Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Surgical Endoscopy
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 7/2018

01-07-2018

An observational study of the timing of surgery, use of laparoscopy and outcomes for acute cholecystitis in the USA and UK

Authors: A. C. Murray, S. Markar, H. Mackenzie, O. Baser, T. Wiggins, A. Askari, G. Hanna, O. Faiz, E. Mayer, C. Bicknell, A. Darzi, R. P. Kiran

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 7/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Evidence supports early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Differences in treatment patterns between the USA and UK, associated outcomes and resource utilization are not well understood.

Methods

In this retrospective, observational study using national administrative data, emergency patients admitted with acute cholecystitis were identified in England (Hospital Episode Statistics 1998–2012) and USA (National Inpatient Sample 1998–2011). Proportions of patients who underwent emergency cholecystectomy, utilization of laparoscopy and associated outcomes including length of stay (LOS) and complications were compared. The effect of delayed treatment on subsequent readmissions was evaluated for England.

Results

Patients with a diagnosis of acute cholecystitis totaled 1,191,331 in the USA vs. 288 907 in England. Emergency cholecystectomy was performed in 628,395 (52.7% USA) and 45,299 (15.7% England) over the time period. Laparoscopy was more common in the USA (82.8 vs. 37.9%; p < 0.001). Pre-treatment (1 vs. 2 days; p < 0.001) and total ( 4 vs. 7 days; p < 0.001) LOS was lower in the USA. Overall incidence of bile duct injury was higher in England than the USA (0.83 vs. 0.43%; p < 0.001), but was no different following laparoscopic surgery (0.1%). In England, 40.5% of patients without an immediate cholecystectomy were subsequently readmitted with cholecystitis. An additional 14.5% were admitted for other biliary complications, amounting to 2.7 readmissions per patient in the year following primary admission.

Conclusion

This study highlights management practices for acute cholecystitis in the USA and England. Despite best evidence, index admission laparoscopic cholecystectomy is performed less in England, which significantly impacts subsequent healthcare utilization.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Portincasa P, Moschetta A, Palasciano G (2006) Cholesterol gallstone disease. Lancet 368(9531):230–239CrossRefPubMed
2.
Friedman GD (1993) Natural history of asymptomatic and symptomatic gallstones. Am J Surg 165(4):399–404CrossRefPubMed
3.
Sanders G, Kingsnorth AN. Gallstones (2007) BMJ: Br Med J 335(7614):295–299CrossRef
4.
Peng WK, Sheikh Z, Nixon SJ, Paterson-Brown S (2005) Role of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the early management of acute gallbladder disease. Br J Surg 92(5):586–591CrossRefPubMed
5.
Siciliani L, Hurst J (2005) Tackling excessive waiting times for elective surgery: a comparative analysis of policies in 12 OECD countries. Health Policy 72(2):201–215CrossRefPubMed
6.
Monkhouse SJ, Court EL, Dash I, Coombs NJ (2009) Two-week target for laparoscopic cholecystectomy following gallstone pancreatitis is achievable and cost neutral. Br J Surg 96(7):751–755CrossRefPubMed
7.
Overby DW, Apelgren KN, Richardson W, Fanelli R (2010) SAGES guidelines for the clinical application of laparoscopic biliary tract surgery. Surg Endosc 24(10):2368–2386CrossRefPubMed
8.
9.
Cameron IC, Chadwick C, Phillips J, Johnson AG (2004) Management of acute cholecystitis in UK hospitals: time for a change. Postgrad Med J 80(943):292–294CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Karthikesalingam A, Vidal-Diez A, Holt PJ et al (2016) Thresholds for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in England and the United States. N Engl J Med 375(21):2051–2059CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
(HCUP) HCaUP. National inpatient sample. 2016
12.
Centre H-HaSCI. Hospital episode statistic. 2016
13.
Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40(5):373–383CrossRefPubMed
14.
Worth PJ, Kaur T, Diggs BS, Sheppard BC, Hunter JG, Dolan JP (2016) Major bile duct injury requiring operative reconstruction after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a follow-on study. Surg Endosc 30(5):1839–1846CrossRefPubMed
15.
Drosler SE, Klazinga NS, Romano PS et al (2009) Application of patient safety indicators internationally: a pilot study among seven countries. Int J Qual Health Care 21(4):272–278CrossRefPubMed
16.
Gutt CN, Encke J, Koninger J et al (2013) Acute cholecystitis: early versus delayed cholecystectomy, a multicenter randomized trial (ACDC study, NCT00447304). Ann Surg 258(3):385–393CrossRefPubMed
17.
Lai PB, Kwong KH, Leung KL et al (1998) Randomized trial of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg 85(6):764–767CrossRefPubMed
18.
Macafee DA, Humes DJ, Bouliotis G, Beckingham IJ, Whynes DK, Lobo DN (2009) Prospective randomized trial using cost-utility analysis of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute gallbladder disease. Br J Surg 96(9):1031–1040CrossRefPubMed
19.
Lo CM, Liu CL, Fan ST, Lai EC, Wong J (1998) Prospective randomized study of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Ann Surg 227(4):461–467CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Wu XD, Tian X, Liu MM, Wu L, Zhao S, Zhao L (2015) Meta-analysis comparing early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg 102(11):1302–1313CrossRefPubMed
21.
Papi C, Catarci M, D’Ambrosio L et al (2004) Timing of cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 99(1):147–155CrossRefPubMed
22.
Gurusamy KS, Nagendran M, Davidson BR (2013) Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute gallstone pancreatitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9:Cd010326
23.
Brooks KR, Scarborough JE, Vaslef SN, Shapiro ML (2013) No need to wait: an analysis of the timing of cholecystectomy during admission for acute cholecystitis using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 74(1):167–173; 173–164.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zafar SN, Obirieze A, Adesibikan B, Cornwell EE 3rd, Fullum TM, Tran DD (2015) Optimal time for early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. JAMA Surg 150(2):129–136CrossRefPubMed
25.
Murphy PB, Vogt KN, Mele TS, Hameed SM, Ball CG, Parry NG (2016) Timely surgical care for acute biliary disease: an indication of quality. Ann Surg 264(6):913–914CrossRefPubMed
26.
Sutton AJ, Vohra RS, Hollyman M (2017) Cost-effectiveness of emergency versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute gallbladder pathology. Br J Surg 104(1):98–107CrossRefPubMed
27.
Schwartz DA, Shah AA, Zogg CK et al (2015) Operative delay to laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Racking up the cost of health care. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 79(1):15–21CrossRefPubMed
28.
29.
Germanos S, Gourgiotis S, Kocher HM (2007) Clinical update: early surgery for acute cholecystitis. Lancet 369(9575):1774–1776CrossRefPubMed
30.
31.
Cameron I, Chadwick C, Phillips J, Johnson A (2004) Management of acute cholecystitis in UK hospitals: time for a change. Postgrad Med J 80(943):292–294CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
Sinha S, Hofman D, Stoker DL et al (2013) Epidemiological study of provision of cholecystectomy in England from 2000 to 2009: retrospective analysis of Hospital Episode Statistics. Surg Endosc 27(1):162–175CrossRefPubMed
33.
CholeS Study Group, West Midlands Research Collaborative (2016) Population-based cohort study of variation in the use of emergency cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder diseases. Br J Surg 103(12):1716–1726CrossRef
34.
Harrison EM, O’Neill S, Meurs TS et al (2012) Hospital volume and patient outcomes after cholecystectomy in Scotland: retrospective, national population based study. BMJ (Clin Res ed) 344:e3330
35.
Simpson DJ, Wood AM, Paterson HM, Nixon SJ, Paterson-Brown S (2008) Improved management of acute gallstone disease after regional surgical subspecialization. World J Surg 32(12):2690–2694CrossRefPubMed
36.
Hobbs MS, Mai Q, Knuiman MW, Fletcher DR, Ridout SC (2006) Surgeon experience and trends in intraoperative complications in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 93(7):844–853CrossRefPubMed
37.
Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W et al (1999) Relation of surgical volume to outcome in eight common operations: results from the VA national surgical quality improvement program. Ann Surg 230(3):414CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
Csikesz NG, Singla A, Murphy MM, Tseng JF, Shah SA (2010) Surgeon volume metrics in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Dig Dis Sci 55(8):2398–2405CrossRefPubMed
39.
40.
41.
Abercrombie J (2017) General surgery: GIRFT programme national specialty report
42.
Bokhari S, Walsh U, Qurashi K et al (2015) Impact of a dedicated emergency surgical unit on early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 16:1–9
43.
Mercer SJ, Knight JS, Toh SK, Walters AM, Sadek SA, Somers SS (2004) Implementation of a specialist-led service for the management of acute gallstone disease. Br J Surg 91(4):504–508CrossRefPubMed
44.
Grol R, Grimshaw J (2003) From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients’ care. Lancet 362(9391):1225–1230CrossRefPubMed
45.
46.
47.
Parthasarathy M, Reid V, Pyne L, Groot-Wassink T (2015) Are we recording postoperative complications correctly? Comparison of NHS Hospital Episode Statistics with the American College of surgeons national surgical quality improvement program. BMJ Qual Saf 24(9):594–602CrossRefPubMed
48.
Jhung MA, Banerjee SN (2009) Administrative coding data and health care-associated infections. Clin Infect Dis 49(6):949–955CrossRefPubMed
49.
Burns EM, Rigby E, Mamidanna R et al (2012) Systematic review of discharge coding accuracy. J Public Health 34(1):138–148CrossRef
50.
Silverman E, Skinner J (2004) Medicare upcoding and hospital ownership. J Health Econ 23(2):369–389CrossRefPubMed
51.
52.
Riall TS, Zhang D, Townsend CM Jr, Kuo YF, Goodwin JS (2010) Failure to perform cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis in elderly patients is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and cost. J Am Coll Surg 210(5):668–677, 677–669CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
An observational study of the timing of surgery, use of laparoscopy and outcomes for acute cholecystitis in the USA and UK
Authors
A. C. Murray
S. Markar
H. Mackenzie
O. Baser
T. Wiggins
A. Askari
G. Hanna
O. Faiz
E. Mayer
C. Bicknell
A. Darzi
R. P. Kiran
Publication date
01-07-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 7/2018
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-6016-9

Other articles of this Issue 7/2018

Surgical Endoscopy 7/2018 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

Adenoma detection rate metrics in colorectal cancer surveillance colonoscopy

OriginalPaper

Update regarding the society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) grant distribution and impact on recipient’s academic career

Dynamic Manuscript

Transpapillary endopancreatic surgery: decompression of duct system and comparison of greenlight laser with monopolar electrosurgical device in ex vivo and in vivo animal models

OriginalPaper

Single-port laparoscopic surgery in uncomplicated acute appendicitis: a randomized controlled trial

OriginalPaper

Interpretation of motion analysis of laparoscopic instruments based on principal component analysis in box trainer settings

OriginalPaper

Trends and surgical outcomes of laparoscopic versus open pyloromyotomy