Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Case report

Anaphylactic reaction in patient allergic to mango

Authors: Natalia Ukleja-Sokołowska, Ewa Gawrońska-Ukleja, Kinga Lis, Magdalena Żbikowska-Gotz, Łukasz Sokołowski, Zbigniew Bartuzi

Published in: Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

An allergy to mango is extremely rare. The antigenic composition of the fruit is not fully known. Profilin from mango has a structure similar to birch tree profiling: it is responsible for cross-reactions between mango and pear, apple, and peach. A panallergen with a structure similar to mugwort defensin (Art v 1) which cross-reacts with celery, carrot, peanuts, pepper, aniseed, and caraway has been previously described.

Case study

A female patient, 30 years old, was admitted in February 2017 because of recurrent allergic reactions following consumption of various foods. The most severe allergic reaction in the patient’s life occurred after eating a mango fruit. Within several minutes the patient developed a generalised urticaria, followed by facial oedema, strong stomach pain and watery diarrhoea. The diagnostics involved skin tests with a set of inhalatory and food allergens, including native skin tests. The patient also experienced symptoms of recurrent, generalized urticaria in connection with consumption of various types of food, especially complex dishes containing many different ingredients. Additionally, an interview revealed that the patient was experiencing symptoms of the oral allergy syndrome after ingesting various fruit and vegetables, especially during late summer and fall. Diagnostics was extended by determining the levels of IgE specific for allergen components, using the ImmunoCap ISAC method. In order to confirm the occurence of a cross-reaction between mugwort and mango allergens, we performed the inhibition test of IgE specific for mugwort using a mango allergen extract and ImmunoCap matrix.

Results

Skin prick tests (SPT) were positive for allergens of grass 7 mm; weeds 8 mm; cat’s fur 5 mm; mugwort 6 mm. SPT were also positive for mango. The level of specific IgE was increased for allergens of mugwort, grass, celery, pepper, carrot, mango, banana, peach, and apple. The ImmunoCap ISAC test demonstrated a high level of specific IgE rPhl p 1 (timothy grass) and Art v 1 (mugwort). We also performed the IgE inhibition test using both mango extract and ImmunoCap matrix and confirmed a cross-reaction with Art v 1 in the pathogenesis of symptoms observed in the patient.

Conclusions

An anaphylactic reaction to consumed mango, resulting from cross-allergy with mugwort Art v 1 was diagnosed in the patient. Acute urticarial in this case is a manifestation of IgE-mediated food allergy. During in vitro diagnostic procedures we found an elevated concentration of IgE specific to several food allergens (including celery, peppers, carrot, banana, peach, apple, shrimp). The elimination diet removing allergens the patient was allergic to was recommended. Considering the anaphylactic reaction the patient was instructed to carry a rescue set composed of an adrenaline autosyringe, steroids, and antihistamines.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hegde VL, Venkatesh YP. Anaphylaxis following ingestion of mango fruit. J Invest Allergol Clin Immunol. 2007;17(5):341–4. Hegde VL, Venkatesh YP. Anaphylaxis following ingestion of mango fruit. J Invest Allergol Clin Immunol. 2007;17(5):341–4.
2.
go back to reference McGovern TW, LaWarre S. Botanical briefs: the mango tree—Mangifera indica L. Cutis. 2001;67:365–6.PubMed McGovern TW, LaWarre S. Botanical briefs: the mango tree—Mangifera indica L. Cutis. 2001;67:365–6.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Sareen R, Shah A. Hypersensitivity manifestations to the fru-it mango. Asia Pac Allergy. 2011;1:43–9.CrossRef Sareen R, Shah A. Hypersensitivity manifestations to the fru-it mango. Asia Pac Allergy. 2011;1:43–9.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Himly M, Jahn-Schmid B, Dedic A, et al. Art v 1, the major allergen of mugwort pollen, is a modular glycoprotein with a defensin-like and a hydroxyproline-rich domain. FASEB J. 2003;17:106–8.CrossRef Himly M, Jahn-Schmid B, Dedic A, et al. Art v 1, the major allergen of mugwort pollen, is a modular glycoprotein with a defensin-like and a hydroxyproline-rich domain. FASEB J. 2003;17:106–8.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Paschke A, Kinder H, Zunker K. Characterization of cross-reac-ting allergens in mango fruit. Allergy. 2001;56:237–42.CrossRef Paschke A, Kinder H, Zunker K. Characterization of cross-reac-ting allergens in mango fruit. Allergy. 2001;56:237–42.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Gruber P, Gadermaier G, Bauer R, et al. Role of the polypeptide backbone and post-translational modifications in cross-reactivity of Art v 1, the major mugwort pollen allergen. Biol Chem. 2009;390:445–51.CrossRef Gruber P, Gadermaier G, Bauer R, et al. Role of the polypeptide backbone and post-translational modifications in cross-reactivity of Art v 1, the major mugwort pollen allergen. Biol Chem. 2009;390:445–51.CrossRef
10.
13.
go back to reference Brehler R, Theissen U, Mohr C, Luger T. Latex-fruit syndrome: frequency of cross-reacting IgE antibodies. Allergy. 1997;52(4):404–10.CrossRef Brehler R, Theissen U, Mohr C, Luger T. Latex-fruit syndrome: frequency of cross-reacting IgE antibodies. Allergy. 1997;52(4):404–10.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Paschke A, Kinder H, Zunker K, Wigotzki M, Steinhart H, Wessbecher R, Vieluf I. Characterization of cross-reacting allergens in mango fruit. Allergy. 2001;56(3):237–42.CrossRef Paschke A, Kinder H, Zunker K, Wigotzki M, Steinhart H, Wessbecher R, Vieluf I. Characterization of cross-reacting allergens in mango fruit. Allergy. 2001;56(3):237–42.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Pablos I, Eichhorn S, Machado Y, Briza P, Neunkirchner A, Jahn-Schmid B, Wildner S, Soh WT, Ebner C, Park JW, Pickl WF, Arora N, Vieths S, Ferreira F, Gadermaier G. Distinct epitope structures of defensin-like proteins linked to proline-rich regions give rise to differences in their allergenic activity. Allergy. 2018;73(2):431–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.13298.CrossRefPubMed Pablos I, Eichhorn S, Machado Y, Briza P, Neunkirchner A, Jahn-Schmid B, Wildner S, Soh WT, Ebner C, Park JW, Pickl WF, Arora N, Vieths S, Ferreira F, Gadermaier G. Distinct epitope structures of defensin-like proteins linked to proline-rich regions give rise to differences in their allergenic activity. Allergy. 2018;73(2):431–41. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​all.​13298.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Silva R, Lopes C, Castro E, de Oliveira JF, Bartolomé B, Castel-Branco MG. Anaphylaxis to mango fruit and crossreactivity with Artemisia vulgaris pollen. J Invest Allergol Clin Immunol. 2009;19(5):420–2. Silva R, Lopes C, Castro E, de Oliveira JF, Bartolomé B, Castel-Branco MG. Anaphylaxis to mango fruit and crossreactivity with Artemisia vulgaris pollen. J Invest Allergol Clin Immunol. 2009;19(5):420–2.
19.
go back to reference Weinstein S, Bassiri-Tehrani S, Cohen DE. Allergic contact dermatitis to mango flesh. Int J Dermatol. 2004;43(3):195–6.CrossRef Weinstein S, Bassiri-Tehrani S, Cohen DE. Allergic contact dermatitis to mango flesh. Int J Dermatol. 2004;43(3):195–6.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Burks W. Skin manifestations of food allergy. Pediatrics. 2003;111(6 Pt 3):1617–24.PubMed Burks W. Skin manifestations of food allergy. Pediatrics. 2003;111(6 Pt 3):1617–24.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Boyce JA, Assa’ad A, Burks AW, Jones SM, Sampson HA, Wood RA, Plaut M, Cooper SF, Fenton MJ, Arshad SH, Bahna SL, Beck LA, Byrd-Bredbenner C, Camargo CA Jr, Eichenfield L, Furuta GT, Hanifin JM, Jones C, Kraft M, Levy BD, Lieberman P, Luccioli S, McCall KM, Schneider LC, Simon RA, Simons FE, Teach SJ, Yawn BP, Schwaninger JM. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of food allergy in the United States: summary of the NIAID-sponsored expert panel report. Nutr Res. 2011;31(1):61–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nutres.2011.01.001.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Boyce JA, Assa’ad A, Burks AW, Jones SM, Sampson HA, Wood RA, Plaut M, Cooper SF, Fenton MJ, Arshad SH, Bahna SL, Beck LA, Byrd-Bredbenner C, Camargo CA Jr, Eichenfield L, Furuta GT, Hanifin JM, Jones C, Kraft M, Levy BD, Lieberman P, Luccioli S, McCall KM, Schneider LC, Simon RA, Simons FE, Teach SJ, Yawn BP, Schwaninger JM. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of food allergy in the United States: summary of the NIAID-sponsored expert panel report. Nutr Res. 2011;31(1):61–75. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​nutres.​2011.​01.​001.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Anaphylactic reaction in patient allergic to mango
Authors
Natalia Ukleja-Sokołowska
Ewa Gawrońska-Ukleja
Kinga Lis
Magdalena Żbikowska-Gotz
Łukasz Sokołowski
Zbigniew Bartuzi
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1710-1492
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13223-018-0294-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology 1/2018 Go to the issue