Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 2/2016

01-06-2016 | Case Report

Advantages of the robotic approach to deep infiltrating rectal endometriosis: because less is more

Authors: Sergio Eduardo Alonso Araujo, Victor Edmond Seid, Renato Moretti Marques, Mariano Tamura Vieira Gomes

Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Issue 2/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

For symptomatic deep infiltrating endometriosis, surgery is often required to achieve symptom relief and restore fertility. A minimally invasive approach using laparoscopy is considered the gold standard. However, specific limitations of the laparoscopic approach deep in the pelvis keep challenging even surgeons with a solid experience with minimally invasive techniques. Robotic surgery has the potential to compensate for technical drawbacks inherent in conventional laparoscopic surgery, such as limited degree of freedom, two-dimensional vision, and the fulcrum effect. In the present report, we aim at demonstrating the central role of robotic surgery for deep infiltrating endometriosis, with special emphasis in the ability to practice organ (rectal) preservation. A 45-year-old white female with a 4-month history of chronic pelvic pain, dyschezia, and dysmenorrhea, refractory to hormonal therapy was referred to our unit. MRI findings were diagnostic of deep infiltrating endometriosis (retrocervical and rectovaginal) extending to the anterior rectal serosal layer (partial-thickness rectal invasion). Using a fully robotic approach, appropriate dissection of the rectovaginal septum and of the extraperitoneal rectum followed by complete excision of the endometriotic rectal nodule with organ (rectal) preservation was undertaken. It is our belief that using a robotic approach, the potential to boost rectal preservation might be established. Moreover, it is possible that in many cases, a robotic operation may allow the surgeon to perform the intervention with greater accuracy and comfort. As a result, more patients with deep infiltrating endometriosis may benefit from rectal sparing procedures.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Balasch J, Creus M, Fábregues F, Carmona F, Ordi J, Martinez-Román S et al (1996) Visible and non-visible endometriosis at laparoscopy in fertile and infertile women and in patients with chronic pelvic pain: a prospective study. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl 11:387–391CrossRef Balasch J, Creus M, Fábregues F, Carmona F, Ordi J, Martinez-Román S et al (1996) Visible and non-visible endometriosis at laparoscopy in fertile and infertile women and in patients with chronic pelvic pain: a prospective study. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl 11:387–391CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Leibson CL, Good AE, Hass SL, Ransom J, Yawn BP, O’Fallon WM et al (2004) Incidence and characterization of diagnosed endometriosis in a geographically defined population. Fertil Steril 82:314–321CrossRefPubMed Leibson CL, Good AE, Hass SL, Ransom J, Yawn BP, O’Fallon WM et al (2004) Incidence and characterization of diagnosed endometriosis in a geographically defined population. Fertil Steril 82:314–321CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Revised American Fertility Society classification of endometriosis (1985) Fertil Steril 43:351–352CrossRef Revised American Fertility Society classification of endometriosis (1985) Fertil Steril 43:351–352CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ruffo G, Sartori A, Crippa S, Partelli S, Barugola G, Manzoni A et al (2012) Laparoscopic rectal resection for severe endometriosis of the mid and low rectum: technique and operative results. Surg Endosc 26:1035–1040. doi:10.1007/s00464-011-1991-8 CrossRefPubMed Ruffo G, Sartori A, Crippa S, Partelli S, Barugola G, Manzoni A et al (2012) Laparoscopic rectal resection for severe endometriosis of the mid and low rectum: technique and operative results. Surg Endosc 26:1035–1040. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-011-1991-8 CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Vercellini P, Pietropaolo G, De Giorgi O, Pasin R, Chiodini A, Crosignani PG (2005) Treatment of symptomatic rectovaginal endometriosis with an estrogen–progestogen combination versus low-dose norethindrone acetate. Fertil Steril 84:1375–1387CrossRefPubMed Vercellini P, Pietropaolo G, De Giorgi O, Pasin R, Chiodini A, Crosignani PG (2005) Treatment of symptomatic rectovaginal endometriosis with an estrogen–progestogen combination versus low-dose norethindrone acetate. Fertil Steril 84:1375–1387CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Abrão MS, Petraglia F, Falcone T, Keckstein J, Osuga Y, Chapron C (2015) Deep endometriosis infiltrating the recto-sigmoid: critical factors to consider before management. Hum Reprod Update 21:329–339. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmv003 CrossRefPubMed Abrão MS, Petraglia F, Falcone T, Keckstein J, Osuga Y, Chapron C (2015) Deep endometriosis infiltrating the recto-sigmoid: critical factors to consider before management. Hum Reprod Update 21:329–339. doi:10.​1093/​humupd/​dmv003 CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Ercoli A, D’asta M, Fagotti A, Fanfani F, Romano F, Baldazzi G et al (2012) Robotic treatment of colorectal endometriosis: technique, feasibility and short-term results. Hum Reprod 27:722–6. doi:10.1093/humrep/der444 Ercoli A, D’asta M, Fagotti A, Fanfani F, Romano F, Baldazzi G et al (2012) Robotic treatment of colorectal endometriosis: technique, feasibility and short-term results. Hum Reprod 27:722–6. doi:10.​1093/​humrep/​der444
10.
go back to reference Seracchioli R, Manuzzi L, Mabrouk M, Solfrini S, Frascà C, Manferrari F et al (2010) A multidisciplinary, minimally invasive approach for complicated deep infiltrating endometriosis. Fertil Steril 93(1007):e1–e3PubMed Seracchioli R, Manuzzi L, Mabrouk M, Solfrini S, Frascà C, Manferrari F et al (2010) A multidisciplinary, minimally invasive approach for complicated deep infiltrating endometriosis. Fertil Steril 93(1007):e1–e3PubMed
12.
13.
go back to reference Goldberg JM, Falcone T (2003) Laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis with and without robotic assistance. Hum Reprod 18:145–147CrossRefPubMed Goldberg JM, Falcone T (2003) Laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis with and without robotic assistance. Hum Reprod 18:145–147CrossRefPubMed
14.
15.
go back to reference Bush SH, Apte SM (2015) Robotic-assisted surgery in gynecological oncology. Cancer Control 22:307–313PubMed Bush SH, Apte SM (2015) Robotic-assisted surgery in gynecological oncology. Cancer Control 22:307–313PubMed
Metadata
Title
Advantages of the robotic approach to deep infiltrating rectal endometriosis: because less is more
Authors
Sergio Eduardo Alonso Araujo
Victor Edmond Seid
Renato Moretti Marques
Mariano Tamura Vieira Gomes
Publication date
01-06-2016
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Issue 2/2016
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-016-0586-8

Other articles of this Issue 2/2016

Journal of Robotic Surgery 2/2016 Go to the issue