Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Dermatological Research 8/2021

01-10-2021 | Anesthetics | Original Paper

Risk of adverse events due to high volumes of local anesthesia during Mohs micrographic surgery

Authors: James Randall Patrinely Jr, Charles Darragh, Nicholas Frank, Brandon C. Danford, Lee Wheless, Anna Clayton

Published in: Archives of Dermatological Research | Issue 8/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

General guidelines for the maximum amounts of locally injected lidocaine exist; however, there is a paucity of data in the Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) literature. This study aimed to determine the safety and adverse effects seen in patients that receive larger amounts of locally injected lidocaine. A retrospective chart review of 563 patients from 1992 to 2016 who received over 30 mL of locally injected lidocaine was conducted. Patient records were reviewed within seven postoperative days for complications. The average amount of anesthesia received was 40 mL, and the average patient weight was 86.69 kg. 1.4% of patients had a complication on the day of surgery, and 4.4% of patients had a complication within 7 days of the surgery. The most common complications were excessive bleeding/hematoma formation and wound infection. Only two complications could be attributable to local anesthetics. Gender, heart disease, hypertension, diabetes, and smoking were not significant risk factors for the development of complications. MMS is a safe outpatient procedure for patients that require over 30 mL of locally injected anesthesia. The safety of high volumes of lidocaine extends to patients with risk factors such as heart disease, hypertension, diabetes, and smoking.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lomas A, Leonardi-Bee J, Bath-Hextall F (2012) A systematic review of worldwide incidence of nonmelanoma skin cancer. Br J Dermatol 166(5):1069–1080CrossRef Lomas A, Leonardi-Bee J, Bath-Hextall F (2012) A systematic review of worldwide incidence of nonmelanoma skin cancer. Br J Dermatol 166(5):1069–1080CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kouba DJ et al (2016) Guidelines for the use of local anesthesia in office-based dermatologic surgery. J Am Acad Dermatol 74:1201–1219CrossRef Kouba DJ et al (2016) Guidelines for the use of local anesthesia in office-based dermatologic surgery. J Am Acad Dermatol 74:1201–1219CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Prickett KK, Wise SK, DelGaudio JM (2012) Cost analysis of office-based and operating room procedures in rhinology. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2(3):207–211CrossRef Prickett KK, Wise SK, DelGaudio JM (2012) Cost analysis of office-based and operating room procedures in rhinology. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2(3):207–211CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Harmatz A (2009) Local anesthetics: uses and toxicities. Surg Clin North Am 89(3):587–598CrossRef Harmatz A (2009) Local anesthetics: uses and toxicities. Surg Clin North Am 89(3):587–598CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Rubin JP, Bierman C, Rosow CE et al (1999) The tumescent technique: the effect of high tissue pressure and dilute epinephrine on absorption of lidocaine. PlastReconstr Surg. 103:990–996 ((Discussion 997–1002))CrossRef Rubin JP, Bierman C, Rosow CE et al (1999) The tumescent technique: the effect of high tissue pressure and dilute epinephrine on absorption of lidocaine. PlastReconstr Surg. 103:990–996 ((Discussion 997–1002))CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Shalom A, Westreich M, Hadad E et al (2008) Complications of minor skin surgery performed under local anesthesia. Dermatol Surg 34:1077–1079PubMed Shalom A, Westreich M, Hadad E et al (2008) Complications of minor skin surgery performed under local anesthesia. Dermatol Surg 34:1077–1079PubMed
7.
go back to reference Alam M et al (2010) Safety of peak serum lidocaine concentration after mohs micrographic surgery: a prospective cohort study. J Am Acad Dermatol 63(1):87–92CrossRef Alam M et al (2010) Safety of peak serum lidocaine concentration after mohs micrographic surgery: a prospective cohort study. J Am Acad Dermatol 63(1):87–92CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Asgari MM, Olson J, Alam M (2012) Needs assessment for mohs micrographic surgery. Dermatol Clin 30(1):167–175CrossRef Asgari MM, Olson J, Alam M (2012) Needs assessment for mohs micrographic surgery. Dermatol Clin 30(1):167–175CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Koay J, Orengo I (2002) Application of local anesthetics in dermatologic surgery. Dermatol Surg 28(2):143–148PubMed Koay J, Orengo I (2002) Application of local anesthetics in dermatologic surgery. Dermatol Surg 28(2):143–148PubMed
10.
go back to reference Eggleston ST, Lush LW (1996) Understanding allergic reactions to local anesthetics. Ann Pharmacother 30:851–857CrossRef Eggleston ST, Lush LW (1996) Understanding allergic reactions to local anesthetics. Ann Pharmacother 30:851–857CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Bhole MV, Manson AL, Seneviratne SL, Misbah SA (2012) IgE-mediated allergy to local anesthetics: separating fact from perception: a UK perspective. Br J Anaesth 108:903–911CrossRef Bhole MV, Manson AL, Seneviratne SL, Misbah SA (2012) IgE-mediated allergy to local anesthetics: separating fact from perception: a UK perspective. Br J Anaesth 108:903–911CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Altinyazar HC, Ozdemir H, Koca R, Hosnuter M, Demirel CB, Gundogdu S (2004) Epinephrine in digital block: color doppler flow imaging. Dermatol Surg 30:508–511PubMed Altinyazar HC, Ozdemir H, Koca R, Hosnuter M, Demirel CB, Gundogdu S (2004) Epinephrine in digital block: color doppler flow imaging. Dermatol Surg 30:508–511PubMed
13.
go back to reference Chowdhry S, Seidenstricker L, Cooney DS, Hazani R, Wilhelmi BJ (2010) Do not use epinephrine in digital blocks: myth or truth? Part II. A retrospective review of 1111 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 126:2031–2034CrossRef Chowdhry S, Seidenstricker L, Cooney DS, Hazani R, Wilhelmi BJ (2010) Do not use epinephrine in digital blocks: myth or truth? Part II. A retrospective review of 1111 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 126:2031–2034CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Daublander M, Muller R, Lipp MD (1997) The incidence of complications associated with local anesthesia in dentistry. Anesth Prog 44:132–141PubMed Daublander M, Muller R, Lipp MD (1997) The incidence of complications associated with local anesthesia in dentistry. Anesth Prog 44:132–141PubMed
15.
go back to reference Butterwick KJ, Goldman MP, Sriprachya-Anunt S (1999) Lidocaine levels during the first two hours of infiltration of dilute anesthetic solution for tumescent liposuction: rapid versus slow delivery. Dermatol Surg 25:681–690CrossRef Butterwick KJ, Goldman MP, Sriprachya-Anunt S (1999) Lidocaine levels during the first two hours of infiltration of dilute anesthetic solution for tumescent liposuction: rapid versus slow delivery. Dermatol Surg 25:681–690CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Childers CP, Maggard-Gibbons M (2018) Understanding costs of care in the operating room. JAMA Surg 153(4):e176233CrossRef Childers CP, Maggard-Gibbons M (2018) Understanding costs of care in the operating room. JAMA Surg 153(4):e176233CrossRef
17.
go back to reference LaBove G, Davison SP (2016) Cost analysis of an office-based surgical suite. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 4(7):e803CrossRef LaBove G, Davison SP (2016) Cost analysis of an office-based surgical suite. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 4(7):e803CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Risk of adverse events due to high volumes of local anesthesia during Mohs micrographic surgery
Authors
James Randall Patrinely Jr
Charles Darragh
Nicholas Frank
Brandon C. Danford
Lee Wheless
Anna Clayton
Publication date
01-10-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Dermatological Research / Issue 8/2021
Print ISSN: 0340-3696
Electronic ISSN: 1432-069X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-020-02155-1

Other articles of this Issue 8/2021

Archives of Dermatological Research 8/2021 Go to the issue