Top

Published in:

Open Access 15-05-2024

“All Children in Focus”: Effects of a Universal Parenting Program at a 6-Month Follow-Up in a Randomized Controlled Trial in Sweden

Authors: Isabella Victoria Cinà, Lene Lindberg, Pia Enebrink

Published in: Prevention Science | Issue 4/2024

Abstract

Parenting programs have been shown to empower parents and prevent mental health problems in children. However, few programs are designed to promote wellbeing, which led to the development of the Swedish-promotive universal program, “All Children in Focus” (ACF). This study aimed to understand the effects of parents’ participation in the ACF program on parents’ emotion regulation and parenting practices over a 6-month follow-up and if intervention-produced changes predict child wellbeing (CW). Parental self-efficacy (PSE) was also included to assess the relation with parental outcomes and CW. This is an evaluation of a multicenter randomized waitlisted control trial conducted in Stockholm County, Sweden, with parents of children aged 3 to 12 years (n = 621) in 2012. Parents were randomized 1:1 to enter the program or to a waitlist. Questionnaires were completed by parents at baseline, post-intervention, and 6 months post-baseline. We used generalized mixed modeling to test effects on parental outcomes over time and regression analyses to study the predictive role of parental outcomes on CW. From baseline to the post- and to the 6-month follow-ups, parents in the intervention group reported greater levels of emotion regulation skills, cognitive reappraisal, and positive parenting than did parents in the control group. A decrease in negative and harsh parenting was evident in both groups, although it was greater in the intervention group. An increase in PSE was associated with high negative parenting at baseline in the intervention group. Child gender moderated positive parenting, suggesting that parents of girls in the intervention group had more favorable development of positive strategies. The findings indicate that a change in PSE predicts a change in CW at 6 months. The ACF program can be used to strengthen and develop parenting. This study advances our knowledge about the potential advantages of using a health-promoting approach to strengthen the wellbeing of families in the general population. Clinical trial registration: ISRCTN70202532 Current Controlled Trials

Available only for authorised users

Barlow, J., & Coren, E. (2018). The effectiveness of parenting programs: A review of Campbell reviews. Research on Social Work Practice, 28(1), 99–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731517725184CrossRef

Bloomfield, L., & Kendall, S. (2012). Parenting self-efficacy, parenting stress and child behaviour before and after a parenting programme. Prim Health Care Res Dev., 13(4), 364–372. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423612000060CrossRefPubMed

Daines, C. L., Hansen, D., Novilla, M. L. B., & Crandall, A. (2021). Effects of positive and negative childhood experiences on adult family health. BMC Public Health, 21(1), 651. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10732-wCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Eisner, M., Nagin, D., Ribeaud, D., & Malti, T. (2012). Effects of a universal parenting program for highly adherent parents: A propensity score matching approach. Prevention Science, 13(3), 252–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-011-0266-xCrossRefPubMed

Enebrink, P., Björnsdotter, A., & Ghaderi, A. (2013). The emotion regulation questionnaire: Psychometric properties and norms for Swedish parents of children aged 10–13 years. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 9(2), 289–303. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v9i2.535CrossRef

Enebrink, P., Danneman, M., Benvestito Mattsson, V., Ulfsdotter, M., Jalling, C., & Lindberg, L. (2015). ABC for parents: Pilot study of a universal 4-session program shows increased parenting skills, self-efficacy and child well-being. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(7), 1917–1931. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-014-9992-6CrossRef

Goldberg, D. P., & Williams, P. (1988). The user’s guide to the general health questionnaire. Windsor: NFER-Wilson.

Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 348–362. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348CrossRefPubMed

Hahlweg, K., Heinrichs, N., Kuschel, A., Bertram, H., & Naumann, S. (2010). Long-term outcome of a randomized controlled universal prevention trial through a positive parenting program: Is it worth the effort? Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 4, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1753-2000-4-14CrossRef

Halfon, N., & Forrest, C. B. (2018). The emerging theoretical framework of life course health development. In N. Halfon, C. B. Forrest, R. M. Lerner, & E. M. Faustman (Eds.), Handbook of life course health development (pp. 19–43). CH: Cham.CrossRef

Havighurst, S. S., Wilson, K. R., Harley, A. E., Prior, M. R., & Kehoe, C. (2010). Tuning in to Kids: Improving emotion socialization practices in parents of preschool children-findings from a community trial. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 51(12), 1342–1350. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02303.xCrossRefPubMed

Heinrichs, N., Kliem, S., & Hahlweg, K. (2014). Four-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of Triple P group for parent and child outcomes. Prevention Science, 15(2), 233–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-012-0358-2CrossRefPubMed

Hudson, J. L., Minihan, S., Chen, W., Carl, T., Fu, M., Tully, L., & Martiniuk, A. (2023). Interventions for young children’s mental health: A review of reviews. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 26(3), 593–641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-023-00443-6CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Jiang, J. (2007). Linear and generalized linear mixed models and their applications. Springer Science & Buisness Media.

Juffer, F., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & Van Ijzendoorn, M. H. (2018). Video-feedback intervention to promote positive parenting and sensitive discipline: Development and meta-analytic evidence for its effectiveness. In H. Steele & M. Steele (Eds.), Handbook of attachment-based interventions (pp. 1–26). The Guilford Press.

Kim, J. H., Schulz, W., Zimmermann, T., & Hahlweg, K. (2018). Parent–child interactions and child outcomes: Evidence from randomized intervention. Labour Economics, 54, 152–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2018.08.003CrossRef

Krishnan, V. (2010). Early child development: A conceptual model. Presented at the Early Childhood Council Annual Conference 2010, Christchurch, New Zealand, 7-9 May 2010.

Leslie, L. K., Mehus, C. J., Hawkins, J. D., Boat, T., McCabe, M. A., Barkin, S., Perrin, E. C., Metzler, C. W., Prado, G., Tait, V. F., Brown, R., & Beardslee, W. (2016). Primary health care: Potential home for family-focused preventive interventions. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 51(4), S106–S118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2016.05.014CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Lindberg, L., Ulfsdotter, M., Jalling, C., Skärstrand, E., Lalouni, M., Lönn Rhodin, K., Månsdotter, A., & Enebrink, P. (2013). The effects and costs of the universal parent group program - All children in focus: A study protocol for a randomized wait-list controlled trial. BMC Public Health, 13(1), 688. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-688CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Ravens-Sieberer, U., Herdman, M., Devine, J., Otto, C., Bullinger, M., Rose, M., & Klasen, F. (2014). The European KIDSCREEN approach to measure quality of life and well-being in children: Development, current application, and future advances. Quality of Life Research, 23(3), 791–803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0428-3CrossRefPubMed

Reedtz, C., Handegård, B. H., & Mørch, W.-T. (2011). Development and aging promoting positive parenting practices in primary pare: Outcomes and mechanisms of change in a randomized controlled risk reduction trial. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 52(2), 131–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2010.00854.xCrossRefPubMed

Salari, R., & Enebrink, P. (2018). Role of universal parenting programs in prevention. In M. Sanders & A. Morawska (Eds.), Handbook of parenting and child development across the lifespan (pp. 713–743). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94598-9_32CrossRef

Sampaio, F., Sarkadi, A., Salari, R., Zethraeus, N., & Feldman, I. (2015). Cost and effects of a universal parenting programme delivered to parents of preschoolers. The European Journal of Public Health, 25(6), 1035–1042. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckv106CrossRefPubMed

Sanders, M. R. (2008). Triple P-Positive Parenting Program as a public health approach to strengthening parenting. Journal of Family Psychology, 22(4), 506–517. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.22.3.506CrossRefPubMed

Sanders, M. R., & Kirby, J. N. (2014). A public-health approach to improving parenting and promoting children’s well-being. Child Development Perspectives, 8(4), 250–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12086CrossRef

Sanders, M. R., Kirby, J. N., Tellegen, C. L., & Day, J. J. (2014). The Triple P-Positive Parenting Program: A systematic review and meta-analysis of a multi-level system of parenting support. Clinical Psychology Review, 34(4), 337–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2014.04.003CrossRefPubMed

Simkiss, D. E., Snooks, H. A., Stallard, N., Kimani, P. K., Sewell, B., Fitzsimmons, D., Anthony, R., Winstanley, S., Wilson, L., Phillips, C. J., & Stewart-Brown, S. (2013). Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a universal parenting skills programme in deprived communities: Multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open, 3(8). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002851

Solheim Skar, A.-M., Von Tetzchner, S., Clucas, C., Sherr, L., & Solheim Skar, M. (2015). The long-term effectiveness of the International Child Development Programme (ICDP) implemented as a community-wide parenting programme. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12(1), 54–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2014.950219CrossRef

Stattin, H., Enebrink, P., Özdemir, M., & Giannotta, F. (2015). A national evaluation of parenting programs in Sweden: The short-term effects using an RCT effectiveness design. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 83(6), 1069–1084. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039328CrossRefPubMed

Stewart-Brown, S. (2008). Improving parenting: The why and the how. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 93(2), 102–104. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2006.113522CrossRefPubMed

Swedish Ministry of Health and Social Affairs. (2009). Nationell strategi för ett utvecklat föräldrastöd. En vinst för alla [National strategy for a developed parental support. A win for all]. Stockholm: Regeringskansliet: Socialdepartemente.

Tanner-Smith, E. E., Durlak, J. A., & Marx, R. A. (2018). Empirically based mean effect size distributions for universal prevention programs targeting school-aged youth: A review of meta-analyses. Prevention Science, 19, 1091–1101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-018-0492-1CrossRefPubMed

Thomas Boyce, W., & Hertzmann, C. (2018). Early childhood health and the life course: The state of the science and proposed research priorities. In N. Halfon, C. B. Forrest, R. M. Lerner, & E. M. Faustman (Eds.), Handbook of life course health development (pp. 61-93). Cham (CH).

Ulfsdotter, M., Enebrink, P., & Lindberg, L. (2014). Effectiveness of a universal health-promoting parenting program: A randomized waitlistcontrolled trial of All Children in Focus. BMC Public Health, 14(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-1083CrossRef

Ulfsdotter, M., Lindberg, L., & Månsdotter, A. (2015). A cost-effectiveness analysis of the Swedish universal parenting program All Children in Focus. PLoS ONE, 10(12), e0145201.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Webster-Stratton, C., Reid, M. J., & Hammond, M. (2001). Social skills and problem-solving training for children with early-onset conduct problmes: Who benefits? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42(7), 943–952.CrossRefPubMed

Wilson, K. R., Havighurst, S. S., & Harley, A. E. (2012). Tuning in to Kids: An effectiveness trial of a parenting program targeting emotion socialization of preschoolers. Journal of Family Psychology, 26(1), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026480CrossRefPubMed

Title: “All Children in Focus”: Effects of a Universal Parenting Program at a 6-Month Follow-Up in a Randomized Controlled Trial in Sweden
Authors: Isabella Victoria Cinà
Lene Lindberg
Pia Enebrink
Publication date: 15-05-2024
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Prevention Science / Issue 4/2024
Print ISSN: 1389-4986
Electronic ISSN: 1573-6695
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-024-01681-y

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

“All Children in Focus”: Effects of a Universal Parenting Program at a 6-Month Follow-Up in a Randomized Controlled Trial in Sweden

Abstract

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 4/2024

Wife-Mother Role Conflict at the Critical Child-Rearing Stage: A Machine-Learning Approach to Identify What and How Matters in Maternal Depression Symptoms in China

School Connectedness and Risk for Sexual Intercourse and Nonconsensual Sex in Adolescence

Sexual Assault Among Young Adolescents in Informal Settlements in Nairobi, Kenya: Findings from the IMPower and SOS Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial

High School Follow-Up of the Dating Matters® RCT: Effects on Teen Dating Violence and Relationship Behaviors

Gender and Sexual Orientation Differences in Sexual Violence Knowledge, Prevention Behaviors, and Care-Seeking Behaviors

Changes in Sexual Behaviors Due to Mpox: a Cross-Sectional Study of Sexual and Gender Minority Individuals in Illinois