Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Urolithiasis 1/2023

01-12-2023 | Research

Analysis of stone-free rates and residual fragment sizes following standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: mistakes in the treatment of non-opaque kidney stones

Authors: Ümit Yildirim, Kemal Sarica, Mehmet Ezer, Mehmet Uslu, İsmet Bilger Erihan, Cengiz Kara

Published in: Urolithiasis | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Our presented study aimed to evaluate the possible effects of stone opacity, on both the success of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and the sizes of residual fragments following the procedure. Medical records of patients undergoing PCNL treatment for kidney stones at our clinic between July 2014 and May 2022 were evaluated in a retrospective manner. A total sample size of 304 patients with the required criteria was included. Patients were divided into two groups based on the radiopacity status of the stones assessed in the kidney-ureter-bladder graphy (KUB) [Group O (n = 211): opaque, Group N (n = 93): non-opaque)]. Demographic data, laboratory results, and surgical follow-up information were comparatively evaluated between groups. The mean age and percentage of female patients were higher in Group N (45.2 vs. 25,1%; p < 0.001). Also, patients in this group were associated with more comorbidities. No significant difference was present regarding stones’ laterality, size, surface area, and localization. Cases in the Group N group demonstrated higher median hemoglobin reduction [1.7 (IQR = 1.2–2.5) vs. 2 (IQR = 1.6–2.6); p = 0.047]. The stone-free rates in Group O patients were higher (67.8% vs. 53.8%; p = 0.014). The size of the residual fragments was meaningfully larger in Group N cases [8 (IQR = 7–13) vs. 10 (IQR = 8–16); p = 0.032]. Finally, no significant difference was observed between the groups regarding both minor (as grade 3a and below) and major (grade 3b and above) assessed by the Modified Clavien-Dindo Classification. Our data show that treatment of patients with so-called non-opaque kidney stones by PCNL results in low SFR and larger residual fragments, which is due to a variety of errors that should be avoided by appropriate measures.
Literature
6.
go back to reference Kim HY, Choe HS, Lee DS et al (2020) Is absence of hydronephrosis a risk factor for bleeding in conventional percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Urol J 17:8–13PubMed Kim HY, Choe HS, Lee DS et al (2020) Is absence of hydronephrosis a risk factor for bleeding in conventional percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Urol J 17:8–13PubMed
8.
go back to reference Maghsoudi R, Etemadian M, Kashi AH, Ranjbaran A (2016) The association of stone opacity in plain radiography with percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes and complications. Urol J 13:2899–2902PubMed Maghsoudi R, Etemadian M, Kashi AH, Ranjbaran A (2016) The association of stone opacity in plain radiography with percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes and complications. Urol J 13:2899–2902PubMed
17.
go back to reference Cracco CM, Noll TK, Liatsikos EN et al (2017) Rigid-only versus combined rigid and flexible percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review. Min Urol Nephrol 69:330–341 Cracco CM, Noll TK, Liatsikos EN et al (2017) Rigid-only versus combined rigid and flexible percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review. Min Urol Nephrol 69:330–341
Metadata
Title
Analysis of stone-free rates and residual fragment sizes following standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: mistakes in the treatment of non-opaque kidney stones
Authors
Ümit Yildirim
Kemal Sarica
Mehmet Ezer
Mehmet Uslu
İsmet Bilger Erihan
Cengiz Kara
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Urolithiasis / Issue 1/2023
Print ISSN: 2194-7228
Electronic ISSN: 2194-7236
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-023-01448-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

Urolithiasis 1/2023 Go to the issue