Skip to main content
Top
Published in: PharmacoEconomics 8/2004

01-06-2004 | Original Research Article

An Economic Evaluation of Fluvastatin used for the Prevention of Cardiac Events Following Successful First Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the UK

Authors: Dr Paul A. Scuffham, Stephen Chaplin

Published in: PharmacoEconomics | Issue 8/2004

Login to get access

Abstract

Aims: To estimate the costs, benefits and cost effectiveness, from the UK NHS perspective, of fluvastatin (relative to no HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor [statin]) for the secondary prevention of major adverse cardiac events following a successful first percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Methods: A cost-effectiveness analysis was undertaken using efficacy data from the Lescol® Intervention Prevention Study (LIPS). LIPS was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial undertaken in 77 centres (predominantly in Europe). Patients included in the trial had moderate hypercholesterolaemia and had successfully undergone their first PCI. Fluvastatin (Lescol®) 40mg twice daily plus dietary counselling was given to the intervention group for up to 4 years; the control group received dietary counselling only. A Markov model was used to estimate the incremental costs per QALY gained over a 10-year period, with cost data drawn from the UK NHS (2002 values). Monte Carlo simulations and multivariate analysis were used to assess uncertainty. Costs were discounted at 6% per annum, and health outcomes at 1.5% per annum.
Results: On average, treatment with fluvastatin cost an additional £300 (SD £303) [€423; SD €428] per patient and resulted in an additional 0.092 (SD 0.06) QALYs per patient over 10 years compared with controls. The incremental cost per QALY gained with fluvastatin versus the control group was £3207 (SD £5497) [€4527; SD €7759]. Fluvastatin was dominant (better outcomes and lower costs) in 15.9% of the simulations and was dominated in 2.9%. The key determinants of cost effectiveness were: the effectiveness of fluvastatin in reducing acute myocardial infarction, subsequent PCI, coronary artery bypass graft and cardiac deaths; the utility weight associated with a subsequent post-PCI state; the cost of fluvastatin; and the time horizon evaluated.
Conclusions: Fluvastatin is the only statin which has proven effective in preventing major coronary adverse events in new PCI patients; other statins lack this evidence. This Markov model, with its underlying assumptions and data, suggests that fluvastatin is a viable and economically efficient pharmaceutical (relative to no statin) to reduce heart disease in the UK when given routinely to all patients following PCI.
Footnotes
1
The use of trade names is for product identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Final appraisal determination: coronary artery stents. London: National Institute for Clinical Excellence, 2003 National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Final appraisal determination: coronary artery stents. London: National Institute for Clinical Excellence, 2003
2.
go back to reference Department of Health. NHS reference costs 2002 Department of Health, London, 2002 [online]. Available from URL: http:// www.doh.gov.uk/nhsexecIREFCOSTS/refcosts2002.pdf [Accessed 2003 Sep 18] Department of Health. NHS reference costs 2002 Department of Health, London, 2002 [online]. Available from URL: http:// www.doh.gov.uk/nhsexecIREFCOSTS/refcosts2002.pdf [Accessed 2003 Sep 18]
3.
go back to reference Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group. MRCIBHF heart protection study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20,536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2002; 360 (9326): 7–22CrossRef Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group. MRCIBHF heart protection study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20,536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2002; 360 (9326): 7–22CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Serruys PW, de Feyter P, Macaya C, et al. Fluvastatin for prevention of cardiac events following successful first percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2002; 287 (24): 3215–22PubMedCrossRef Serruys PW, de Feyter P, Macaya C, et al. Fluvastatin for prevention of cardiac events following successful first percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2002; 287 (24): 3215–22PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Data Pro. Williamstown (MA): Tree Age Software Inc, 2002 Data Pro. Williamstown (MA): Tree Age Software Inc, 2002
6.
go back to reference Cleland JG, Walker A. Is medical treatment for angina the most cost-effective option? Eur Heart J 1997; 18 Suppl. B: B35–42 Cleland JG, Walker A. Is medical treatment for angina the most cost-effective option? Eur Heart J 1997; 18 Suppl. B: B35–42
7.
go back to reference Cleland JG, Walker A. Therapeutic options and cost considerations in the treatment of ischemic heart disease. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 1998; 12 Suppl. 3: 225–32PubMedCrossRef Cleland JG, Walker A. Therapeutic options and cost considerations in the treatment of ischemic heart disease. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 1998; 12 Suppl. 3: 225–32PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Pharoah PD, Hollingworth W. Cost effectiveness of lowering cholesterol concentration with statins in patients with and without pre-existing coronary heart disease: life table method applied to health authority population. BMJ 1996; 312 (7044): 1443–8PubMedCrossRef Pharoah PD, Hollingworth W. Cost effectiveness of lowering cholesterol concentration with statins in patients with and without pre-existing coronary heart disease: life table method applied to health authority population. BMJ 1996; 312 (7044): 1443–8PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Troche CJ, Tacke J, Hinzpeter B, et al. Cost-effectiveness of primary and secondary prevention in cardiovascular diseases. Eur Heart J 1998; 19 Suppl. C: C59–65 Troche CJ, Tacke J, Hinzpeter B, et al. Cost-effectiveness of primary and secondary prevention in cardiovascular diseases. Eur Heart J 1998; 19 Suppl. C: C59–65
10.
go back to reference DeWilde S, Carey IM, Bremner SA, et al. Evolution of statin prescribing 1994–2001: a case of agism but not of sexism? Heart 2003; 89 (4): 417–21PubMedCrossRef DeWilde S, Carey IM, Bremner SA, et al. Evolution of statin prescribing 1994–2001: a case of agism but not of sexism? Heart 2003; 89 (4): 417–21PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Briggs A. Handling uncertainty in economic evaluations and presenting the results. In: Drummond MF, McGuire A, editors. Economic evaluation in health care. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001: 172–214 Briggs A. Handling uncertainty in economic evaluations and presenting the results. In: Drummond MF, McGuire A, editors. Economic evaluation in health care. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001: 172–214
12.
go back to reference Sonnenberg FA, Beck JR. Markov models in medical decision making: a practical guide. Med Decis Making 1993; 13: 322–38PubMedCrossRef Sonnenberg FA, Beck JR. Markov models in medical decision making: a practical guide. Med Decis Making 1993; 13: 322–38PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Melsop KA, Boothroyd DB, Hlatky MA. Quality of life and time trade-off utility measures in patients with coronary artery disease. Am Heart J 2003; 145 (1): 3641CrossRef Melsop KA, Boothroyd DB, Hlatky MA. Quality of life and time trade-off utility measures in patients with coronary artery disease. Am Heart J 2003; 145 (1): 3641CrossRef
14.
go back to reference National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Health technology appraisal: review of coronary artery stents and appraisal of drug eluting stents. London: National Institute for Clinical Excellence, 2003 National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Health technology appraisal: review of coronary artery stents and appraisal of drug eluting stents. London: National Institute for Clinical Excellence, 2003
15.
go back to reference Serruys PW, Unger F, Sousa JE, et al. Comparison of coronaryartery bypass surgery and stenting for the treatment of multivessel disease. N Engl J Med 2001; 344 (15): 1117–24PubMedCrossRef Serruys PW, Unger F, Sousa JE, et al. Comparison of coronaryartery bypass surgery and stenting for the treatment of multivessel disease. N Engl J Med 2001; 344 (15): 1117–24PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Greiner W, Weijen T, Nieuwenhuizen M, et al. A single European currency for EQ-5D health states: results from a sixcountry study. Eur J Health Econ 2003; 4 (3): 222–31PubMedCrossRef Greiner W, Weijen T, Nieuwenhuizen M, et al. A single European currency for EQ-5D health states: results from a sixcountry study. Eur J Health Econ 2003; 4 (3): 222–31PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference British Medical Association and the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain. British National Ponmlary (BNF) 45 Clinical and Biomedical Computing Ltd, 2001 [online]. Available from URL: www.bnf.org.uk [Accessed 2002 Apr 22] British Medical Association and the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain. British National Ponmlary (BNF) 45 Clinical and Biomedical Computing Ltd, 2001 [online]. Available from URL: www.bnf.org.uk [Accessed 2002 Apr 22]
18.
go back to reference Department of Health. Prescription cost analysis 2001 Department of Health, London, 2002 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.doh.gov.uk/stats/pca2001.htm [Accessed 2003 Mar 18] Department of Health. Prescription cost analysis 2001 Department of Health, London, 2002 [online]. Available from URL: http://​www.​doh.​gov.​uk/​stats/​pca2001.​htm [Accessed 2003 Mar 18]
19.
go back to reference Netten A, Rees T, Harrison G. Unit costs of health and social care 2001 Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury, 2002 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.ukc.ac.ukIPSSRU [Accessed 2003 May 30] Netten A, Rees T, Harrison G. Unit costs of health and social care 2001 Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury, 2002 [online]. Available from URL: http://​www.​ukc.​ac.​ukIPSSRU [Accessed 2003 May 30]
20.
go back to reference Norris RM, Wong PS, Dixon G, et al. Fatality outside hospital from acute coronary events in three British health districts, 1994–5. BMJ 1998; 316 (7137): 1065–70PubMed Norris RM, Wong PS, Dixon G, et al. Fatality outside hospital from acute coronary events in three British health districts, 1994–5. BMJ 1998; 316 (7137): 1065–70PubMed
21.
go back to reference National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Technical guidance for manufacturers and sponsors on making a submission to a technology appraisal. London: National Institute for Clinical Excellence, 2001 National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Technical guidance for manufacturers and sponsors on making a submission to a technology appraisal. London: National Institute for Clinical Excellence, 2001
22.
go back to reference Zethraeus N, Johannesson M, Jonsson B, et al. Advantages of using the net-benefit approach for analysing uncertainty in economic evaluation studies. Pharmacoeconomics 2003; 21 (1), 39–48PubMedCrossRef Zethraeus N, Johannesson M, Jonsson B, et al. Advantages of using the net-benefit approach for analysing uncertainty in economic evaluation studies. Pharmacoeconomics 2003; 21 (1), 39–48PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Drummond MF, O’Brien B, Stoddart GL, et al. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997 Drummond MF, O’Brien B, Stoddart GL, et al. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997
24.
go back to reference Caro J, Klittich W, McGuire A, et al. The West of Scotland coronary prevention study: economic benefit analysis or primary prevention with pravastatin. BMJ 1997; 315: 1577–82PubMedCrossRef Caro J, Klittich W, McGuire A, et al. The West of Scotland coronary prevention study: economic benefit analysis or primary prevention with pravastatin. BMJ 1997; 315: 1577–82PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Huse DM, Russell MW, Miller JD, et al. Cost-effectiveness of stanns. Am J Cardiol 1998; 82: 1357–63PubMedCrossRef Huse DM, Russell MW, Miller JD, et al. Cost-effectiveness of stanns. Am J Cardiol 1998; 82: 1357–63PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Prosser LA, Stinnett AA, Glodman PA, et al. Cost-effectiveness of cholesterol-lowering therapies according to selected patient characteristics. Ann Intern Med 2000; 132 (10): 769–79PubMed Prosser LA, Stinnett AA, Glodman PA, et al. Cost-effectiveness of cholesterol-lowering therapies according to selected patient characteristics. Ann Intern Med 2000; 132 (10): 769–79PubMed
27.
go back to reference van Hout BA, Simoons ML. Cost-effectiveness of HMG coenzyme reductase inhibitors: whom to treat? Eur Heart J 2001; 22: 751–61PubMedCrossRef van Hout BA, Simoons ML. Cost-effectiveness of HMG coenzyme reductase inhibitors: whom to treat? Eur Heart J 2001; 22: 751–61PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Department of Health. Hospital episode statistics 2001–2002 Department of Health, London, 2002 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.doh.gov.uk/hes/tables/tbcv101exls [Accessed 2003 Sep 18] Department of Health. Hospital episode statistics 2001–2002 Department of Health, London, 2002 [online]. Available from URL: http://​www.​doh.​gov.​uk/​hes/​tables/​tbcv101exls [Accessed 2003 Sep 18]
29.
go back to reference Department of Health. Hospital episode statistics 2000–2001 Department of Health, London, 2001 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.doh.gov.uk/hes/tables/tbcv100exls [Accessed 2003 Sep 18] Department of Health. Hospital episode statistics 2000–2001 Department of Health, London, 2001 [online]. Available from URL: http://​www.​doh.​gov.​uk/​hes/​tables/​tbcv100exls [Accessed 2003 Sep 18]
Metadata
Title
An Economic Evaluation of Fluvastatin used for the Prevention of Cardiac Events Following Successful First Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the UK
Authors
Dr Paul A. Scuffham
Stephen Chaplin
Publication date
01-06-2004
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
PharmacoEconomics / Issue 8/2004
Print ISSN: 1170-7690
Electronic ISSN: 1179-2027
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200422080-00004

Other articles of this Issue 8/2004

PharmacoEconomics 8/2004 Go to the issue