Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 9/2005

01-09-2005 | Original Article

An open study of methotrimeprazine in the management of nausea and vomiting in patients with advanced cancer

Authors: A. Kennett, J. Hardy, S. Shah, R. A’Hern

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 9/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Nausea and vomiting are distressing symptoms affecting between 20% and 70% of patients with advanced cancer. Methotrimeprazine is a phenothiazine antipsychotic used in palliative care for the management of terminal agitation and nausea/vomiting but there is only anecdotal evidence to support its use in palliative care.

Aim

To establish whether nausea/vomiting in palliative care patients is improved by the administration of low-dose methotrimeprazine.

Methods

Patients with advanced malignancy were entered at different treatment levels according to symptom severity. The dose was altered according to response (minimum dose 6.25 mg daily po, maximum 25 mg by 24-h subcutaneous infusion). Symptoms and side effects were recorded daily from 0 (baseline) to day 5 using a four-point scale. Any improvement in nausea/vomiting score was taken as a response.

Results

Sixty-five patients were entered. The cause of nausea and vomiting was multifactorial in the majority of patients, 35/65 (54%). As expected in a study of patients with poor performance status, the attrition rate was high. Of 53 patients evaluable for response at day 2, 33 (62%) showed some improvement in nausea or vomiting. At day 5, improvement was seen in 20/34 (58%). There was no significant change in “side effects” from baseline with time.

Conclusion

These results suggest that methotrimeprazine has antiemetic activity.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Twycross R, Back I (1998) Nausea and vomiting in advanced cancer. Eur J Palliat Care 5(2):39–45 Twycross R, Back I (1998) Nausea and vomiting in advanced cancer. Eur J Palliat Care 5(2):39–45
2.
go back to reference Twycross RG, Barkby GD, Hallwood PM (1997) The use of low dose methotrimeprazine (methotrimeprazine) in the management of nausea and vomiting. Prog Palliat Care 5(2):49–53 Twycross RG, Barkby GD, Hallwood PM (1997) The use of low dose methotrimeprazine (methotrimeprazine) in the management of nausea and vomiting. Prog Palliat Care 5(2):49–53
3.
go back to reference Oliver DJ (1985) The use of methotrimeprazine in terminal care. Br J Clin Pract 39(9):339–340 Oliver DJ (1985) The use of methotrimeprazine in terminal care. Br J Clin Pract 39(9):339–340
4.
go back to reference Higi M, Niederle N, Bierbaum W et al (1980) Pronounced antiemetic activity of the antipsychotic drug methotrimeprazine (L) in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 97:81–86 Higi M, Niederle N, Bierbaum W et al (1980) Pronounced antiemetic activity of the antipsychotic drug methotrimeprazine (L) in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 97:81–86
5.
go back to reference Vetter V, Beck JD (1995) The prevention of nausea and vomiting in children on chemotherapy. Monschr Kinderheilkd 143:1242–1246 Vetter V, Beck JD (1995) The prevention of nausea and vomiting in children on chemotherapy. Monschr Kinderheilkd 143:1242–1246
6.
go back to reference Dobkin AB, Purkin N (1960) Double blind study of phenothiazines used in pre-anaesthetic medication; a clinical evaluation of promethazine (Phenergan), promazine (Sparine), prochlorperazine (Stemetil) and methotrimeprazine (Nozinan). Can Anaesth Soc J 7:158–165 Dobkin AB, Purkin N (1960) Double blind study of phenothiazines used in pre-anaesthetic medication; a clinical evaluation of promethazine (Phenergan), promazine (Sparine), prochlorperazine (Stemetil) and methotrimeprazine (Nozinan). Can Anaesth Soc J 7:158–165
7.
go back to reference Lichter I (1993) Results of antiemetic management in terminal illness. J Palliat Care 9 (2):19–21 Lichter I (1993) Results of antiemetic management in terminal illness. J Palliat Care 9 (2):19–21
8.
go back to reference Edmonds PM, Stuttaford JM, Penny J et al (1998) Do hospital palliative care teams improve symptom control? Use of a modified STAS as an evaluation tool. Palliat Med 12 (5):345–351 Edmonds PM, Stuttaford JM, Penny J et al (1998) Do hospital palliative care teams improve symptom control? Use of a modified STAS as an evaluation tool. Palliat Med 12 (5):345–351
9.
go back to reference Critchley P, Plach N, Grantham M et al (2001) Efficacy of Haloperidol in the treatment of nausea and vomiting in the palliative patient: a systematic review. J Pain Symptom Manage 22(2):631–633 Critchley P, Plach N, Grantham M et al (2001) Efficacy of Haloperidol in the treatment of nausea and vomiting in the palliative patient: a systematic review. J Pain Symptom Manage 22(2):631–633
10.
go back to reference Mystakidou K, Befon S, Liossi C, Vlachos L (1998) Comparison of the efficacy and safety of tropisetron, metoclopramide, and chlorpromazine in the treatment of emesis associated with far advanced cancer. Cancer 83(6):1214–1223 Mystakidou K, Befon S, Liossi C, Vlachos L (1998) Comparison of the efficacy and safety of tropisetron, metoclopramide, and chlorpromazine in the treatment of emesis associated with far advanced cancer. Cancer 83(6):1214–1223
11.
go back to reference Bruera E, Belzile M, Neumann C et al (2000) A double blind crossover study of controlled release metoclopramide and placebo for the chronic nausea and dyspepsia of advanced cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage 19(6):427–435 Bruera E, Belzile M, Neumann C et al (2000) A double blind crossover study of controlled release metoclopramide and placebo for the chronic nausea and dyspepsia of advanced cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage 19(6):427–435
12.
go back to reference Corli O, Cozzolino A, Battaiotto L (1995) Effectiveness of levosulpiride versus metoclopramide for nausea and vomiting in advanced cancer patients: a double-blind, randomized, crossover study. J Pain Symptom Manage 10(7):521–526 Corli O, Cozzolino A, Battaiotto L (1995) Effectiveness of levosulpiride versus metoclopramide for nausea and vomiting in advanced cancer patients: a double-blind, randomized, crossover study. J Pain Symptom Manage 10(7):521–526
13.
go back to reference Bruera E, MacEachern TJ, Spachynski KA et al (1994) Comparison of the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of controlled release and immediate release metoclopramide for the management of chronic nausea in patients with advanced cancer. Cancer 74(12):3204–3211 Bruera E, MacEachern TJ, Spachynski KA et al (1994) Comparison of the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of controlled release and immediate release metoclopramide for the management of chronic nausea in patients with advanced cancer. Cancer 74(12):3204–3211
14.
go back to reference Bruera E, Sefert L, Watanabe S et al (1996) Chronic nausea in advanced cancer patients: a retrospective assessment of a metoclopramide-based antiemetic regimen. J Pain Symptom Manage 11(3):147–153 Bruera E, Sefert L, Watanabe S et al (1996) Chronic nausea in advanced cancer patients: a retrospective assessment of a metoclopramide-based antiemetic regimen. J Pain Symptom Manage 11(3):147–153
15.
go back to reference Nelson K, Walsh D (1993) Metoclopramide in anorexia caused by cancer-associated dyspepsia syndrome (CADS). J Palliat Care 9(2):14–18 Nelson K, Walsh D (1993) Metoclopramide in anorexia caused by cancer-associated dyspepsia syndrome (CADS). J Palliat Care 9(2):14–18
16.
go back to reference Bruera E, Brenneis C, Michaud M et al (1987) Continuous sc infusion for treatment of narcotic bowel syndrome. Cancer Treat Rep 71(11):1121–1122 Bruera E, Brenneis C, Michaud M et al (1987) Continuous sc infusion for treatment of narcotic bowel syndrome. Cancer Treat Rep 71(11):1121–1122
17.
go back to reference Bruera E, MacDonald N, Brenneis C et al (1986) Metoclopramide infusion with a disposable portable pump. Ann Intern Med 104(6):896 Bruera E, MacDonald N, Brenneis C et al (1986) Metoclopramide infusion with a disposable portable pump. Ann Intern Med 104(6):896
18.
go back to reference Wilson J, Plourde J-Y, Marshall D et al (2002) Long-term safety and clinical effectiveness of controlled-release metoclopramide in cancer-associated dyspepsia syndrome: a multicentre evaluation. J Palliat Care 18(2):84–91 Wilson J, Plourde J-Y, Marshall D et al (2002) Long-term safety and clinical effectiveness of controlled-release metoclopramide in cancer-associated dyspepsia syndrome: a multicentre evaluation. J Palliat Care 18(2):84–91
19.
go back to reference Glare P, Pereira G, Kristjanson L, Stockler M (2004) Systematic review of the efficacy of antiemetics in the treatment of nausea in patients with far-advanced cancer. Support Care Cancer 12:432–440 Glare P, Pereira G, Kristjanson L, Stockler M (2004) Systematic review of the efficacy of antiemetics in the treatment of nausea in patients with far-advanced cancer. Support Care Cancer 12:432–440
20.
go back to reference Jordhoy M, Kaasa S, Fayers P et al (1999) Challenges in palliative care research: recruitment, attrition and compliance: experience from a randomised controlled trial. Palliat Med 13:299–310 Jordhoy M, Kaasa S, Fayers P et al (1999) Challenges in palliative care research: recruitment, attrition and compliance: experience from a randomised controlled trial. Palliat Med 13:299–310
21.
go back to reference Dickman A, Littlewood C, Varga J (2003) The syringe driver-continuous subcutaneous infusions in palliative care. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK Dickman A, Littlewood C, Varga J (2003) The syringe driver-continuous subcutaneous infusions in palliative care. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
Metadata
Title
An open study of methotrimeprazine in the management of nausea and vomiting in patients with advanced cancer
Authors
A. Kennett
J. Hardy
S. Shah
R. A’Hern
Publication date
01-09-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 9/2005
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-004-0768-1

Other articles of this Issue 9/2005

Supportive Care in Cancer 9/2005 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine