Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Health Services Research
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

An ideal-typical model for comparing interprofessional relations and skill mix in health care

Authors: Walter Schönfelder, Elin Anita Nilsen

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Comparisons of health system performance, including the regulations of interprofessional relations and the skill mix between health professions are challenging. National strategies for regulating interprofessional relations vary widely across European health care systems. Unambiguously defined and generally accepted performance indicators have to remain generic, with limited power for recognizing the organizational structures regulating interprofessional relations in different health systems. A coherent framework for in-depth comparisons of different models for organizing interprofessional relations and the skill mix between professional groups is currently not available. This study aims to develop an ideal-typical framework for categorizing skill mix and interprofessional relations in health care, and to assess the potential impact for different ideal types on care coordination and integrated service delivery.

Methods

A document analysis of the Health Systems in Transition (HiT) reports published by the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies was conducted. The HiT reports to 31 European health systems were analyzed using a qualitative content analysis and a process of meaning condensation.

Results

The educational tracks available to nurses have an impact on the professional autonomy for nurses, the hierarchy between professional groups, the emphasis given to negotiating skill mix, interdisciplinary teamwork and the extent of cooperation across the health and social service interface. Based on the results of the document analysis, three ideal types for regulating interprofessional relations and skill mix in health care are delimited. For each ideal type, outcomes on service coordination and holistic service delivery are described.

Conclusions

Comparisons of interprofessional relations are necessary for proactive health human resource policies. The proposed ideal-typical framework provides the means for in-depth comparisons of interprofessional relations in the health care workforce beyond of what is possible with directly comparable, but generic performance indicators.
Footnotes
Literature
1.
Smith PC, Papanicolas I. Policy Summary 4. Health system performance comparison: an agenda for policy, information and research. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2012.
2.
Buchan J, Calman L. Skill-Mix and Policy Change in the Health Workforce. Nurses in Advanced Roles. OECD Health Working Papers, No. 17. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2005.
3.
Buchan J, Dal Poz MR. Skill Mix in the Health Care Workforce: Reviewing the Evidence. Bull World Health Organ. 2002;80:575–80.PubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Richards A, Carley J, Jenkins-Clarke S, Richards DA. Skill mix between nurses and doctors working in primary care-delegation or allocation: a review of the literature. Int J Nurs Stud. 2000;37:185–97.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Sibbald B, Shen J, McBride A. Changing the skill-mix of the health care workforce. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2004;9:28–38.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Bourgeault IL, Merritt K. Deploying and Managing Health Human Resources. In: Kuhlmann E, Blank RH, Bourgeault IL, Wendt C, editors. The Palgrave International Handbook of Healthcare Policy and Governance. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2015. p. 308–24.CrossRef
7.
8.
Kuhlmann E, Groenewegen PP, Batenburg R, Larsen C. Health Human Resources Policy in Europe. In: Kuhlmann E, Blank RH, Bourgeault IL, Wendt C, editors. The Palgrave International Handbook of Healthcare Policy and Governance. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2015. p. 289–307.CrossRef
9.
10.
Anell A, Glenngård A, Merkur S. Sweden: Health system review. Copenhagen: WHO on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2012.
11.
Busse R, Riesberg A. Gesundheitssysteme im Wandel: Deutschland. Copenhagen: WHO on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2005.
12.
13.
McKee M, Dubois C-A, Sibbald B. Changing professional boundaries. In: Dubois C-A, McKee M, Nolte E, editors. Human resources for health in Europe. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2006. p. 63–78.
14.
Kuhlmann E, Batenburg R, Groenewegen PP, Larsen C. Bringing a European perspective to the health human resources debate: A scoping study. Health Policy. 2013;110:6–13.CrossRefPubMed
15.
16.
Dubois C-A, Singh D, Jiwani I. The human resource challenge in chronic care. In: Nolte E, McKee M, editors. Caring for people with chronic conditions a health system perspective. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2008. p. 143–71.
17.
Bourgeault IL, Kuhlmann E, Neiterman E, Wrede S. How can optimal skill mix be effectively implemented and why? WHO Regional Office for Europe: Copenhagen; 2008.
18.
Huby G, Brook JH, Thompson A, Tierney A. Capturing the concealed: Interprofessional practice and older patients’ participation in decision-making about discharge after acute hospitalization. J Interprof Care. 2007;21:55–67.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Tataw D. Toward human resource management in inter-professional health practice: linking organizational culture, group identity and individual autonomy. Int J Health Plann Manag. 2012;27:130–49.CrossRef
20.
Abbott A. The system of professions : an essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1988.
21.
Kroezen M, van Dijk L, Groenewegen PP, Francke AL. Knowledge claims, jurisdictional control and professional status: the case of nurse prescribing. PLoS One. 2013;8:e77279.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
23.
EU Expert Group on Gender and Employment, Bettio F, Verashchagina A. Long-Term Care for the elderly. Provisions and providers in 33 European countries. Rome: Publications Office of the European Union; 2012.
24.
Pavolini E, Theobald H. Long-Term Care Policies. In: Kuhlmann E, Blank RH, Bourgeault IL, Wendt C, editors. The Palgrave International Handbook of Healthcare Policy and Governance. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2015. p. 428–78.
25.
26.
Leichsenring K. Integrated care for older people in Europe-latest trends and perceptions. Int J Integr Care. 2012;12:e150.
27.
28.
29.
Kvale S. Interviews : an introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1996.
30.
31.
Boyle S. United Kingdom (England): Health system review. Copenhagen: WHO on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2011.
32.
Olejaz M, Nielsen AJ, Rudkjøbing A, Birk HO, Krasnik A, Hernandez-Quevedo C. Denmark: Health system review. Copenhagen: WHO on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2012.
33.
34.
35.
Weber M. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie. Frankfurt: Zweitausendeins; 2010.
36.
Dubois C-A, McKee M, Nolte E, editors. Human resources for health in Europe. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2006.
37.
38.
Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: the chronic care model, Part 2. JAMA. 2002;288:1909–14.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness. JAMA. 2002;288:1775–9.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Pavlickova A. EPPOSI AIP-CCM White Paper: Building a Workable Model for the Holistic Management of Chronic Conditions in Europe. Brussels: Epposi (European Platform for Patients’ Organisations, Science & Industry; 2012.
41.
Taylor BJ. Developing an Integrated Assessment Tool for the Health and Social Care of Older People. Br J Soc Work. 2012;42:1293–314.CrossRef
42.
Gaál P, Szigeti S, Csere M, Gaskins M, Panteli D. Hungary: Health system review. Copenhagen: WHO on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2011.
43.
Metadata
Title
An ideal-typical model for comparing interprofessional relations and skill mix in health care
Authors
Walter Schönfelder
Elin Anita Nilsen
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1881-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Health Services Research 1/2016 Go to the issue

Study protocol

The impact of web-based and face-to-face simulation on patient deterioration and patient safety: protocol for a multi-site multi-method design

Research article

Availability and utilization of medical devices in Jimma zone hospitals, Southwest Ethiopia: a case study

Research article

Computer-assisted client assessment survey for mental health: patient and health provider perspectives

Research article

Perceived discrimination and health outcomes among Asian Indians in the United States

Research article

The assessment and management of pain in patients with dementia in hospital settings: a multi-case exploratory study from a decision making perspective

Research article

Intraprofessional collaboration and learning between specialists and general practitioners during postgraduate training: a qualitative study