Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Obesity Surgery 6/2009

01-06-2009 | Research Article

Analysis of Weight Loss After Bariatric Surgery Using Mixed-Effects Linear Modeling

Authors: Ramsey M. Dallal, Brian B. Quebbemann, Lacy H. Hunt, Leonard E. Braitman

Published in: Obesity Surgery | Issue 6/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The standard analysis of bariatric surgery weight outcomes data (using t tests) is well known. However, these uncontrolled comparisons may yield misleading results and limit the range of research questions. The aim of the study was to develop a valid approach to the longitudinal analysis of weight loss outcomes after bariatric surgery using multivariable mixed models. This study has a multi-institutional setting.

Methods

We developed a mixed-effects model to examine weight after gastric bypass surgery while controlling for several independent variables: gender, anastomotic technique, age, race, initial weight, height, and institution. We contrasted this approach with traditional uncontrolled analyses using percent excess weight loss (%EWL).

Results

One thousand one hundred sixty-eight gastric bypass procedures were performed between 2000 and 2006. The average %EWL at 1, 2, and 3 years was 71%, 79%, and 76%, respectively. Using weight as the outcome variable, initial weight and gender were the only independent predictors of outcome (p < 0.001). %EWL was substantially less accurate than weight as an outcome measure in multivariable modeling. Including initial weight and height as separate independent variables yielded a more accurate model than using initial body mass index. In a traditional uncontrolled analysis, average %EWL was higher in women than men. However, average weight loss was lower, not higher, in women (p < 0.001) in our multivariable mixed model. Height, surgical technique, race and age did not independently predict weight loss.

Conclusions

Multivariable mixed models provide more accurate analyses of weight loss surgery than traditional methods and should be used in studies that examine repeated measurements.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Christou NV, Look D, Maclean LD. Weight gain after short- and long-limb gastric bypass in patients followed for longer than 10 years. Ann Surg. 2006;244(5):734–40.CrossRef Christou NV, Look D, Maclean LD. Weight gain after short- and long-limb gastric bypass in patients followed for longer than 10 years. Ann Surg. 2006;244(5):734–40.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Oria HE, Carrasquilla C, Cunningham P, et al. Guidelines for weight calculations and follow-up in bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2005;1(1):67–8.CrossRef Oria HE, Carrasquilla C, Cunningham P, et al. Guidelines for weight calculations and follow-up in bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2005;1(1):67–8.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Brolin RE, Kenler HA, Gorman JH, et al. Long-limb gastric bypass in the superobese. A prospective randomized study. Ann Surg. 1992;215(4):387–95.CrossRef Brolin RE, Kenler HA, Gorman JH, et al. Long-limb gastric bypass in the superobese. A prospective randomized study. Ann Surg. 1992;215(4):387–95.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Fernstrom JD, Courcoulas AP, Houck PR, et al. Long-term changes in blood pressure in extremely obese patients who have undergone bariatric surgery. Arch Surg. 2006;141(3):276–83.CrossRef Fernstrom JD, Courcoulas AP, Houck PR, et al. Long-term changes in blood pressure in extremely obese patients who have undergone bariatric surgery. Arch Surg. 2006;141(3):276–83.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Cottam DR, Atkinson J, Anderson A, et al. A case-controlled matched-pair cohort study of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and Lap-Band patients in a single US center with three-year follow-up. Obes Surg. 2006;16(5):534–40.CrossRef Cottam DR, Atkinson J, Anderson A, et al. A case-controlled matched-pair cohort study of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and Lap-Band patients in a single US center with three-year follow-up. Obes Surg. 2006;16(5):534–40.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kinzl JF, Schrattenecker M, Traweger C, et al. Psychosocial predictors of weight loss after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2006;16(12):1609–14.CrossRef Kinzl JF, Schrattenecker M, Traweger C, et al. Psychosocial predictors of weight loss after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2006;16(12):1609–14.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Singer JD, Willett JB. Applied longitudinal data analysis: modeling change and event occurrence. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003.CrossRef Singer JD, Willett JB. Applied longitudinal data analysis: modeling change and event occurrence. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Quebbemann BB, Dallal RM. The orientation of the antecolic Roux limb markedly affects the incidence of internal hernias after laparoscopic gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2005;15(6):766–70. discussion 770.CrossRef Quebbemann BB, Dallal RM. The orientation of the antecolic Roux limb markedly affects the incidence of internal hernias after laparoscopic gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2005;15(6):766–70. discussion 770.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Twisk JWR. Applied longitudinal data analysis for epidemiology. A practical guide. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2003. Twisk JWR. Applied longitudinal data analysis for epidemiology. A practical guide. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2003.
10.
11.
go back to reference Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;292(14):1724–37.CrossRef Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;292(14):1724–37.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Analysis of Weight Loss After Bariatric Surgery Using Mixed-Effects Linear Modeling
Authors
Ramsey M. Dallal
Brian B. Quebbemann
Lacy H. Hunt
Leonard E. Braitman
Publication date
01-06-2009
Publisher
Springer New York
Published in
Obesity Surgery / Issue 6/2009
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Electronic ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-009-9816-8

Other articles of this Issue 6/2009

Obesity Surgery 6/2009 Go to the issue