Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 4/2018

01-08-2018 | Original Article

Analysis of Symmetry Stability Following Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction and Contralateral Management in 582 Patients with Long-Term Outcomes

Authors: M. Barone, A. Cogliandro, M. Signoretti, P. Persichetti

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 4/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

This study aimed to analyse the long-term outcomes following breast reconstruction and contralateral management to evaluate the stability of breast symmetry and patient satisfaction.

Materials and Methods

The study population consisted of women who had undergone implant-based monolateral breast reconstruction and contralateral management. Patients answered the BREAST-Q reconstruction module. Two reviewers analysed the post-operative outcomes of the patients included and compiled the Kroll Scale. Patients were divided into three groups: implant-based contralateral management, breast reduction and mastopexy. The Fisher’s exact test was applied to the results.

Results

From the BREAST-Q analysis, the group of patients undergoing contralateral breast augmentation achieved significantly better results regarding the ability to wear clothing (p ≪ 0.001), symmetry (p ≪ 0.001), psychosocial well-being (p ≪ 0.001) and physical well-being (p ≪ 0.001). From the analysis of the Kroll Scale, the group of implant-based contralateral management received the highest score for symmetry (p ≪ 0.001), shape (p ≪ 0.001) and aesthetic result overall (p ≪ 0.001).

Conclusions

This study was the first to use BREAST-Q to analyse the stability of breast symmetry following breast reconstruction with long-term results. The implant-based contralateral management was the most effective procedure for achieving a stable and lasting result to obtain the high satisfaction of patients.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Barone M, Cogliandro A, Persichetti P (2017) BREAST-Q following breast reconstruction: analysis of breast perception and sexuality. Plast Reconstr Surg 139:1016e–1017eCrossRefPubMed Barone M, Cogliandro A, Persichetti P (2017) BREAST-Q following breast reconstruction: analysis of breast perception and sexuality. Plast Reconstr Surg 139:1016e–1017eCrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Cagli B, Barone M, Ippolito E, Cogliandro A, Silipigni S, Ramella S, Persichetti P (2016) Ten years experience with breast reconstruction after salvage mastectomy in previously irradiated patients: analysis of outcomes, satisfaction and well-being. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 20:4635–4641PubMed Cagli B, Barone M, Ippolito E, Cogliandro A, Silipigni S, Ramella S, Persichetti P (2016) Ten years experience with breast reconstruction after salvage mastectomy in previously irradiated patients: analysis of outcomes, satisfaction and well-being. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 20:4635–4641PubMed
3.
go back to reference Bellino S, Fenocchio M, Zizza M, Rocca G, Bogetti P, Bogetto F (2011) Quality of life of patients who undergo breast reconstruction after mastectomy: effects of personality characteristics. Plast Reconstr Surg 127:10–17CrossRefPubMed Bellino S, Fenocchio M, Zizza M, Rocca G, Bogetti P, Bogetto F (2011) Quality of life of patients who undergo breast reconstruction after mastectomy: effects of personality characteristics. Plast Reconstr Surg 127:10–17CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Serletti JM, Fosnot J, Nelson JA, Disa JJ, Bucky LP (2011) Breast reconstruction after breast cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg 127:124e–135eCrossRefPubMed Serletti JM, Fosnot J, Nelson JA, Disa JJ, Bucky LP (2011) Breast reconstruction after breast cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg 127:124e–135eCrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Satteson ES, Brown BJ, Nahabedian MY (2017) Nipple-areolar complex reconstruction and patient satisfaction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gland Surg 6:4–13CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Satteson ES, Brown BJ, Nahabedian MY (2017) Nipple-areolar complex reconstruction and patient satisfaction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gland Surg 6:4–13CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Filiberti A, Tamburini M, Murru L, Lovo GF, Ventafridda V, Arioli N et al (1986) Psychologic effects and esthetic results of breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Tumori 72:585–588CrossRefPubMed Filiberti A, Tamburini M, Murru L, Lovo GF, Ventafridda V, Arioli N et al (1986) Psychologic effects and esthetic results of breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Tumori 72:585–588CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Pusic AL, Klassen A, Scott A, Klok JA, Cordeiro PG, Cano SJ (2009) Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg 124:345–353CrossRefPubMed Pusic AL, Klassen A, Scott A, Klok JA, Cordeiro PG, Cano SJ (2009) Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg 124:345–353CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Kroll S, Baldwin B (1992) A comparison of outcomes using three different methods of breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 90:455–462CrossRefPubMed Kroll S, Baldwin B (1992) A comparison of outcomes using three different methods of breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 90:455–462CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Barone M, Cogliandro A, La Monaca G, Tambone V, Persichetti P (2015) Cognitive investigation study of patients admitted for cosmetic surgery: information, expectations, and consent for treatment. Arch Plast Surg 42:46–51CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Barone M, Cogliandro A, La Monaca G, Tambone V, Persichetti P (2015) Cognitive investigation study of patients admitted for cosmetic surgery: information, expectations, and consent for treatment. Arch Plast Surg 42:46–51CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Barone M, Cogliandro A, Morelli Coppola M, Persichetti P (2017) The importance of patient satisfaction: A blessing, a curse, or simply irrelevant? Plast Reconstr Surg 140:362e–363eCrossRefPubMed Barone M, Cogliandro A, Morelli Coppola M, Persichetti P (2017) The importance of patient satisfaction: A blessing, a curse, or simply irrelevant? Plast Reconstr Surg 140:362e–363eCrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Waljee JF, Hu ES, Ubel PA, Smith DM, Newman LA, Alderman AK (2008) Effect of esthetic outcome after breast-conserving surgery on psychosocial functioning and quality of life. J Clin Oncol 26:3331–3337CrossRefPubMed Waljee JF, Hu ES, Ubel PA, Smith DM, Newman LA, Alderman AK (2008) Effect of esthetic outcome after breast-conserving surgery on psychosocial functioning and quality of life. J Clin Oncol 26:3331–3337CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Juhl AA, Christensen S, Zachariae R, Damsgaard TE (2017) Unilateral breast reconstruction after mastectomy—patient satisfaction, aesthetic outcome and quality of life. Acta Oncol 56:225–231CrossRefPubMed Juhl AA, Christensen S, Zachariae R, Damsgaard TE (2017) Unilateral breast reconstruction after mastectomy—patient satisfaction, aesthetic outcome and quality of life. Acta Oncol 56:225–231CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Losken A, Schaefer TG, Newell M, Styblo TM (2009) The impact of partial breast reconstruction using reduction techniques on postoperative cancer surveillance. Plast Reconstr Surg 124:9–17CrossRefPubMed Losken A, Schaefer TG, Newell M, Styblo TM (2009) The impact of partial breast reconstruction using reduction techniques on postoperative cancer surveillance. Plast Reconstr Surg 124:9–17CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Nava MB, Rocco N, Catanuto G, Falco G, Capalbo E, Marano L, Bordoni D, Spano A, Scaperrotta G (2015) Impact of contra-lateral breast reshaping on mammographic surveillance in women undergoing breast reconstruction following mastectomy for breast cancer. Breast 24:434–439CrossRefPubMed Nava MB, Rocco N, Catanuto G, Falco G, Capalbo E, Marano L, Bordoni D, Spano A, Scaperrotta G (2015) Impact of contra-lateral breast reshaping on mammographic surveillance in women undergoing breast reconstruction following mastectomy for breast cancer. Breast 24:434–439CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Spear SL, Spittler CJ (2001) Breast reconstruction with implants and expanders. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:177–187CrossRefPubMed Spear SL, Spittler CJ (2001) Breast reconstruction with implants and expanders. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:177–187CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Cogliandro A, Barone M, Cassotta G, Tenna S, Cagli B, Persichetti P (2017) Patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes following 414 breast reductions: application of BREAST-Q. Aesthetic Plast Surg 41:245–249CrossRefPubMed Cogliandro A, Barone M, Cassotta G, Tenna S, Cagli B, Persichetti P (2017) Patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes following 414 breast reductions: application of BREAST-Q. Aesthetic Plast Surg 41:245–249CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Yip JM, Watson DI, Tiggemann M, Hsia S, Smallman AE, Dean NR (2015) Determinants of breast reconstruction outcome: How important is volume symmetry? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 68:679–685CrossRefPubMed Yip JM, Watson DI, Tiggemann M, Hsia S, Smallman AE, Dean NR (2015) Determinants of breast reconstruction outcome: How important is volume symmetry? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 68:679–685CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Uda H, Tomioka YK, Sugawara Y, Sarukawa S, Sunaga A (2015) Shaping of the unaffected breast with brava-assisted autologous fat grafting to obtain symmetry after breast reconstruction. Aesthet Surg J 35:565–573CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Uda H, Tomioka YK, Sugawara Y, Sarukawa S, Sunaga A (2015) Shaping of the unaffected breast with brava-assisted autologous fat grafting to obtain symmetry after breast reconstruction. Aesthet Surg J 35:565–573CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Analysis of Symmetry Stability Following Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction and Contralateral Management in 582 Patients with Long-Term Outcomes
Authors
M. Barone
A. Cogliandro
M. Signoretti
P. Persichetti
Publication date
01-08-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 4/2018
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-018-1082-5

Other articles of this Issue 4/2018

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 4/2018 Go to the issue