Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 1/2021

01-02-2021 | Mood Disorders | Original Paper

Association between tDCS computational modeling and clinical outcomes in depression: data from the ELECT-TDCS trial

Authors: Paulo J. C. Suen, Sarah Doll, Marcelo C. Batistuzzo, Geraldo Busatto, Lais B. Razza, Frank Padberg, Eva Mezger, Lucia Bulubas, Daniel Keeser, Zhi-De Deng, Andre R. Brunoni

Published in: European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation intervention investigated for the treatment of depression. Clinical results have been heterogeneous, partly due to the variability of electric field (EF) strength in the brain owing to interindividual differences in head anatomy. Therefore, we investigated whether EF strength was correlated with behavioral changes in 16 depressed patients using simulated electric fields in real patient data from a controlled clinical trial. We hypothesized that EF strength in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), brain regions implicated in depression pathophysiology, would be associated with changes in depression, mood and anxiety scores. SimNIBS were used to simulate individual electric fields based on the MRI structural T1-weighted brain scans of depressed subjects. Linear regression models showed, at the end of the acute treatment phase, that simulated EF strength was inversely associated with negative affect in the bilateral ACC (left: β = − 160.463, CI [− 291.541, − 29.385], p = 0.021; right: β = − 189.194, CI [− 289.479, − 88.910], p = 0.001) and DLPFC (left: β = − 93.210, CI [− 154.960, − 31.461], p = 0.006; right: β = − 82.564, CI [− 142.867, − 22.262], p = 0.011) and with depression scores in the left ACC (β = − 156.91, CI [− 298.51, − 15.30], p = 0.033). No association between positive affect or anxiety scores, and simulated EF strength in the investigated brain regions was found. To conclude, our findings show preliminary evidence that EF strength simulations might be associated with further behavioral changes in depressed patients, unveiling a potential mechanism of action for tDCS. Further studies should investigate whether individualization of EF strength in key brain regions impact clinical response.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Brunoni AR, Nitsche MA, Bolognini N et al (2012) Clinical research with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): challenges and future directions. Brain Stimul 5:175–195PubMed Brunoni AR, Nitsche MA, Bolognini N et al (2012) Clinical research with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): challenges and future directions. Brain Stimul 5:175–195PubMed
2.
go back to reference Moffa AH, Brunoni AR, Nikolin S, Loo CK (2018) Transcranial direct current stimulation in psychiatric disorders: a comprehensive review. Psychiatr Clin North Am 41:447–463PubMed Moffa AH, Brunoni AR, Nikolin S, Loo CK (2018) Transcranial direct current stimulation in psychiatric disorders: a comprehensive review. Psychiatr Clin North Am 41:447–463PubMed
3.
go back to reference Moffa AH, Martin D, Alonzo A, et al (2019) Efficacy and acceptability of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for major depressive disorder: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry pp 109836 Moffa AH, Martin D, Alonzo A, et al (2019) Efficacy and acceptability of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for major depressive disorder: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry pp 109836
4.
go back to reference Grimm S, Beck J, Schuepbach D et al (2008) Imbalance between left and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in major depression is linked to negative emotional judgment: an fMRI study in severe major depressive disorder. Biol Psychiatr 63:369–376 Grimm S, Beck J, Schuepbach D et al (2008) Imbalance between left and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in major depression is linked to negative emotional judgment: an fMRI study in severe major depressive disorder. Biol Psychiatr 63:369–376
5.
go back to reference Seibt O, Brunoni AR, Huang Y, Bikson M (2015) The pursuit of DLPFC: non-neuronavigated methods to target the left dorsolateral pre-frontal cortex with symmetric bicephalic transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Brain Stimul 8:590–602PubMed Seibt O, Brunoni AR, Huang Y, Bikson M (2015) The pursuit of DLPFC: non-neuronavigated methods to target the left dorsolateral pre-frontal cortex with symmetric bicephalic transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Brain Stimul 8:590–602PubMed
6.
go back to reference Brunoni AR, Valiengo L, Baccaro A et al (2013) The sertraline vs. electrical current therapy for treating depression clinical study: results from a factorial, randomized, controlled trial. JAMA Psychiatr 70:383–391 Brunoni AR, Valiengo L, Baccaro A et al (2013) The sertraline vs. electrical current therapy for treating depression clinical study: results from a factorial, randomized, controlled trial. JAMA Psychiatr 70:383–391
7.
go back to reference Brunoni AR, Moffa AH, Sampaio-Junior B et al (2017) Trial of electrical direct-current therapy versus escitalopram for depression. N Engl J Med 376:2523–2533PubMed Brunoni AR, Moffa AH, Sampaio-Junior B et al (2017) Trial of electrical direct-current therapy versus escitalopram for depression. N Engl J Med 376:2523–2533PubMed
8.
go back to reference Sampaio-Junior B, Tortella G, Borrione L et al (2018) Efficacy and safety of transcranial direct current stimulation as an add-on treatment for bipolar depression: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatr 75:158–166 Sampaio-Junior B, Tortella G, Borrione L et al (2018) Efficacy and safety of transcranial direct current stimulation as an add-on treatment for bipolar depression: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatr 75:158–166
9.
go back to reference Brunoni AR, Moffa AH, Fregni F et al (2016) Transcranial direct current stimulation for acute major depressive episodes: meta-analysis of individual patient data. Br J Psychiatr 208:522 Brunoni AR, Moffa AH, Fregni F et al (2016) Transcranial direct current stimulation for acute major depressive episodes: meta-analysis of individual patient data. Br J Psychiatr 208:522
10.
go back to reference Loo CK, Husain MM, McDonald WM et al (2018) International randomized-controlled trial of transcranial direct current stimulation in depression. Brain Stimul 11:125–133PubMed Loo CK, Husain MM, McDonald WM et al (2018) International randomized-controlled trial of transcranial direct current stimulation in depression. Brain Stimul 11:125–133PubMed
11.
go back to reference Lisanby SH (2017) Noninvasive brain stimulation for depression—the devil is in the dosing. N Engl J Med 376:2593–2594PubMed Lisanby SH (2017) Noninvasive brain stimulation for depression—the devil is in the dosing. N Engl J Med 376:2593–2594PubMed
12.
go back to reference Lang N, Nitsche MA, Dileone M et al (2011) Transcranial direct current stimulation effects on I-wave activity in humans. J Neurophysiol 105:2802–2810PubMed Lang N, Nitsche MA, Dileone M et al (2011) Transcranial direct current stimulation effects on I-wave activity in humans. J Neurophysiol 105:2802–2810PubMed
13.
go back to reference Fresnoza S, Paulus W, Nitsche MA, Kuo M-F (2014) Nonlinear dose-dependent impact of D1 receptor activation on motor cortex plasticity in humans. J Neurosci 34:2744–2753PubMedPubMedCentral Fresnoza S, Paulus W, Nitsche MA, Kuo M-F (2014) Nonlinear dose-dependent impact of D1 receptor activation on motor cortex plasticity in humans. J Neurosci 34:2744–2753PubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Datta A, Truong D, Minhas P et al (2012) Inter-individual variation during transcranial direct current stimulation and normalization of dose using MRI-derived computational models. Front Psychiatr 3:91 Datta A, Truong D, Minhas P et al (2012) Inter-individual variation during transcranial direct current stimulation and normalization of dose using MRI-derived computational models. Front Psychiatr 3:91
15.
go back to reference Bulubas L, Padberg F, Bueno PV et al (2019) Antidepressant effects of tDCS are associated with prefrontal gray matter volumes at baseline: evidence from the ELECT-TDCS trial. Brain Stimul 12:1197–1204PubMed Bulubas L, Padberg F, Bueno PV et al (2019) Antidepressant effects of tDCS are associated with prefrontal gray matter volumes at baseline: evidence from the ELECT-TDCS trial. Brain Stimul 12:1197–1204PubMed
16.
go back to reference Opitz A, Paulus W, Will S et al (2015) Determinants of the electric field during transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuroimage 109:140–150PubMed Opitz A, Paulus W, Will S et al (2015) Determinants of the electric field during transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuroimage 109:140–150PubMed
17.
go back to reference Antonenko D, Thielscher A, Saturnino GB et al (2019) Towards precise brain stimulation: is electric field simulation related to neuromodulation? Brain Stimul 12:1159–1168PubMed Antonenko D, Thielscher A, Saturnino GB et al (2019) Towards precise brain stimulation: is electric field simulation related to neuromodulation? Brain Stimul 12:1159–1168PubMed
18.
go back to reference Mikkonen M, Laakso I, Sumiya M et al (2018) TMS motor thresholds correlate with TDCS electric field strengths in hand motor area. Front Neurosci 12:426PubMedPubMedCentral Mikkonen M, Laakso I, Sumiya M et al (2018) TMS motor thresholds correlate with TDCS electric field strengths in hand motor area. Front Neurosci 12:426PubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Bora E, Fornito A, Pantelis C, Yücel M (2012) Gray matter abnormalities in major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of voxel based morphometry studies. J Affect Disord 138:9–18PubMed Bora E, Fornito A, Pantelis C, Yücel M (2012) Gray matter abnormalities in major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of voxel based morphometry studies. J Affect Disord 138:9–18PubMed
20.
go back to reference Lai C-H (2013) Gray matter volume in major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of voxel-based morphometry studies. Psychiatr Res 211:37–46 Lai C-H (2013) Gray matter volume in major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of voxel-based morphometry studies. Psychiatr Res 211:37–46
21.
go back to reference Liao Y, Huang X, Wu Q et al (2013) Is depression a disconnection syndrome? Meta-analysis of diffusion tensor imaging studies in patients with MDD. J Psychiatr Neurosci 38:49–56 Liao Y, Huang X, Wu Q et al (2013) Is depression a disconnection syndrome? Meta-analysis of diffusion tensor imaging studies in patients with MDD. J Psychiatr Neurosci 38:49–56
22.
go back to reference Brunoni AR, Sampaio-Junior B, Moffa AH et al (2019) Noninvasive brain stimulation in psychiatric disorders: a primer. Braz J Psychiatr 41:70–81 Brunoni AR, Sampaio-Junior B, Moffa AH et al (2019) Noninvasive brain stimulation in psychiatric disorders: a primer. Braz J Psychiatr 41:70–81
23.
go back to reference Baeken C, Brem A-K, Arns M et al (2019) Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment for depressive disorders. Curr Opin Psychiatr 32:409 Baeken C, Brem A-K, Arns M et al (2019) Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment for depressive disorders. Curr Opin Psychiatr 32:409
24.
go back to reference Smith R, Chen K, Baxter L et al (2013) Antidepressant effects of sertraline associated with volume increases in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. J Affect Disord 146:414–419PubMed Smith R, Chen K, Baxter L et al (2013) Antidepressant effects of sertraline associated with volume increases in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. J Affect Disord 146:414–419PubMed
25.
go back to reference Weigand A, Horn A, Caballero R et al (2018) Prospective validation that subgenual connectivity predicts antidepressant efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation sites. Biol Psychiatr 84:28–37 Weigand A, Horn A, Caballero R et al (2018) Prospective validation that subgenual connectivity predicts antidepressant efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation sites. Biol Psychiatr 84:28–37
26.
go back to reference Hamilton M (1980) Rating depressive patients. J Clin Psychiatr 41:21–24 Hamilton M (1980) Rating depressive patients. J Clin Psychiatr 41:21–24
27.
go back to reference Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A (1988) Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol 54:1063–1070PubMed Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A (1988) Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol 54:1063–1070PubMed
28.
go back to reference Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL (1983) State-trait anxiety inventory for adults: manual, instrument, and scoring guide. Mind Garden Incorporated, Menlo Park Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL (1983) State-trait anxiety inventory for adults: manual, instrument, and scoring guide. Mind Garden Incorporated, Menlo Park
29.
go back to reference Brunoni AR, Zanao T, Vanderhasselt MA, et al (2013) Enhancement of affective processing induced by bi-frontal transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with major depression. Neuromodulation [Epub–ahead of print] Brunoni AR, Zanao T, Vanderhasselt MA, et al (2013) Enhancement of affective processing induced by bi-frontal transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with major depression. Neuromodulation [Epub–ahead of print]
30.
go back to reference Moreno ML, Vanderhasselt M-A, Carvalho AF et al (2015) Effects of acute transcranial direct current stimulation in hot and cold working memory tasks in healthy and depressed subjects. Neurosci Lett 591:126–131PubMed Moreno ML, Vanderhasselt M-A, Carvalho AF et al (2015) Effects of acute transcranial direct current stimulation in hot and cold working memory tasks in healthy and depressed subjects. Neurosci Lett 591:126–131PubMed
31.
go back to reference Ironside M, O’Shea J, Cowen PJ, Harmer CJ (2016) Frontal cortex stimulation reduces vigilance to threat: implications for the treatment of depression and anxiety. Biol Psychiatr 79:823–830 Ironside M, O’Shea J, Cowen PJ, Harmer CJ (2016) Frontal cortex stimulation reduces vigilance to threat: implications for the treatment of depression and anxiety. Biol Psychiatr 79:823–830
32.
go back to reference Brunoni AR, Sampaio-Junior B, Moffa AH et al (2015) The escitalopram versus electric current therapy for treating depression clinical study (ELECT-TDCS): rationale and study design of a non-inferiority, triple-arm, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Sao Paulo Med J 133:252–263PubMed Brunoni AR, Sampaio-Junior B, Moffa AH et al (2015) The escitalopram versus electric current therapy for treating depression clinical study (ELECT-TDCS): rationale and study design of a non-inferiority, triple-arm, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Sao Paulo Med J 133:252–263PubMed
33.
go back to reference Thielscher A, Antunes A, Saturnino GB (2015) Field modeling for transcranial magnetic stimulation: a useful tool to understand the physiological effects of TMS? In: 2015 37th annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society (EMBC). pp 222–225 Thielscher A, Antunes A, Saturnino GB (2015) Field modeling for transcranial magnetic stimulation: a useful tool to understand the physiological effects of TMS? In: 2015 37th annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society (EMBC). pp 222–225
34.
go back to reference Sallet J, Mars RB, Noonan MP et al (2013) The organization of dorsal frontal cortex in humans and macaques. J Neurosci 33:12255–12274PubMedPubMedCentral Sallet J, Mars RB, Noonan MP et al (2013) The organization of dorsal frontal cortex in humans and macaques. J Neurosci 33:12255–12274PubMedPubMedCentral
35.
go back to reference Fan L, Li H, Zhuo J et al (2016) The Human brainnetome atlas: a new brain atlas based on connectional architecture. Cereb Cortex 26:3508–3526PubMedPubMedCentral Fan L, Li H, Zhuo J et al (2016) The Human brainnetome atlas: a new brain atlas based on connectional architecture. Cereb Cortex 26:3508–3526PubMedPubMedCentral
36.
go back to reference Fox MD, Buckner RL, White MP et al (2012) Efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation targets for depression is related to intrinsic functional connectivity with the subgenual cingulate. Biol Psychiatr 72:595–603 Fox MD, Buckner RL, White MP et al (2012) Efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation targets for depression is related to intrinsic functional connectivity with the subgenual cingulate. Biol Psychiatr 72:595–603
37.
go back to reference Li C-T, Wang S-J, Hirvonen J et al (2010) Antidepressant mechanism of add-on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in medication-resistant depression using cerebral glucose metabolism. J Affect Disord 127:219–229PubMed Li C-T, Wang S-J, Hirvonen J et al (2010) Antidepressant mechanism of add-on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in medication-resistant depression using cerebral glucose metabolism. J Affect Disord 127:219–229PubMed
38.
go back to reference Downar J, Geraci J, Salomons TV et al (2014) Anhedonia and reward-circuit connectivity distinguish nonresponders from responders to dorsomedial prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in major depression. Biol Psychiatr 76:176–185 Downar J, Geraci J, Salomons TV et al (2014) Anhedonia and reward-circuit connectivity distinguish nonresponders from responders to dorsomedial prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in major depression. Biol Psychiatr 76:176–185
39.
go back to reference Rossum G (1995) Python reference manual. CWI (Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science), Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Rossum G (1995) Python reference manual. CWI (Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
40.
go back to reference Seabold S, Perktold J (2010) Statsmodels: econometric and statistical modeling with python of the 9th Python in science conference Seabold S, Perktold J (2010) Statsmodels: econometric and statistical modeling with python of the 9th Python in science conference
41.
go back to reference Brunoni AR, Padberg F, Vieira ELM et al (2018) Plasma biomarkers in a placebo-controlled trial comparing tDCS and escitalopram efficacy in major depression. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatr 86:211–217 Brunoni AR, Padberg F, Vieira ELM et al (2018) Plasma biomarkers in a placebo-controlled trial comparing tDCS and escitalopram efficacy in major depression. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatr 86:211–217
42.
go back to reference Moreno ML, Goerigk SA, Bertola L et al (2020) Cognitive changes after tDCS and escitalopram treatment in major depressive disorder: results from the placebo-controlled ELECT-TDCS trial. J Affect Disord 263:344–352PubMed Moreno ML, Goerigk SA, Bertola L et al (2020) Cognitive changes after tDCS and escitalopram treatment in major depressive disorder: results from the placebo-controlled ELECT-TDCS trial. J Affect Disord 263:344–352PubMed
43.
go back to reference Zhang F-F, Peng W, Sweeney JA et al (2018) Brain structure alterations in depression: psychoradiological evidence. CNS Neurosci Ther 24:994–1003PubMedPubMedCentral Zhang F-F, Peng W, Sweeney JA et al (2018) Brain structure alterations in depression: psychoradiological evidence. CNS Neurosci Ther 24:994–1003PubMedPubMedCentral
44.
go back to reference Lan MJ, Chhetry BT, Liston C et al (2016) Transcranial magnetic stimulation of left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex induces brain morphological changes in regions associated with a treatment resistant major depressive episode: an exploratory analysis. Brain Stimul 9:577–583PubMedPubMedCentral Lan MJ, Chhetry BT, Liston C et al (2016) Transcranial magnetic stimulation of left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex induces brain morphological changes in regions associated with a treatment resistant major depressive episode: an exploratory analysis. Brain Stimul 9:577–583PubMedPubMedCentral
45.
go back to reference Yrondi A, Péran P, Sauvaget A et al (2018) Structural-functional brain changes in depressed patients during and after electroconvulsive therapy. Acta Neuropsychiatr 30:17–28PubMed Yrondi A, Péran P, Sauvaget A et al (2018) Structural-functional brain changes in depressed patients during and after electroconvulsive therapy. Acta Neuropsychiatr 30:17–28PubMed
46.
go back to reference Iseger TA, van Bueren NER, Kenemans JL et al (2020) A frontal-vagal network theory for major depressive disorder: implications for optimizing neuromodulation techniques. Brain Stimul 13:1–9PubMed Iseger TA, van Bueren NER, Kenemans JL et al (2020) A frontal-vagal network theory for major depressive disorder: implications for optimizing neuromodulation techniques. Brain Stimul 13:1–9PubMed
47.
go back to reference Taylor SF, Ho SS, Abagis T et al (2018) Changes in brain connectivity during a sham-controlled, transcranial magnetic stimulation trial for depression. J Affect Disord 232:143–151PubMedPubMedCentral Taylor SF, Ho SS, Abagis T et al (2018) Changes in brain connectivity during a sham-controlled, transcranial magnetic stimulation trial for depression. J Affect Disord 232:143–151PubMedPubMedCentral
48.
go back to reference Rive MM, van Rooijen G, Veltman DJ et al (2013) Neural correlates of dysfunctional emotion regulation in major depressive disorder. A systematic review of neuroimaging studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 37:2529–2553PubMed Rive MM, van Rooijen G, Veltman DJ et al (2013) Neural correlates of dysfunctional emotion regulation in major depressive disorder. A systematic review of neuroimaging studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 37:2529–2553PubMed
49.
go back to reference Greening SG, Osuch EA, Williamson PC, Mitchell DGV (2014) The neural correlates of regulating positive and negative emotions in medication-free major depression. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 9:628–637PubMed Greening SG, Osuch EA, Williamson PC, Mitchell DGV (2014) The neural correlates of regulating positive and negative emotions in medication-free major depression. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 9:628–637PubMed
50.
go back to reference Dixon ML, Thiruchselvam R, Todd R, Christoff K (2017) Emotion and the prefrontal cortex: an integrative review. Psychol Bull 143:1033–1081PubMed Dixon ML, Thiruchselvam R, Todd R, Christoff K (2017) Emotion and the prefrontal cortex: an integrative review. Psychol Bull 143:1033–1081PubMed
51.
go back to reference Ochsner KN, Bunge SA, Gross JJ, Gabrieli JDE (2002) Rethinking feelings: an FMRI study of the cognitive regulation of emotion. J Cogn Neurosci 14:1215–1229PubMed Ochsner KN, Bunge SA, Gross JJ, Gabrieli JDE (2002) Rethinking feelings: an FMRI study of the cognitive regulation of emotion. J Cogn Neurosci 14:1215–1229PubMed
52.
go back to reference Chikazoe J, Lee DH, Kriegeskorte N, Anderson AK (2014) Population coding of affect across stimuli, modalities and individuals. Nat Neurosci 17:1114–1122PubMedPubMedCentral Chikazoe J, Lee DH, Kriegeskorte N, Anderson AK (2014) Population coding of affect across stimuli, modalities and individuals. Nat Neurosci 17:1114–1122PubMedPubMedCentral
53.
go back to reference Heller AS, Johnstone T, Peterson MJ et al (2013) Increased prefrontal cortex activity during negative emotion regulation as a predictor of depression symptom severity trajectory over 6 months. JAMA Psychiatry 70:1181–1189PubMed Heller AS, Johnstone T, Peterson MJ et al (2013) Increased prefrontal cortex activity during negative emotion regulation as a predictor of depression symptom severity trajectory over 6 months. JAMA Psychiatry 70:1181–1189PubMed
54.
go back to reference Kambeitz J, Goerigk S, Gattaz W et al (2020) Clinical patterns differentially predict response to transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and escitalopram in major depression: a machine learning analysis of the ELECT-TDCS study. J Affect Disord 265:460PubMed Kambeitz J, Goerigk S, Gattaz W et al (2020) Clinical patterns differentially predict response to transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and escitalopram in major depression: a machine learning analysis of the ELECT-TDCS study. J Affect Disord 265:460PubMed
56.
go back to reference Vanderhasselt M-A, De Raedt R, Namur V et al (2016) Emotional reactivity to valence-loaded stimuli are related to treatment response of neurocognitive therapy. J Affect Disord 190:443–449PubMed Vanderhasselt M-A, De Raedt R, Namur V et al (2016) Emotional reactivity to valence-loaded stimuli are related to treatment response of neurocognitive therapy. J Affect Disord 190:443–449PubMed
57.
go back to reference Sanchez-Lopez A, Vanderhasselt M-A, Allaert J et al (2018) Neurocognitive mechanisms behind emotional attention: Inverse effects of anodal tDCS over the left and right DLPFC on gaze disengagement from emotional faces. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 18:485–494PubMed Sanchez-Lopez A, Vanderhasselt M-A, Allaert J et al (2018) Neurocognitive mechanisms behind emotional attention: Inverse effects of anodal tDCS over the left and right DLPFC on gaze disengagement from emotional faces. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 18:485–494PubMed
58.
go back to reference Ironside M, Browning M, Ansari TL et al (2019) Effect of prefrontal cortex stimulation on regulation of amygdala response to threat in individuals with trait anxiety: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatr 76:71–78 Ironside M, Browning M, Ansari TL et al (2019) Effect of prefrontal cortex stimulation on regulation of amygdala response to threat in individuals with trait anxiety: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatr 76:71–78
59.
go back to reference de Lima AL, Braga FMA, da Costa RMM et al (2019) Transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: a randomized clinical trial. J Affect Disord 259:31–37PubMed de Lima AL, Braga FMA, da Costa RMM et al (2019) Transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: a randomized clinical trial. J Affect Disord 259:31–37PubMed
60.
go back to reference D’Urso G, Dell’Osso B, Rossi R et al (2017) Clinical predictors of acute response to transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in major depression. J Affect Disord 219:25–30PubMed D’Urso G, Dell’Osso B, Rossi R et al (2017) Clinical predictors of acute response to transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in major depression. J Affect Disord 219:25–30PubMed
61.
go back to reference Sanchez A, Vanderhasselt M-A, Baeken C, De Raedt R (2016) Effects of tDCS over the right DLPFC on attentional disengagement from positive and negative faces: an eye-tracking study. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 16:1027–1038PubMed Sanchez A, Vanderhasselt M-A, Baeken C, De Raedt R (2016) Effects of tDCS over the right DLPFC on attentional disengagement from positive and negative faces: an eye-tracking study. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 16:1027–1038PubMed
63.
go back to reference Brunoni AR, Vanderhasselt M-A, Boggio PS et al (2013) Polarity- and valence-dependent effects of prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation on heart rate variability and salivary cortisol. Psychoneuroendocrinology 38:58–66PubMed Brunoni AR, Vanderhasselt M-A, Boggio PS et al (2013) Polarity- and valence-dependent effects of prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation on heart rate variability and salivary cortisol. Psychoneuroendocrinology 38:58–66PubMed
66.
go back to reference Opitz A, Falchier A, Yan C-G et al (2016) Spatiotemporal structure of intracranial electric fields induced by transcranial electric stimulation in humans and nonhuman primates. Sci Rep 6:31236PubMedPubMedCentral Opitz A, Falchier A, Yan C-G et al (2016) Spatiotemporal structure of intracranial electric fields induced by transcranial electric stimulation in humans and nonhuman primates. Sci Rep 6:31236PubMedPubMedCentral
67.
go back to reference Datta A, Krause MR, Pilly PK et al (2016) On comparing in vivo intracranial recordings in non-human primates to predictions of optimized transcranial electrical stimulation. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2016:1774–1777 Datta A, Krause MR, Pilly PK et al (2016) On comparing in vivo intracranial recordings in non-human primates to predictions of optimized transcranial electrical stimulation. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2016:1774–1777
68.
go back to reference Bikson M, Brunoni AR, Charvet LE et al (2018) Rigor and reproducibility in research with transcranial electrical stimulation: an NIMH-sponsored workshop. Brain Stimul 11:465–480PubMed Bikson M, Brunoni AR, Charvet LE et al (2018) Rigor and reproducibility in research with transcranial electrical stimulation: an NIMH-sponsored workshop. Brain Stimul 11:465–480PubMed
Metadata
Title
Association between tDCS computational modeling and clinical outcomes in depression: data from the ELECT-TDCS trial
Authors
Paulo J. C. Suen
Sarah Doll
Marcelo C. Batistuzzo
Geraldo Busatto
Lais B. Razza
Frank Padberg
Eva Mezger
Lucia Bulubas
Daniel Keeser
Zhi-De Deng
Andre R. Brunoni
Publication date
01-02-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience / Issue 1/2021
Print ISSN: 0940-1334
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-020-01127-w

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 1/2021 Go to the issue