Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 2/2020

01-02-2020 | Original Contribution

Age-specific norms and validation of the German SDQ parent version based on a nationally representative sample (KiGGS)

Authors: Silke Janitza, Kathrin Klipker, Heike Hölling

Published in: European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry | Issue 2/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is the most widely used mental health screening instrument for children and adolescents. It is a short questionnaire including 25 items that can be answered by parents, teachers or children. There are two studies which report norms for the German SDQ parent version. They do not include children younger than 6 years. Moreover, whether the German SDQ parent version is measurement invariant across age has not yet been investigated. The absence of measurement invariance across age would support the use of age-specific norms that are not yet available for the German SDQ parent version. We used data of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents (KiGGS), a nationally representative survey including 14,835 children aged 3–17 years, to assess measurement invariance of the German SDQ parent version across the full age range. Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the hyperactivity and emotional symptoms subscales are not comparable between children of different ages. This supports the use of age-specific norms for these two subscales and for the total SDQ. We used methods of centile estimation to smoothly model the centiles of the SDQ total score and the subscale scores in dependence on age. These age-specific centiles reflect the developmental course of SDQ problems in children (including preschoolers) and adolescents living in Germany. They can be used to identify children and adolescents with abnormal behaviour, while accounting for the developmental course of emotional and behaviour problems.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
The original SDQ differs from this early-year version in the wording of three items (two items of the behaviour problem subscale and one item of the hyperactivity subscale; see http://​www.​sdqinfo.​org).
 
2
Kline [26], for example, suggests a minimum of 100 subjects per group.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cicchetti D (2006) Development and psychopathology. In: Cicchetti D, Cohen DJ (eds) Developmental psychopathology, Vol 1: theory and method, 2nd edn. Wiley, Hoboken Cicchetti D (2006) Development and psychopathology. In: Cicchetti D, Cohen DJ (eds) Developmental psychopathology, Vol 1: theory and method, 2nd edn. Wiley, Hoboken
2.
go back to reference Hudziak JJ et al (2007) A dimensional approach to developmental psychopathology. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 16(Suppl 1):S16–S23CrossRef Hudziak JJ et al (2007) A dimensional approach to developmental psychopathology. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 16(Suppl 1):S16–S23CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Goodman R (1997) The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a research note. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 38(5):581–586CrossRef Goodman R (1997) The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a research note. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 38(5):581–586CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Goodman R et al (2000) Using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) to screen for child psychiatric disorders in a community sample. Br J Psychiatry 177:534–539CrossRef Goodman R et al (2000) Using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) to screen for child psychiatric disorders in a community sample. Br J Psychiatry 177:534–539CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Stone LL et al (2010) Psychometric properties of the parent and teacher versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire for 4- to 12-year-olds: a review. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev 13(3):254–274CrossRef Stone LL et al (2010) Psychometric properties of the parent and teacher versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire for 4- to 12-year-olds: a review. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev 13(3):254–274CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Barkmann C, Schulte-Markwort M (2004) Prävalenz psychischer Auffälligkeit bei Kindern und Jugendlichen in Deutschland - ein systematischer Literaturüberblick. Psychiatr Prax 31(6):278–287CrossRef Barkmann C, Schulte-Markwort M (2004) Prävalenz psychischer Auffälligkeit bei Kindern und Jugendlichen in Deutschland - ein systematischer Literaturüberblick. Psychiatr Prax 31(6):278–287CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Goodman A, Lamping DL, Ploubidis GB (2010) When to use broader internalising and externalising subscales instead of the hypothesised five subscales on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): data from British parents, teachers and children. J Abnorm Child Psychol 38(8):1179–1191CrossRef Goodman A, Lamping DL, Ploubidis GB (2010) When to use broader internalising and externalising subscales instead of the hypothesised five subscales on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): data from British parents, teachers and children. J Abnorm Child Psychol 38(8):1179–1191CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Becker A et al (2006) Psychopathological screening of children with ADHD: Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in a pan-European study. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 15(Suppl 1):56–62CrossRef Becker A et al (2006) Psychopathological screening of children with ADHD: Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in a pan-European study. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 15(Suppl 1):56–62CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Becker A et al (2004) Validation of the parent and teacher SDQ in a clinical sample. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 13(Suppl 2):11–16 Becker A et al (2004) Validation of the parent and teacher SDQ in a clinical sample. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 13(Suppl 2):11–16
10.
go back to reference Klein AM et al (2013) Psychometric properties of the parent-rated SDQ in preschoolers. Eur J Psychol Assess 29(2):96–104CrossRef Klein AM et al (2013) Psychometric properties of the parent-rated SDQ in preschoolers. Eur J Psychol Assess 29(2):96–104CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Rothenberger A et al (2008) Psychometric properties of the parent strengths and difficulties questionnaire in the general population of German children and adolescents: results of the BELLA study. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 17(Suppl 1):99–105CrossRef Rothenberger A et al (2008) Psychometric properties of the parent strengths and difficulties questionnaire in the general population of German children and adolescents: results of the BELLA study. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 17(Suppl 1):99–105CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Woerner W et al (2002) Normierung und Evaluation der deutschen Elternversion des Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Felderhebung. Zeitschrift fur Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie 30(2):105–112CrossRef Woerner W et al (2002) Normierung und Evaluation der deutschen Elternversion des Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Felderhebung. Zeitschrift fur Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie 30(2):105–112CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Woerner W, Becker A, Rothenberger A (2004) Normative data and scale properties of the German parent SDQ. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 13(Suppl 2):3–10 Woerner W, Becker A, Rothenberger A (2004) Normative data and scale properties of the German parent SDQ. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 13(Suppl 2):3–10
14.
go back to reference Stone LL et al (2010) Psychometric properties of the parent and teacher versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire for 4- to 12-year-olds: a review. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev 13(3):254–274CrossRef Stone LL et al (2010) Psychometric properties of the parent and teacher versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire for 4- to 12-year-olds: a review. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev 13(3):254–274CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Goodman A, Goodman R (2011) Population mean scores predict child mental disorder rates: validating SDQ prevalence estimators in Britain. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 52(1):100–108CrossRef Goodman A, Goodman R (2011) Population mean scores predict child mental disorder rates: validating SDQ prevalence estimators in Britain. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 52(1):100–108CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Hölling H et al (2007) Behavioral problems in children and adolescents. First results of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents (KiGGS) [Verhaltensauffälligkeiten bei Kindern und Jugendlichen. Erste Ergebnisse aus dem Kinder- und Jugendgesundheitssurvey (KiGGS)]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt 50(5–6):784–793CrossRef Hölling H et al (2007) Behavioral problems in children and adolescents. First results of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents (KiGGS) [Verhaltensauffälligkeiten bei Kindern und Jugendlichen. Erste Ergebnisse aus dem Kinder- und Jugendgesundheitssurvey (KiGGS)]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt 50(5–6):784–793CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kurth BM (2007) The German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents (KiGGS): an overview of its planning, implementation and results taking into account aspects of quality management. Bundesgesundheitsblatt 50(5–6):533–546CrossRef Kurth BM (2007) The German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents (KiGGS): an overview of its planning, implementation and results taking into account aspects of quality management. Bundesgesundheitsblatt 50(5–6):533–546CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Rothenberger A et al (2008) Psychometric properties of the parent Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in the general population of German children and adolescents: results of the BELLA study. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 17(Suppl 1):99–105CrossRef Rothenberger A et al (2008) Psychometric properties of the parent Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in the general population of German children and adolescents: results of the BELLA study. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 17(Suppl 1):99–105CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Hölling H et al (2012) Die KiGGS-Studie. Bundesweit repräsentative Längs- und Querschnittstudie zur Gesundheit von Kindern und Jugendlichen im Rahmen des Gesundheitsmonitorings am Robert Koch-Institut. Bundesgesundheitsblatt 55(6):836–842CrossRef Hölling H et al (2012) Die KiGGS-Studie. Bundesweit repräsentative Längs- und Querschnittstudie zur Gesundheit von Kindern und Jugendlichen im Rahmen des Gesundheitsmonitorings am Robert Koch-Institut. Bundesgesundheitsblatt 55(6):836–842CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kamtsiuris P, Lange M, Rosario AS (2007) Der Kinder-und Jugendgesundheitssurvey (KiGGS): Stichprobendesign, Response und Nonresponse-Analyse. Bundesgesundheitsblatt 50(5):547–556CrossRef Kamtsiuris P, Lange M, Rosario AS (2007) Der Kinder-und Jugendgesundheitssurvey (KiGGS): Stichprobendesign, Response und Nonresponse-Analyse. Bundesgesundheitsblatt 50(5):547–556CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Kurth B-M et al (2008) The challenge of comprehensively mapping children’s health in a nation-wide health survey: design of the German KiGGS-Study. BMC Public Health 8:196CrossRef Kurth B-M et al (2008) The challenge of comprehensively mapping children’s health in a nation-wide health survey: design of the German KiGGS-Study. BMC Public Health 8:196CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Muthén B (1984) A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categorical, and continuous latent variable indicators. Psychometrika 49(1):115–132CrossRef Muthén B (1984) A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categorical, and continuous latent variable indicators. Psychometrika 49(1):115–132CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Schermelleh-Engel K, Moosbrugger H, Müller H (2003) Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods Psychol Res Online 8(2):23–74 Schermelleh-Engel K, Moosbrugger H, Müller H (2003) Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods Psychol Res Online 8(2):23–74
24.
go back to reference Bentler PM (1990) Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull 107(2):238–246CrossRef Bentler PM (1990) Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull 107(2):238–246CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Schreiber JB et al (2006) Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: a review. J Educ Res 99(6):323–338CrossRef Schreiber JB et al (2006) Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: a review. J Educ Res 99(6):323–338CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Kline T (2005) Psychological testing: a practical approach to design and evaluation. Sage Publications, Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA Kline T (2005) Psychological testing: a practical approach to design and evaluation. Sage Publications, Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA
27.
go back to reference Muthén L, Muthén B (1998–2010) Mplus user’s guide, 6th edn. Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles Muthén L, Muthén B (1998–2010) Mplus user’s guide, 6th edn. Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles
28.
go back to reference Bowen N, Masa R (2015) Conducting measurement invariance tests with ordinal data: a guide for social work researchers. J Soc Soc Work Res 6(2):229–249CrossRef Bowen N, Masa R (2015) Conducting measurement invariance tests with ordinal data: a guide for social work researchers. J Soc Soc Work Res 6(2):229–249CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Chen FF (2007) Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Struct Equ Model 14(3):464–504CrossRef Chen FF (2007) Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Struct Equ Model 14(3):464–504CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Cheung GW, Rensvold RB (2002) Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Struct Equ Model 9(2):233–255CrossRef Cheung GW, Rensvold RB (2002) Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Struct Equ Model 9(2):233–255CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Meade AW, Johnson EC, Braddy PW (2008) Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance. J Appl Psychol 93(3):568–592CrossRef Meade AW, Johnson EC, Braddy PW (2008) Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance. J Appl Psychol 93(3):568–592CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Rigby RA, Stasinopoulos DM (2004) Smooth centile curves for skew and kurtotic data modelled using the Box–Cox power exponential distribution. Stat Med 23(19):3053–3076CrossRef Rigby RA, Stasinopoulos DM (2004) Smooth centile curves for skew and kurtotic data modelled using the Box–Cox power exponential distribution. Stat Med 23(19):3053–3076CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Buuren SV, Fredriks M (2001) Worm plot: a simple diagnostic device for modelling growth reference curves. Stat Med 20(8):1259–1277CrossRef Buuren SV, Fredriks M (2001) Worm plot: a simple diagnostic device for modelling growth reference curves. Stat Med 20(8):1259–1277CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Royston P, Wright E (2000) Goodness-of-fit statistics for age-specific reference intervals. Stat Med 19(21):2943–2962CrossRef Royston P, Wright E (2000) Goodness-of-fit statistics for age-specific reference intervals. Stat Med 19(21):2943–2962CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Rosseel Y (2012) lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. J Stat Softw 48(2):1–36CrossRef Rosseel Y (2012) lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. J Stat Softw 48(2):1–36CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Stasinopoulos DM, Rigby RA (2007) Generalized additive models for location scale and shape (GAMLSS) in R. J Stat Softw 23(7):1–46CrossRef Stasinopoulos DM, Rigby RA (2007) Generalized additive models for location scale and shape (GAMLSS) in R. J Stat Softw 23(7):1–46CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Age-specific norms and validation of the German SDQ parent version based on a nationally representative sample (KiGGS)
Authors
Silke Janitza
Kathrin Klipker
Heike Hölling
Publication date
01-02-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry / Issue 2/2020
Print ISSN: 1018-8827
Electronic ISSN: 1435-165X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-019-01337-1

Other articles of this Issue 2/2020

European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 2/2020 Go to the issue