Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Orthopaedic Science 2/2014

01-03-2014 | Original Article

Ambulatory surgery in orthopedics: experience of over 10,000 patients

Authors: M. Á. Martín-Ferrero, O. Faour-Martín, C. Simon-Perez, M. Pérez-Herrero, J. A. de Pedro-Moro

Published in: Journal of Orthopaedic Science | Issue 2/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The concept of day surgery is becoming an increasingly important part of elective surgery worldwide. Relentless pressure to cut costs may constrain clinical judgment regarding the most appropriate location for a patient’s surgical care. The aim of this study was to determine clinical and quality indicators relating to our experience in orthopedic day durgery, mainly in relation to unplanned overnight admission and readmission rates. Additionally, we focused on describing the main characteristics of the patients that experienced complications, and compared the patient satisfaction rates following ambulatory and non-ambulatory procedures.

Methods

We evaluated 10,032 patients who underwent surgical orthopedic procedures according to the protocols of our Ambulatory Surgery Unit. All complications that occurred were noted. A quality-of-life assessment (SF-36 test) was carried out both pre- and postoperatively. Ambulatory substitution rates and quality indicators for orthopedic procedures were also determined.

Results

The major complication rate was minimal, with no mortal cases, and there was a high rate of ambulatory substitution for the procedures studied. Outcomes of the SF-36 questionnaire showed significant improvement postoperatively. An unplanned overnight admission rate of 0.14 % was achieved.

Conclusions

Our institution has shown that it is possible to provide good-quality ambulatory orthopedic surgery. There still appears to be the potential to increase the proportion of these procedures. Surgeons and anesthesiologists must strongly adhere to strict patient selection criteria for ambulatory orthopedic surgery in order to reduce complications in the immediate postoperative term.
Literature
1.
go back to reference National Center for Health Statistics. Hospital admissions, average length of stay, and outpatient visits, according to type of ownership and size of hospital, and percent outpatient surgery: United States, selected years 1975–2000 [Table 96]. In: Health, United States, 2002, With Chartbook on Trends in the Health of Americans. Hyattsville, MD: NCHS; 2002. National Center for Health Statistics. Hospital admissions, average length of stay, and outpatient visits, according to type of ownership and size of hospital, and percent outpatient surgery: United States, selected years 1975–2000 [Table 96]. In: Health, United States, 2002, With Chartbook on Trends in the Health of Americans. Hyattsville, MD: NCHS; 2002.
2.
go back to reference NHS Modernisation Agency. 10 high impact changes for service improvement and delivery: a guide for NHS leaders, vols 15–84. London: NHS Modernisation Agency; 2004. NHS Modernisation Agency. 10 high impact changes for service improvement and delivery: a guide for NHS leaders, vols 15–84. London: NHS Modernisation Agency; 2004.
3.
go back to reference Punnonen H. January–December 2007 at hospitals and hospital districts—a summary of demand, production and finance. Helsinki: Finnish Local and Regional Authorities; 2008. p 34–39 (in Finnish). Punnonen H. January–December 2007 at hospitals and hospital districts—a summary of demand, production and finance. Helsinki: Finnish Local and Regional Authorities; 2008. p 34–39 (in Finnish).
4.
go back to reference National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health. Care periods in 2006 and trends of care periods in the years 1997–2006. Finnish official statistics. Helsinki: National Institute for Health and Welfare; 2007. National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health. Care periods in 2006 and trends of care periods in the years 1997–2006. Finnish official statistics. Helsinki: National Institute for Health and Welfare; 2007.
6.
go back to reference Twersky R, Fishman D, Homel P. What happens after discharge? Return hospital visits after ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg. 1997;84:319–24.PubMed Twersky R, Fishman D, Homel P. What happens after discharge? Return hospital visits after ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg. 1997;84:319–24.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Fleisher LA, Pasternak LR, Lyles A. A novel index of elevated risk of inpatient hospital admission immediately following outpatient surgery. Arch Surg. 2007;142:263–8.PubMedCrossRef Fleisher LA, Pasternak LR, Lyles A. A novel index of elevated risk of inpatient hospital admission immediately following outpatient surgery. Arch Surg. 2007;142:263–8.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Preoperative Fasting. Practice guidelines for preoperative fasting and the use of pharmacologic agents to reduce the risk of pulmonary aspiration: application to healthy patients undergoing elective procedures. Anesthesiology. 1999;90:896–905.CrossRef American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Preoperative Fasting. Practice guidelines for preoperative fasting and the use of pharmacologic agents to reduce the risk of pulmonary aspiration: application to healthy patients undergoing elective procedures. Anesthesiology. 1999;90:896–905.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Korttila K. Anaesthesia for ambulatory surgery: firm definitions of “home readiness” needed. Ann Med. 1991;23:635–6.PubMedCrossRef Korttila K. Anaesthesia for ambulatory surgery: firm definitions of “home readiness” needed. Ann Med. 1991;23:635–6.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Herrera FJ, Wong J, Chung MB. A systematic review of postoperative recovery outcomes measurements after ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg. 2007;105(1):63–9.PubMedCrossRef Herrera FJ, Wong J, Chung MB. A systematic review of postoperative recovery outcomes measurements after ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg. 2007;105(1):63–9.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Wu CL, Berenholtz SM, Pronovost PJ, Fleisher LA. Systematic review and analysis of postdischarge symptoms after outpatient surgery. Anesthesiology. 2002;96:994–1003.PubMedCrossRef Wu CL, Berenholtz SM, Pronovost PJ, Fleisher LA. Systematic review and analysis of postdischarge symptoms after outpatient surgery. Anesthesiology. 2002;96:994–1003.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Smith I. Day surgery for all: updated selection criteria. Current Anaesth Critical Care. 2007;18:181–7.CrossRef Smith I. Day surgery for all: updated selection criteria. Current Anaesth Critical Care. 2007;18:181–7.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Aldwinckle RJ, Montgomery JE. Unplanned admission rates and postdischarge complications in patients over the age of 70 following day case surgery. Anaesthesia. 2004;59:57–9.PubMedCrossRef Aldwinckle RJ, Montgomery JE. Unplanned admission rates and postdischarge complications in patients over the age of 70 following day case surgery. Anaesthesia. 2004;59:57–9.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ansell GL, Montgomery JE. Outcome of ASA III patients undergoing day case surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2004;92:71–4. Ansell GL, Montgomery JE. Outcome of ASA III patients undergoing day case surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2004;92:71–4.
16.
go back to reference Fortier J, Chung F, Su J. Unanticipated admission after ambulatory surgery—a prospective study. Can J Anaesth. 1998;45:612–9.PubMedCrossRef Fortier J, Chung F, Su J. Unanticipated admission after ambulatory surgery—a prospective study. Can J Anaesth. 1998;45:612–9.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Coley KC, Williams BA, DaPos SV, Chen C, Smith RB. Retrospective evaluation of unanticipated admissions and readmissions after same day surgery and associated costs. J Clin Anesth. 2002;14:349–53.PubMedCrossRef Coley KC, Williams BA, DaPos SV, Chen C, Smith RB. Retrospective evaluation of unanticipated admissions and readmissions after same day surgery and associated costs. J Clin Anesth. 2002;14:349–53.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Mattila K, Hynynen M. Day surgery in Finland: a prospective cohort study of 14 day-surgery units. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009;53:455–63.PubMedCrossRef Mattila K, Hynynen M. Day surgery in Finland: a prospective cohort study of 14 day-surgery units. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009;53:455–63.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Colomer J, Ondategui S, Esteban E. Substitution indexes in ambulatory surgery: measure, count and compare. Gac Sanit. 2001;15:523–6.PubMedCrossRef Colomer J, Ondategui S, Esteban E. Substitution indexes in ambulatory surgery: measure, count and compare. Gac Sanit. 2001;15:523–6.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Lindh A, Andersson AS, Westman L. Is transient lumbar pain after spinal anaesthesia with lidocaine influenced by early mobilisation? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2001;45:290–3.PubMedCrossRef Lindh A, Andersson AS, Westman L. Is transient lumbar pain after spinal anaesthesia with lidocaine influenced by early mobilisation? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2001;45:290–3.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Ambulatory surgery in orthopedics: experience of over 10,000 patients
Authors
M. Á. Martín-Ferrero
O. Faour-Martín
C. Simon-Perez
M. Pérez-Herrero
J. A. de Pedro-Moro
Publication date
01-03-2014
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Science / Issue 2/2014
Print ISSN: 0949-2658
Electronic ISSN: 1436-2023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-013-0501-3

Other articles of this Issue 2/2014

Journal of Orthopaedic Science 2/2014 Go to the issue