Skip to main content
Top
Published in: MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY 2/2016

Open Access 01-08-2016 | Original Article

Aetiology of lateral progression of arthritis following Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement: a case–control study

Authors: H. Pandit, B. Spiegelberg, A. Clavé, C. McGrath, A. D. Liddle, D. W. Murray

Published in: MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY | Issue 2/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this case–control study is to assess for predictive factors that may determine development of lateral compartment progression after Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement.

Methods

Twenty-eight patients who were revised as a result of lateral osteoarthritis progression were matched to 52 alive and unrevised patients. Body mass index, intra-operative findings, postoperative leg alignment, meniscal bearing size and histological findings have been analysed. Radiological analysis was carried out on the immediate postoperative radiographs by two blinded observers to assess the severity of arthritis in the lateral compartment. The measurements of the components positions were converted into binary figures as to whether they were inside or outside the recommended limits for analysis. Conditional logistic regression was used to identify important predictors of progression, taking into account the case–control grouping.

Results

The results shows that the condition of the lateral compartment is a significant predictor for developing subsequent lateral compartment arthrosis (OR 2.627, p = 0.019). The study showed no relationship between progression of arthritis and component position (OR [0.5–1.18], p [0.21–1]). Nor have it demonstrated that BMI (OR 1.06, p = 0.61), postoperative leg alignment (OR 1.26, p = 0.636), meniscal bearing size (1.32, p = 0.307) or presence of chondrocalcinosis (OR 0.35, p = 0.36) have any association with lateral osteoarthritis progression.

Conclusions

This study showed the importance of excluding radiographic evidence of lateral compartment osteoarthritis on the preoperative radiograph prior to medial unicompartmental knee replacement. We have not been able to show any relationship between progression of arthritis and component position.
Level of proof Case–control study, level III.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kendrick BJ et al (2011) Polyethylene wear of mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee replacement at 20 years. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 93(4):470CrossRef Kendrick BJ et al (2011) Polyethylene wear of mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee replacement at 20 years. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 93(4):470CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Pandit H et al (2011) Minimally invasive Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee replacement: results of 1000 cases. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 93(2):98 Pandit H et al (2011) Minimally invasive Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee replacement: results of 1000 cases. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 93(2):98
3.
go back to reference Lisowski LA et al (2011) Oxford Phase 3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: medium-term results of a minimally invasive surgical procedure. KSSTA 19:277 Lisowski LA et al (2011) Oxford Phase 3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: medium-term results of a minimally invasive surgical procedure. KSSTA 19:277
4.
go back to reference Price AJ, Svard U (2011) A second decade lifetable survival analysis of the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:174CrossRefPubMed Price AJ, Svard U (2011) A second decade lifetable survival analysis of the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:174CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Lewold S et al (1998) Revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: outcome in 1,135 cases from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty study. Acta orthop Scandz 69:469CrossRef Lewold S et al (1998) Revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: outcome in 1,135 cases from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty study. Acta orthop Scandz 69:469CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Emerson RH Jr, Higgins LL (2008) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with the oxford prosthesis in patients with medial compartment arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 90:118CrossRef Emerson RH Jr, Higgins LL (2008) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with the oxford prosthesis in patients with medial compartment arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 90:118CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Khan OH et al (2004) Radiological changes ten years after St. Georg Sled unicompartmental knee replacement. Knee 11:403CrossRefPubMed Khan OH et al (2004) Radiological changes ten years after St. Georg Sled unicompartmental knee replacement. Knee 11:403CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Weale AE et al (1999) Does arthritis progress in the retained compartments after ‘Oxford’ medial unicompartmental arthroplasty? A clinical and radiological study with a minimum ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 81:783CrossRef Weale AE et al (1999) Does arthritis progress in the retained compartments after ‘Oxford’ medial unicompartmental arthroplasty? A clinical and radiological study with a minimum ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 81:783CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Goodfellow JW et al (1988) The Oxford Knee for unicompartmental osteoarthritis. The first 103 cases. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 70:692 Goodfellow JW et al (1988) The Oxford Knee for unicompartmental osteoarthritis. The first 103 cases. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 70:692
10.
go back to reference Kendrick BJ et al (2010) The implications of damage to the lateral femoral condyle on medial unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 92:374CrossRef Kendrick BJ et al (2010) The implications of damage to the lateral femoral condyle on medial unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 92:374CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Beard DJ et al (2007) Pre-operative clinical and radiological assessment of the patellofemoral joint in unicompartmental knee replacement and its influence on outcome. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 89:1602CrossRef Beard DJ et al (2007) Pre-operative clinical and radiological assessment of the patellofemoral joint in unicompartmental knee replacement and its influence on outcome. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 89:1602CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Beard DJ et al (2007) The influence of the presence and severity of pre-existing patellofemoral degenerative changes on the outcome of the Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 89:1597CrossRef Beard DJ et al (2007) The influence of the presence and severity of pre-existing patellofemoral degenerative changes on the outcome of the Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 89:1597CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kozinn SC, Scott R (1989) Unicondylar knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 71:145 Kozinn SC, Scott R (1989) Unicondylar knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 71:145
15.
go back to reference Clarius M et al (2010) Correlation of positioning and clinical results in Oxford UKA. Int Orthop 34:1145CrossRefPubMed Clarius M et al (2010) Correlation of positioning and clinical results in Oxford UKA. Int Orthop 34:1145CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86:420CrossRefPubMed Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86:420CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, O’Connor JJ (1998) The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 80:983CrossRef Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, O’Connor JJ (1998) The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 80:983CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Gulati A et al (2009) The effect of leg alignment on the outcome of unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 91:469CrossRef Gulati A et al (2009) The effect of leg alignment on the outcome of unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 91:469CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Murray DW et al (2013) Does body mass index affect the outcome of unicompartmental knee replacement? Knee 20:461CrossRefPubMed Murray DW et al (2013) Does body mass index affect the outcome of unicompartmental knee replacement? Knee 20:461CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Hernigou P et al (2012) Does primary or secondary chondrocalcinosis influence long-term survivorship of unicompartmental arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:1973CrossRefPubMed Hernigou P et al (2012) Does primary or secondary chondrocalcinosis influence long-term survivorship of unicompartmental arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:1973CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Liddle AD et al (2014) Valgus subsidence of the tibial component in cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement. Bone Joint J 96:345CrossRefPubMed Liddle AD et al (2014) Valgus subsidence of the tibial component in cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement. Bone Joint J 96:345CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Aetiology of lateral progression of arthritis following Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement: a case–control study
Authors
H. Pandit
B. Spiegelberg
A. Clavé
C. McGrath
A. D. Liddle
D. W. Murray
Publication date
01-08-2016
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY / Issue 2/2016
Print ISSN: 2035-5106
Electronic ISSN: 2035-5114
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-015-0394-8

Other articles of this Issue 2/2016

MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY 2/2016 Go to the issue