Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 1/2017

01-01-2017

“Alarm-corrected” ergonomic armrest use could improve learning curves of novices on robotic simulator

Authors: Kun Yang, Manuela Perez, Gabriela Hossu, Nicolas Hubert, Cyril Perrenot, Jacques Hubert

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In robotic surgery, the professional ergonomic habit of using an armrest reduces operator fatigue and increases the precision of motion. We designed and validated a pressure surveillance system (PSS) based on force sensors to investigate armrest use. The objective was to evaluate whether adding an alarm to the PSS system could shorten ergonomic training and improve performance.

Study design

Twenty robot and simulator-naïve participants were recruited and randomized in two groups (A and B). The PSS was installed on a robotic simulator, the dV-Trainer, to detect contact with the armrest. The Group A members completed three tasks on the dV-Trainer without the alarm, making 15 attempts at each task. The Group B members practiced the first two tasks with the alarm and then completed the final tasks without the alarm. The simulator provided an overall score reflecting the trainees’ performance. We used the new concept of an “armrest load” score to describe the ergonomic habit of using the armrest.

Results

Group B had a significantly higher performance score (p < 0.001) and armrest load score (p < 0.001) than Group A from the fifth attempt of the first task to the end of the experiment.

Conclusions

Based on the conditioned reflex effect, the alarm associated with the PSS rectified ergonomic errors and accelerated professional ergonomic habit acquisition. The combination of the PSS and alarm is effective in significantly shortening the learning curve in the robotic training process.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lee GI, Lee MR et al (2014) Comparative assessment of physical and cognitive ergonomics associated with robotic and traditional laparoscopic surgeries. Surg Endosc 28:456–465CrossRefPubMed Lee GI, Lee MR et al (2014) Comparative assessment of physical and cognitive ergonomics associated with robotic and traditional laparoscopic surgeries. Surg Endosc 28:456–465CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Uemura M, Tomikawa M et al (2014) Analysis of hand motion differentiates expert and novice surgeons. J Surg Res 188:8–13CrossRefPubMed Uemura M, Tomikawa M et al (2014) Analysis of hand motion differentiates expert and novice surgeons. J Surg Res 188:8–13CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Nisky I, Allison M et al (2014) Effect of robotic manipulators on movements of novices and surgeons. Surg Endosc 28:2145–2158CrossRefPubMed Nisky I, Allison M et al (2014) Effect of robotic manipulators on movements of novices and surgeons. Surg Endosc 28:2145–2158CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Lendvay TS, Brand TC et al (2013) Virtual reality robotic surgery warm-up improves task performance in a dry laboratory environment: a prospective randomized controlled study. J Am Coll Surg 216:1181–1192CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lendvay TS, Brand TC et al (2013) Virtual reality robotic surgery warm-up improves task performance in a dry laboratory environment: a prospective randomized controlled study. J Am Coll Surg 216:1181–1192CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Rehman S, Raza SJ et al (2013) Simulation-based robot-assisted surgical training: a health economic evaluation. Int J Surg 11:841–846CrossRefPubMed Rehman S, Raza SJ et al (2013) Simulation-based robot-assisted surgical training: a health economic evaluation. Int J Surg 11:841–846CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Perrenot C, Perez M et al (2012) The virtual reality simulator dV-Trainer (®) is a valid assessment tool for robotic surgical skills. Surg Endosc 26:2587–2593CrossRefPubMed Perrenot C, Perez M et al (2012) The virtual reality simulator dV-Trainer (®) is a valid assessment tool for robotic surgical skills. Surg Endosc 26:2587–2593CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Abboudi H, Khan MS et al (2013) Current status of validation for robotic surgery simulators—a systematic review. BJU Int 111:194–205CrossRefPubMed Abboudi H, Khan MS et al (2013) Current status of validation for robotic surgery simulators—a systematic review. BJU Int 111:194–205CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Patel A, Patel M et al (2014) Can we become better robot surgeons through simulator practice? Surg Endosc 28:847–853CrossRefPubMed Patel A, Patel M et al (2014) Can we become better robot surgeons through simulator practice? Surg Endosc 28:847–853CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Foell K, Furse A et al (2013) Multidisciplinary validation study of the da Vinci Skills Simulator: educational tool and assessment device. J Robotic Surg 7:365–369CrossRef Foell K, Furse A et al (2013) Multidisciplinary validation study of the da Vinci Skills Simulator: educational tool and assessment device. J Robotic Surg 7:365–369CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Mansoor J, Stuart B et al (2013) Energy consumption during simulated minimal access surgery with and without using an armrest. Surg Endosc 27:971–977CrossRef Mansoor J, Stuart B et al (2013) Energy consumption during simulated minimal access surgery with and without using an armrest. Surg Endosc 27:971–977CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Safwat B, Su EL et al (2009) The role of posture, magnification, and grip force on microscopic accuracy. Ann Biomed Eng 37:997–1006CrossRefPubMed Safwat B, Su EL et al (2009) The role of posture, magnification, and grip force on microscopic accuracy. Ann Biomed Eng 37:997–1006CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Goto T, Hongo K et al (2013) The concept and feasibility of EXPERT: intelligent armrest using robotics technology. Neurosurgery 72(Suppl 1):39–42CrossRefPubMed Goto T, Hongo K et al (2013) The concept and feasibility of EXPERT: intelligent armrest using robotics technology. Neurosurgery 72(Suppl 1):39–42CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Bosma J, Aarts S et al (2015) The Minimally Invasive Manipulator: an ergonomic and economic non-robotic alternative for endoscopy? Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 24:24–30CrossRefPubMed Bosma J, Aarts S et al (2015) The Minimally Invasive Manipulator: an ergonomic and economic non-robotic alternative for endoscopy? Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 24:24–30CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Hubert N, Gilles M et al (2013) Ergonomic assessment of the surgeon’s physical workload during standard and robotic assisted laparoscopic procedures. Int J Med Robotics Comput Assist Surg 9(2):142–147CrossRef Hubert N, Gilles M et al (2013) Ergonomic assessment of the surgeon’s physical workload during standard and robotic assisted laparoscopic procedures. Int J Med Robotics Comput Assist Surg 9(2):142–147CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Tausch TJ, Kowalewski TM et al (2012) Content and construct validation of a robotic surgery curriculum using an electromagnetic instrument tracker. J Urol 188:919–923CrossRefPubMed Tausch TJ, Kowalewski TM et al (2012) Content and construct validation of a robotic surgery curriculum using an electromagnetic instrument tracker. J Urol 188:919–923CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Windholz G (1996) Pavlov’s conceptualization of the dynamic stereotype in the theory of higher nervous activity. Am J Psychol 109:287–295CrossRefPubMed Windholz G (1996) Pavlov’s conceptualization of the dynamic stereotype in the theory of higher nervous activity. Am J Psychol 109:287–295CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Karafantis DM (2011) The effects of ethnocultural empathy on level of stereotyping toward college athletes. J Evid Based Soc Work 8:426–444CrossRefPubMed Karafantis DM (2011) The effects of ethnocultural empathy on level of stereotyping toward college athletes. J Evid Based Soc Work 8:426–444CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Zihni AM, Ohu I et al (2014) Ergonomic analysis of robot-assisted and traditional laparoscopic procedures. Surg Endosc 28:3379–3384CrossRefPubMed Zihni AM, Ohu I et al (2014) Ergonomic analysis of robot-assisted and traditional laparoscopic procedures. Surg Endosc 28:3379–3384CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Park A, Lee G et al (2010) Patients benefit while surgeons suffer: an impending epidemic. J Am Coll Surg 210:06–13CrossRef Park A, Lee G et al (2010) Patients benefit while surgeons suffer: an impending epidemic. J Am Coll Surg 210:06–13CrossRef
Metadata
Title
“Alarm-corrected” ergonomic armrest use could improve learning curves of novices on robotic simulator
Authors
Kun Yang
Manuela Perez
Gabriela Hossu
Nicolas Hubert
Cyril Perrenot
Jacques Hubert
Publication date
01-01-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 1/2017
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4934-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Surgical Endoscopy 1/2017 Go to the issue