Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Anesthesia 2/2015

01-04-2015 | Clinical Report

An evaluation of the I-gel supraglottic airway in 70 pediatric patients

Authors: Tze Yeng Yeoh, Koo Boon Chan, Lynn S. H. Yeo, Eugene H. C. Liu, Terry L. T. Pan

Published in: Journal of Anesthesia | Issue 2/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

The I-gel is a supraglottic airway device which is commonly used in adult patients undergoing general anesthesia. In this study, we evaluated the speed of insertion, adequacy of ventilation, leak pressure, gastric tube insertion, and problems when using the I-gel in children. We included 70 patients aged between 1 and 16 years old with ASA physical status classification I or II, undergoing elective surgery requiring general anesthesia, for which use of a supraglottic airway would be appropriate. The overall insertion success rate was 96 % with a median insertion time of 25 (18–34) [7–100] s. Seventeen patients (24.3 %) experienced problems including the need for change of airway device, laryngospasm, device displacement, blood on device after removal, and postoperative sore throat. In conclusion, there was a moderate rate of problems when using the I-gel in children, and it was necessary to change the airway in a few patients to optimize ventilation.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Lopez-Gil M, Brimacombe J, Alvarez M. Safety and efficacy of the laryngeal mask airway. A prospective survey of 1400 children. Anaesthesia. 1996;51:969–72.CrossRefPubMed Lopez-Gil M, Brimacombe J, Alvarez M. Safety and efficacy of the laryngeal mask airway. A prospective survey of 1400 children. Anaesthesia. 1996;51:969–72.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Beylacq L, Bordes M, Semjen F, Cros AM. The I-gel, a single-use supraglottic airway device with a non-inflatable cuff and an esophageal vent: an observational study in children. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009;53:376–9.CrossRefPubMed Beylacq L, Bordes M, Semjen F, Cros AM. The I-gel, a single-use supraglottic airway device with a non-inflatable cuff and an esophageal vent: an observational study in children. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009;53:376–9.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Beringer RM, Kelly F, Cook TM, Nolan J, Hardy R, Simpson T, White MC. A cohort evaluation of the paediatric I-gel™ airway during anaesthesia in 120 children. Anaesthesia. 2011;66:1121–6.CrossRefPubMed Beringer RM, Kelly F, Cook TM, Nolan J, Hardy R, Simpson T, White MC. A cohort evaluation of the paediatric I-gel™ airway during anaesthesia in 120 children. Anaesthesia. 2011;66:1121–6.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Hughes C, Place K, Berg S, Mason D. A clinical evaluation of the I-gel supraglottic airway device in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012;22:765–71.CrossRefPubMed Hughes C, Place K, Berg S, Mason D. A clinical evaluation of the I-gel supraglottic airway device in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012;22:765–71.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Abukawa Y, Hiroki K, Ozaki M. Initial experience of the i-gel supraglottic airway by the residents in pediatric patients. J Anesth. 2012;26:357–61.CrossRefPubMed Abukawa Y, Hiroki K, Ozaki M. Initial experience of the i-gel supraglottic airway by the residents in pediatric patients. J Anesth. 2012;26:357–61.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Foucher-Lezla A, Lehousse T, Monrigal JP, Granry JC, Beydon L. Fibreoptic assessment of laryngeal positioning of the paediatric supraglottic airway device I-Gel. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2013;30:441–2.CrossRefPubMed Foucher-Lezla A, Lehousse T, Monrigal JP, Granry JC, Beydon L. Fibreoptic assessment of laryngeal positioning of the paediatric supraglottic airway device I-Gel. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2013;30:441–2.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Shimbori H, Ono K, Miwa T, Morimura N, Noguchi M, Hiroki K. Comparison of the LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Classic in children. Br J Anaesth. 2004;93:528–31.CrossRefPubMed Shimbori H, Ono K, Miwa T, Morimura N, Noguchi M, Hiroki K. Comparison of the LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Classic in children. Br J Anaesth. 2004;93:528–31.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Lopez-Gil M, Brimacombe J, Keller C. A comparison of four methods for assessing oropharyngeal leak pressure with the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in paediatric patients. Paediatr Anaesth. 2001;11:319–21.CrossRefPubMed Lopez-Gil M, Brimacombe J, Keller C. A comparison of four methods for assessing oropharyngeal leak pressure with the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in paediatric patients. Paediatr Anaesth. 2001;11:319–21.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Goldmann K, Jakob C. Size 2 ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a randomized, crossover investigation with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paediatric patients. Br J Anaesth. 2005;94:385–9.CrossRefPubMed Goldmann K, Jakob C. Size 2 ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a randomized, crossover investigation with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paediatric patients. Br J Anaesth. 2005;94:385–9.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Jagannathan N, Sohn LE, Chang E, Sawardekar A. A cohort evaluation of the laryngeal mask airway-supreme in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012;22:759–64.CrossRefPubMed Jagannathan N, Sohn LE, Chang E, Sawardekar A. A cohort evaluation of the laryngeal mask airway-supreme in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012;22:759–64.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Jagannathan N, Sohn LE, Sawardekar A, Gordon J, Langen KE, Anderson K. A randomised comparison of the LMA Supreme™ and LMAProSeal™ in children. Anaesthesia. 2012;67:632–9.CrossRefPubMed Jagannathan N, Sohn LE, Sawardekar A, Gordon J, Langen KE, Anderson K. A randomised comparison of the LMA Supreme™ and LMAProSeal™ in children. Anaesthesia. 2012;67:632–9.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Kelly F, Sale S, Bayley G, Cook T, Stoddart P, White M. A cohort evaluation of the pediatric ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in 100 children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2008;18:947–51.CrossRefPubMed Kelly F, Sale S, Bayley G, Cook T, Stoddart P, White M. A cohort evaluation of the pediatric ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in 100 children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2008;18:947–51.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Lopez-Gil M, Brimacombe J, Garcia G. A randomized non-crossover study comparing the ProSeal and Classic laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized children. Br J Anaesth. 2005;95:827–30.CrossRefPubMed Lopez-Gil M, Brimacombe J, Garcia G. A randomized non-crossover study comparing the ProSeal and Classic laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized children. Br J Anaesth. 2005;95:827–30.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Sinha A, Sharma B, Sood J. ProSeal as an alternative to endotracheal intubation in pediatric laparoscopy. Paediatr Anaesth. 2007;17:327–32.CrossRefPubMed Sinha A, Sharma B, Sood J. ProSeal as an alternative to endotracheal intubation in pediatric laparoscopy. Paediatr Anaesth. 2007;17:327–32.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Tokgoz O, Tufek A, Beyaz SG, Yuksel MU, Celik F, Aycan IO, Guzel A. Comparison of the efficacies of Igel™ and LMA-Proseal™ for airway management in pediatric patients. Turk J Med Sci. 2013;43:208–13. Tokgoz O, Tufek A, Beyaz SG, Yuksel MU, Celik F, Aycan IO, Guzel A. Comparison of the efficacies of Igel™ and LMA-Proseal™ for airway management in pediatric patients. Turk J Med Sci. 2013;43:208–13.
17.
18.
go back to reference Bagshaw O. The size 1.5 laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in paediatric anaesthetic practice. Paediatr Anaesth. 2002;12:420–3.CrossRefPubMed Bagshaw O. The size 1.5 laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in paediatric anaesthetic practice. Paediatr Anaesth. 2002;12:420–3.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Lopez-Gil M, Brimacombe J. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2005;15:229–34.CrossRefPubMed Lopez-Gil M, Brimacombe J. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2005;15:229–34.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
An evaluation of the I-gel supraglottic airway in 70 pediatric patients
Authors
Tze Yeng Yeoh
Koo Boon Chan
Lynn S. H. Yeo
Eugene H. C. Liu
Terry L. T. Pan
Publication date
01-04-2015
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Journal of Anesthesia / Issue 2/2015
Print ISSN: 0913-8668
Electronic ISSN: 1438-8359
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-014-1915-6

Other articles of this Issue 2/2015

Journal of Anesthesia 2/2015 Go to the issue