Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Current Dermatology Reports

02-05-2024 | REVIEW

An Overview of Airborne Contact Dermatitis

Author: Neetu Jain

Published in: Current Dermatology Reports

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Airborne contact dermatitis (ABCD) is a morphological diagnosis that include all acute or chronic dermatoses of the exposed parts of the body, which are caused by substances which are released into the air, and settle on the exposed skin. Present study highlights the common antigens, clinical manifestation, nature of allergens, pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of ABCD.

Recent Findings

Acids and alkalis, metals and metallic salt powders, cement, industrial solvents, glass fibres, sewage sludge, ammonia, woods, plastics, rubbers and glues, vegetable, insecticides, pesticides, animal feed additives, and many plant products are common airborne irritants and allergens. The physical state of the airborne contactants can also be classified as volatile airborne contactants such as acids, alkalis, ammonia, and pesticides; droplets such as insecticides, perfumes, and hair sprays; powders such as aluminium, anhydrous calcium silicate, and metallic oxides; and particles such as tree sawing particles, wool, and plastics. The Compositae family is increasingly being recognized as the principal cause of plant contact dermatitis. In India, Parthenium dermatitis is the most common kind of airborne contact dermatitis. There is no scoring method in place to determine the severity of this chronic condition, which has a remitting and relapsing course and causes severe morbidity and quality of life impairment.

Summary

Although a skilled eye can easily make the diagnosis of ABCD, a treating dermatologist may find it challenging to identify the underlying cause and cure the resulting clinical condition through avoidance.
Literature
1.
Gauss WF, Alarie JP, Karol MH. Workplace allergenicity of a psyllium-containing bulk laxative. Allergy. 1985;40:73–6.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Rietschel RL, Fowler JF. Fisher’s Contact Dermatitis. Hamilton: BC Decker Inc; 2008. p. 69–101.
3.
Sharma VK, Sethuraman G, Tejasvi T. Comparison of patch test contact sensitivity acetone and aqueous extracts of Parthenium hysterophorus in patients with airborne contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 2004;50:230–2.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Goossens A, Hulst KV. Occupational contact dermatitis in the pharmaceutical industry. Clin Dermatol. 2011;29:662–8.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Ghosh S. Airborne contact dermatitis: An urban perspective. In: Mitra AK, editor. Perils of Urban Pollution: Proceedings National Seminar on Pollution in Urban Industrial Environment. Kolkata: St Xavier’s College; 2006. p. 9–12.
6.
Lammintausta K, Neuvonen H. Airborne allergic contact dermatitis from 4-(bromomethyl)benzoicacid in a university chemist. Contact Dermatitis. 2008;58:314–5.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Neumark M, Ingber A, Levin M, Slodownik D. Occupational airborne contact dermatitis caused by pantoprazole. Contact Dermatitis. 2011;64:60–1.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Clark RA, Chong B, Mirchandani N, Brinster NK, Yamanaka K, Dowgiert RK, et al. The vast majority of CLA+ T cells are resident in normal skin. J Immunol. 2006;176(7):4431–9.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Kostner L, Anzengruber F, Guillod C, Recher M, Schmid-Grendelmeier P, Navarini AA. Allergic contact dermatitis. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2017;37(1):141–52.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Gupta SK, Gupta V. An Overview of Airborne Contact Dermatitis. Air Water Borne Dis. 2016;5(1):1–3.CrossRef
11.
Christophe J. Le Coz, Ducomb SG. In: Frosch PJ, Menne T, Lepoittevin JP, editors. Plants and Plant Products Contact Dermatitis. 4th ed. Heidelberg: Springer; 2006. p. 751–800.
12.
• Bonamonte D, Romita P, Filoni A, Angelini G, Foti C. Airborne Contact Dermatitis. The Open Dermato J. 2020;14:31–7. In this systemic review Epidemiology and pathogenic mechanism, differential diagnosis of fiberglass dermatitis, body parts commonly involved were summarized. They concluded that among the various clinical forms, airborne contact dermatitis interests the parts of the body exposed to the air; face, neck, upper aspect of the chest, hands, wrists.CrossRef
13.
Dooms-Goossens A, Deveylder H, Duron C, Dooms M, Degreef H. Airborne contact urticaria due to cinchona. Contact Dermatitis. 1986;15:258.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Yokozeki H, Satoh T, Katayama I, Nishioka K. Airborne contact dermatitis due to Japanese cedar pollen. Contact Dermatitis. 2007;56:224–8.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Proietti L, Gueli G, Bella R, Vasta N, Bonanno G. Airborne contact dermatitis caused by latex exposure: A clinical case. Clin Ter. 2006;157:341–4.PubMed
16.
Ackermann L, Aalto-Korte K, Jolanki R, Alanko K. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from cinnamon including one case from airborne exposure. Contact Dermatitis. 2009;60:96–9.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Paulsen E, Larsen FS, Christensen LP, Andersen KE. Airborne contact dermatitis from Eucalyptus pulverulenta ‘Baby Blue’ in a florist. Contact Dermatitis. 2008;59:171–3.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Mahajan VK, Sharma NL. Occupational airborne contact dermatitis caused by Pinusrox burghii sawdust. Contact Dermatitis. 2010;64:110–20.CrossRef
19.
Lonkar A, Jog MK. Dermatitis caused by plant Parthenium hysterophorus: A case report. Ind J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 1968;34:194–6.
20.
Bajaj AK, Govil DC, Bhargave SN. Contact dermatitis due to plants. lnd J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 1982;48:268–70.
21.
Sharma SC, Kaur S. Airborne contact dermatitis from Compositae plant in Northern India. Contact Dermatitis. 1989;21:1–15.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Sharma VK, Verma P. Parthenium dermatitis in India: Past, present and future. Ind J Dermatol Venerol Leprol. 2012;78:560–8.CrossRef
23.
• Srinivas K, Nanda K. Study of etiopathogenesis of air borne contact dermatitis. IP Indian J Clin Exp Dermatol. 2020;6(2):178–1. Patients having a clinical picture and medical history that supported airborne contact dermatitis (ABCD) as a result of patch testing for Parthenium hysterophorus, Chrysanthemum, and Xanthiumwere included in this study. During Patch testing 82 patients were found positive for Partheniumfollowed by 9 patients for Chrysanthemum, 3 for Xanthium and 6 for other chemicals.CrossRef
24.
Handa S, De D, Mahajan R. Airborne contact dermatitis - current perspectives in etiopathogenesis and management. Indian J Dermatol. 2011;56(6):700–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
25.
Dooms-Goossens AE, Debusschere KM, Gevers DM, Dupr´e KM, Degreef HJ, Loncke JP, et al. Contact dermatitis caused by airborne agents. JAm Acad Dermatol. 1986;15(1):1–10.CrossRef
26.
Swinnen I, Goossens A. An update on airborne contact dermatitis: 2007–2011. Contact Dermatitis. 2013;68:232–8.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Dickel H, Leiste A, Tran DH, Stücker M, Altmeyer P. “Spring-summer-fall dermatitis” in a florist. Consequences for workmen’s compensation insurance Hautarzt. 2008;59:922–8.PubMed
28.
Clark RA, Adinoff AD. Aeroallergen contact can exacerbate atopic dermatitis: Patch test as a diagnostic tool. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1989;21:8639.CrossRef
29.
Poltronieri A, Partrini L, Pigatto P, Riboldi L, Marsili C, Previdi M, et al. Occupational allergic “march”. Rapid evolution of contact dermatitis to ammonium persulfate into airborne contact dermatitis with rhinitis and asthma in hairdresser. Med Lav. 2010;101:403–8.PubMed
30.
Huygen S, Goossen A. An update on airborne contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 2001;44:1–6.CrossRef
31.
Pillette M, Claudel JP, Muller C, Lorette G. Contact dermatitis caused by pristinamycin after sensitization to topical virginiamycin. Allerg Immunol. 1990;22:197.
32.
Foti C, Bonamonte D, Carino M, Mastrandrea V, Angelini G. Occupational airborne contact allergy to cyanamide and dibenzyl phosphite. Contact Dermat. 2003;48:272–90.CrossRef
33.
Minciullo PL, Imbesi S, Tigano V, Gangemi S. Airborne contact dermatitis to drugs. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2013;41(2):121–6.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Bonnekoh B, Merk HF. Airborne allergic contact dermatitis from benzoyl peroxide as a bleachingagent of candle wax. Contact Dermatitis. 1991;24:367–8.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Komerichi P, Aberer W, Kranke B. An 8-year experience in airborne contact dermatitis. Wien KlinWochenschi. 2004;116:322–5.
36.
Bencko V. Chromium: a review of environmental and occupational toxicology. J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol. 1985;29(1):37–46.PubMed
37.
Wright AM, Cahill JL. Airborne exposure to methylisothiazolinone in paint causing allergic contact dermatitis: An Australian perspective. Aust J Dermat. 2016;57(4):294–5.CrossRef
38.
Goodier MC, Ljungberg L, Persson C, Engfeldt M, Bruze M, Warshaw EM. Allergic Contact Dermatitis from Methylisothiazolinone in Residential Wall Paint. Dermatitis. 2017;28(4):284–7.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Giorgini S, Martinelli C, D’Erme AM, Lotti TM. A case of airborne allergic contact dermatitis by rubber additives. G Ital Dermatol Venereol. 2010;145:133–4.PubMed
40.
Bonamonte D, Foti C, Cassano N, Rigano L, Angelini G. Contact dermatitis from organophosphorus pesticides. Contact Dermatitis. 2001;44:179–80.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Corazza M, Zauli S, Pagnoni A, Virgili A. Allergic Contact Dermatitis Caused by Metals in Blackboard Chalk: A Case Report. Acta Derm Venereol. 2012;92(4):436–7.PubMedCrossRef
42.
• Tramontana M, Hansel K, Bianchi L, Sensini C, Malatesta N, Stingeni L. Advancing the understanding of allergic contact dermatitis: from pathophysiology to novel therapeutic approaches. Front Med. 2023;10:1184289. https://​doi.​org/​10.​3389/​fmed.​2023.​1184289. In this article epidemiology, pathomechanism, clinical features, culprit allergens, diagnosis, and treatment of allergic contact dermatitis was discussed.CrossRef
43.
Johansson H, Lindstedt M, Albrekt AS, Borrebaeck CA. A genomic biomarker signature can predict skin sensitizers using a cell-based in vitro alternative to animal tests. BMC Genomics. 2011;12(1):399.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
44.
45.
• Isaksson M, Rustemeyer T, Antelmi A. Contact allergy to dental materials and implants. In: Johansen J, Mahler V, Lepoittevin JP, Frosch P, editors. Contact dermatitis. Cham: Springer; 2020. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-3-319-72451-5_​39-2. This article deals with multiple factors causing irritant contact dermatitis and major sensitizers like methacrylates in dentin bonding agents, dental composite resins (DCR), and prostheses, in addition to rubber chemicals, metals, fragrances, and disinfectants.
46.
Nicholson PJ, Llewellyn D, English JS. On behalf of the Guidelines Development Group. Evidence-based guidelines for the prevention, identification and management of occupational contact dermatitis and urticaria. Contact Dermatitis. 2010;63:177–86.
47.
Ang P, Chua SH, Gan SL. Allergens and Irritants. In: Ng SK, Goh CL, editors. The principles and practice of contact and occupational dermatology in the Asia-Pacific region. New Jersey: World Scientific; 2001. p. 71–115.
48.
Sharma VK, Bhat R, Sethuraman G, Manchanda Y. Treatment of Parthenium dermatitis with methotrexate. Contact Dermatitis. 2007;57:118–9.PubMedCrossRef
49.
Verma KK, Mahesh R, Srivastava P, Ramam M, Mukhopadhyaya AK. Azathioprine versus betamethasone for the treatment of parthenium dermatitis: A randomized controlled study. Ind J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2008;74:453–7.CrossRef
50.
Dogra S, Parsad D, Handa S. Narrow band ultraviolet B in air borne contact dermatitis: A ray of hope! Br J Dermatol. 2004;150:367–99.CrossRef
51.
Handa S, Sahoo B, Sharma VK. Oral hyposensitization in patients with contact dermatitis from Parthenium hysterophorus. Contact Dermatitis. 2001;44:279–82.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
An Overview of Airborne Contact Dermatitis
Author
Neetu Jain
Publication date
02-05-2024
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Current Dermatology Reports
Electronic ISSN: 2162-4933
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13671-024-00428-w