Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Urology 6/2008

01-12-2008 | Original Article

Analysis of three different vesicourethral anastomotic techniques in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

Authors: Dogu Teber, Tibet Erdogru, Joanne Cresswell, Ali Serdar Gözen, Thomas Frede, Jens J. Rassweiler

Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 6/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

The vesicourethral anastomosis is critical to the outcome of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). We retrospectively compared a recently introduced running suture with existing interrupted techniques.

Materials and methods

A total of 600 patients undergoing LRP at our institution were reviewed. Each group consisted of 200 patients. Group 1 (intracorporeal-single-knot-running suture) was compared to cohorts in whom the anastomosis was created by interrupted suturing, with (group 2) or without (group 3) a previously placed 6 o’clock suture. Intraoperative data and cystographic evaluation were collected prospectively. Detailed analysis of the location of extravasation was correlated with duration of leak. At a median follow up of 26 months, continence and stricture rates were assessed.

Results

The groups were statistically similar with respect to age, prostate volumes and pre-operative PSA. Numbers of patients undergoing lymphadenectomy and/or nerve-sparing procedures were also similar between groups. The median time for anastomosis was significantly shorter for group 1 (15.3 min) compared to group 2 (23.5 min) and group 3 (27.7 min) (P < 0.000.1). This was reflected in the overall operative times [group 1; 155.4 min, group 2; 185.6 min and group 3; 202.2 min (P = 0.03)]. Subjective assessment suggested that tension to the anastamosis was present in fewer patients in group 1 (3.5%) compared to group 2 (17%) and group 3 (9.5%) (P = 0.001). There was no significant difference in the continence or stricture rate between the three groups.

Conclusions

The continuous anastomotic suture reduced the operative time and tension to the anastomosis. However, the long term continence and stricture rates were unaffected by anastomotic technique.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Laguna MP, Schreuders LC, Rassweiler JJ, Abbou CC, van Velthoven R, Janetschek G et al (2005) Development of laparoscopic surgery and training facilities in Europe: results of a survey of the European Society of Uro-Technology (ESUT). Eur Urol 47:346–351PubMedCrossRef Laguna MP, Schreuders LC, Rassweiler JJ, Abbou CC, van Velthoven R, Janetschek G et al (2005) Development of laparoscopic surgery and training facilities in Europe: results of a survey of the European Society of Uro-Technology (ESUT). Eur Urol 47:346–351PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference De La Rosette JJ, Abbou CC, Rassweiler J, Laguna MP, Schulman CC (2002) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a European virus with global potentials. Arch Esp Urol 55:603–609PubMed De La Rosette JJ, Abbou CC, Rassweiler J, Laguna MP, Schulman CC (2002) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a European virus with global potentials. Arch Esp Urol 55:603–609PubMed
3.
go back to reference Rassweiler J, Stolzenburg J, Sulser T, Deger S, Zumbe J, Hofmockel G et al (2006) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy—the experience of the German Laparoscopic Working Group. Eur Urol 49:113–119PubMedCrossRef Rassweiler J, Stolzenburg J, Sulser T, Deger S, Zumbe J, Hofmockel G et al (2006) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy—the experience of the German Laparoscopic Working Group. Eur Urol 49:113–119PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Menon M, Tewari A, Peabody JO, Shrivastava A, Kaul S, Bhandari A et al (2004) Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy, a technique of robotic radical prostatectomy for management of localized carcinoma of the prostate: experience of over 1100 cases. Urol Clin North Am 31:701–717PubMedCrossRef Menon M, Tewari A, Peabody JO, Shrivastava A, Kaul S, Bhandari A et al (2004) Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy, a technique of robotic radical prostatectomy for management of localized carcinoma of the prostate: experience of over 1100 cases. Urol Clin North Am 31:701–717PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Frede T, Erdogru T, Zukosky D, Gulkesen H, Teber D, Rassweiler J (2005) Comparison of training modalities for performing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: experience with 1, 000 patients. J Urol 174:673–678PubMedCrossRef Frede T, Erdogru T, Zukosky D, Gulkesen H, Teber D, Rassweiler J (2005) Comparison of training modalities for performing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: experience with 1, 000 patients. J Urol 174:673–678PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Schuessler WW, Schulam PG, Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR (1997) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial short term experience. Urology 50:854–857PubMedCrossRef Schuessler WW, Schulam PG, Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR (1997) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial short term experience. Urology 50:854–857PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Cohen MS, Triaca V, Silverman ML, Tuerk IA (2006) Progression of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Improved outcomes with the extraperitoneal approach and a running anastomosis. J Endourol 20:574–579PubMedCrossRef Cohen MS, Triaca V, Silverman ML, Tuerk IA (2006) Progression of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Improved outcomes with the extraperitoneal approach and a running anastomosis. J Endourol 20:574–579PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hoznek A, Salomon L, Rabii R, Ben Slama M-R, Cicco A, Antiphon P et al (2000) Vesicourethral anastomosis during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the running suture method. J Endourol 14:749–753PubMedCrossRef Hoznek A, Salomon L, Rabii R, Ben Slama M-R, Cicco A, Antiphon P et al (2000) Vesicourethral anastomosis during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the running suture method. J Endourol 14:749–753PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Nadu A, Salomon L, Hoznek A, Olsson LE, Saint F, de la Taille A et al (2001) Early removal of the catheter after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 166:1662–1664PubMedCrossRef Nadu A, Salomon L, Hoznek A, Olsson LE, Saint F, de la Taille A et al (2001) Early removal of the catheter after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 166:1662–1664PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Guillonneau B, Vallancien G (2000) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the montsouris technique. J Urol 163:1643–1649PubMedCrossRef Guillonneau B, Vallancien G (2000) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the montsouris technique. J Urol 163:1643–1649PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Rassweiler J, Sentker L, Seemann O, Hatzinger M, Rumpelt HJ (2001) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the Heilbronn technique: an analysis of the first 180 cases. J Urol 166:2101–2108PubMedCrossRef Rassweiler J, Sentker L, Seemann O, Hatzinger M, Rumpelt HJ (2001) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the Heilbronn technique: an analysis of the first 180 cases. J Urol 166:2101–2108PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Van Velthoven RF, Ahlering TE, Peltier A, Skarecky DW, Clayman RV (2003) Technique for laparoscopic running urethrovesical anastomosis: the single knot method. Urology 61:699–702PubMedCrossRef Van Velthoven RF, Ahlering TE, Peltier A, Skarecky DW, Clayman RV (2003) Technique for laparoscopic running urethrovesical anastomosis: the single knot method. Urology 61:699–702PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Menon M, Hemal AK, Tewari A, Shrivastava A, Bhandari A (2004) The technique of apical dissection of the prostate and urethrovesical anastomosis in robotic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 93:715–719PubMedCrossRef Menon M, Hemal AK, Tewari A, Shrivastava A, Bhandari A (2004) The technique of apical dissection of the prostate and urethrovesical anastomosis in robotic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 93:715–719PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Rassweiler J, Seemann O, Hatzinger M, Schulze M, Frede T (2003) Technical evolution of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy after 450 cases. J Endourol 17:143–154PubMedCrossRef Rassweiler J, Seemann O, Hatzinger M, Schulze M, Frede T (2003) Technical evolution of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy after 450 cases. J Endourol 17:143–154PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Erdogru T, Teber D, Frede T, Marrero R, Hammady A, Seemann O et al (2004) Comparison of transperitoneal and extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy using match-pair analysis. Eur Urol 46:312–319PubMedCrossRef Erdogru T, Teber D, Frede T, Marrero R, Hammady A, Seemann O et al (2004) Comparison of transperitoneal and extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy using match-pair analysis. Eur Urol 46:312–319PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Katz R, Nadu A, Olsson LE, Hoznek A, de la Taille A, Salomon L et al (2003) A simplified 5-step model for training laparoscopic urethrovesical anastomosis. J Urol 169:2041–2044PubMedCrossRef Katz R, Nadu A, Olsson LE, Hoznek A, de la Taille A, Salomon L et al (2003) A simplified 5-step model for training laparoscopic urethrovesical anastomosis. J Urol 169:2041–2044PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Teber D, Dekel Y, Frede T, Klein J, Rassweiler J (2005) The Heilbronn laparoscopic training program for laparoscopic suturing: concept and validation. J Endourol 19:230–238PubMedCrossRef Teber D, Dekel Y, Frede T, Klein J, Rassweiler J (2005) The Heilbronn laparoscopic training program for laparoscopic suturing: concept and validation. J Endourol 19:230–238PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Schatzl G, Madersbacher S, Hofbauer J, Pycha A, Reiter WJ, Svolba G et al (1999) The impact of urinary extravasation after radical retropubic prostatectomy on urinary incontinence and anastomotic strictures. Eur Urol 36:187–190PubMedCrossRef Schatzl G, Madersbacher S, Hofbauer J, Pycha A, Reiter WJ, Svolba G et al (1999) The impact of urinary extravasation after radical retropubic prostatectomy on urinary incontinence and anastomotic strictures. Eur Urol 36:187–190PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Leibovitch I, Rowland RG, Little JS, Foster RS, Bihrle R, Donohue JP (1995) Cystography after radical retropubic prostatectomy: clinical implications of abnormal findings. Urology 46:78–80PubMedCrossRef Leibovitch I, Rowland RG, Little JS, Foster RS, Bihrle R, Donohue JP (1995) Cystography after radical retropubic prostatectomy: clinical implications of abnormal findings. Urology 46:78–80PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Surya BV, Provet J, Johanson KE, Brown J (1990) Anastomotic strictures following radical retropubic prostatectomy: risk factors and management. J Urol 143:755–758PubMed Surya BV, Provet J, Johanson KE, Brown J (1990) Anastomotic strictures following radical retropubic prostatectomy: risk factors and management. J Urol 143:755–758PubMed
21.
go back to reference Berlin JW, Ramchandani P, Banner MP, Pollack HM, Nodin CF, Wein AJ (1994) Voiding cystography after radical prostatectomy: normal findings and correlation between contrast extravasation and anastomotic strictures. Am J Roentgenol 162:87–91 Berlin JW, Ramchandani P, Banner MP, Pollack HM, Nodin CF, Wein AJ (1994) Voiding cystography after radical prostatectomy: normal findings and correlation between contrast extravasation and anastomotic strictures. Am J Roentgenol 162:87–91
Metadata
Title
Analysis of three different vesicourethral anastomotic techniques in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
Authors
Dogu Teber
Tibet Erdogru
Joanne Cresswell
Ali Serdar Gözen
Thomas Frede
Jens J. Rassweiler
Publication date
01-12-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Urology / Issue 6/2008
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-008-0281-0

Other articles of this Issue 6/2008

World Journal of Urology 6/2008 Go to the issue