Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Behavioral Medicine 6/2021

01-12-2021 | Mood Disorders | Full length manuscript

Sociodemographic and Psychological Risk Factors for Anxiety and Depression: Findings from the Covid-19 Health and Adherence Research in Scotland on Mental Health (CHARIS-MH) Cross-sectional Survey

Authors: Gill Hubbard, Chantal den Daas, Marie Johnston, Diane Dixon

Published in: International Journal of Behavioral Medicine | Issue 6/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Investigations about mental health report prevalence rates with fewer studies investigating psychological and social factors influencing mental health during the Covid-19 pandemic. Study aims: (1) identify sociodemographic groups of the adult population at risk of anxiety and depression and (2) determine if the following social and psychological risk factors for poor mental health moderated these direct sociodemographic effects: loneliness, social support, threat perception, illness representations.

Methods

Cross-sectional nationally representative telephone survey in Scotland in June 2020. If available, validated instruments were used, for example, Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-4) to measure anxiety and depression. Simple linear regressions followed by examination of moderation effect.

Results

A total of 1006 participants; median age 53 years, 61.4% female, from all levels of area deprivation (i.e., 3.8% in the most deprived decile and 15.6% in the most affluent decile). Analyses show associations of anxiety and depression with sociodemographic (age, gender, deprivation), social (social support, loneliness) and psychological factors (perceived threat and illness representations). Mental health was poorer in younger adults, women and people living in the most deprived areas. Age effects were exacerbated by loneliness and illness representations, gender effects by loneliness and illness representations and deprivation effects by loneliness, social support, illness representations and perceived threat. In each case, the moderating variables amplified the detrimental effects of the sociodemographic factors.

Conclusions

These findings confirm the results of pre-Covid-19 pandemic studies about associations between sociodemographics and mental health. Loneliness, lack of social support and thoughts about Covid-19 exacerbated these effects and offer pointers for pre-emptive action.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Allwood L, Bell A. Covid-19: understanding inequalities in mental health during the pandemic. London; 2020. Allwood L, Bell A. Covid-19: understanding inequalities in mental health during the pandemic. London; 2020.
5.
go back to reference Pierce M, Hope, H, Ford, T, Hatch, S, Hotopf, M, John, A, Kontopantelis, E, Webb, R, Wessely, S, McManus, S, Abel, K. Mental health before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal probability sample survey of the UK population. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30308-4. Pierce M, Hope, H, Ford, T, Hatch, S, Hotopf, M, John, A, Kontopantelis, E, Webb, R, Wessely, S, McManus, S, Abel, K. Mental health before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal probability sample survey of the UK population. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S2215-0366(20)30308-4.
6.
go back to reference Covidlife. Covidlife Survey First. Edinburgh; 2020. Covidlife. Covidlife Survey First. Edinburgh; 2020.
7.
go back to reference Office for National Statistics. Coronavirus and the social impacts on Great Britain. London; 2020. Office for National Statistics. Coronavirus and the social impacts on Great Britain. London; 2020.
8.
go back to reference Office for National Statistics. Coronavirus and the social impacts on Great Britain. London; 2020. Office for National Statistics. Coronavirus and the social impacts on Great Britain. London; 2020.
11.
go back to reference Cowan K. Survey results: Understanding people’s concerns about the mental health impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. London; 2020. Cowan K. Survey results: Understanding people’s concerns about the mental health impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. London; 2020.
13.
go back to reference Ipsos Mori. Public perceptions of health and social care in light of COVID-19. London; 2020. Ipsos Mori. Public perceptions of health and social care in light of COVID-19. London; 2020.
18.
go back to reference Petzold MB, Bendau A, Plag J, Pyrkosch L, Mascarell Maricic L, Betzler F, et al. Risk, resilience, psychological distress, and anxiety at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany. Brain Behav. 2020:e01745. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1745. Petzold MB, Bendau A, Plag J, Pyrkosch L, Mascarell Maricic L, Betzler F, et al. Risk, resilience, psychological distress, and anxiety at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany. Brain Behav. 2020:e01745. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​brb3.​1745.
19.
go back to reference Wang C, Pan R, Wan X, Tan Y, Xu L, Ho CS, et al. Immediate psychological responses and associated factors during the initial stage of the 2019 Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) epidemic among the general population in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:1729.CrossRef Wang C, Pan R, Wan X, Tan Y, Xu L, Ho CS, et al. Immediate psychological responses and associated factors during the initial stage of the 2019 Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) epidemic among the general population in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:1729.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Local government association: public mental health and wellbeing. 2020. Accessed 5 Aug 2020. Local government association: public mental health and wellbeing. 2020. Accessed 5 Aug 2020.
31.
go back to reference Yue C, Liu C, Wang J, Zhang M, Wu H, Li C, et al. Association between social support and anxiety among pregnant women in the third trimester during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic in Qingdao, China: The mediating effect of risk perception. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2020:0020764020941567. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764020941567 Yue C, Liu C, Wang J, Zhang M, Wu H, Li C, et al. Association between social support and anxiety among pregnant women in the third trimester during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic in Qingdao, China: The mediating effect of risk perception. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2020:0020764020941567. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1177/​0020764020941567​
33.
go back to reference Evers AW, Kraaimaat FW, van Lankveld W, Jongen PJ, Jacobs JW, Bijlsma JW. Beyond unfavorable thinking: the illness cognition questionnaire for chronic diseases. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2001;69(6):1026–36.CrossRef Evers AW, Kraaimaat FW, van Lankveld W, Jongen PJ, Jacobs JW, Bijlsma JW. Beyond unfavorable thinking: the illness cognition questionnaire for chronic diseases. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2001;69(6):1026–36.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference den Daas C, Hubbard G, Johnston M, Dixon D. Protocol of the COVID-19 Health and Adherence Research in Scotland (CHARIS) study: Understanding changes in adherence to transmission-reducing behaviours, mental and general health, in weekly or fortnightly representative samples of the Scottish population. PsyArXiv [Preprints]. 2020. den Daas C, Hubbard G, Johnston M, Dixon D. Protocol of the COVID-19 Health and Adherence Research in Scotland (CHARIS) study: Understanding changes in adherence to transmission-reducing behaviours, mental and general health, in weekly or fortnightly representative samples of the Scottish population. PsyArXiv [Preprints]. 2020.
39.
go back to reference Scottish Government. Scotland’s route map through and out of the crisis. 1st ed. Edinburgh; 2020. Scottish Government. Scotland’s route map through and out of the crisis. 1st ed. Edinburgh; 2020.
40.
go back to reference Cheong CK, Dean L, Dougall I, Hinchliffe S, Mirani K, Vosnaki K, et al. The scottish health survey. In: McLean J, L D, editors. 2nd ed. Edinbrugh; 2020. Cheong CK, Dean L, Dougall I, Hinchliffe S, Mirani K, Vosnaki K, et al. The scottish health survey. In: McLean J, L D, editors. 2nd ed. Edinbrugh; 2020.
43.
go back to reference Office for National Statistics. 2011 Census variable and classification information: part 3. London; 2020. Office for National Statistics. 2011 Census variable and classification information: part 3. London; 2020.
49.
go back to reference Aiken LS, West SG, Reno RR. Multiple regression : testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks; London: SAGE; 1991. Aiken LS, West SG, Reno RR. Multiple regression : testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks; London: SAGE; 1991.
55.
go back to reference Office for National Statistics. Deaths involving COVID-19 by local area and socioeconomic deprivation: deaths occurring between 1 March and 17 April 2020. London: Statistical Bulletin; 2020. Office for National Statistics. Deaths involving COVID-19 by local area and socioeconomic deprivation: deaths occurring between 1 March and 17 April 2020. London: Statistical Bulletin; 2020.
56.
go back to reference Office for National Statistics. Deaths involving COVID-19, England and Wales: deaths occurring in April 2020. London; 2020. Office for National Statistics. Deaths involving COVID-19, England and Wales: deaths occurring in April 2020. London; 2020.
Metadata
Title
Sociodemographic and Psychological Risk Factors for Anxiety and Depression: Findings from the Covid-19 Health and Adherence Research in Scotland on Mental Health (CHARIS-MH) Cross-sectional Survey
Authors
Gill Hubbard
Chantal den Daas
Marie Johnston
Diane Dixon
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Medicine / Issue 6/2021
Print ISSN: 1070-5503
Electronic ISSN: 1532-7558
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-021-09967-z

Other articles of this Issue 6/2021

International Journal of Behavioral Medicine 6/2021 Go to the issue