Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Mood Disorders | Research

The long and winding road to happiness: A randomized controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis of a positive psychology intervention for lonely people with health problems and a low socio-economic status

Authors: Laura A. Weiss, Martijn A. H. Oude Voshaar, Ernst T. Bohlmeijer, Gerben J. Westerhof

Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Our objective was to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the positive psychology intervention ‘Happiness Route’ compared to an active control condition in a vulnerable population with an accumulation of health and psychosocial problems.

Methods

We conducted a randomized, single-blind, actively-controlled, parallel group study in seven municipalities in the Netherlands. To be eligible, participants had to experience loneliness, health problems and low socio-economic status. Each group received several home visits by a counsellor (two in the control condition, two to six in the experimental condition). In the Happiness Route, a happiness-based approach was used, whereas the control condition used a traditional problem-based approach. The primary outcome was well-being, measured with the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF).

Results

Fifty-eight participants were randomized to the Happiness Route, 50 to the control condition. Participants were severely lonely, had on average three health problems and less than 5% had paid work. The total MHC-SF score, emotional and social well-being, depression and loneliness improved significantly over the nine-month period in both conditions (p < .05), but there were no significant changes between the conditions across time. Languishing decreased significantly from 33% at baseline to 16% at follow-up among the Happiness Route participants but did not change significantly in the control condition. No significant improvement over time was found in psychological well-being, resilience, purpose in life, health-related quality of life and social participation. Cost-effectiveness analysis showed that expected saved costs per QALY lost was €219,948 for the Happiness Route, relative to the control condition. The probability was 83% that the Happiness Route was cost saving and 54% that the Happiness Route was cost-effective at a willingness to accept a threshold of €100,000.

Conclusions

Mental health status of both groups improved considerably. However, we could not demonstrate that the Happiness Route yielded better health outcomes compared to the control condition. Nevertheless, the results of the cost-effectiveness analysis suggested that the Happiness Route is an acceptable intervention from a health-economic point of view. Our results should be viewed in light of the fact that we could not include the planned number of participants.

Trial registration

Netherlands Trial Register: NTR3377. Registered 2 Apr 2012.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
Keyes CLM. Promoting and protecting mental health as flourishing. A complementary strategy for improving national mental health. Am Psychol. 2007;62:95–108.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Keyes CLM, Shapiro AD. Social well-being in the United States: a descriptive epidemiology. In: Brim OG, Ryff CD, Kessler RC, editors. How healthy are we? A national study of well-being at midlife. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 2004. p. 350–73.
4.
Diener E, Suh EM, Lucas RE, Smith HL. Subjective well-being: three decades of progress. Psychol Bull. 1999;125:276–302.CrossRef
5.
Mangelli L, Gribbin N, Büchi S, Allard S, Sensky T. Psychological well-being in rheumatoid arthritis: relationship to ‘disease’ variables and affective disturbance. Psychother Psychosom. 2002;71:112–6.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Ryff CD, Singer BH. Know thyself and become what you are: a eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. J Happiness Stud. 2008;9:13–39.CrossRef
7.
Golden J, Conroy RM, Bruce I, Denihan A, Greene E, Kirby M, Lawlor BA. Loneliness, social support networks, mood and wellbeing in community-dwelling elderly. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009;24:694–700.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Pinquart M, Sörensen S. Influences of socioeconomic status, social network, and competence on subjective well-being in later life: a meta-analysis. Psychol Aging. 2000;15:187–224.PubMedCrossRef
9.
10.
Masi CM, Chen H-Y, Hawkley LC, Cacioppo JT. A meta-analysis of interventions to reduce loneliness. Personal Soc Psychol Rev. 2011;15:219–66.CrossRef
11.
Holt-Lunstad J, Smith TB, Baker M, Harris T, Stephenson D. Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: a meta-analytic review. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015;10:227–37.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Flaskerud JH, Winslow BJ. Conceptualizing vulnerable populations health-related research. Nurs Res. 1998;47:69–78.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Valtorta NK, Kanaan M, Gilbody S, Ronzi S, Hanratty B. Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for coronary heart disease and stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal observational studies. Heart. 2016;102:1009–16.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Lorant V, Croux C, Weich S, Deliège D, Mackenbach J, Ansseau M. Depression and socio-economic risk factors: 7-year longitudinal population study. Br J Psychiatry. 2007;190:293–8.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Van der Plaats JJ. Eindrapportage Zorg in Beeld Verlicht. Almelo: Gemeente Almelo; 2002.
16.
Machielse A. Sociaal isolement bij ouderen: een typologie als richtlijn voor effectieve interventies. JSI. 2011;20:40–61.CrossRef
17.
Seligman MEP, Csikszentmihalyi M. Positive psychology. An introduction. Am Psychol. 2000;55:5–14.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Barry MM, Jenkins R. Implementing mental health promotion. Edingburgh: Elsevier; 2007.
19.
Herrman H, Saxena S, Moodie R. Promoting mental health: concepts, emerging evidence, practice: a report of the World Health Organization, Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse in collaboration with the Victorian Health Promotion Foundation and the University of Melbourne. World Health Organization. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005.
20.
Lyubomirsky S, King L, Diener E. The benefits of frequent positive affect: does happiness lead to success? Psychol Bull. 2005;131:803–55.PubMedCrossRef
21.
22.
23.
Sin NL, Lyubomirsky S. Enhancing well-being and alleviating depressive symptoms with positive psychology interventions: a practice-friendly meta-analysis. J Clin Psychol. 2009;65:467–87.PubMedCrossRef
24.
25.
Francissen AA, Wezenberg EJ, Westerhof GJ. De gevolgen van geluk. Achtergronden en toekomst van het geluksbudget. Borne: Arcon; 2010.
26.
Weiss LA, Kedzia S, Francissen A. Westerhof GJ. Improving the health care sector with a happiness-based approach. The case of the Happiness Route. In: Søraker J, Van der Rijt JW, de Boer J, Wong PH, Brey P, editors. Well-Being in contemporary society. Cham: Springer; 2015. p. 59–71.
27.
Weiss LA, Westerhof GJ, Bohlmeijer ET. Nudging socially isolated people towards well-being with the 'Happiness Route': design of a randomized controlled trial for the evaluation of a happiness-based intervention. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​1477-7525-11-159.
28.
De Jong GJ, van Tilburg T. Manual of the loneliness scale. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam; 1999.
29.
30.
Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek, Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau. Armoedesignalement 2013. Den Haag: CBS; 2013.
31.
Lamers SMA, Westerhof GJ, Bohlmeijer ET, ten Klooster PM, Keyes CLM. Evaluating the psychometric properties of the mental health continuum-short form (MHC-SF). J Clin Psychol. 2011;67:99–110.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977;1:385–401.CrossRef
33.
Bouma J, Ranchor AV, Sanderman R, van Sonderen E. Het meten van symptomen van depressie met de CES-D. Een handleiding. 2nd ed. Groningen: Noordelijk Centrum voor Gezondheidsvraagstukken, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen; 1995.
34.
Parks AC, Biswas-Diener R. Positive interventions: past, present, and future. In: Kashdan TB, Ciarrochi J, editors. Mindfulness, acceptance, and positive psychology. The seven foundations of well-being. Oakland: Context Press/New Harbinger Publications; 2013. p. 140–65.
35.
Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2000;55:68–78.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Hermans D, van de Putte J. Cognitieve gedragstherapie bij depressie. Houten: Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum; 2004.
37.
Ryff CD. Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989;57:1069–81.CrossRef
38.
Ryff CD, Keyes CLM. The structure of psychological well-being revisited. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995;69:719–27.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Keyes CL. Brief description of the mental health continuum short form (MHC-SF). Atlanta: Emory University; 2009.
40.
Smith BW, Dalen J, Wiggins K, Tooley E, Christopher P, Bernard J. The brief resilience scale: assessing the ability to bounce back. Int J Behav Med. 2008;15:194–200.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Steverink N, Westerhof GJ, Bode C, Dittmann-Kohli F. Dutch aging survey: onderzoekdesign en instrumenten. Een onderzoek naar de leefsituatie en het welbevinden van mensen vanaf 40 jaar. Nijmegen: Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen; 2001.
42.
Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek. Permanent onderzoek leefsituatie. Voorburg/Heerlen: CBS; 2005.
43.
Scherpenzeel A. Start of the LISS panel. Sample and recruitment of a probability-based internet panel. Tilburg: CentERdata; 2009.
44.
Hakkaart-van Roijen L, Van Straten A, Donker M, Tiemens B. Handleiding Trimbos/iMTA questionnaire for costs associated with psychiatric illness (TiC-P). Rotterdam: Institute for Medical Technology Assessment; 2002.
45.
Hakkaart-van RL. Handleiding TiC-P. Vragenlijst voor zorggebruik en productieverliezen bij psychische aandoeningen. Rotterdam: Institute for Medical Technology Assessment; 2002.
46.
Hakkaart-van Roijen L, Hoeijenbos M, Regeer E, Ten Have M, Nolen W, Veraart C, Rutten F. The societal costs and quality of life of patients suffering from bipolar disorder in the Netherlands. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2004;110:383–92.PubMedCrossRef
47.
Hoefman RJ, Van Exel NJA, Brouwer WBF. iVICQ. iMTA valuation of informal care questionnaire. Rotterdam: iMTA; 2013.
48.
49.
50.
White IR, Royston P, Wood AM. Multiple imputation using chained equations: issues and guidance for practice. Stat Med. 2011;30:377–99.PubMedCrossRef
51.
52.
Lipsey MW, Wilson DB. The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment. Confirmation from meta-analysis. Am Psychol. 1993;48:1181–209.PubMedCrossRef
53.
Ramsey SD, Willke RJ, Glick H, Reed SD, Augustovski F, Jonsson B, Briggs A, Sullivan SD. Cost-effectiveness analysis alongside clinical trials II—an ISPOR good research practices task force report. Value Health. 2015;18:161–72.PubMedCrossRef
54.
Nixon RM, Wonderling D, Grieve RD. Non-parametric methods for cost-effectiveness analysis: the central limit theorem and the bootstrap compared. Health Econ. 2010;19:316–33.PubMedCrossRef
55.
Van Tilburg TG, De Jong Gierveld J. Cesuurbepaling van de eenzaamheidsschaal. 1999. Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 1999;30:158–63.PubMed
56.
Lewinsohn PM, Seeley JR, Roberts RE, Allen NB. Center for epidemiologic studies depression scale (CES-D) as a screening instrument for depression among community-residing older adults. Psychol Aging. 1997;12:277–87.PubMedCrossRef
57.
Sobocki P, Ekman M, Ågren H, Krakau I, Runeson B, Mårtensson B, Jönsson B. Health-related quality of life measured with EQ-5D in patients treated for depression in primary care. Value Health. 2007;10:153–60.PubMedCrossRef
58.
Barnett AG, van der Pols JC, Dobson AJ. Regression to the mean: what it is and how to deal with it. Int J Epidemiol. 2005;34:215–20.PubMedCrossRef
59.
Lamers SMA, Glas CAW, Westerhof GJ, Bohlmeijer ET. Longitudinal evaluation of the mental health continuum-short form (MHC-SF). Measurement invariance across demographics, physical illness and mental illness. Eur J Psychol Assess. 2012;28:290–6.CrossRef
60.
Fokkema T, van Tilburg T. Aanpak van eenzaamheid: helpt het? In: Een vergelijkend effect- en procesevaluatie-onderzoek naar interventies ter voorkoming en vermindering van eenzaamheid onder ouderen Den Haag: NIDI; 2006.
61.
Findlay RA. Interventions to reduce social isolation amongst older people: where is the evidence? Ageing Soc. 2003;23:647–58.CrossRef
62.
O'Brien BJ, Gertsen K, Willan AR, Faulkner LA. Is there a kink in consumers' threshold value for cost-effectiveness in health care? Health Econ. 2002;11:175–80.PubMedCrossRef
63.
Stolk E, Krabbe P, Busschbach J. Using the internet to collect EQ-5D norm scores: a valid alternative. In: Busschbach J, Rabin R, De Charro F, editors. 24th scientific plenary meeting of the EuroQol group - proceedings. The Hague: EuroQol Group; 2007. p. 153–65.
64.
Westerhof GJ, Keyes CLM. Geestelijke gezondheid is meer dan de afwezigheid van geestelijke ziekte. MGV. 2008;63:808–20.
65.
Keyes CL. The next steps in the promotion and protection of positive mental health. Can J Nurs Res. 2010;42:17–28.PubMed
Metadata
Title
The long and winding road to happiness: A randomized controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis of a positive psychology intervention for lonely people with health problems and a low socio-economic status
Authors
Laura A. Weiss
Martijn A. H. Oude Voshaar
Ernst T. Bohlmeijer
Gerben J. Westerhof
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1477-7525
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01416-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2020 Go to the issue

Research

Analysis of adherence to HIV-positive quality of care indicators and their impact on service quality perceptions in patients: a Spanish cross-sectional study

Research

Perceived changes of specific attitudes, perceptions and behaviors during the Corona pandemic and their relation to wellbeing

Research

Quality of life in allergic rhinitis - children’s and their parents’ perspective in polish urban and rural population

Research

Mapping the Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire (MLHFQ) to EQ-5D-5L in patients with heart failure

Research

Defining the content of a minimal dataset for acquired brain injury using a Delphi procedure

Research

Quality of life, level of functioning, and its relationship with mental and physical disorders in the elderly: results from the MentDis_ICF65+ study