Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Mood Disorders | Study protocol

Clinical- and cost-effectiveness of a technology-supported and solution-focused intervention (DIALOG+) in treatment of patients with chronic depression—study protocol for a multi-site, cluster randomised controlled trial [TACK]

Authors: Philip McNamee, Aleksandra Matanov, Lauren Jerome, Sally Kerry, Neil Walker, Yan Feng, Andrew Molodynski, Shonagh Scott, Latha Guruvaiah, Sue Collinson, Rose McCabe, John Geddes, Stefan Priebe, Victoria Bird

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Many with an acute depressive disorder go on to develop chronic depression, despite ongoing care. There are few specifically designed interventions to treat chronic depression. DIALOG+, a technology-assisted intervention based on the principles of solution-focused therapy, may be beneficial. It has been shown to be effective as a treatment for patients with psychotic disorders, especially in regards to increasing quality of life. DIALOG+ was designed to be flexibly applied and not diagnosis-specific, aiming to structure communication and generate a personally-tailored care plan. This cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) is part of a programme of research to adapt and test DIALOG+ for patients with chronic depression.

Methods

Patients will be eligible for the trial, if they have exhibited symptoms of depression or non-psychotic low mood for at least 2 years, have regular contact with a clinician and have a low subjective quality of life and moderate depressive symptoms. Clinicians, who routinely see eligible patients, will be recruited from a number of sites across NHS England. Clusters will have between 1 and 6 patients per clinician and will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to either the intervention (DIALOG+) or active control group (treatment as usual + DIALOG scale). Clinicians in the intervention group are trained and asked to deliver the intervention regularly for 12 months. Active control participants receive treatment as usual and are asked to rate their satisfaction with areas of life and treatment on the DIALOG scale at the end of the clinical session. Approximately 112 clinician clusters will be recruited to reach a total patient sample size of 376. Clinical and social outcomes including costs are assessed at baseline and 3, 6 and 12 months post randomisation. The primary outcome will be subjective quality of life at 12 months.

Discussion

This definitive multi-site, cluster RCT aims to evaluate the clinical- and cost-effectiveness of DIALOG+ for people with chronic depression. If shown to be effective for this patient population it could be used to improve outcomes of mental health care on a larger scale, ensuring that patients with complex and co-morbid diagnoses can benefit.

Trial registration

ISRCTN11301686. Registered on 13 Jun 2019.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Santomauro SF, Mantilla Herrera AM, Shadid J, Zheng P, Ashbaugh C, Pigott DM, et al. Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. 2021. 1700:1712. Santomauro SF, Mantilla Herrera AM, Shadid J, Zheng P, Ashbaugh C, Pigott DM, et al. Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. 2021. 1700:1712.
4.
go back to reference Patel V, Chisholm D, Parikh R, Charlson FJ, Degenhardt L, Dua T, et al. Addressing the burden of mental, neurological, and substance use disorders: key messages from Disease Control Priorities, 3rd edition. Lancet. 2016:1672–85. Patel V, Chisholm D, Parikh R, Charlson FJ, Degenhardt L, Dua T, et al. Addressing the burden of mental, neurological, and substance use disorders: key messages from Disease Control Priorities, 3rd edition. Lancet. 2016:1672–85.
9.
go back to reference Fonagy P, Rost F, Carlyle JA, McPherson S, Thomas R, Pasco Fearon RM, et al. Pragmatic randomized controlled trial of long-term psychoanalytic psychotherapy for treatment-resistant depression: the Tavistock Adult Depression Study (TADS). World Psychiatry. 2015:312–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20267. Fonagy P, Rost F, Carlyle JA, McPherson S, Thomas R, Pasco Fearon RM, et al. Pragmatic randomized controlled trial of long-term psychoanalytic psychotherapy for treatment-resistant depression: the Tavistock Adult Depression Study (TADS). World Psychiatry. 2015:312–21. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​wps.​20267.
12.
go back to reference Kocsis JH, Gelenberg AJ, Rothbaum B, Klein DN, Trivedi MH, Manber R, et al. Chronic forms of major depression are still undertreated in the 21st century: systematic assessment of 801 patients presenting for treatment. J Affect Disord. 2008;110:55–61.CrossRef Kocsis JH, Gelenberg AJ, Rothbaum B, Klein DN, Trivedi MH, Manber R, et al. Chronic forms of major depression are still undertreated in the 21st century: systematic assessment of 801 patients presenting for treatment. J Affect Disord. 2008;110:55–61.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Priebe S, Kelley L, Omer S, Golden E, Walsh S, Khanom H, et al. The effectiveness of a patient-centred assessment with a solution-focused approach (DIALOG+) for patients with psychosis: A pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial in community care. Psychother Psychosom. 2015;84:304–3.CrossRef Priebe S, Kelley L, Omer S, Golden E, Walsh S, Khanom H, et al. The effectiveness of a patient-centred assessment with a solution-focused approach (DIALOG+) for patients with psychosis: A pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial in community care. Psychother Psychosom. 2015;84:304–3.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Priebe S, Golden E, Kingdon D, Omer S, Walsh S, Katevas K, et al. Effective patient-clinician interaction to improve treatment outcomes for patients with psychosis: a mixed methods design (DIALOG+). Health Technol Assess Program Grants Appl Res. 2017;5:6. Priebe S, Golden E, Kingdon D, Omer S, Walsh S, Katevas K, et al. Effective patient-clinician interaction to improve treatment outcomes for patients with psychosis: a mixed methods design (DIALOG+). Health Technol Assess Program Grants Appl Res. 2017;5:6.
18.
go back to reference Slatina Murga S, Janković S, Muhić M, Sikira H, Burn E, Priebe S. Effectiveness of a structured intervention to make routine clinical meetings therapeutically effective (DIALOG+) for patients with depressive and anxiety disorders in Bosnia and Herzegovina: A cluster randomised controlled trial. Psychiatr Res Commun. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psycom.2021.100010. Slatina Murga S, Janković S, Muhić M, Sikira H, Burn E, Priebe S. Effectiveness of a structured intervention to make routine clinical meetings therapeutically effective (DIALOG+) for patients with depressive and anxiety disorders in Bosnia and Herzegovina: A cluster randomised controlled trial. Psychiatr Res Commun. 2021. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​psycom.​2021.​100010.
23.
go back to reference Montgomery SA, Åsberg M. A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry. 1979:382–9. Montgomery SA, Åsberg M. A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry. 1979:382–9.
24.
go back to reference Priebe S, McCabe R, Bullenkamp J, Hansson L, Lauber C, Martinez-Leal R, et al. Structured patient-clinician communication and 1-year outcome in community mental healthcare. Cluster randomised controlled trial (DIALOG). Br J Psychiatry. 2007:420–6. Priebe S, McCabe R, Bullenkamp J, Hansson L, Lauber C, Martinez-Leal R, et al. Structured patient-clinician communication and 1-year outcome in community mental healthcare. Cluster randomised controlled trial (DIALOG). Br J Psychiatry. 2007:420–6.
28.
go back to reference Guy W. ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare; 1976. Guy W. ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare; 1976.
31.
go back to reference Beecham J, Martin K. Costing psychiatric interventions. In: Thornicroft G, editor. Measuring Mental Health Needs. London: Gaskell; 2001. p. 200–24. Beecham J, Martin K. Costing psychiatric interventions. In: Thornicroft G, editor. Measuring Mental Health Needs. London: Gaskell; 2001. p. 200–24.
33.
go back to reference Black W. The CE plane: A graphic representation of cost-effectiveness. Med Decis Making. 1990;10:212–4.CrossRef Black W. The CE plane: A graphic representation of cost-effectiveness. Med Decis Making. 1990;10:212–4.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Van Hout B, Al M, Gordon G, Rutten F. Costs, effects and c/e-ratios alongside a clinical trial. Health Econ. 1994;309-319. Van Hout B, Al M, Gordon G, Rutten F. Costs, effects and c/e-ratios alongside a clinical trial. Health Econ. 1994;309-319.
35.
go back to reference Flynn TN, Huynh E, Peters TJ, Al-Janabi H, Clemens S, Moody A, et al. Scoring the ICECAP-A capability instrument. Estimation of a UK general population tariff. Health Econ. 2015:258–69. Flynn TN, Huynh E, Peters TJ, Al-Janabi H, Clemens S, Moody A, et al. Scoring the ICECAP-A capability instrument. Estimation of a UK general population tariff. Health Econ. 2015:258–69.
Metadata
Title
Clinical- and cost-effectiveness of a technology-supported and solution-focused intervention (DIALOG+) in treatment of patients with chronic depression—study protocol for a multi-site, cluster randomised controlled trial [TACK]
Authors
Philip McNamee
Aleksandra Matanov
Lauren Jerome
Sally Kerry
Neil Walker
Yan Feng
Andrew Molodynski
Shonagh Scott
Latha Guruvaiah
Sue Collinson
Rose McCabe
John Geddes
Stefan Priebe
Victoria Bird
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06181-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Trials 1/2022 Go to the issue