Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 3/2011

01-03-2011 | Knee

Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, using CT-based navigation and fiducial markers

Authors: Keiji Tensho, Hiroyuki Kodaira, Gaku Yasuda, Yasuo Yoshimura, Nobuyo Narita, Susumu Morioka, Hiroyuki Kato, Naoto Saito

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 3/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Accurate placement of separate anteromedial and posterolateral bundle bone tunnels is crucial for anatomic, double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. However, identifying the anatomic footprint at which to make the tibial and femoral bone tunnels is not a straightforward procedure. To overcome this problem, we used a CT-based navigation technique with a registration procedure based on fiducial markers (FMs).

Methods

Preoperatively, 10 FM points were placed on skin around knee joint and scanned with CT. Imaging data of the knee were recorded on the computer system for preoperative registration and surgical planning. Intraoperatively, with a reference frame fixed to the distal medial aspect of femur and tibia, paired-point matching registration was performed with the use of points marked on skin through FM center holes. During tibial tunnel guide wire placement, tibial aiming guide with tracking device fed back the position of tip and direction of the guide wire on the three-dimensional (3D) tibia bone surface image and multiple image planes in real time. For the femoral side, the navigation pointer was placed at the footprint center with visual guidance of 3D image of lateral wall sagittal view on navigation monitor and marked with navigation awl.

Results

The average registration accuracy of 22 consecutive patients was 0.7 ± 0.2 mm and 0.6 ± 0.2 mm for femoral and tibial bone, respectively. Most of the bone tunnel positions evaluated with 3D-CT image were confirmed to be accurately placed in reference to the preoperative plan. There was no damage to femoral condyle cartilage and no other complication.

Conclusion

This new CT-based computer navigation system opens the possibility for surgeons to plan bone tunnel positioning preoperatively and control it during technically demanding anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Aglietti P, Giron F, Losco M, Cuomo P, Ciardullo A, Mondanelli N (2009) Comparison between single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomized, single-blinded clinical trial. Am J Sports Med 38:25–34CrossRefPubMed Aglietti P, Giron F, Losco M, Cuomo P, Ciardullo A, Mondanelli N (2009) Comparison between single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomized, single-blinded clinical trial. Am J Sports Med 38:25–34CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Biau DJ, Tournoux C, Katsahian S, Schranz P, Nizard R (2007) ACL reconstruction: a meta-analysis of functional scores. Clin Orthop Relat Res 458:180–187PubMed Biau DJ, Tournoux C, Katsahian S, Schranz P, Nizard R (2007) ACL reconstruction: a meta-analysis of functional scores. Clin Orthop Relat Res 458:180–187PubMed
3.
go back to reference Colombet PD, Robinson JR (2008) Computer-assisted, anatomic, double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 24:1152–1160CrossRefPubMed Colombet PD, Robinson JR (2008) Computer-assisted, anatomic, double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 24:1152–1160CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Ferretti M, Ekdahl M, Shen W, Fu FH (2007) Osseous landmarks of the femoral attachment of the anterior cruciate ligament: an anatomic study. Arthroscopy 23:1218–1225CrossRefPubMed Ferretti M, Ekdahl M, Shen W, Fu FH (2007) Osseous landmarks of the femoral attachment of the anterior cruciate ligament: an anatomic study. Arthroscopy 23:1218–1225CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Harner CD, Giffin JR, Dunteman RC, Annunziata CC, Friedman MJ (2001) Evaluation and treatment of recurrent instability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Instr Course Lect 50:463–474PubMed Harner CD, Giffin JR, Dunteman RC, Annunziata CC, Friedman MJ (2001) Evaluation and treatment of recurrent instability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Instr Course Lect 50:463–474PubMed
6.
go back to reference Hart R, Krejzla J, Sváb P, Kocis J, Stipcák V (2008) Outcomes after conventional versus computer-navigated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 24:569–578CrossRefPubMed Hart R, Krejzla J, Sváb P, Kocis J, Stipcák V (2008) Outcomes after conventional versus computer-navigated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 24:569–578CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Petersen W, Zantop T (2006) Anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament with regard to its two bundles. Clin Orthop Relat Res 454:35–47CrossRef Petersen W, Zantop T (2006) Anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament with regard to its two bundles. Clin Orthop Relat Res 454:35–47CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Pombo MW, Shen W, Fu FH (2008) Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: where are we today? Arthroscopy 24:1168–1177CrossRefPubMed Pombo MW, Shen W, Fu FH (2008) Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: where are we today? Arthroscopy 24:1168–1177CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Purnell ML, Larson AI, Clancy W (2008) Anterior cruciate ligament insertions on the tibia and femur and their relationships to critical bony landmarks using high-resolution volume-rendering computed tomography. Am J Sports Med 36:2083–2090CrossRefPubMed Purnell ML, Larson AI, Clancy W (2008) Anterior cruciate ligament insertions on the tibia and femur and their relationships to critical bony landmarks using high-resolution volume-rendering computed tomography. Am J Sports Med 36:2083–2090CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Sudhahar TA, Glasgow MM, Donell ST (2004) Comparison of expected vs. actual tunnel position in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee 11:15–18CrossRefPubMed Sudhahar TA, Glasgow MM, Donell ST (2004) Comparison of expected vs. actual tunnel position in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee 11:15–18CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Takahashi M, Doi M, Abe M, Suzuki D, Nagano A (2006) Anatomical study of the femoral and tibial insertions of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of human anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 34:787–792CrossRefPubMed Takahashi M, Doi M, Abe M, Suzuki D, Nagano A (2006) Anatomical study of the femoral and tibial insertions of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of human anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 34:787–792CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Tsuda E, Ishibashi Y, Fukuda A, Yamamoto Y, Tsukada H, Ono S (2010) Tunnel position and relationship to postoperative knee laxity after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a transtibial technique. Am J Sports Med 38:698–706CrossRefPubMed Tsuda E, Ishibashi Y, Fukuda A, Yamamoto Y, Tsukada H, Ono S (2010) Tunnel position and relationship to postoperative knee laxity after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a transtibial technique. Am J Sports Med 38:698–706CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Yagi M, Wong EK, Kanamori A, Debski RE, Fu FH, Woo SL (2002) Biomechanical analysis of an anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 30:660–666PubMed Yagi M, Wong EK, Kanamori A, Debski RE, Fu FH, Woo SL (2002) Biomechanical analysis of an anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 30:660–666PubMed
14.
go back to reference Yasuda K, Kondo E, Ichiyama H, Tanabe Y, Tohyama H (2006) Clinical evaluation of anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedure using hamstring tendon grafts: comparisons among 3 different procedures. Arthroscopy 22:240–251CrossRefPubMed Yasuda K, Kondo E, Ichiyama H, Tanabe Y, Tohyama H (2006) Clinical evaluation of anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedure using hamstring tendon grafts: comparisons among 3 different procedures. Arthroscopy 22:240–251CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Zantop T, Haase AK, Fu FH, Petersen W (2008) Potential risk of cartilage damage in double bundle ACL reconstruction: impact of knee flexion angle and portal location on the femoral PL bundle tunnel. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128:509–513CrossRefPubMed Zantop T, Haase AK, Fu FH, Petersen W (2008) Potential risk of cartilage damage in double bundle ACL reconstruction: impact of knee flexion angle and portal location on the femoral PL bundle tunnel. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128:509–513CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, using CT-based navigation and fiducial markers
Authors
Keiji Tensho
Hiroyuki Kodaira
Gaku Yasuda
Yasuo Yoshimura
Nobuyo Narita
Susumu Morioka
Hiroyuki Kato
Naoto Saito
Publication date
01-03-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 3/2011
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1217-y

Other articles of this Issue 3/2011

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 3/2011 Go to the issue