Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Asia Pacific Family Medicine 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research

An analysis of qualitative and mixed methods abstracts from Japanese, UK and US primary care conferences

Authors: Makoto Kaneko, Takuya Aoki, Ryuichi Ohta, Machiko Inoue, Rakesh N. Modi

Published in: Asia Pacific Family Medicine | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

As research in family medicine covers varied topics, multiple methodologies such as qualitative research (QR) and mixed methods research (MMR) are crucial. However, we do not know about the difference in the proportion of QR or MMR between Japan, the UK and the US. This knowledge is needed to shape future research within countries with developing primary care such as Japan and other Asian countries. This study aims to describe the use of QR and MMR in Japanese primary care and compare this to the UK and US; then to make informed recommendations for primary care research.

Methods

A repeated cross-sectional study (2012–2016) based on the abstracts submitted to the annual conferences of the Japanese Primary Care Association in Japan, the Royal College of General Practitioners in the UK, and the North American Primary Care Research Group in the US and other North American countries. The proportions of QR/MMR among all the posters and paper presentations for each of these three conferences were assessed. Also examined were trends and types of qualitative techniques for all three countries and participants/settings for Japan.

Results

There were 1080 abstracts for Japan, 575 for UK and 3614 for US conferences. QR/MMR proportions were 7.5%, 15.1% and 28.1%, respectively. Japan’s proportion was lower than that of UK and US (p < 0.001). The proportion was increasing over time for the UK (p = 0.02). Steps for coding and analyses was most popular for Japan, thematic analysis for the UK and grounded theory for the US. Primary care doctors and hospitals were the commonest contexts for Japan.

Conclusions

QR and MMR were not as popular in primary care in Japan compared to the UK and the US, whereas their use was increasing in the UK. Approaches, participants and settings may differ among these countries. Education and promotion of QR/MMR and multi-disciplinary collaborations need to be recommended in Japan with developing primary care.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Liamputtong P. Research methods in health: foundations for evidenced based practice. Victoria: Oxford University Press; 2016. Liamputtong P. Research methods in health: foundations for evidenced based practice. Victoria: Oxford University Press; 2016.
2.
go back to reference McKibbon KA, Gadd CS. A quantitative analysis of qualitative studies in clinical journals for the 2000 publishing year. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2004;4:11.CrossRef McKibbon KA, Gadd CS. A quantitative analysis of qualitative studies in clinical journals for the 2000 publishing year. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2004;4:11.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Greenhalgh T. Research methods for primary health care. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2008. p. 57–89. Greenhalgh T. Research methods for primary health care. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2008. p. 57–89.
6.
go back to reference Kusaba T. Comprehensiveness and education about common disease in outpatient care of primary care clinics. In: Yokobayashi K, editor. Recommendations: common disease in Japan generalist teachers consortium. Tokyo: Kai-shorin; 2013. p. 104–11 (in Japanese). Kusaba T. Comprehensiveness and education about common disease in outpatient care of primary care clinics. In: Yokobayashi K, editor. Recommendations: common disease in Japan generalist teachers consortium. Tokyo: Kai-shorin; 2013. p. 104–11 (in Japanese).
8.
go back to reference Aomatsu M. Qualitative research in primary care and effort of editors. Off J Jpn Prim Care Assoc. 2017;40(1):1. Aomatsu M. Qualitative research in primary care and effort of editors. Off J Jpn Prim Care Assoc. 2017;40(1):1.
12.
go back to reference Aoki T, Fukuhara S. Japanese representation in high-impact international primary care journals. Off J Jpn Prim Care Assoc. 2017;40(3):126–30. Aoki T, Fukuhara S. Japanese representation in high-impact international primary care journals. Off J Jpn Prim Care Assoc. 2017;40(3):126–30.
13.
go back to reference Saiki-Craighill S. Overview of grounded theory approach. Keio SFC J. 2014;14(1):30–43. Saiki-Craighill S. Overview of grounded theory approach. Keio SFC J. 2014;14(1):30–43.
19.
go back to reference Toi T, Murata A, Ota H, Ohashi H, Kusaba T. Research on actual condition of family physician in Japan. Off J Jpn Prim Care Assoc. 2016;39:243–9. Toi T, Murata A, Ota H, Ohashi H, Kusaba T. Research on actual condition of family physician in Japan. Off J Jpn Prim Care Assoc. 2016;39:243–9.
20.
go back to reference Kitajima Y, Nishihira T, Nishitani M, Tao M, Miyashiba T, Sakashita R. The current state of and issues in nursing research carried out by clinical nurses with reference to papers in academic journals. RINCPC Bull. 2012;19:1–15. Kitajima Y, Nishihira T, Nishitani M, Tao M, Miyashiba T, Sakashita R. The current state of and issues in nursing research carried out by clinical nurses with reference to papers in academic journals. RINCPC Bull. 2012;19:1–15.
Metadata
Title
An analysis of qualitative and mixed methods abstracts from Japanese, UK and US primary care conferences
Authors
Makoto Kaneko
Takuya Aoki
Ryuichi Ohta
Machiko Inoue
Rakesh N. Modi
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Asia Pacific Family Medicine / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1447-056X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12930-018-0048-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Asia Pacific Family Medicine 1/2018 Go to the issue