Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 4/2020

01-04-2020 | Anemia | Hepatobiliary Tumors

The MEGNA Score and Preoperative Anemia are Major Prognostic Factors After Resection in the German Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Cohort

Authors: Andreas A. Schnitzbauer, MD, FACS, FEBS, Johannes Eberhard, MD, Fabian Bartsch, MD, Stefan M. Brunner, MD, Güralp O. Ceyhan, MD, Dirk Walter, MD, Helmut Fries, MD, Sabine Hannes, MD, Andreas Hecker, MD, Jun Li, MD, Karl Oldhafer, MD, FEBS, Nuh Rahbari, MD, Falk Rauchfuss, MD, Hans J. Schlitt, MD, FACS, FRCS, FRCAS, MHM, Utz Settmacher, MD, Gregor Stavrou, MD, habil, Jürgen Weitz, MD, Hauke Lang, MD, Wolf O. Bechstein, MD, Felix Rückert, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 4/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Surgical resection is associated with the best long-term results for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC); however, long-term outcomes are still poor.

Objective

The primary aim of this study was to validate the recently proposed MEGNA score and to identify additional prognostic factors influencing short- and long-term survival.

Patients and Methods

This was a retrospective analysis of a German multicenter cohort operated at 10 tertiary centers from 2004 to 2013. Patients were clustered using the MEGNA score and overall survival was analyzed. Cox regression analysis was used to identify prognostic factors for both overall and 90-day survival.

Results

A total of 488 patients undergoing liver resection for ICC fulfilled the inclusion criteria and underwent analysis. Median age was 67 years, 72.5% of patients underwent major hepatic resection, and the lymphadenectomy rate was 86.9%. Median overall survival was 32.2 months. The MEGNA score significantly discriminated the long-term overall survival: 0 (68%), I (48%), II (32%), and III (19%) [p <0.001]. In addition, anemia was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (hazard ratio 1.78, 95% confidence interval 1.29–2.45; p <0.01).

Conclusion

Hepatic resection provides the best long-term survival in all risk groups (19–65% overall survival). The MEGNA score is a good discriminator using histopathologic items and age for stratification. Correction of anemia should be attempted in every patient who responds to treatment. Perioperative liver failure remains a clinical challenge and contributes to a relevant number of perioperative deaths.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Statistisches Bundesamt. Krankenhausstatistik-Diagnosedaten der Patienten und Patientinnen in Krankenhäusern, Statistisches Bundesamt. Statistisches Bundesamt. Krankenhausstatistik-Diagnosedaten der Patienten und Patientinnen in Krankenhäusern, Statistisches Bundesamt.
2.
go back to reference Filmann N, Walter D, Schadde E, et al. Mortality after liver surgery in Germany. Br J Surg. 2019;106(11):1523–9.CrossRef Filmann N, Walter D, Schadde E, et al. Mortality after liver surgery in Germany. Br J Surg. 2019;106(11):1523–9.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Raoof M, Dumitra S, Ituarte PHG, et al. Development and validation of a prognostic score for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. JAMA Surg. 2017;152:e170117.CrossRef Raoof M, Dumitra S, Ituarte PHG, et al. Development and validation of a prognostic score for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. JAMA Surg. 2017;152:e170117.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Khan SA, Davidson BR, Goldin RD, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of cholangiocarcinoma: an update. Gut. 2012;61:1657–69.CrossRef Khan SA, Davidson BR, Goldin RD, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of cholangiocarcinoma: an update. Gut. 2012;61:1657–69.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Zhang X-F, Chakedis J, Bagante F, et al. Trends in use of lymphadenectomy in surgery with curative intent for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg. 2018;105:857–66.CrossRef Zhang X-F, Chakedis J, Bagante F, et al. Trends in use of lymphadenectomy in surgery with curative intent for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg. 2018;105:857–66.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bridgewater J, Galle PR, Khan SA, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatol. 2014;60:1268–89.CrossRef Bridgewater J, Galle PR, Khan SA, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatol. 2014;60:1268–89.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Belgihiti J, Clavien PA, Gadzijev E, et al. The Brisbane 2000 terminology of liver anatomy and resections. HPB (Oxford). 2000;2:333–9.CrossRef Belgihiti J, Clavien PA, Gadzijev E, et al. The Brisbane 2000 terminology of liver anatomy and resections. HPB (Oxford). 2000;2:333–9.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.CrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Rahbari NN, Garden OJ, Padbury R, et al. Posthepatectomy liver failure: a definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS). Surgery. 2011;149:713–24.CrossRef Rahbari NN, Garden OJ, Padbury R, et al. Posthepatectomy liver failure: a definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS). Surgery. 2011;149:713–24.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Koch M, Garden OJ, Padbury R, et al. Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Surgery. 2011;149:680–8.CrossRef Koch M, Garden OJ, Padbury R, et al. Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Surgery. 2011;149:680–8.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Rahbari NN, Garden OJ, Padbury R, et al. Post-hepatectomy haemorrhage: a definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS). HPB (Oxford). 2011;13:528–35.CrossRef Rahbari NN, Garden OJ, Padbury R, et al. Post-hepatectomy haemorrhage: a definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS). HPB (Oxford). 2011;13:528–35.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Chawla LS, Amdur RL, Amodeo S, et al. The severity of acute kidney injury predicts progression to chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2011;79:1361–9.CrossRef Chawla LS, Amdur RL, Amodeo S, et al. The severity of acute kidney injury predicts progression to chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2011;79:1361–9.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Keding V, Zacharowski K, Bechstein WO, et al. Patient Blood Management improves outcome in oncologic surgery. World J Surg Oncol. 2018;16:159.CrossRef Keding V, Zacharowski K, Bechstein WO, et al. Patient Blood Management improves outcome in oncologic surgery. World J Surg Oncol. 2018;16:159.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Meybohm P, Fischer DP, Geisen C, et al. Safety and effectiveness of a Patient Blood Management (PBM) program in surgical patients: the study design for a multi-centre prospective epidemiologic non-inferiority trial. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:576.CrossRef Meybohm P, Fischer DP, Geisen C, et al. Safety and effectiveness of a Patient Blood Management (PBM) program in surgical patients: the study design for a multi-centre prospective epidemiologic non-inferiority trial. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:576.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Meybohm P, Herrmann E, Steinbicker AU, et al. Patient blood management is associated with a substantial reduction of red blood cell utilization and safe for patient’s outcome: a prospective, Multicenter cohort study with a noninferiority design. Ann Surg. 2016;264:203–11.CrossRef Meybohm P, Herrmann E, Steinbicker AU, et al. Patient blood management is associated with a substantial reduction of red blood cell utilization and safe for patient’s outcome: a prospective, Multicenter cohort study with a noninferiority design. Ann Surg. 2016;264:203–11.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kim Y, Moris DP, Zhang X-F, et al. Evaluation of the 8th edition American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) analysis. J Surg Oncol. 2017;116:643–50.CrossRef Kim Y, Moris DP, Zhang X-F, et al. Evaluation of the 8th edition American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) analysis. J Surg Oncol. 2017;116:643–50.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Spolverato G, Kim Y, Alexandrescu S, et al. Is hepatic resection for large or multifocal intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma justified? Results from a Multi-Institutional Collaboration. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:2218–25.CrossRef Spolverato G, Kim Y, Alexandrescu S, et al. Is hepatic resection for large or multifocal intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma justified? Results from a Multi-Institutional Collaboration. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:2218–25.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hyder O, Marques H, Pulitano C, et al. A nomogram to predict long-term survival after resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: an Eastern and Western experience. JAMA Surg. 2014;149:432–8.CrossRef Hyder O, Marques H, Pulitano C, et al. A nomogram to predict long-term survival after resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: an Eastern and Western experience. JAMA Surg. 2014;149:432–8.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Ray S, Mehta NN, Golhar A, et al. Post hepatectomy liver failure—a comprehensive review of current concepts and controversies. Ann Med Surg. 2018;34:4–10.CrossRef Ray S, Mehta NN, Golhar A, et al. Post hepatectomy liver failure—a comprehensive review of current concepts and controversies. Ann Med Surg. 2018;34:4–10.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Mueller MM, Van Remoortel H, Meybohm P, et al. Patient blood management: recommendations from the 2018 Frankfurt Consensus Conference. JAMA. 2019;321:983–97.CrossRef Mueller MM, Van Remoortel H, Meybohm P, et al. Patient blood management: recommendations from the 2018 Frankfurt Consensus Conference. JAMA. 2019;321:983–97.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Hildebrand T, Pannicke N, Dechene A, et al. Biliary strictures and recurrence after liver transplantation for primary sclerosing cholangitis: a retrospective multicenter analysis. Liver Transplant. 2016;22:42–52.CrossRef Hildebrand T, Pannicke N, Dechene A, et al. Biliary strictures and recurrence after liver transplantation for primary sclerosing cholangitis: a retrospective multicenter analysis. Liver Transplant. 2016;22:42–52.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Krawczyk M, Grąt M, Adam R, et al. Liver transplantation for hepatic trauma: a study from the European Liver Transplant Registry. Transplantation. 2016;100:2372–81.CrossRef Krawczyk M, Grąt M, Adam R, et al. Liver transplantation for hepatic trauma: a study from the European Liver Transplant Registry. Transplantation. 2016;100:2372–81.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Guise J-M, Savitz LA, Friedman CP. Mind the gap: putting evidence into practice in the era of learning health systems. J Gen Intern Med. 2018;33:2237–9.CrossRef Guise J-M, Savitz LA, Friedman CP. Mind the gap: putting evidence into practice in the era of learning health systems. J Gen Intern Med. 2018;33:2237–9.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The MEGNA Score and Preoperative Anemia are Major Prognostic Factors After Resection in the German Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Cohort
Authors
Andreas A. Schnitzbauer, MD, FACS, FEBS
Johannes Eberhard, MD
Fabian Bartsch, MD
Stefan M. Brunner, MD
Güralp O. Ceyhan, MD
Dirk Walter, MD
Helmut Fries, MD
Sabine Hannes, MD
Andreas Hecker, MD
Jun Li, MD
Karl Oldhafer, MD, FEBS
Nuh Rahbari, MD
Falk Rauchfuss, MD
Hans J. Schlitt, MD, FACS, FRCS, FRCAS, MHM
Utz Settmacher, MD
Gregor Stavrou, MD, habil
Jürgen Weitz, MD
Hauke Lang, MD
Wolf O. Bechstein, MD
Felix Rückert, MD
Publication date
01-04-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 4/2020
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07968-7

Other articles of this Issue 4/2020

Annals of Surgical Oncology 4/2020 Go to the issue