Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 2/2015

01-02-2015 | Original Article

Aggressiveness of cancer treatment in patients hospitalized in a supportive care unit

Authors: C. Luthy, A. Pugliesi, E. Rapiti, M. Kossovsky, P. Y. Dietrich, C. Cedraschi, A. F. Allaz

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 2/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed at determining the aggressiveness of chemotherapy (CT)in patients hospitalized in a supportive care unit (focusing on mortality, patient profiles, survival, readmissions, and CT near death).

Methods

In a prospective cohort study, 247 consecutive patients were investigated at the admission (disease, treatments, oncologist’s theoretical survival prognosis, internist’s clinical global impression (CGI)). A 3-and 6-month follow-upwas performed. Survival was assessed up to 3 years.

Results

Various cancer diagnoses were represented in polymorbid patients. Since disease onset, 69.6 % had received a first line of CT only; 147 patients (59.5 %) had CT at the admission; median CGI was 3 (range = 0–10); and theoretical survival prognosis was <12 months in 65.2 %. In-hospitalmortality rate was 21 %. Odds of receiving CT was inversely associated with age (OR for patients ≥71 years vs. patients <50 years 0.19; 95 % CI 0.06–0.65; p = 0.02) and number of previous CT lines (OR for patients with 2–4 lines vs. those with 1 line 0.14; 95 % CI 0.06–0.34; p = 0.000). In the multiadjusted model, 6-monthsurvival remained associated with CT at the admission (HR 1.86; 95 % CI 1.31–2.65; p = 0.001), CGI (per point HR 0.84; 95 % CI 0.73–0.96; p = 0.013), and theoretical survival prognosis (per category HR 0.53; 95 % CI 0.44–0.66; p = 0.000). Very few patients needed readmission related to CT’s adverse effects. From admission and throughout follow-up, 24 patients (9.7 %) had received CT during their last 14 days of life.

Conclusion

This study showed that a supportive care program can benefit a heterogeneous population as it contributes to assess clinical risks and benefits of CT and prevent aggressive care near death.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Earle CC, Landrum MB, Souza JM et al (2008)Aggressiveness of cancer care near the end of life: is it a quality-of-careissue? J Clin Oncol 26:3860–3866 Earle CC, Landrum MB, Souza JM et al (2008)Aggressiveness of cancer care near the end of life: is it a quality-of-careissue? J Clin Oncol 26:3860–3866
2.
go back to reference Temel JS, Greer JA, Muzikansky A et al (2010)Early palliative care for patients with metastatic non-small-celllung cancer. N Engl J Med 363:733–742 Temel JS, Greer JA, Muzikansky A et al (2010)Early palliative care for patients with metastatic non-small-celllung cancer. N Engl J Med 363:733–742
3.
go back to reference Greer JA, Pirl WF, Jackson VA et al (2012)Effect of early palliative care on chemotherapy use and end-of-lifecare in patients with metastatic non-small-celllung cancer. J Clin Oncol 30:394–400 Greer JA, Pirl WF, Jackson VA et al (2012)Effect of early palliative care on chemotherapy use and end-of-lifecare in patients with metastatic non-small-celllung cancer. J Clin Oncol 30:394–400
5.
go back to reference Earle CC, Neville BA, Landrum MB et al (2004)Trends in the aggressiveness of cancer care near the end of life. J Clin Oncol 22:315–321PubMedCrossRef Earle CC, Neville BA, Landrum MB et al (2004)Trends in the aggressiveness of cancer care near the end of life. J Clin Oncol 22:315–321PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987)A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383PubMedCrossRef Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987)A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC et al (1982)Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 5:649–655CrossRef Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC et al (1982)Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 5:649–655CrossRef
8.
9.
10.
go back to reference Näppä U, Lindqvist O, Rasmussen BH, Axelsson B (2011)Palliative chemotherapy during the last month of life. Ann Oncol 22:2375–2380PubMedCrossRef Näppä U, Lindqvist O, Rasmussen BH, Axelsson B (2011)Palliative chemotherapy during the last month of life. Ann Oncol 22:2375–2380PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Murillo JR Jr, Koeller J (2006)Chemotherapy given near the end of life by community oncologists for advanced non-smallcell lung cancer. Oncologist 11:1095–1099 Murillo JR Jr, Koeller J (2006)Chemotherapy given near the end of life by community oncologists for advanced non-smallcell lung cancer. Oncologist 11:1095–1099
12.
go back to reference Rose C, Stovall E, Ganz PA et al (2008)Cancer quality alliance: blueprint for a better cancer care system. CA Cancer J Clin 58:266–292PubMedCrossRef Rose C, Stovall E, Ganz PA et al (2008)Cancer quality alliance: blueprint for a better cancer care system. CA Cancer J Clin 58:266–292PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Glare P, Virik K, Jones M et al (2003)A systematic review of physicians’ predictions in terminally ill cancer patients. BM 327:195–200CrossRef Glare P, Virik K, Jones M et al (2003)A systematic review of physicians’ predictions in terminally ill cancer patients. BM 327:195–200CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Matsuyama R, Reddy S, Smith TJ (2006)Why do patients choose chemotherapy near the end of life? A review of the perspective of those facing death from cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:3490–3496PubMedCrossRef Matsuyama R, Reddy S, Smith TJ (2006)Why do patients choose chemotherapy near the end of life? A review of the perspective of those facing death from cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:3490–3496PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Leung KM, Hopman WM, Kawakami J (2012)Challenging the 10-yearrule: The accuracy of patient life expectancy predictions by physicians in relation to prostate cancer management. Can Urol Assoc J 6:367–373 Leung KM, Hopman WM, Kawakami J (2012)Challenging the 10-yearrule: The accuracy of patient life expectancy predictions by physicians in relation to prostate cancer management. Can Urol Assoc J 6:367–373
16.
go back to reference The AM, Hak T, Koëter G, van Der Wal G (2000)Collusion in doctor-patientcommunication about imminent death: an ethnographic study. BMJ 321:1376–1381 The AM, Hak T, Koëter G, van Der Wal G (2000)Collusion in doctor-patientcommunication about imminent death: an ethnographic study. BMJ 321:1376–1381
17.
go back to reference Aparicio T, Jouve JL, Teillet L et al (2013)Geriatric factors predict chemotherapy feasibility: ancillary results of FFCD 2001-02phase III study in first-linechemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer in elderly patients. J Clin Oncol 31:1464–1470 Aparicio T, Jouve JL, Teillet L et al (2013)Geriatric factors predict chemotherapy feasibility: ancillary results of FFCD 2001-02phase III study in first-linechemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer in elderly patients. J Clin Oncol 31:1464–1470
18.
go back to reference MacDermid E, Hooton G, MacDonald M et al (2009)Improving patient survival with the colorectal cancer multi-disciplinaryteam. Colorectal Dis 11:291–295 MacDermid E, Hooton G, MacDonald M et al (2009)Improving patient survival with the colorectal cancer multi-disciplinaryteam. Colorectal Dis 11:291–295
19.
go back to reference Stephens MR, Lewis WG, Brewster AE et al (2006)Multidisciplinary team management is associated with improved outcomes after surgery for esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus 19:164–171PubMedCrossRef Stephens MR, Lewis WG, Brewster AE et al (2006)Multidisciplinary team management is associated with improved outcomes after surgery for esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus 19:164–171PubMedCrossRef
20.
Metadata
Title
Aggressiveness of cancer treatment in patients hospitalized in a supportive care unit
Authors
C. Luthy
A. Pugliesi
E. Rapiti
M. Kossovsky
P. Y. Dietrich
C. Cedraschi
A. F. Allaz
Publication date
01-02-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 2/2015
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2341-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2015

Supportive Care in Cancer 2/2015 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine