Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Public Health 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Systematic review

An integrative review on methodological considerations in mental health research – design, sampling, data collection procedure and quality assurance

Authors: Eric Badu, Anthony Paul O’Brien, Rebecca Mitchell

Published in: Archives of Public Health | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Several typologies and guidelines are available to address the methodological and practical considerations required in mental health research. However, few studies have actually attempted to systematically identify and synthesise these considerations. This paper provides an integrative review that identifies and synthesises the available research evidence on mental health research methodological considerations.

Methods

A search of the published literature was conducted using EMBASE, Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Scopus. The search was limited to papers published in English for the timeframe 2000–2018. Using pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, three reviewers independently screened the retrieved papers. A data extraction form was used to extract data from the included papers.

Results

Of 27 papers meeting the inclusion criteria, 13 focused on qualitative research, 8 mixed methods and 6 papers focused on quantitative methodology. A total of 14 papers targeted global mental health research, with 2 papers each describing studies in Germany, Sweden and China. The review identified several methodological considerations relating to study design, methods, data collection, and quality assurance. Methodological issues regarding the study design included assembling team members, familiarisation and sharing information on the topic, and seeking the contribution of team members. Methodological considerations to facilitate data collection involved adequate preparation prior to fieldwork, appropriateness and adequacy of the sampling and data collection approach, selection of consumers, the social or cultural context, practical and organisational skills; and ethical and sensitivity issues.

Conclusion

The evidence confirms that studies on methodological considerations in conducting mental health research largely focus on qualitative studies in a transcultural setting, as well as recommendations derived from multi-site surveys. Mental health research should adequately consider the methodological issues around study design, sampling, data collection procedures and quality assurance in order to maintain the quality of data collection.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference National Ethics Advisory Committee. Ethical guidelines for intervention studies: revised edition. Wellington (New Zealand): Ministry of Health. 2012. National Ethics Advisory Committee. Ethical guidelines for intervention studies: revised edition. Wellington (New Zealand): Ministry of Health. 2012.
2.
go back to reference Mann C. Observational research methods. Research design II: cohort, cross sectional, and case-control studies. Emerg Med J. 2003;20(1):54–60.CrossRef Mann C. Observational research methods. Research design II: cohort, cross sectional, and case-control studies. Emerg Med J. 2003;20(1):54–60.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference DiPietro NA. Methods in epidemiology: observational study designs. Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy. 2010;30(10):973–84.CrossRef DiPietro NA. Methods in epidemiology: observational study designs. Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy. 2010;30(10):973–84.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hong NQ, Pluyr P, Fabregues S, Bartlett G, Boardman F, Cargo M, et al. Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Canada.: Intellectual Property Office, Canada; 2018. Hong NQ, Pluyr P, Fabregues S, Bartlett G, Boardman F, Cargo M, et al. Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Canada.: Intellectual Property Office, Canada; 2018.
5.
go back to reference Creswell JW, Creswell JD. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches: sage publications; 2017. Creswell JW, Creswell JD. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches: sage publications; 2017.
6.
go back to reference Wisdom J, Creswell JW. Mixed methods: integrating quantitative and qualitative data collection and analysis while studying patient-centered medical home models. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2013. Wisdom J, Creswell JW. Mixed methods: integrating quantitative and qualitative data collection and analysis while studying patient-centered medical home models. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2013.
7.
go back to reference Bonita R, Beaglehole R, Kjellström T. Basic epidemiology: World Health Organization; 2006. Bonita R, Beaglehole R, Kjellström T. Basic epidemiology: World Health Organization; 2006.
8.
go back to reference Centers for Disease Control Prevention [CDC]. Principles of epidemiology in public health practice: an introduction to applied epidemiology and biostatistics. Atlanta, GA: US Dept. of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Office of Workforce and Career Development; 2012. Centers for Disease Control Prevention [CDC]. Principles of epidemiology in public health practice: an introduction to applied epidemiology and biostatistics. Atlanta, GA: US Dept. of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Office of Workforce and Career Development; 2012.
9.
go back to reference Parab S, Bhalerao S. Study designs. International journal of Ayurveda research. 2010;1(2):128.CrossRef Parab S, Bhalerao S. Study designs. International journal of Ayurveda research. 2010;1(2):128.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Yang W, Zilov A, Soewondo P, Bech OM, Sekkal F, Home PD. Observational studies: going beyond the boundaries of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010;88:S3–9.CrossRef Yang W, Zilov A, Soewondo P, Bech OM, Sekkal F, Home PD. Observational studies: going beyond the boundaries of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010;88:S3–9.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Besen J, Gan DS. A critical evaluation of clinical research study designs. J Investig Dermatol. 2014;134.CrossRef Besen J, Gan DS. A critical evaluation of clinical research study designs. J Investig Dermatol. 2014;134.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Axelrod DA, Hayward R. Nonrandomized interventional study designs (quasi-experimental designs). Clinical research methods for surgeons: Springer; 2006. p. 63–76. Axelrod DA, Hayward R. Nonrandomized interventional study designs (quasi-experimental designs). Clinical research methods for surgeons: Springer; 2006. p. 63–76.
14.
go back to reference Thiese MS. Observational and interventional study design types; an overview. Biochemia medica: Biochemia medica. 2014;24(2):199–210.CrossRef Thiese MS. Observational and interventional study design types; an overview. Biochemia medica: Biochemia medica. 2014;24(2):199–210.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Velengtas P, Mohr P, Messner DA. Making informed decisions: assessing the strengths and weaknesses of study designs and analytic methods for comparative effectiveness research. National Pharmaceutical Council 2012. Velengtas P, Mohr P, Messner DA. Making informed decisions: assessing the strengths and weaknesses of study designs and analytic methods for comparative effectiveness research. National Pharmaceutical Council 2012.
16.
go back to reference Guerrera F, Renaud S, Tabbò F, Filosso PL. How to design a randomized clinical trial: tips and tricks for conduct a successful study in thoracic disease domain. Journal of thoracic disease. 2017;9(8):2692.CrossRef Guerrera F, Renaud S, Tabbò F, Filosso PL. How to design a randomized clinical trial: tips and tricks for conduct a successful study in thoracic disease domain. Journal of thoracic disease. 2017;9(8):2692.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Bhide A, Shah PS, Acharya G. A simplified guide to randomized controlled trials. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018;97(4):380–7.CrossRef Bhide A, Shah PS, Acharya G. A simplified guide to randomized controlled trials. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018;97(4):380–7.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Palinkas L, Horwitz SM, Chamberlain P, Hurlburt MS, Landsverk J. Mixed-methods designs in mental health services research: a review. Psychiatr Serv. 2011;62(3):255–63.CrossRef Palinkas L, Horwitz SM, Chamberlain P, Hurlburt MS, Landsverk J. Mixed-methods designs in mental health services research: a review. Psychiatr Serv. 2011;62(3):255–63.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Palinkas L. Qualitative and mixed methods in mental health services and implementation research. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2014;43(6):851–61.CrossRef Palinkas L. Qualitative and mixed methods in mental health services and implementation research. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2014;43(6):851–61.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Whittemore R, Knafl K. The integrative review: updated methodology. J Adv Nurs. 2005;52(5):546–53.CrossRef Whittemore R, Knafl K. The integrative review: updated methodology. J Adv Nurs. 2005;52(5):546–53.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Hopia H, Latvala E, Liimatainen L. Reviewing the methodology of an integrative review. Scand J Caring Sci. 2016;30(4):662–9.CrossRef Hopia H, Latvala E, Liimatainen L. Reviewing the methodology of an integrative review. Scand J Caring Sci. 2016;30(4):662–9.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Pearson A, White H, Bath-Hextall F, Apostolo J, Salmond S, Kirkpatrick P. Methodology for JBI mixed methods systematic reviews. The Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers Manual. 2014;1:5–34. Pearson A, White H, Bath-Hextall F, Apostolo J, Salmond S, Kirkpatrick P. Methodology for JBI mixed methods systematic reviews. The Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers Manual. 2014;1:5–34.
24.
go back to reference Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.CrossRef Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Alonso J, Angermeyer MC, Bernert S, Bruffaerts R, Brugha TS, Bryson H, et al. Sampling and methods of the European study of the epidemiology of mental disorders (ESEMeD) project. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 2004;109(420):8–20. Alonso J, Angermeyer MC, Bernert S, Bruffaerts R, Brugha TS, Bryson H, et al. Sampling and methods of the European study of the epidemiology of mental disorders (ESEMeD) project. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 2004;109(420):8–20.
26.
go back to reference Baarnhielm S, Ekblad S. Qualitative research, culture and ethics: a case discussion. Transcultural Psychiatry. 2002;39(4):469–83.CrossRef Baarnhielm S, Ekblad S. Qualitative research, culture and ethics: a case discussion. Transcultural Psychiatry. 2002;39(4):469–83.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Brown C, Lloyd K. Qualitative methods in psychiatric research. Adv Psychiatr Treat. 2001;7(5):350–6.CrossRef Brown C, Lloyd K. Qualitative methods in psychiatric research. Adv Psychiatr Treat. 2001;7(5):350–6.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Davidsen AS. Phenomenological approaches in psychology and health sciences. Qual Res Psychol. 2013;10(3):318–39.CrossRef Davidsen AS. Phenomenological approaches in psychology and health sciences. Qual Res Psychol. 2013;10(3):318–39.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference de Jong JT, Van Ommeren M. Toward a culture-informed epidemiology: combining qualitative and quantitative research in transcultural contexts. Transcultural Psychiatry. 2002;39(4):422–33.CrossRef de Jong JT, Van Ommeren M. Toward a culture-informed epidemiology: combining qualitative and quantitative research in transcultural contexts. Transcultural Psychiatry. 2002;39(4):422–33.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Ekblad S, Baarnhielm S. Focus group interview research in transcultural psychiatry: reflections on research experiences. Transcultural Psychiatry. 2002;39(4):484–500.CrossRef Ekblad S, Baarnhielm S. Focus group interview research in transcultural psychiatry: reflections on research experiences. Transcultural Psychiatry. 2002;39(4):484–500.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Fossey E, Harvey C, McDermott F, Davidson L. Understanding and evaluating qualitative research. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2002;36(6):717–32.CrossRef Fossey E, Harvey C, McDermott F, Davidson L. Understanding and evaluating qualitative research. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2002;36(6):717–32.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Jacobi F, Wittchen H-U, Holting C, Sommer S, Lieb R, Hofler M, et al. Estimating the prevalence of mental and somatic disorders in the community: aims and methods of the German National Health Interview and examination survey. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 2002;11(1):1–18.CrossRef Jacobi F, Wittchen H-U, Holting C, Sommer S, Lieb R, Hofler M, et al. Estimating the prevalence of mental and somatic disorders in the community: aims and methods of the German National Health Interview and examination survey. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 2002;11(1):1–18.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Koch A, Vogel A, Holzmann M, Pfennig A, Salize HJ, Puschner B, et al. MEMENTA-‘Mental healthcare provision for adults with intellectual disability and a mental disorder’. A cross-sectional epidemiological multisite study assessing prevalence of psychiatric symptomatology, needs for care and quality of healthcare provision for adults with intellectual disability in Germany: a study protocol. BMJ Open. 2014;4(5):e004878.CrossRef Koch A, Vogel A, Holzmann M, Pfennig A, Salize HJ, Puschner B, et al. MEMENTA-‘Mental healthcare provision for adults with intellectual disability and a mental disorder’. A cross-sectional epidemiological multisite study assessing prevalence of psychiatric symptomatology, needs for care and quality of healthcare provision for adults with intellectual disability in Germany: a study protocol. BMJ Open. 2014;4(5):e004878.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Korver N, Quee PJ, Boos HB, Simons CJ, de Haan L, Investigators G. Genetic risk and outcome of psychosis (GROUP), a multi site longitudinal cohort study focused on gene–environment interaction: objectives, sample characteristics, recruitment and assessment methods. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2012;21(3):205–21.CrossRef Korver N, Quee PJ, Boos HB, Simons CJ, de Haan L, Investigators G. Genetic risk and outcome of psychosis (GROUP), a multi site longitudinal cohort study focused on gene–environment interaction: objectives, sample characteristics, recruitment and assessment methods. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2012;21(3):205–21.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Larkin M, Watts S, Clifton E. Giving voice and making sense in interpretative phenomenological analysis. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):102–20.CrossRef Larkin M, Watts S, Clifton E. Giving voice and making sense in interpretative phenomenological analysis. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):102–20.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Latvala E, Vuokila-Oikkonen P, Janhonen S. Videotaped recording as a method of participant observation in psychiatric nursing research. J Adv Nurs. 2000;31(5):1252–7.CrossRef Latvala E, Vuokila-Oikkonen P, Janhonen S. Videotaped recording as a method of participant observation in psychiatric nursing research. J Adv Nurs. 2000;31(5):1252–7.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Leese MN, White IR, Schene AH, Koeter MW, Ruggeri M, Gaite L. Reliability in multi-site psychiatric studies. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2001;10(1):29–42.CrossRef Leese MN, White IR, Schene AH, Koeter MW, Ruggeri M, Gaite L. Reliability in multi-site psychiatric studies. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2001;10(1):29–42.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Liu Z, Huang Y, Lv P, Zhang T, Wang H, Li Q, et al. The China mental health survey: II. Design and field procedures. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2016;51(11):1547–57.CrossRef Liu Z, Huang Y, Lv P, Zhang T, Wang H, Li Q, et al. The China mental health survey: II. Design and field procedures. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2016;51(11):1547–57.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Montgomery P, Bailey PH. Field notes and theoretical memos in grounded theory. West J Nurs Res. 2007;29(1):65–79.CrossRef Montgomery P, Bailey PH. Field notes and theoretical memos in grounded theory. West J Nurs Res. 2007;29(1):65–79.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Owen S. The practical, methodological and ethical dilemmas of conducting focus groups with vulnerable clients. J Adv Nurs. 2001;36(5):652–8.CrossRef Owen S. The practical, methodological and ethical dilemmas of conducting focus groups with vulnerable clients. J Adv Nurs. 2001;36(5):652–8.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Palinkas L, Horwitz SM, Green CA, Wisdom JP, Duan N, Hoagwood K. Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Adm Policy Ment Health Ment Health Serv Res. 2015;42(5):533–44.CrossRef Palinkas L, Horwitz SM, Green CA, Wisdom JP, Duan N, Hoagwood K. Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Adm Policy Ment Health Ment Health Serv Res. 2015;42(5):533–44.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Palinkas L, Aarons GA, Horwitz S, Chamberlain P, Hurlburt M, Landsverk J. Mixed method designs in implementation research. Adm Policy Ment Health Ment Health Serv Res. 2011;38(1):44–53.CrossRef Palinkas L, Aarons GA, Horwitz S, Chamberlain P, Hurlburt M, Landsverk J. Mixed method designs in implementation research. Adm Policy Ment Health Ment Health Serv Res. 2011;38(1):44–53.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Razafsha M, Behforuzi H, Azari H, Zhang Z, Wang KK, Kobeissy FH, et al. Qualitative versus quantitative methods in psychiatric research. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;829:49–62.CrossRef Razafsha M, Behforuzi H, Azari H, Zhang Z, Wang KK, Kobeissy FH, et al. Qualitative versus quantitative methods in psychiatric research. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;829:49–62.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Robins CS, Ware NC, Dosreis S, Willging CE, Chung JY, Lewis-Fernández R. Dialogues on mixed-methods and mental health services research: anticipating challenges, building solutions. Psychiatr Serv. 2008;59(7):727–31.CrossRef Robins CS, Ware NC, Dosreis S, Willging CE, Chung JY, Lewis-Fernández R. Dialogues on mixed-methods and mental health services research: anticipating challenges, building solutions. Psychiatr Serv. 2008;59(7):727–31.CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Robinson OC. Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: a theoretical and practical guide. Qual Res Psychol. 2014;11(1):25–41.CrossRef Robinson OC. Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: a theoretical and practical guide. Qual Res Psychol. 2014;11(1):25–41.CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Schilder K, Tomov T, Mladenova M, Mayeya J, Jenkins R, Gulbinat W, et al. The appropriateness and use of focus group methodology across international mental health communities. International Review of Psychiatry. 2004;16(1–2):24–30.CrossRef Schilder K, Tomov T, Mladenova M, Mayeya J, Jenkins R, Gulbinat W, et al. The appropriateness and use of focus group methodology across international mental health communities. International Review of Psychiatry. 2004;16(1–2):24–30.CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Schoonenboom J, Johnson RB. How to construct a mixed methods research DesignWie man ein mixed methods-Forschungs-design konstruiert. KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie. 2017;69(2):107–31.CrossRef Schoonenboom J, Johnson RB. How to construct a mixed methods research DesignWie man ein mixed methods-Forschungs-design konstruiert. KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie. 2017;69(2):107–31.CrossRef
49.
go back to reference Yin H, Phillips MR, Wardenaar KJ, Xu G, Ormel J, Tian H, et al. The Tianjin mental health survey (TJMHS): study rationale, design and methods. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2017;26(3):09.CrossRef Yin H, Phillips MR, Wardenaar KJ, Xu G, Ormel J, Tian H, et al. The Tianjin mental health survey (TJMHS): study rationale, design and methods. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2017;26(3):09.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
An integrative review on methodological considerations in mental health research – design, sampling, data collection procedure and quality assurance
Authors
Eric Badu
Anthony Paul O’Brien
Rebecca Mitchell
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Archives of Public Health / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 2049-3258
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-019-0363-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Archives of Public Health 1/2019 Go to the issue