Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Primary Care 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

An overview of systematic reviews on the collaboration between physicians and nurses and the impact on patient outcomes: what can we learn in primary care?

Authors: Evi Matthys, Roy Remmen, Peter Van Bogaert

Published in: BMC Primary Care | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Primary care needs to be strengthened in order to address the many societal challenges. Group practices in primary care foster collaboration with other health care providers, which encourages care co-ordination and leads to a higher quality of primary care. Nursing roles and responsibilities expanded over time and nurses have been found to often provide equal high-quality chronic patient care compared to physicians, even with higher patient satisfaction. Inter-professional collaboration between primary care physicians and nurses is a possible strategy to achieve the desired quality outcomes in a strengthened primary care system. The objective of this research is to synthesize the evidence presented in literature on the impact of collaboration between physicians and nurses on patient outcomes in primary care or in comparable care settings.

Methods

A systematic review of peer-reviewed reviews was performed in four databases: COCHRANE, MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL. All studies from 1970 until May 22 2016 were included in the search strategy. Titles, abstracts and full texts were respectively reviewed. At least two of the three authors independently reviewed each of the 277 abstracts and 58 full texts retrieved in the searches to identify those which contained all the inclusion criteria. Two authors independently appraised the methodological quality of the reviews, using the AMSTAR quality appraisal tool.

Results

A total of eleven systematic reviews met all the inclusion criteria and almost fifty different patient outcomes were described. In most reviews, it was concluded that nurses do have added value. Blood pressure, patient satisfaction and hospitalization are patient outcomes where three or more systematic reviews concluded better results when physicians and nurses collaborated, compared to usual care. Colorectal screening, hospital length of stay and health-related quality of life are outcomes where collaboration appeared not to be effective.

Conclusions

Collaboration between physicians and nurses may have a positive impact on a number of patient outcomes and on a variety of pathologies. To address future challenges of primary care, there is a need for more integrated inter-professional collaboration care models with sufficiently educated nurses.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference OECD. Health at a Glance: Europe 2016. State of Health in the EU Cycle. 4th edition. OECD publishing; 2016. p. 204. OECD. Health at a Glance: Europe 2016. State of Health in the EU Cycle. 4th edition. OECD publishing; 2016. p. 204.
3.
go back to reference Ogden J, et al. I want more time with my doctor: a quantitative study of time and the consultation. Fam Pract. 2004;21(5):479–83.CrossRefPubMed Ogden J, et al. I want more time with my doctor: a quantitative study of time and the consultation. Fam Pract. 2004;21(5):479–83.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Kacenelenbogen N, Offermans AM, Roland M. Burnout of general practitioners in Belgium: societal consequences and paths to solutions. Rev Med Brux. 2011;32(4):413–23.PubMed Kacenelenbogen N, Offermans AM, Roland M. Burnout of general practitioners in Belgium: societal consequences and paths to solutions. Rev Med Brux. 2011;32(4):413–23.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Goetz K, et al. The influence of workload and health behavior on job satisfaction of general practitioners. Fam Med. 2013;45(2):95–101.PubMed Goetz K, et al. The influence of workload and health behavior on job satisfaction of general practitioners. Fam Med. 2013;45(2):95–101.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Gerkens SM, Belgium S. Health System Review. Health Systems in Transition. 2010;12(5):1–266.PubMed Gerkens SM, Belgium S. Health System Review. Health Systems in Transition. 2010;12(5):1–266.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Berwick DM, Nolan TW, Whittington J. The triple aim: care, health, and cost. Health Aff (Millwood). 2008;27(3):759–69.CrossRef Berwick DM, Nolan TW, Whittington J. The triple aim: care, health, and cost. Health Aff (Millwood). 2008;27(3):759–69.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kringos DSB, Hutchinson A WGW, Saltman RB. Building Primary Care in a Changing Europe: Case Studies. European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. 2015;38:172. Kringos DSB, Hutchinson A WGW, Saltman RB. Building Primary Care in a Changing Europe: Case Studies. European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. 2015;38:172.
9.
go back to reference Hildebrandt H, et al. Pursuing the triple aim: evaluation of the integrated care system Gesundes Kinzigtal: population health, patient experience and cost-effectiveness. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2015;58(4–5):383–92.CrossRefPubMed Hildebrandt H, et al. Pursuing the triple aim: evaluation of the integrated care system Gesundes Kinzigtal: population health, patient experience and cost-effectiveness. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2015;58(4–5):383–92.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Sikka R, Morath JM, Leape L. The quadruple aim: care, health, cost and meaning in work. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015;24(10):608–10.CrossRefPubMed Sikka R, Morath JM, Leape L. The quadruple aim: care, health, cost and meaning in work. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015;24(10):608–10.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference van Uden CJ, Crebolder HF. Does setting up out of hours primary care cooperatives outside a hospital reduce demand for emergency care? Emerg Med J. 2004;21(6):722–3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral van Uden CJ, Crebolder HF. Does setting up out of hours primary care cooperatives outside a hospital reduce demand for emergency care? Emerg Med J. 2004;21(6):722–3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference van Loenen T, et al. Organizational aspects of primary care related to avoidable hospitalization: a systematic review. Fam Pract. 2014;31(5):502–16.CrossRefPubMed van Loenen T, et al. Organizational aspects of primary care related to avoidable hospitalization: a systematic review. Fam Pract. 2014;31(5):502–16.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Longman JM, et al. Admissions for chronic ambulatory care sensitive conditions - a useful measure of potentially preventable admission? BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:472.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Longman JM, et al. Admissions for chronic ambulatory care sensitive conditions - a useful measure of potentially preventable admission? BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:472.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
16.
go back to reference Shea BJ, et al. AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):1013–20.CrossRefPubMed Shea BJ, et al. AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):1013–20.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Pollock M, Fernandes RM, Hartling L. Evaluation of AMSTAR to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017;17(1):48.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pollock M, Fernandes RM, Hartling L. Evaluation of AMSTAR to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017;17(1):48.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Specialized nursing practice for chronic disease management in the primary care setting: an evidence-based analysis. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2013;13(10):1–66. Specialized nursing practice for chronic disease management in the primary care setting: an evidence-based analysis. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2013;13(10):1–66.
20.
go back to reference Martin, J.S., et al., Interprofessional collaboration among nurses and physicians: Making a difference in patient outcome. Swiss Med. Wkly, 2010. 140(SEPTEMBER). Martin, J.S., et al., Interprofessional collaboration among nurses and physicians: Making a difference in patient outcome. Swiss Med. Wkly, 2010. 140(SEPTEMBER).
21.
go back to reference Snaterse M, et al. Effective components of nurse-coordinated care to prevent recurrent coronary events: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart. 2016;102(1):50–6.CrossRefPubMed Snaterse M, et al. Effective components of nurse-coordinated care to prevent recurrent coronary events: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart. 2016;102(1):50–6.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Allen J, et al. Quality care outcomes following transitional care interventions for older people from hospital to home: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:346.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Allen J, et al. Quality care outcomes following transitional care interventions for older people from hospital to home: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:346.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Newhouse, R.P., et al., Advanced practice nurse outcomes 1990-2008: a systematic review. Nurs Econ, 2011. 29(5): p. 230–250; quiz 251. Newhouse, R.P., et al., Advanced practice nurse outcomes 1990-2008: a systematic review. Nurs Econ, 2011. 29(5): p. 230–250; quiz 251.
24.
go back to reference Smith AA, Kepka D, Yabroff KR. Advanced practice registered nurses, physician assistants and cancer prevention and screening: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:68.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Smith AA, Kepka D, Yabroff KR. Advanced practice registered nurses, physician assistants and cancer prevention and screening: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:68.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Stalpers D, et al. Associations between characteristics of the nurse work environment and five nurse-sensitive patient outcomes in hospitals: a systematic review of literature. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015;52(4):817–35.CrossRefPubMed Stalpers D, et al. Associations between characteristics of the nurse work environment and five nurse-sensitive patient outcomes in hospitals: a systematic review of literature. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015;52(4):817–35.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Team-Based Models for End-of-Life Care: An Evidence-Based Analysis. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2014;14(20):1–49. Team-Based Models for End-of-Life Care: An Evidence-Based Analysis. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2014;14(20):1–49.
28.
go back to reference Shaw RJ, et al. Effects of nurse-managed protocols in the outpatient management of adults with chronic conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2014;161(2):113–21.CrossRefPubMed Shaw RJ, et al. Effects of nurse-managed protocols in the outpatient management of adults with chronic conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2014;161(2):113–21.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Renders Carry M, et al. Interventions to improve the management of diabetes mellitus in primary care, outpatient and community settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001481.. Renders Carry M, et al. Interventions to improve the management of diabetes mellitus in primary care, outpatient and community settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000. doi:10.​1002/​14651858.​CD001481.​.
30.
go back to reference Dwan K, et al. Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias - an updated review. PLoS One. 2013;8(7):e66844.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dwan K, et al. Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias - an updated review. PLoS One. 2013;8(7):e66844.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
go back to reference Mahler C, et al. Terminology for interprofessional collaboration: definition and current practice. GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2014;31(4):Doc40.PubMedPubMedCentral Mahler C, et al. Terminology for interprofessional collaboration: definition and current practice. GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2014;31(4):Doc40.PubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference O'Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J. Why, and how, mixed methods research is undertaken in health services research in England: a mixed methods study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007;7:85.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral O'Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J. Why, and how, mixed methods research is undertaken in health services research in England: a mixed methods study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007;7:85.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
go back to reference Zwarenstein M, Bryant W. Interventions to promote collaboration between nurses and doctors. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;2:CD000072. Zwarenstein M, Bryant W. Interventions to promote collaboration between nurses and doctors. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;2:CD000072.
34.
go back to reference Morgan S, Pullon S, McKinlay E. Observation of interprofessional collaborative practice in primary care teams: an integrative literature review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015;52(7):1217–30.CrossRefPubMed Morgan S, Pullon S, McKinlay E. Observation of interprofessional collaborative practice in primary care teams: an integrative literature review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015;52(7):1217–30.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Rosenstein, A.H. and M. O'Daniel, Disruptive behavior and clinical outcomes: perceptions of nurses and physicians. Am J Nurs, 2005. 105(1): p. 54–64; quiz 64-5. Rosenstein, A.H. and M. O'Daniel, Disruptive behavior and clinical outcomes: perceptions of nurses and physicians. Am J Nurs, 2005. 105(1): p. 54–64; quiz 64-5.
36.
go back to reference Manojlovich M, DeCicco B. Healthy work environments, nurse-physician communication, and patients' outcomes. Am J Crit Care. 2007;16(6):536–43.PubMed Manojlovich M, DeCicco B. Healthy work environments, nurse-physician communication, and patients' outcomes. Am J Crit Care. 2007;16(6):536–43.PubMed
37.
go back to reference Zwarenstein M, et al. Structuring communication relationships for Interprofessional teamwork (SCRIPT): a cluster randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2007;8:23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zwarenstein M, et al. Structuring communication relationships for Interprofessional teamwork (SCRIPT): a cluster randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2007;8:23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
go back to reference Schmalenberg C, et al. Excellence through evidence: securing collegial/collaborative nurse-physician relationships, part 1. J Nurs Adm. 2005;35(10):450–8.CrossRefPubMed Schmalenberg C, et al. Excellence through evidence: securing collegial/collaborative nurse-physician relationships, part 1. J Nurs Adm. 2005;35(10):450–8.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Xyrichis A, Lowton K. What fosters or prevents interprofessional teamworking in primary and community care? A literature review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2008;45(1):140–53.CrossRefPubMed Xyrichis A, Lowton K. What fosters or prevents interprofessional teamworking in primary and community care? A literature review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2008;45(1):140–53.CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Supper I, et al. Interprofessional collaboration in primary health care: a review of facilitators and barriers perceived by involved actors. J Public Health (Oxf). 2015;37(4):716–27. Supper I, et al. Interprofessional collaboration in primary health care: a review of facilitators and barriers perceived by involved actors. J Public Health (Oxf). 2015;37(4):716–27.
42.
go back to reference Walker L, Clendon J, Nelson K. Nursing roles and responsibilities in general practice: three case studies. J Prim Health Care. 2015;7(3):236–43.PubMed Walker L, Clendon J, Nelson K. Nursing roles and responsibilities in general practice: three case studies. J Prim Health Care. 2015;7(3):236–43.PubMed
43.
go back to reference Freund T, et al. Skill mix, roles and remuneration in the primary care workforce: who are the healthcare professionals in the primary care teams across the world? Int J Nurs Stud. 2015;52(3):727–43.CrossRefPubMed Freund T, et al. Skill mix, roles and remuneration in the primary care workforce: who are the healthcare professionals in the primary care teams across the world? Int J Nurs Stud. 2015;52(3):727–43.CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Maier, C.E.A., Nurses in Advanced Roles in Primary Care: Policy Levers for Implementation OECD Health Working Papers. Paris: OECD Publishing. Maier, C.E.A., Nurses in Advanced Roles in Primary Care: Policy Levers for Implementation OECD Health Working Papers. Paris: OECD Publishing.
45.
go back to reference Steinman MA, et al. Improving antibiotic selection: a systematic review and quantitative analysis of quality improvement strategies. Med Care. 2006;44(7):617–28.CrossRefPubMed Steinman MA, et al. Improving antibiotic selection: a systematic review and quantitative analysis of quality improvement strategies. Med Care. 2006;44(7):617–28.CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Walsh JM, et al. Quality improvement strategies for hypertension management: a systematic review. Med Care. 2006;44(7):646–57.CrossRefPubMed Walsh JM, et al. Quality improvement strategies for hypertension management: a systematic review. Med Care. 2006;44(7):646–57.CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Shojania KG, et al. The effects of on-screen, point of care computer reminders on processes and outcomes of care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;3:Cd001096. Shojania KG, et al. The effects of on-screen, point of care computer reminders on processes and outcomes of care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;3:Cd001096.
Metadata
Title
An overview of systematic reviews on the collaboration between physicians and nurses and the impact on patient outcomes: what can we learn in primary care?
Authors
Evi Matthys
Roy Remmen
Peter Van Bogaert
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Primary Care / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 2731-4553
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-017-0698-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Primary Care 1/2017 Go to the issue