Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Alzheimer's Disease | Research

Is Aducanumab treatment developed to prevent progression of Alzheimer's disease cost-effective in Turkey?

Authors: Vahit Yigit, Selin Kalender, Iskender Cetinturk

Published in: Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Alzheimer's Disease (AD), the most common type of dementia, is a chronic, progressive, and neurodegenerative brain discomfort that causes the be damage to brain cells. Although there is no definitive treatment for AD, various drug treatments are used to reduce and control the symptoms of the disease. Developed for the treatment of mild-stage Alzheimer's patients, Aducanumab is the only drug approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the past two decades. However, the cost is very high and, in many countries, Aducanumab has not been approved due to insufficient clinical efficacy and lack of evidence yet. This study aims to analyze the cost-effectiveness of Aducanumab, which was developed for the treatment of mild-stage AD, from the patient's perspective.

Methods

In the study, the Markov model was developed to determine the cost-effectiveness of Aducanumab compared to Standard of Care (SoC) therapy over a 5-year horizon. Cost and effectiveness data were taken from the literature. In the study, the discount rate was determined as 6%. The results were presented as the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), which represents the cost per quality-adjusted life years (QALY). The results were retested with a one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) due to possible uncertainties in the research parameters. The results were presented with the tornado diagram and the scatter plots.

Results

With the Markov model, the total costs of Aducanumab and SoC treatments over a 5-year horizon were found to be 98.068 $ and 21.292 $, respectively. Aducanumab treatment had an incremental gain of 0.64 QALY and an incremental cost of 76.776 $ compared to the SoC treatment. The ICER value, which shows the additional cost per QALY of Aducanumab, was 119.408 $/QALY. As a result of the study, it was determined that Aducanumab was not cost-effective when compared to SoC treatment. Sensitivity analysis results showed stability against uncertainties. Aducanumab was confirmed not to be cost-effective with its current price and potential clinical benefit.

Conclusion

The result of the research is considered important in terms of providing evidence-based information on the cost-effectiveness of Aducanumab in Turkey. However, further, research is needed to evaluate Aducanumab's clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
This study was presented as an oral presentation to the 7. International Health Sciences and Management Conference on 17 June 2022.
 
Literature
2.
go back to reference Knopman DS, Amieva H, Petersen RC, Chételat G, Holtzman DM, Hyman BT, et al. Alzheimer Disease. Nat Rev Dis Prim Nat Res. 2021;7:1–21. Knopman DS, Amieva H, Petersen RC, Chételat G, Holtzman DM, Hyman BT, et al. Alzheimer Disease. Nat Rev Dis Prim Nat Res. 2021;7:1–21.
3.
go back to reference Öztürk-Özkan G. Effect of Flavonoids on Alzheimer’s disease. J Heal Sci Life. 2022;6:26–38. Öztürk-Özkan G. Effect of Flavonoids on Alzheimer’s disease. J Heal Sci Life. 2022;6:26–38.
4.
go back to reference Elçioğlu HK, Yılmaz G, İlhan B, Karan MA. Alzheimer Hastalığında Deneysel Hayvan Modelleri. Nobel Med. 2019;14:5–13. Elçioğlu HK, Yılmaz G, İlhan B, Karan MA. Alzheimer Hastalığında Deneysel Hayvan Modelleri. Nobel Med. 2019;14:5–13.
5.
go back to reference Dos Santos Picanco LC, Ozela PF, Fatima De, de Brito BM, Pinheiro AA, Padilha EC, Braga FS, et al. Alzheimer’s disease: a review from the pathophysiology to diagnosis, new perspectives for pharmacological treatment. Curr Med Chem. 2018;25:3141–59.CrossRefPubMed Dos Santos Picanco LC, Ozela PF, Fatima De, de Brito BM, Pinheiro AA, Padilha EC, Braga FS, et al. Alzheimer’s disease: a review from the pathophysiology to diagnosis, new perspectives for pharmacological treatment. Curr Med Chem. 2018;25:3141–59.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Elmacı-Tuncer N. The pathophysiology of alzheimer’s disease. Turkiye Klin J Neurol-Special Top. 2012;5:7–10. Elmacı-Tuncer N. The pathophysiology of alzheimer’s disease. Turkiye Klin J Neurol-Special Top. 2012;5:7–10.
8.
9.
go back to reference Hampel H, Broich K, Hoessler Y, Pantel J. Biological markers for early detection and pharmacological treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2009;11:141–57.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hampel H, Broich K, Hoessler Y, Pantel J. Biological markers for early detection and pharmacological treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2009;11:141–57.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Winblad B, Wimo A, Ove A. Outcome Measures in Alzheimer’s disease: do they go far enough? Dement Geiatric Cogn Disord. 2000;11:3–10.CrossRef Winblad B, Wimo A, Ove A. Outcome Measures in Alzheimer’s disease: do they go far enough? Dement Geiatric Cogn Disord. 2000;11:3–10.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Dunn B, Stein P, Cavazzoni P. Approval of aducanumab for alzheimer disease - the fda’s perspective. JAMA Intern Med. 2021;181:1276–8.CrossRefPubMed Dunn B, Stein P, Cavazzoni P. Approval of aducanumab for alzheimer disease - the fda’s perspective. JAMA Intern Med. 2021;181:1276–8.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Synnott PGS, Whittington MD, Lin GA, Rind DM, Pearson SD. The effectiveness and value of aducanumab for Alzheimer’s disease. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021;27:1613–7.PubMed Synnott PGS, Whittington MD, Lin GA, Rind DM, Pearson SD. The effectiveness and value of aducanumab for Alzheimer’s disease. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021;27:1613–7.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Sinha P, Barocas JA. Cost-effectiveness of aducanumab to prevent Alzheimer’s disease progression at current list price. Alzheimer’s Dement Transl Res Clin Interv. 2022;8:1–4. Sinha P, Barocas JA. Cost-effectiveness of aducanumab to prevent Alzheimer’s disease progression at current list price. Alzheimer’s Dement Transl Res Clin Interv. 2022;8:1–4.
18.
21.
go back to reference Haacker M, Hallett TB, Atun R. On time horizons in health economic evaluations. Health Policy Plan. 2020;35:1237–43.CrossRefPubMed Haacker M, Hallett TB, Atun R. On time horizons in health economic evaluations. Health Policy Plan. 2020;35:1237–43.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Cummings J. New approaches to symptomatic treatments for Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Neurodegener. 2021;16:1–13. Cummings J. New approaches to symptomatic treatments for Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Neurodegener. 2021;16:1–13.
25.
go back to reference Green C, Handels R, Gustavsson A, Wimo A, Winblad B, Sköldunger A, et al. Assessing cost-effectiveness of early intervention in Alzheimer’s disease: an open-source modeling framework. Alzheimers Dement. 2019;15:1309–21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Green C, Handels R, Gustavsson A, Wimo A, Winblad B, Sköldunger A, et al. Assessing cost-effectiveness of early intervention in Alzheimer’s disease: an open-source modeling framework. Alzheimers Dement. 2019;15:1309–21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Boustani M, Doty EG, Garrison LP, Smolen LJ, Belger M, Klein TM, et al. Assessing the cost-effectiveness of a hypothetical disease-modifying therapy with limited duration for the treatment of early symptomatic alzheimer disease. Clin Ther. 2022;44:1449–62.CrossRefPubMed Boustani M, Doty EG, Garrison LP, Smolen LJ, Belger M, Klein TM, et al. Assessing the cost-effectiveness of a hypothetical disease-modifying therapy with limited duration for the treatment of early symptomatic alzheimer disease. Clin Ther. 2022;44:1449–62.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Tahami Monfared AA, Tafazzoli A, Chavan A, Ye W, Zhang Q. The potential economic value of lecanemab in patients with early alzheimer’s disease using simulation modeling. Neurol Ther. 2022;11:1285–307.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tahami Monfared AA, Tafazzoli A, Chavan A, Ye W, Zhang Q. The potential economic value of lecanemab in patients with early alzheimer’s disease using simulation modeling. Neurol Ther. 2022;11:1285–307.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Anderson R, Knapp M, Wittenberg R, Handels R, Schott JM. Economic modelling of disease-modifying therapies in Alzheimer’s disease. London. 2018. www.lse.ac.uk/pssru. Accessed 20 July 2023. Anderson R, Knapp M, Wittenberg R, Handels R, Schott JM. Economic modelling of disease-modifying therapies in Alzheimer’s disease. London. 2018. www.​lse.​ac.​uk/​pssru. Accessed 20 July 2023.
29.
go back to reference Neumann PJ, Araki SS, Arcelus A, Longo A, Papadopoulos G, Kosik KS, et al. Measuring Alzheimer’s disease progression with transition probabilities: estimates from CERAD. Neurology. 2001;57:957–64.CrossRefPubMed Neumann PJ, Araki SS, Arcelus A, Longo A, Papadopoulos G, Kosik KS, et al. Measuring Alzheimer’s disease progression with transition probabilities: estimates from CERAD. Neurology. 2001;57:957–64.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Green C, Shearer J, Ritchie CW, Zajicek JP. Model-based economic evaluation in Alzheimer’s disease: a review of the methods available to model Alzheimer’s disease progression. Value Heal. 2011;14:621–30.CrossRef Green C, Shearer J, Ritchie CW, Zajicek JP. Model-based economic evaluation in Alzheimer’s disease: a review of the methods available to model Alzheimer’s disease progression. Value Heal. 2011;14:621–30.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Alzheimer’s Association. Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2023;2023(19):1598–695. Alzheimer’s Association. Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2023;2023(19):1598–695.
32.
go back to reference Spackman DE, Kadiyala S, Neumann PJ, Veenstra DL, Sullivan SD. Measuring Alzheimer disease progression with transition probabilities: estimates from NACC-UDS. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2012;9:1050–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Spackman DE, Kadiyala S, Neumann PJ, Veenstra DL, Sullivan SD. Measuring Alzheimer disease progression with transition probabilities: estimates from NACC-UDS. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2012;9:1050–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
go back to reference Budd Haeberlein S, Aisen PS, Barkhof F, Chalkias S, Chen T, Cohen S, et al. Two randomized phase 3 studies of aducanumab in early alzheimer’s disease. J Prev Alzheimer’s Dis. 2022;9:197–210. Budd Haeberlein S, Aisen PS, Barkhof F, Chalkias S, Chen T, Cohen S, et al. Two randomized phase 3 studies of aducanumab in early alzheimer’s disease. J Prev Alzheimer’s Dis. 2022;9:197–210.
34.
go back to reference Eroymak S, Yigit V. Cost effectiveness analysis of alzheimer’s disease. Turkiye Klin J Heal Sci. 2020;5:99–111.CrossRef Eroymak S, Yigit V. Cost effectiveness analysis of alzheimer’s disease. Turkiye Klin J Heal Sci. 2020;5:99–111.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Neumann PJ, Kuntz KM, Leon J, Araki SS, Hermann RC, Hsu M-A, et al. Health utilities in alzheimer’s disease: a cross-sectional study of patients and caregivers. Source Med Care. 1999;37:27–32.CrossRef Neumann PJ, Kuntz KM, Leon J, Araki SS, Hermann RC, Hsu M-A, et al. Health utilities in alzheimer’s disease: a cross-sectional study of patients and caregivers. Source Med Care. 1999;37:27–32.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Haacker M, Hallett TB, Atun R. On discount rates for economic evaluations in global health. Health Policy Plan. 2020;35:107–14.CrossRefPubMed Haacker M, Hallett TB, Atun R. On discount rates for economic evaluations in global health. Health Policy Plan. 2020;35:107–14.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Griffiths M, Maruszczak M, Kusel J. The who-choice cost-effectiveness Threshold: a Country-level analysis of changes over time. Value Heal. 2015;18:A88.CrossRef Griffiths M, Maruszczak M, Kusel J. The who-choice cost-effectiveness Threshold: a Country-level analysis of changes over time. Value Heal. 2015;18:A88.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Briggs AH, Claxton K, Sculpher MJ. Decision modelling for health economic evaluation. Oxford: Press OU; 2006.CrossRef Briggs AH, Claxton K, Sculpher MJ. Decision modelling for health economic evaluation. Oxford: Press OU; 2006.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Gandjour A. Willingness to pay for new medicines: a step towards narrowing the gap between NICE and IQWiG. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20:1–7.CrossRef Gandjour A. Willingness to pay for new medicines: a step towards narrowing the gap between NICE and IQWiG. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20:1–7.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Whittington MD, Campbell JD, Rind D, Fluetsch N, Lin GA, Pearson SD. Cost-effectiveness and value-based pricing of aducanumab for patients with early alzheimer disease. Neurol. 2022;98:e968–77.CrossRef Whittington MD, Campbell JD, Rind D, Fluetsch N, Lin GA, Pearson SD. Cost-effectiveness and value-based pricing of aducanumab for patients with early alzheimer disease. Neurol. 2022;98:e968–77.CrossRef
42.
43.
go back to reference Herring WL, Gould IG, Fillit H, Lindgren P, Forrestal F, Thompson R, et al. Predicted lifetime health outcomes for aducanumab in patients with early alzheimer’s disease. Neurol Ther. 2021;10:919–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Herring WL, Gould IG, Fillit H, Lindgren P, Forrestal F, Thompson R, et al. Predicted lifetime health outcomes for aducanumab in patients with early alzheimer’s disease. Neurol Ther. 2021;10:919–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
45.
go back to reference Cummings JL, Isaacson RS, Schmitt FA, Velting DM. A practical algorithm for managing Alzheimer’s disease: what, when, and why? Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2015;2:307–23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cummings JL, Isaacson RS, Schmitt FA, Velting DM. A practical algorithm for managing Alzheimer’s disease: what, when, and why? Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2015;2:307–23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
49.
go back to reference World Health Organisation. WHO guide for standardization of economic evaluations of immunization programmes II. Geneva: World Health Organization Publication; 2019. World Health Organisation. WHO guide for standardization of economic evaluations of immunization programmes II. Geneva: World Health Organization Publication; 2019.
Metadata
Title
Is Aducanumab treatment developed to prevent progression of Alzheimer's disease cost-effective in Turkey?
Authors
Vahit Yigit
Selin Kalender
Iskender Cetinturk
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1478-7547
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-023-00463-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation 1/2023 Go to the issue