Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Research

Analysis of the obstetrician's posture and movements during a simulated forceps delivery

Authors: Manon Sorel, Bertrand Gachon, Perrine Coste-Mazeau, Yves Aubard, Fabrice Pierre, Laetitia Fradet

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The objective of this study was to identify and qualify, by means of a three-dimensional kinematic analysis, the postures and movements of obstetricians during a simulated forceps birth, and then to study the association of the obstetricians’ experience with the technique adopted.

Method

Fifty-seven volunteer obstetricians, 20 from the Limoges and 37 from the Poitiers University hospitals, were included in this multi-centric study. They were classified into 3 groups: beginners, intermediates, and experts, beginners having performed fewer than 10 forceps deliveries in real conditions, intermediates between 10 and 100, and experts more than 100. The posture and movements of the obstetricians were recorded between December 2020 and March 2021 using an optoelectronic motion capture system during simulated forceps births. Joint angles qualifying these postures and movements were analysed between the three phases of the foetal traction. These phases were defined by the passage of a virtual point associated with the forceps blade through two anatomical planes: the mid-pelvis and the pelvic outlet. Then, a consolidated ascending hierarchical classification (AHC) was applied to these data in order to objectify the existence of groups of similar behaviours.

Results

The AHC distinguished four different postures adopted when crossing the first plane and three different traction techniques. 48% of the beginners adopted one of the two raised posture, 22% being raised without trunk flexion and 26% raised with trunk flexion. Conversely, 58% of the experts positioned themselves in a “chevalier servant” posture (going down on one knee) and 25% in a “squatting” posture before initiating traction. The results also show that the joint movement amplitude tends to reduce with the level of expertise.

Conclusion

Forceps delivery was performed in different ways, with the experienced obstetricians favouring postures that enabled observation at the level of the maternal perineum and techniques reducing movement amplitude. The first perspective of this work is to relate these different techniques to the traction force generated. The results of these studies have the potential to contribute to the training of obstetricians in forceps delivery, and to improve the safety of women and newborns.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Merriam A, Ananth C, Wright J, Siddiq Z, D’Alton M, Friedman A. Trends in operative vaginal delivery, 2005–2013: a population-based study. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;124(9):1365–72.CrossRef Merriam A, Ananth C, Wright J, Siddiq Z, D’Alton M, Friedman A. Trends in operative vaginal delivery, 2005–2013: a population-based study. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;124(9):1365–72.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Macfarlane A, Blondel B, Mohangoo A, Cuttini M, Nijhuis J, Novak Z, et al. Wide differences in mode of delivery within Europe: risk-stratified analyses of aggregated routine data from the Euro-Peristat study. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;123(4):559–68.CrossRef Macfarlane A, Blondel B, Mohangoo A, Cuttini M, Nijhuis J, Novak Z, et al. Wide differences in mode of delivery within Europe: risk-stratified analyses of aggregated routine data from the Euro-Peristat study. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;123(4):559–68.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Blondel B, Alexander S, Bjarnadóttir RI, Gissler M, Langhoff-Roos J, Novak-Antolič Ž, et al. Variations in rates of severe perineal tears and episiotomies in 20 European countries: a study based on routine national data in Euro-Peristat Project. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016;95(7):746–54.CrossRefPubMed Blondel B, Alexander S, Bjarnadóttir RI, Gissler M, Langhoff-Roos J, Novak-Antolič Ž, et al. Variations in rates of severe perineal tears and episiotomies in 20 European countries: a study based on routine national data in Euro-Peristat Project. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016;95(7):746–54.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Rusavy Z, Paymova L, Kozerovsky M, Veverkova A, Kalis V, Kamel R, et al. Levator ani avulsion: a Systematic evidence review (LASER). BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022;129(4):517–28.CrossRef Rusavy Z, Paymova L, Kozerovsky M, Veverkova A, Kalis V, Kamel R, et al. Levator ani avulsion: a Systematic evidence review (LASER). BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022;129(4):517–28.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Leeuw JW, Struijk PC, Vierhout ME, Wallenburg HCS. Risk factors for third degree perineal ruptures during delivery. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2001;108(4):383–7.CrossRef Leeuw JW, Struijk PC, Vierhout ME, Wallenburg HCS. Risk factors for third degree perineal ruptures during delivery. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2001;108(4):383–7.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Leray C, Lelong N. Enquête nationale périnatale. Paris: Situation et évolution depuis 2016; 2021. Leray C, Lelong N. Enquête nationale périnatale. Paris: Situation et évolution depuis 2016; 2021.
7.
go back to reference Powell J, Gilo N, Foote M, Gil K, Lavin JP. Vacuum and forceps training in residency: experience and self-reported competency. J Perinatol. 2007;27(6):343–6.CrossRefPubMed Powell J, Gilo N, Foote M, Gil K, Lavin JP. Vacuum and forceps training in residency: experience and self-reported competency. J Perinatol. 2007;27(6):343–6.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Gupta N, Dragovic K, Trester R, Blankstein J. The Changing Scenario of Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Training. J Grad Med Educ. 2015;7(3):401–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gupta N, Dragovic K, Trester R, Blankstein J. The Changing Scenario of Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Training. J Grad Med Educ. 2015;7(3):401–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Coste Mazeau P, Boukeffa N, Ticaud Boileau N, Huet S, Traverse M, Eyraud JL, et al. Evaluation of Suzor forceps training by studying obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a retrospective study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):674.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Coste Mazeau P, Boukeffa N, Ticaud Boileau N, Huet S, Traverse M, Eyraud JL, et al. Evaluation of Suzor forceps training by studying obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a retrospective study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):674.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
12.
go back to reference Matsumoto N, Takenaka T, Ikeda N, Yazaki S, Sato Y. Naegele Forceps Delivery and Association between Morbidity and the Number of Forceps Traction Applications: A Retrospective Study. J Pregnancy. 2015;2015:1–7.CrossRef Matsumoto N, Takenaka T, Ikeda N, Yazaki S, Sato Y. Naegele Forceps Delivery and Association between Morbidity and the Number of Forceps Traction Applications: A Retrospective Study. J Pregnancy. 2015;2015:1–7.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Leslie KK, Dipasquale-Lehnerz P, Smith M. Obstetric Forceps Training Using Visual Feedback and the Isometric Strength Testing Unit: Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105(2):377–82.PubMed Leslie KK, Dipasquale-Lehnerz P, Smith M. Obstetric Forceps Training Using Visual Feedback and the Isometric Strength Testing Unit: Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105(2):377–82.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Leboeuf F, Baker R, Barré A, Reay J, Jones R, Sangeux M. The conventional gait model, an open-source implementation that reproduces the past but prepares for the future. Gait Posture. 2019;69:235–41.CrossRefPubMed Leboeuf F, Baker R, Barré A, Reay J, Jones R, Sangeux M. The conventional gait model, an open-source implementation that reproduces the past but prepares for the future. Gait Posture. 2019;69:235–41.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Sorel M, Fradet L, Coste-Mazeau P, Aubard Y, Pizzoferrato AC, Pierre F, et al. A new approach to assessing the obstetrician’s posture and movement during an instrumental forceps delivery. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2023;52(9):102654.CrossRefPubMed Sorel M, Fradet L, Coste-Mazeau P, Aubard Y, Pizzoferrato AC, Pierre F, et al. A new approach to assessing the obstetrician’s posture and movement during an instrumental forceps delivery. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2023;52(9):102654.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Wu G, Siegler S, Allard P, Kirtley C, Leardini A, Rosenbaum D, et al. ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion—part I: ankle, hip, and spine. J Biomech. 2002;35(4):543–8.CrossRefPubMed Wu G, Siegler S, Allard P, Kirtley C, Leardini A, Rosenbaum D, et al. ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion—part I: ankle, hip, and spine. J Biomech. 2002;35(4):543–8.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Wu G, van der Helm FCT, (DirkJan) Veeger HEJ, Makhsous M, Van Roy P, Anglin C, et al. ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion—Part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand. J Biomech. 2005;38(5):981–92.CrossRefPubMed Wu G, van der Helm FCT, (DirkJan) Veeger HEJ, Makhsous M, Van Roy P, Anglin C, et al. ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion—Part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand. J Biomech. 2005;38(5):981–92.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Greenhill JP, Friedman EA. Biological Principles and Modern Practice of Obstetrics. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1974. Greenhill JP, Friedman EA. Biological Principles and Modern Practice of Obstetrics. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1974.
22.
go back to reference Schaal JP. Mécanique et techniques obstétricales. Montpellier: Sauramps médical; 2012. Schaal JP. Mécanique et techniques obstétricales. Montpellier: Sauramps médical; 2012.
23.
go back to reference Massion J, Dufosse M. Coordination Between Posture and Movement: Why and How? Physiology. 1988;3(3):88–93.CrossRef Massion J, Dufosse M. Coordination Between Posture and Movement: Why and How? Physiology. 1988;3(3):88–93.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Dupuis O, Decullier E, Clerc J, Moreau R, Pham MT, Bin-Dorel S, et al. Does forceps training on a birth simulator allow obstetricians to improve forceps blade placement? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;159(2):305–9.CrossRefPubMed Dupuis O, Decullier E, Clerc J, Moreau R, Pham MT, Bin-Dorel S, et al. Does forceps training on a birth simulator allow obstetricians to improve forceps blade placement? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;159(2):305–9.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Vieille P, Mousty E, Letouzey V, Mares P, de Tayrac R. Évaluation de la formation des internes de gynécologie obstétrique sur simulateur d’accouchement. J Gynécologie Obstétrique Biol Reprod. 2015;44(5):471–8.CrossRef Vieille P, Mousty E, Letouzey V, Mares P, de Tayrac R. Évaluation de la formation des internes de gynécologie obstétrique sur simulateur d’accouchement. J Gynécologie Obstétrique Biol Reprod. 2015;44(5):471–8.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Gossett DR, Gilchrist-Scott D, Wayne DB, Gerber SE. Simulation Training for Forceps-Assisted Vaginal Delivery and Rates of Maternal Perineal Trauma. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(3):429–35.CrossRefPubMed Gossett DR, Gilchrist-Scott D, Wayne DB, Gerber SE. Simulation Training for Forceps-Assisted Vaginal Delivery and Rates of Maternal Perineal Trauma. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(3):429–35.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Vacca A. Vacuum-assisted delivery: an analysis of traction force and maternal and neonatal outcomes. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;46(2):124–7.CrossRefPubMed Vacca A. Vacuum-assisted delivery: an analysis of traction force and maternal and neonatal outcomes. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;46(2):124–7.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Analysis of the obstetrician's posture and movements during a simulated forceps delivery
Authors
Manon Sorel
Bertrand Gachon
Perrine Coste-Mazeau
Yves Aubard
Fabrice Pierre
Laetitia Fradet
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06457-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2024 Go to the issue