Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Anesthesia 4/2020

01-08-2020 | Anaphylaxis | Clinical Report

Interpreting the results of early skin tests after perioperative anaphylaxis requires special attention: a case report and review of literature

Authors: Masaki Orihara, Tomonori Takazawa, Kazuhiro Nagumo, Shinya Sakamoto, Tatsuo Horiuchi, Shigeru Saito

Published in: Journal of Anesthesia | Issue 4/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Skin tests are the gold standard for detecting the culprit drug of anaphylaxis, and should ideally be performed after an interval of 4–6 weeks after the reaction to avoid false-negative results. However, when re-operation cannot be delayed and early allergy tests are necessary, special attention is required during subsequent anesthesia, because early skin tests tend to produce false-negative results. This report presents a case of rocuronium-induced anaphylaxis in which early skin tests showed negative results for all the drugs tested. The second anesthesia was safely performed by avoiding all the drugs used for the first anesthesia. Ultimately, skin tests and basophil activation tests (BATs) performed after re-operation demonstrated rocuronium as the drug responsible for anaphylaxis. We recommend performing BATs in addition to skin tests to improve the accuracy of diagnosis of anaphylaxis. In this report, we also discuss interpretation of the results of early skin tests and subsequent selection of drugs for anesthesia. After postponement of surgery due to anaphylaxis, we are often required to perform allergy tests at an early stage if re-operation cannot be delayed. In such cases, skin test results alone should not be used to guide subsequent anesthesia management to avoid recurrent anaphylaxis.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Simons FE, Ebisawa M, Sanchez-Borges M, Thong BY, Worm M, Tanno LK, Lockey RF, El-Gamal YM, Brown SG, Park HS, Sheikh A. 2015 update of the evidence base: World Allergy Organization anaphylaxis guidelines. World Allergy Organ J. 2015;8:32.CrossRef Simons FE, Ebisawa M, Sanchez-Borges M, Thong BY, Worm M, Tanno LK, Lockey RF, El-Gamal YM, Brown SG, Park HS, Sheikh A. 2015 update of the evidence base: World Allergy Organization anaphylaxis guidelines. World Allergy Organ J. 2015;8:32.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Dewachter P, Mouton-Faivre C, Emala CW. Anaphylaxis and anesthesia: controversies and new insights. Anesthesiology. 2009;111:1141–50.CrossRef Dewachter P, Mouton-Faivre C, Emala CW. Anaphylaxis and anesthesia: controversies and new insights. Anesthesiology. 2009;111:1141–50.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Mertes PM, Malinovsky JM, Jouffroy L; Working Group of the SFAR and SFA, Aberer W, Terreehorst I, Brockow K, Demoly P; ENDA; EAACI Interest Group on Drug Allergy. Reducing the risk of anaphylaxis during anesthesia: 2011 updated guidelines for clinical practice. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2011;21:442–53.PubMed Mertes PM, Malinovsky JM, Jouffroy L; Working Group of the SFAR and SFA, Aberer W, Terreehorst I, Brockow K, Demoly P; ENDA; EAACI Interest Group on Drug Allergy. Reducing the risk of anaphylaxis during anesthesia: 2011 updated guidelines for clinical practice. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2011;21:442–53.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Harper NJ, Dixon T, Dugué P, Edgar DM, Fay A, Gooi HC, Herriot R, Hopkins P, Hunter JM, Mirakian R, Pumphrey RS, Seneviratne SL, Walls AF, Williams P, Wildsmith JA, Wood P, Nasser AS, Powell RK, Mirakhur R, Soar J; Working Party of the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland. Suspected anaphylactic reactions associated with anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 2009;64:199–211.CrossRef Harper NJ, Dixon T, Dugué P, Edgar DM, Fay A, Gooi HC, Herriot R, Hopkins P, Hunter JM, Mirakian R, Pumphrey RS, Seneviratne SL, Walls AF, Williams P, Wildsmith JA, Wood P, Nasser AS, Powell RK, Mirakhur R, Soar J; Working Party of the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland. Suspected anaphylactic reactions associated with anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 2009;64:199–211.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ewan PW, Dugué P, Mirakian R, Dixon TA, Harper JN, Nasser SM; BSACI. BSACI guidelines for the investigation of suspected anaphylaxis during general anaesthesia. Clin Exp Allergy. 2010;40:15–31.CrossRef Ewan PW, Dugué P, Mirakian R, Dixon TA, Harper JN, Nasser SM; BSACI. BSACI guidelines for the investigation of suspected anaphylaxis during general anaesthesia. Clin Exp Allergy. 2010;40:15–31.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Soetens F, Rose M, Fisher M. Timing of skin testing after a suspected anaphylactic reaction during anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012;56:1042–6.CrossRef Soetens F, Rose M, Fisher M. Timing of skin testing after a suspected anaphylactic reaction during anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012;56:1042–6.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Fisher MM, Merefield D, Baldo B. Failure to prevent an anaphylactic reaction to a second neuromuscular blocking drug during anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 1999;82:770–3.CrossRef Fisher MM, Merefield D, Baldo B. Failure to prevent an anaphylactic reaction to a second neuromuscular blocking drug during anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 1999;82:770–3.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Fraser BA, Smart JA. Anaphylaxis to cisatracurium following negative skin testing. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2005;33:816–9.CrossRef Fraser BA, Smart JA. Anaphylaxis to cisatracurium following negative skin testing. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2005;33:816–9.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Dewachter P, Mouton-Faivre C. What investigation after an anaphylactic reaction during anaesthesia? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2008;21:363–8.CrossRef Dewachter P, Mouton-Faivre C. What investigation after an anaphylactic reaction during anaesthesia? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2008;21:363–8.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Horiuchi T, Yokohama A, Orihara M, Tomita Y, Tomioka A, Yoshida N, Takahashi K, Saito S, Takazawa T. Usefulness of basophil activation tests for diagnosis of sugammadex-induced anaphylaxis. Anesth Analg. 2018;126:1509–16.CrossRef Horiuchi T, Yokohama A, Orihara M, Tomita Y, Tomioka A, Yoshida N, Takahashi K, Saito S, Takazawa T. Usefulness of basophil activation tests for diagnosis of sugammadex-induced anaphylaxis. Anesth Analg. 2018;126:1509–16.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Horiuchi T, Takazawa T, Orihara M, Sakamoto S, Yokohama A, Takahashi J, Tomioka A, Yoshida N, Hagiwara K, Saito S. Required cefazolin concentration to maximize diagnostic accuracy of the basophil activation test for cefazolin-induced anaphylaxis. J Anesth. 2018;32:797–805.CrossRef Horiuchi T, Takazawa T, Orihara M, Sakamoto S, Yokohama A, Takahashi J, Tomioka A, Yoshida N, Hagiwara K, Saito S. Required cefazolin concentration to maximize diagnostic accuracy of the basophil activation test for cefazolin-induced anaphylaxis. J Anesth. 2018;32:797–805.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Takazawa T, Horiuchi T, Yoshida N, Yokohama A, Saito S. Flow cytometric investigation of sugammadex-induced anaphylaxis. Br J Anaesth. 2015;114:858–9.CrossRef Takazawa T, Horiuchi T, Yoshida N, Yokohama A, Saito S. Flow cytometric investigation of sugammadex-induced anaphylaxis. Br J Anaesth. 2015;114:858–9.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Renaudin JM, Beaudouin E, Ponvert C, Demoly P, Moneret-Vautrin DA. Severe drug-induced anaphylaxis: analysis of 333 cases recorded by the allergy vigilance network from 2002 to 2010. Allergy. 2013;68:929–37.CrossRef Renaudin JM, Beaudouin E, Ponvert C, Demoly P, Moneret-Vautrin DA. Severe drug-induced anaphylaxis: analysis of 333 cases recorded by the allergy vigilance network from 2002 to 2010. Allergy. 2013;68:929–37.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Lafuente A, Javaloyes G, Berroa F, Goikoetxea MJ, Moncada R, Núñez-Córdoba JM, Cabrera-Freitag P, D'Amelio C, Sanz ML, Gastaminza G. Early skin testing is effective for diagnosis of hypersensitivity reactions occurring during anesthesia. Allergy. 2013;68:820–2.CrossRef Lafuente A, Javaloyes G, Berroa F, Goikoetxea MJ, Moncada R, Núñez-Córdoba JM, Cabrera-Freitag P, D'Amelio C, Sanz ML, Gastaminza G. Early skin testing is effective for diagnosis of hypersensitivity reactions occurring during anesthesia. Allergy. 2013;68:820–2.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Fisher MM. Intradermal testing after severe histamine reactions to intravenous drugs used in anaesthesia. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1976;4:97–104.CrossRef Fisher MM. Intradermal testing after severe histamine reactions to intravenous drugs used in anaesthesia. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1976;4:97–104.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Culp JA, Palis RI, Castells MC, Lucas SR, Borish L. Perioperative anaphylaxis in a 44-year-old man. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2007;28:602–5.CrossRef Culp JA, Palis RI, Castells MC, Lucas SR, Borish L. Perioperative anaphylaxis in a 44-year-old man. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2007;28:602–5.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Aalto-Korte K, Makinen-Kiljunen S. False negative SPT after anaphylaxis. Allergy. 2001;56:461–2.CrossRef Aalto-Korte K, Makinen-Kiljunen S. False negative SPT after anaphylaxis. Allergy. 2001;56:461–2.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Schulberg EM, Webb AR, Kolawole H. Early skin and challenge testing after rocuronium anaphylaxis. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2016;44:425–7.CrossRef Schulberg EM, Webb AR, Kolawole H. Early skin and challenge testing after rocuronium anaphylaxis. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2016;44:425–7.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Russ BR, Maddern PJ. Anaphylactic reaction to chlorhexidine in urinary catheter lubricant. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1994;22(5):611–2.CrossRef Russ BR, Maddern PJ. Anaphylactic reaction to chlorhexidine in urinary catheter lubricant. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1994;22(5):611–2.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kubitz JC, Krause T, Dietz R, Friederich P, Goetz AE. Severe anaphylaxis from rocuronium. Anaesthesist. 2006;55:1169–71.CrossRef Kubitz JC, Krause T, Dietz R, Friederich P, Goetz AE. Severe anaphylaxis from rocuronium. Anaesthesist. 2006;55:1169–71.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Goikoetxea MJ, Lafuente A, de la Borbolla JM, Moncada R, Sanz ML, Gastaminza G. Early diagnosis of an allergic reaction to cisatracurium. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2013;23:69–71.PubMed Goikoetxea MJ, Lafuente A, de la Borbolla JM, Moncada R, Sanz ML, Gastaminza G. Early diagnosis of an allergic reaction to cisatracurium. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2013;23:69–71.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Sprung J, Tully MJ, Ziser A. Anaphylactic reactions to isosulfan blue dye during sentinel node lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. Anesth Analg. 2003;96:1051–3.CrossRef Sprung J, Tully MJ, Ziser A. Anaphylactic reactions to isosulfan blue dye during sentinel node lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. Anesth Analg. 2003;96:1051–3.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Ya-Ling Yang H-WH, Yip H-K, Jawan B, Tseng C-C, Hsiao-Feng L. Acute coronary syndrome in cisatracurium-induced anaphylactic shock: kounis syndrome. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2008;46:184–6.CrossRef Ya-Ling Yang H-WH, Yip H-K, Jawan B, Tseng C-C, Hsiao-Feng L. Acute coronary syndrome in cisatracurium-induced anaphylactic shock: kounis syndrome. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2008;46:184–6.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Ebo DG, Faber M, Elst J, Van Gasse AL, Bridts CH, Mertens C, De Clerck LS, Hagendorens MM, Sabato V. In vitro diagnosis of immediate drug hypersensitivity during anesthesia: a review of the literature. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018;6:1176–84.CrossRef Ebo DG, Faber M, Elst J, Van Gasse AL, Bridts CH, Mertens C, De Clerck LS, Hagendorens MM, Sabato V. In vitro diagnosis of immediate drug hypersensitivity during anesthesia: a review of the literature. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018;6:1176–84.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Takazawa T, Sabato V, Ebo DG. In vitro diagnostic tests for perioperative hypersensitivity, a narrative review: potential, limitations, and perspectives. Br J Anaesth. 2019;123(1):e117–e125.CrossRef Takazawa T, Sabato V, Ebo DG. In vitro diagnostic tests for perioperative hypersensitivity, a narrative review: potential, limitations, and perspectives. Br J Anaesth. 2019;123(1):e117–e125.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Sadleir PH, Clarke RC, Bunning DL, Platt PR. Anaphylaxis to neuromuscular blocking drugs: incidence and cross-reactivity in Western Australia from 2002 to 2011. Br J Anaesth. 2013;110:981–7.CrossRef Sadleir PH, Clarke RC, Bunning DL, Platt PR. Anaphylaxis to neuromuscular blocking drugs: incidence and cross-reactivity in Western Australia from 2002 to 2011. Br J Anaesth. 2013;110:981–7.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Tacquard C, Collange O, Gomis P, Malinovsky JM, Petitpain N, Demoly P, Nicoll S, Mertes PM. Anaesthetic hypersensitivity reactions in France between 2011 and 2012: the 10th GERAP epidemiologic survey. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2017;61:290–9.CrossRef Tacquard C, Collange O, Gomis P, Malinovsky JM, Petitpain N, Demoly P, Nicoll S, Mertes PM. Anaesthetic hypersensitivity reactions in France between 2011 and 2012: the 10th GERAP epidemiologic survey. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2017;61:290–9.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Leysen J, Uyttebroek A, Sabato V, Bridts CH, De Clerck LS, Ebo DG. Predictive value of allergy tests for neuromuscular blocking agents: tackling an unmet need. Clin Exp Allergy. 2014;44:1069–75.CrossRef Leysen J, Uyttebroek A, Sabato V, Bridts CH, De Clerck LS, Ebo DG. Predictive value of allergy tests for neuromuscular blocking agents: tackling an unmet need. Clin Exp Allergy. 2014;44:1069–75.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Interpreting the results of early skin tests after perioperative anaphylaxis requires special attention: a case report and review of literature
Authors
Masaki Orihara
Tomonori Takazawa
Kazuhiro Nagumo
Shinya Sakamoto
Tatsuo Horiuchi
Shigeru Saito
Publication date
01-08-2020
Publisher
Springer Singapore
Published in
Journal of Anesthesia / Issue 4/2020
Print ISSN: 0913-8668
Electronic ISSN: 1438-8359
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-020-02802-x

Other articles of this Issue 4/2020

Journal of Anesthesia 4/2020 Go to the issue