Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Medical Ultrasonics 2/2019

Open Access 01-04-2019 | Original Article

An ultrasonographic estimated fetal weight reference for Japanese twin pregnancies

Authors: Masaki Sekiguchi, Masashi Mikami, Chie Nakagawa, Mika Ozaki, Shinji Tanigaki, Tohru Kobayashi, Naoyuki Miyasaka, Haruhiko Sago

Published in: Journal of Medical Ultrasonics | Issue 2/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose was to establish an estimated fetal weight (EFW) reference for twin pregnancies in Japan and to compare the growth of twins with singletons.

Methods

We retrospectively investigated Japanese women who delivered live-born twins at our center during the period from 2010 to 2016. The main exclusion criteria were monoamniotic twins, fetal reduction, maternal complications, twin–twin transfusion syndrome, fetal congenital anomalies, and patients with their first visit after 16 weeks’ gestation. The EFW was measured longitudinally from 16 to 37 weeks’ gestation. We calculated the posterior predictive distribution using hierarchical Bayesian models and determined the EFW corresponding to each Z-score.

Results

A total of 364 women (190 dichorionic and 174 monochorionic) were included, and the total number of examinations was 3952. The EFWs of a Z-score of 0 for twins at 20, 28, and 36 weeks’ gestation were 308, 1070, and 2294 g, respectively. The EFW of a Z-score of 0 for twins was 98–101% that of singletons until 21 weeks, gradually becoming lower than that of singletons and reaching 90–93% that of singletons after 27 weeks.

Conclusion

We established an EFW reference for Japanese twin pregnancies. The EFW of twins is similar to that of singletons until the mid-second trimester, gradually becoming lower than that of singletons and reaching about 90% that of singletons in the third trimester.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kulkarni AD, Kissin DM, Adashi EY. Fertility treatments and multiple births in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1070–1.PubMed Kulkarni AD, Kissin DM, Adashi EY. Fertility treatments and multiple births in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1070–1.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Blondel B, Kaminski M. Trends in the occurrence, determinants, and consequences of multiple births. Semin Perinatol. 2002;26:239–49.CrossRefPubMed Blondel B, Kaminski M. Trends in the occurrence, determinants, and consequences of multiple births. Semin Perinatol. 2002;26:239–49.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Tandberg A, Bjorge T, Bordahl PE, et al. Increasing twinning rates in Norway, 1967–2004: the influence of maternal age and assisted reproductive technology (ART). Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86:833–9.CrossRefPubMed Tandberg A, Bjorge T, Bordahl PE, et al. Increasing twinning rates in Norway, 1967–2004: the influence of maternal age and assisted reproductive technology (ART). Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86:833–9.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. ACOG practice bulletin no. 169: multifetal gestations: twin, triplet, and higher-order multifetal pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128:e131–46.CrossRef American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. ACOG practice bulletin no. 169: multifetal gestations: twin, triplet, and higher-order multifetal pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128:e131–46.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Sankilampi U, Hannila ML, Saari A, et al. New population-based references for birth weight, length, and head circumference in singletons and twins from 23 to 43 gestation weeks. Ann Med. 2013;45:446–54.CrossRefPubMed Sankilampi U, Hannila ML, Saari A, et al. New population-based references for birth weight, length, and head circumference in singletons and twins from 23 to 43 gestation weeks. Ann Med. 2013;45:446–54.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Min SJ, Luke B, Gillespie B, et al. Birth weight references for twins. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182:1250–7.CrossRefPubMed Min SJ, Luke B, Gillespie B, et al. Birth weight references for twins. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182:1250–7.CrossRefPubMed
11.
12.
go back to reference Araujo Junior E, Ruano R, Javadian P, et al. Reference charts for fetal biometric parameters in twin pregnancies according to chorionicity. Prenat Diagn. 2014;34:382–8.CrossRefPubMed Araujo Junior E, Ruano R, Javadian P, et al. Reference charts for fetal biometric parameters in twin pregnancies according to chorionicity. Prenat Diagn. 2014;34:382–8.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Shivkumar S, Himes KP, Hutcheon JA, et al. An ultrasound-based fetal weight reference for twins. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213:e1–9.CrossRef Shivkumar S, Himes KP, Hutcheon JA, et al. An ultrasound-based fetal weight reference for twins. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213:e1–9.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Gabbay-Benziv R, Crimmins S, Contag SA. Reference values for sonographically estimated fetal weight in twin gestations stratified by chorionicity: a single center study. J Ultrasound Med. 2017;36:793–8.CrossRefPubMed Gabbay-Benziv R, Crimmins S, Contag SA. Reference values for sonographically estimated fetal weight in twin gestations stratified by chorionicity: a single center study. J Ultrasound Med. 2017;36:793–8.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Madan A, Holland S, Humbert JE, et al. Racial differences in birth weight of term infants in a northern California population. J Perinatol. 2002;22:230–5.CrossRefPubMed Madan A, Holland S, Humbert JE, et al. Racial differences in birth weight of term infants in a northern California population. J Perinatol. 2002;22:230–5.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Buck Louis GM, Grewal J, Albert PS, et al. Racial/ethnic standards for fetal growth: the NICHD Fetal Growth Studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213:449.e1–41.CrossRef Buck Louis GM, Grewal J, Albert PS, et al. Racial/ethnic standards for fetal growth: the NICHD Fetal Growth Studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213:449.e1–41.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Bora SA, Papageorghiou AT, Bottomley C, et al. Reliability of transvaginal ultrasonography at 7–9 weeks’ gestation in the determination of chorionicity and amnionicity in twin pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;32:618–21.CrossRefPubMed Bora SA, Papageorghiou AT, Bottomley C, et al. Reliability of transvaginal ultrasonography at 7–9 weeks’ gestation in the determination of chorionicity and amnionicity in twin pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;32:618–21.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Carroll SG, Soothill PW, Abdel-Fattah SA, et al. Prediction of chorionicity in twin pregnancies at 10–14 weeks of gestation. BJOG. 2002;109:182–6.PubMed Carroll SG, Soothill PW, Abdel-Fattah SA, et al. Prediction of chorionicity in twin pregnancies at 10–14 weeks of gestation. BJOG. 2002;109:182–6.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Okai T. Standard values of ultrasonic measurements in Japanese fetuses. J Med Ultrason. 2003;30:J415–40. Okai T. Standard values of ultrasonic measurements in Japanese fetuses. J Med Ultrason. 2003;30:J415–40.
20.
go back to reference Stirrup OT, Khalil A, D’Antonio F, et al. Fetal growth reference ranges in twin pregnancy: analysis of the Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK) multiple pregnancy cohort. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45:301–7.CrossRefPubMed Stirrup OT, Khalil A, D’Antonio F, et al. Fetal growth reference ranges in twin pregnancy: analysis of the Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK) multiple pregnancy cohort. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45:301–7.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Martinez-Poyer J. In utero analysis of fetal growth: a sonographic weight standard. Radiology. 1991;181:129–33.CrossRefPubMed Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Martinez-Poyer J. In utero analysis of fetal growth: a sonographic weight standard. Radiology. 1991;181:129–33.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG practice bulletin no. 134: fetal growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121:1122–33.CrossRef American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG practice bulletin no. 134: fetal growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121:1122–33.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG practice bulletin no. 173: fetal macrosomia. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128:e195–209.CrossRef American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG practice bulletin no. 173: fetal macrosomia. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128:e195–209.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
An ultrasonographic estimated fetal weight reference for Japanese twin pregnancies
Authors
Masaki Sekiguchi
Masashi Mikami
Chie Nakagawa
Mika Ozaki
Shinji Tanigaki
Tohru Kobayashi
Naoyuki Miyasaka
Haruhiko Sago
Publication date
01-04-2019
Publisher
Springer Singapore
Published in
Journal of Medical Ultrasonics / Issue 2/2019
Print ISSN: 1346-4523
Electronic ISSN: 1613-2254
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-018-0921-y

Other articles of this Issue 2/2019

Journal of Medical Ultrasonics 2/2019 Go to the issue