhang Y, et al. Efficacy of LVIS vs. Enterprise stent for endovascular treatment of medium-sized intracranial aneurysms: a hemodynamic comparison study. Front Neurol. 2019;10:522.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Endovascular treatment of vertebral and basilar artery aneurysms with low-profile visualized intraluminal support device
Authors
Quanlong Hong
Wenqiang Li
Jing Ma
Peng Jiang
Yisen Zhang
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Neurology / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2377
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-021-02180-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Neurology 1/2021 Go to the issue