Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
International Urogynecology Journal
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 10/2017

01-10-2017 | Original Article

An intra- and interrater reliability and agreement study of vaginal resting pressure, pelvic floor muscle strength, and muscular endurance using a manometer

Authors: Merete Kolberg Tennfjord, Marie Ellström Engh, Kari Bø

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 10/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Manometry is commonly used to assess pelvic floor muscle (PFM) function. Aims of the study were to assess intra- and interrater reliability and agreement of vaginal resting pressure, PFM strength, and muscular endurance using a high-precision pressure transducer.

Methods

A convenient sample of 23 women was included. The participants were tested twice by two examiners on day 1 and retested after 1 week by one examiner. Vaginal resting pressure, PFM strength, and muscular endurance were measured by manometer (Camtech AS). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland–Altman plots were used to analyze reliability and agreement respectively. Results are presented with mean differences (bias) and minimal detectable change.

Results

Twenty participants completed the tests (mean age 55.8 years [27–71], mean parity 1.7 [range 0–3], and mean body mass index 23.7 [range 18.4–27.2, SD 2.4]). ICC values were very good (ICC >0.90) for all measurements. Considerable intervariation of scores, and outliers were seen for measurements representing the highest values. Agreement with mean differences (bias) and minimal detectable change for the intrarater assessment was for vaginal resting pressure: −2.44 ± 8.7 cmH2O, for PFM strength −0.22 ± 7.6 cmH2O, and for muscular endurance 0.75 ± 59.5 cmH2O/s. The interrater agreement for vaginal resting pressure was: 1.36 ± 9.0 cmH2O, for PFM strength 2.24 ± 9.0 cmH2O, and for muscular endurance 15.89 ± 69.7 cmH2O/s.

Conclusions

Manometry (Camtech AS) seems less accurate for the strongest women. In clinical practice, significant improvement in PFM variables needs to exceed the minimal detectable change to be above the error of measurement.
Literature
1.
Kegel AH. Stress incontinence and genital relaxation; a nonsurgical method of increasing the tone of sphincters and their supporting structures. Ciba Clin Symp. 1952;4:35–51.PubMed
2.
Ashton-Miller JA, Delancey JOL. Functional anatomy of the female pelvic floor. In: Bø K, Berghmans B, Mørkved S, Van Kampen M, editors. Evidence-based physical therapy for the pelvic floor bridging science and clinical practice. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2015. p. 19–34.CrossRef
3.
Messelink B, Benson T, Berghmans B, Bo K, Corcos J, Fowler C, et al. Standardization of terminology of pelvic floor muscle function and dysfunction: report from the pelvic floor clinical assessment group of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn. 2005;24:374–80.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Bø K, Sherburn M. Evaluation of female pelvic-floor muscle function and strength. Phys Ther. 2005;85:269–82.PubMed
5.
Sigurdardottir T, Steingrimsdottir T, Arnason A, Bø K. Test-retest intra-rater reliability of vaginal measurement of pelvic floor muscle strength using myomed 932. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88:939–43.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Frawley HC, Galea MP, Phillips BA, Sherburn M, Bø K. Reliability of pelvic floor muscle strength assessment using different test positions and tools. Neurourol Urodyn. 2006;25:236–42.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Ferreira CH, Barbosa PB, de Oliveira SF, Antonio FI, Franco MM, Bø K. Inter-rater reliability study of the modified Oxford Grading Scale and the Peritron manometer. Physiotherapy. 2011;97:132–8.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Bø K, Raastad R, Finckenhagen HB. Does the size of the vaginal probe affect measurement of pelvic floor muscle strength? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005;84:129–33.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Brækken IH, Majida M, Engh ME, Bø K. Can pelvic floor muscle training reverse pelvic organ prolapse and reduce prolapse symptoms? An assessor-blinded, randomized, controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203:170.e1–7.CrossRef
10.
Bø K, Talseth T, Holme I. Single blind, randomised controlled trial of pelvic floor exercises, electrical stimulation, vaginal cones, and no treatment in management of genuine stress incontinence in women. BMJ. 1999;318:487–93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Bø K, Hagen RH, Kvarstein B, Jørgensen J, Larsen S. Pelvic floor muscle exercise for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. III. Effects of two different degrees of pelvic floor muscle exercises. Neurourol Urodyn. 1990;9:489–502.CrossRef
12.
Tennfjord MK, Hilde G, Staer-Jensen J, Siafarikas F, Engh ME, Bo K. Coital incontinence and vaginal symptoms and the relationship to pelvic floor muscle function in primiparous women at 12 months postpartum: a cross-sectional study. J Sex Med. 2015;12:994–1003.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Næss I, Bø K. Pelvic floor muscle function in women with provoked vestibulodynia and asymptomatic controls. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26:1467–73.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Bø K, Hagen R, Kvarstein B, Larsen S. Pelvic floor muscle exercise for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: I. Reliability of vaginal pressure measurements of pelvic muscle strength. Neurourol Urodyn. 1990;9:471–7.CrossRef
15.
Bø K, Hagen RR, Kvarstein B, Larsen S. Pelvic floor muscle exercise for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. II. Validity of vaginal pressure measurements of pelvic muscle strength and the necessity of supplementary methods for control of correct contraction. Neurourol Urodyn. 1990;9:479–87.CrossRef
16.
17.
Kottner JA, Audige L, Brorson S, Donner A, Gajewski BJ, Hròbjartsson A, et al. Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed. Int J Nurs Stud. 2011;48:661–71.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Bø K. Pressure measurements during pelvic floor muscle contractions: the effect of different positions of the vaginal measuring device. Neurourol Urodyn. 1992;11:107–13.CrossRef
19.
Wilmore JH, Costill DL. Physiology of sport and exercise. 2nd ed. Leeds: Human Kinetics; 1999.
20.
Åstrand PO, Rodahl K, Dahl HA. Textbook of work physiology; physiological basis of exercise. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2003.
21.
Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;8:307–10.CrossRef
22.
Atkinson G, Nevill AM. Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Med. 1998;26:217–38.
23.
Guaderrama NM, Nager CW, Liu J, Pretorius DH, Mittal RK. The vaginal pressure profile. Neurourol Urodyn. 2005;24:243–7.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Dumoulin C, Gravel D, Bourbonnais D, Lemieux MC, Morin M. Reliability of dynamometric measurements of the pelvic floor musculature. Neurourol Urodyn. 2004;23:134–42.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Morin M, Gravel D, Bourbonnais D, Dumoulin C, Ouellet S. Reliability of dynamometric passive properties of the pelvic floor muscles in postmenopausal women with stress urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2008;27:819–25.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Vodusek DB. Electromyography. In: Bø K, Berghmans B, Mørkved S, Van Kampen M, editors. Evidence based physical therapy for the pelvic floor bridging science and clinical practice. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2007. p. 56–63.
27.
Tennfjord MK, Hilde G, Stær-Jensen J, Siafarikas F, Ellström Engh M, Bø K. Effect of postpartum pelvic floor muscle training on vaginal symptoms and sexual dysfunction—secondary analysis of a randomised trial. BJOG. 2016;123:634–42.CrossRef
28.
De Vet HCV, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL, editors. Measurement in medicine a practical guide. United States of America: Cambridge University Press; 2011.
29.
Bø K, Finckenhagen HB. Vaginal palpation of pelvic floor muscle strength: inter-test reproducibility and comparison between palpation and vaginal squeeze pressure. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001;80:883–7.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
An intra- and interrater reliability and agreement study of vaginal resting pressure, pelvic floor muscle strength, and muscular endurance using a manometer
Authors
Merete Kolberg Tennfjord
Marie Ellström Engh
Kari Bø
Publication date
01-10-2017
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 10/2017
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3290-y

Other articles of this Issue 10/2017

International Urogynecology Journal 10/2017 Go to the issue

Erratum

Erratum to: Surgeons’ views on sling tensioning during surgery for female stress urinary incontinence

Original Article

Pelvic organ support several years after a first birth

Review Article

Labia minora hypertrophy: causes, impact on women’s health, and treatment options

Original Article

Pregnant women’s awareness, knowledge and beliefs about pelvic floor muscles: a cross-sectional survey

Images in Urogynecology

Vaginal repair of a vesicocervical fistula after labored-cesarean delivery without concomitant hysterectomy

Review Article

A systematic review on vaginal laser therapy for treating stress urinary incontinence: Do we have enough evidence?