Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Drug Safety 4/2015

01-04-2015 | Review Article

ADR Reporting by the General Public: Lessons Learnt from the Dutch and Swedish Systems

Authors: Linda Härmark, Florence van Hunsel, Birgitta Grundmark

Published in: Drug Safety | Issue 4/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Consumer reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) has existed in several countries for decades, but throughout Europe the role of consumers as a source of information on ADRs has not been fully accepted until recently. In Europe, The Netherlands and Sweden were among the first countries to implement consumer reporting well before it was mandated by law throughout the EU. Consumer reporting is an integral part of the spontaneous reporting systems in both The Netherlands and Sweden, with yearly numbers of reports constantly increasing. Consumer reporting forms and handling procedures are essentially the same as for healthcare professional reporting; the message in the reports, not the type of messenger, is what is of importance. Studies have established the significant contribution of consumer reporting to ADR signal detection. Combining all reports regardless of reporter type is recommended since it yields the largest critical mass of reports for signal detection. Examples of signals where consumer reports have been of crucial importance for signal detection are electric shock-like sensations associated with the use of duloxetine, and persistent sexual dysfunction after discontinuation of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. An example of consumer reporting significantly strengthening a detected signal is Pandemrix® (influenza H1N1 vaccine)-induced narcolepsy. Raising public awareness of ADR reporting is important, but time- and resource-consuming. The minimum effort taken should be to passively inform consumers, e.g. via stakeholders’ homepages and via drug product information leaflets. Another possibility of reaching out to this target group could be through co-operation with other (non-government) organizations. Information from consumer reports may give a new perspective on ADRs via the consumers’ unfiltered experiences. Consumers’ views may change the way the benefit–harm balance of drugs is perceived and assessed today, and, being the ultimate users of drugs, consumers could have a relevant influence in the regulatory decision-making processes for drugs. All stakeholders in pharmacovigilance should embrace this new valuable source of information.
Literature
1.
go back to reference CIOMS Working Group VIII. Practical aspects of signal detection in pharmacovigilance: report of CIOMS Working Group VIII. Geneva: CIOMS; 2010. CIOMS Working Group VIII. Practical aspects of signal detection in pharmacovigilance: report of CIOMS Working Group VIII. Geneva: CIOMS; 2010.
2.
go back to reference Raine J. Risk management: a European Regulatory view. In: Mann RM, Andrews EB, editors. Pharmacovigilance. 2nd ed. NewYork:Wiley; 2007:553–558. Raine J. Risk management: a European Regulatory view. In: Mann RM, Andrews EB, editors. Pharmacovigilance. 2nd ed. NewYork:Wiley; 2007:553–558.
3.
go back to reference Lester J, Neyarapally GA, Lipowski E, Graham CF, Hall M, Dal Pan G. Evaluation of FDA safety-related drug label changes in 2010. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013;22(3):302–5.CrossRefPubMed Lester J, Neyarapally GA, Lipowski E, Graham CF, Hall M, Dal Pan G. Evaluation of FDA safety-related drug label changes in 2010. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013;22(3):302–5.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference The Erice Manifesto. for global reform of the safety of medicines in patient care. Drug Saf. 2007;30(3):187–90.CrossRef The Erice Manifesto. for global reform of the safety of medicines in patient care. Drug Saf. 2007;30(3):187–90.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference van Hunsel F, Harmark L, Pal S, Olsson S, van Grootheest K. Experiences with adverse drug reaction reporting by patients: an 11-country survey. Drug Saf. 2012;35(1):45–60.CrossRefPubMed van Hunsel F, Harmark L, Pal S, Olsson S, van Grootheest K. Experiences with adverse drug reaction reporting by patients: an 11-country survey. Drug Saf. 2012;35(1):45–60.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference van Grootheest K, de Graaf L, de Jong-van den Berg L. Consumer adverse drug reaction reporting: a new step in pharmacovigilance? Drug Saf. 2003;26(4):211–217. van Grootheest K, de Graaf L, de Jong-van den Berg L. Consumer adverse drug reaction reporting: a new step in pharmacovigilance? Drug Saf. 2003;26(4):211–217.
8.
go back to reference van Hunsel FPAM. The contribution of direct patient reporting to pharmacovigilance [thesis]. Groningen: Rijsuniversiteit Groningen; 2011. van Hunsel FPAM. The contribution of direct patient reporting to pharmacovigilance [thesis]. Groningen: Rijsuniversiteit Groningen; 2011.
9.
go back to reference Avery AJ, Anderson C, Bond CM, et al. Evaluation of patient reporting of adverse drug reactions to the UK ‘Yellow Card Scheme’: literature review, descriptive and qualitative analyses, and questionnaire surveys. Health Technol Assess. 2011;15(20):1–iv. Avery AJ, Anderson C, Bond CM, et al. Evaluation of patient reporting of adverse drug reactions to the UK ‘Yellow Card Scheme’: literature review, descriptive and qualitative analyses, and questionnaire surveys. Health Technol Assess. 2011;15(20):1–iv.
10.
go back to reference Aagaard L, Nielsen LH, Hansen EH. Consumer reporting of adverse drug reactions: a retrospective analysis of the Danish adverse drug reaction database from 2004 to 2006. Drug Saf. 2009;32(11):1067–74.CrossRefPubMed Aagaard L, Nielsen LH, Hansen EH. Consumer reporting of adverse drug reactions: a retrospective analysis of the Danish adverse drug reaction database from 2004 to 2006. Drug Saf. 2009;32(11):1067–74.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Durrieu G, Palmaro A, Pourcel L, et al. First French experience of ADR reporting by patients after a mass immunization campaign with influenza A (H1N1) pandemic vaccines: a comparison of reports submitted by patients and healthcare professionals. Drug Saf. 2012;35(10):845–54.CrossRefPubMed Durrieu G, Palmaro A, Pourcel L, et al. First French experience of ADR reporting by patients after a mass immunization campaign with influenza A (H1N1) pandemic vaccines: a comparison of reports submitted by patients and healthcare professionals. Drug Saf. 2012;35(10):845–54.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Leone R, Moretti U, D’Incau P, et al. Effect of pharmacist involvement on patient reporting of adverse drug reactions: first Italian study. Drug Saf. 2013;36(4):267–76.CrossRefPubMed Leone R, Moretti U, D’Incau P, et al. Effect of pharmacist involvement on patient reporting of adverse drug reactions: first Italian study. Drug Saf. 2013;36(4):267–76.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Parretta E, Rafaniello C, Magro L, et al. Improvement of patient adverse drug reaction reporting through a community pharmacist-based intervention in the Campania region of Italy. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2014;13(Suppl 1):21–9.CrossRef Parretta E, Rafaniello C, Magro L, et al. Improvement of patient adverse drug reaction reporting through a community pharmacist-based intervention in the Campania region of Italy. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2014;13(Suppl 1):21–9.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Vilhelmsson A. A pill for the ill? Depression, medicalization and public health [thesis]. Lund University; 2014. Vilhelmsson A. A pill for the ill? Depression, medicalization and public health [thesis]. Lund University; 2014.
15.
go back to reference Margraff F, Bertram D. Adverse drug reaction reporting by patients: an overview of fifty countries. Drug Saf. 2014;37(6):409–19.CrossRefPubMed Margraff F, Bertram D. Adverse drug reaction reporting by patients: an overview of fifty countries. Drug Saf. 2014;37(6):409–19.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Esther SM, Jimeno FJ, Aguirre C, Garcia M, Ordonez L, Manso G. Direct reporting by patients of adverse drug reactions in Spain [in Spanish]. Farm Hosp. 2013;37(1):65–71. Esther SM, Jimeno FJ, Aguirre C, Garcia M, Ordonez L, Manso G. Direct reporting by patients of adverse drug reactions in Spain [in Spanish]. Farm Hosp. 2013;37(1):65–71.
17.
go back to reference Kubota K, Okazaki M, Dobashi A, et al. Temporal relationship between multiple drugs and multiple events in patient reports on adverse drug reactions: findings in a pilot study in Japan. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013;22(10):1134–7.PubMed Kubota K, Okazaki M, Dobashi A, et al. Temporal relationship between multiple drugs and multiple events in patient reports on adverse drug reactions: findings in a pilot study in Japan. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013;22(10):1134–7.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Herxheimer A, Crombag R, Alves TL. Direct patient reporting of adverse drug reactions; a fifteen-country survey and literature review. Health Action International Europe; 2010. Herxheimer A, Crombag R, Alves TL. Direct patient reporting of adverse drug reactions; a fifteen-country survey and literature review. Health Action International Europe; 2010.
20.
go back to reference Hazell L, Shakir SA. Under-reporting of adverse drug reactions: a systematic review. Drug Saf. 2006;29(5):385–96.CrossRefPubMed Hazell L, Shakir SA. Under-reporting of adverse drug reactions: a systematic review. Drug Saf. 2006;29(5):385–96.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Golomb BA, McGraw JJ, Evans MA, Dimsdale JE. Physician response to patient reports of adverse drug effects: implications for patient-targeted adverse effect surveillance. Drug Saf. 2007;30(8):669–75.CrossRefPubMed Golomb BA, McGraw JJ, Evans MA, Dimsdale JE. Physician response to patient reports of adverse drug effects: implications for patient-targeted adverse effect surveillance. Drug Saf. 2007;30(8):669–75.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference van Hunsel F, Passier A, van Grootheest AC. Comparing patients’ and healthcare professionals’ ADR reports after media attention: the broadcast of a Dutch television programme about the benefits and risks of statins as an example. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2009;67(5):558–64.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed van Hunsel F, Passier A, van Grootheest AC. Comparing patients’ and healthcare professionals’ ADR reports after media attention: the broadcast of a Dutch television programme about the benefits and risks of statins as an example. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2009;67(5):558–64.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
24.
go back to reference Medawar C, Herxheimer A, Bell A, Jofre S. Paroxetine, Panorama and user reporting of ADRs: consumer intelligence matters in clinical practice and post-marketing drug surveillance. Int J Risk Saf Med. 2002;15(3–4):161–9. Medawar C, Herxheimer A, Bell A, Jofre S. Paroxetine, Panorama and user reporting of ADRs: consumer intelligence matters in clinical practice and post-marketing drug surveillance. Int J Risk Saf Med. 2002;15(3–4):161–9.
25.
go back to reference Medawar C, Herxheimer A. A comparison of adverse drug reaction reports from professionals and users, relating to risk of dependence and suicidal behaviour with paroxetine. Int J Risk Saf Med. 2004;16:5–19. Medawar C, Herxheimer A. A comparison of adverse drug reaction reports from professionals and users, relating to risk of dependence and suicidal behaviour with paroxetine. Int J Risk Saf Med. 2004;16:5–19.
26.
go back to reference Ekins-Daukes S, Irvine D, Wise L, Fiddes S. The Yellow Card Scheme: evaluation of patient reporting of suspected adverse drug reactions [abstract]. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2006;15:S1–316.CrossRef Ekins-Daukes S, Irvine D, Wise L, Fiddes S. The Yellow Card Scheme: evaluation of patient reporting of suspected adverse drug reactions [abstract]. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2006;15:S1–316.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Blenkinsopp A, Wilkie P, Wang M, Routledge PA. Patient reporting of suspected adverse drug reactions: a review of published literature and international experience. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2007;63(2):148–56.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Blenkinsopp A, Wilkie P, Wang M, Routledge PA. Patient reporting of suspected adverse drug reactions: a review of published literature and international experience. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2007;63(2):148–56.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
28.
go back to reference van Hunsel FP, ten Berge EA, Borgsteede SD, van Grootheest K. What motivates patients to report an adverse drug reaction? Ann Pharmacother. 2010;44(5):936–7.CrossRefPubMed van Hunsel FP, ten Berge EA, Borgsteede SD, van Grootheest K. What motivates patients to report an adverse drug reaction? Ann Pharmacother. 2010;44(5):936–7.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference van Hunsel F, van der Welle C, Passier A, van Puijenbroek E, van Grootheest K. Motives for reporting adverse drug reactions by patient-reporters in the Netherlands. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2010;66(11):1143–50.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed van Hunsel F, van der Welle C, Passier A, van Puijenbroek E, van Grootheest K. Motives for reporting adverse drug reactions by patient-reporters in the Netherlands. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2010;66(11):1143–50.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
31.
go back to reference de Langen J, van Hunsel F, Passier A, de Jong-van den Berg L, van Grootheest K. Adverse drug reaction reporting by patients in the Netherlands: three years of experience. Drug Saf. 2008;31(6):515–524. de Langen J, van Hunsel F, Passier A, de Jong-van den Berg L, van Grootheest K. Adverse drug reaction reporting by patients in the Netherlands: three years of experience. Drug Saf. 2008;31(6):515–524.
32.
go back to reference The Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb. Gokverslaving en antiparkinsonmiddelen. Geneesmiddelenbulletin. 2006;40(8):86–7. The Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb. Gokverslaving en antiparkinsonmiddelen. Geneesmiddelenbulletin. 2006;40(8):86–7.
33.
go back to reference McLernon DJ, Bond CM, Hannaford PC, et al. Adverse drug reaction reporting in the UK: a retrospective observational comparison of yellow card reports submitted by patients and healthcare professionals. Drug Saf. 2010;33(9):775–88.CrossRefPubMed McLernon DJ, Bond CM, Hannaford PC, et al. Adverse drug reaction reporting in the UK: a retrospective observational comparison of yellow card reports submitted by patients and healthcare professionals. Drug Saf. 2010;33(9):775–88.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Inch J, Watson MC, Anakwe-Umeh S. Patient versus healthcare professional spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting: a systematic review. Drug Saf. 2012;35(10):807–18.CrossRefPubMed Inch J, Watson MC, Anakwe-Umeh S. Patient versus healthcare professional spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting: a systematic review. Drug Saf. 2012;35(10):807–18.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Rolfes L, van Hunsel F, Wilkes S, van Grootheest K, van Puijenbroek E. Adverse drug reaction reports of patients and healthcare professionals-differences in reported information. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf (Epub 31 Jul 2014). doi:10.1002/pds.3687. Rolfes L, van Hunsel F, Wilkes S, van Grootheest K, van Puijenbroek E. Adverse drug reaction reports of patients and healthcare professionals-differences in reported information. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf (Epub 31 Jul 2014). doi:10.​1002/​pds.​3687.
36.
go back to reference Walji R, Boon H, Barnes J, Austin Z, Welsh S, Baker GR. Consumers of natural health products: natural-born pharmacovigilantes? BMC Complement Altern Med. 2010;10:8.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Walji R, Boon H, Barnes J, Austin Z, Welsh S, Baker GR. Consumers of natural health products: natural-born pharmacovigilantes? BMC Complement Altern Med. 2010;10:8.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
39.
go back to reference Krska J, Jones L, McKinney J, Wilson C. Medicine safety: experiences and perceptions of the general public in Liverpool. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011;20(10):1098–103.CrossRefPubMed Krska J, Jones L, McKinney J, Wilson C. Medicine safety: experiences and perceptions of the general public in Liverpool. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011;20(10):1098–103.CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Arnott J, Hesselgreaves H, Nunn AJ, et al. What can we learn from parents about enhancing participation in pharmacovigilance? Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;75(4):1109–17.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Arnott J, Hesselgreaves H, Nunn AJ, et al. What can we learn from parents about enhancing participation in pharmacovigilance? Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;75(4):1109–17.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
41.
go back to reference van Grootheest AC, Passier JL, van Puijenbroek EP. Direct reporting of side effects by the patient: favourable experience in the first year [in Dutch]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2005;149(10):529–33.PubMed van Grootheest AC, Passier JL, van Puijenbroek EP. Direct reporting of side effects by the patient: favourable experience in the first year [in Dutch]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2005;149(10):529–33.PubMed
42.
go back to reference Vilhelmsson A, Svensson T, Meeuwisse A. A pill for the ill? Patients’ reports of their experience of the medical encounter in the treatment of depression. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e66338.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Vilhelmsson A, Svensson T, Meeuwisse A. A pill for the ill? Patients’ reports of their experience of the medical encounter in the treatment of depression. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e66338.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
43.
go back to reference Ekbom Y, Hedenmalm K, Dalin L, Lonnroth K, Persson I. Reporting of side-effects–a system in need of improvement. Reporting of a physician questionnaire [in Swedish]. Lakartidningen. 2002;99(34):3290–5.PubMed Ekbom Y, Hedenmalm K, Dalin L, Lonnroth K, Persson I. Reporting of side-effects–a system in need of improvement. Reporting of a physician questionnaire [in Swedish]. Lakartidningen. 2002;99(34):3290–5.PubMed
44.
go back to reference Consumentenbond. Ziek van de pillen. Consumentengids 2014;(5):16–19. Consumentenbond. Ziek van de pillen. Consumentengids 2014;(5):16–19.
45.
go back to reference Robertson J, Newby DA. Low awareness of adverse drug reaction reporting systems: a consumer survey. Med J Aust. 2013;199(10):684–6.CrossRefPubMed Robertson J, Newby DA. Low awareness of adverse drug reaction reporting systems: a consumer survey. Med J Aust. 2013;199(10):684–6.CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference van Hunsel FP, Kant AC, van Puijenbroek EP. Thrombosis and embolism during Diane-35 use: analysis of reports made to the Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb [in Dutch]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2014;158:A6651.PubMed van Hunsel FP, Kant AC, van Puijenbroek EP. Thrombosis and embolism during Diane-35 use: analysis of reports made to the Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb [in Dutch]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2014;158:A6651.PubMed
47.
go back to reference Kant A, van Puijenbroek E, van Hunsel F. Reflections after the Diane affair. J Thromb Haemost. 2014;12(9):1385–7.CrossRefPubMed Kant A, van Puijenbroek E, van Hunsel F. Reflections after the Diane affair. J Thromb Haemost. 2014;12(9):1385–7.CrossRefPubMed
48.
go back to reference van Hunsel F, van Puijenbroek E, de Jong-van den Berg L, van Grootheest K. Media attention and the influence on the reporting odds ratio in disproportionality analysis: an example of patient reporting of statins. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010;19(1):26–32. van Hunsel F, van Puijenbroek E, de Jong-van den Berg L, van Grootheest K. Media attention and the influence on the reporting odds ratio in disproportionality analysis: an example of patient reporting of statins. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010;19(1):26–32.
49.
go back to reference van Hunsel F, Talsma A, van Puijenbroek E, de Jong-van den Berg L, van Grootheest K. The proportion of patient reports of suspected ADRs to signal detection in the Netherlands: case-control study. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011;20(3):286–291. van Hunsel F, Talsma A, van Puijenbroek E, de Jong-van den Berg L, van Grootheest K. The proportion of patient reports of suspected ADRs to signal detection in the Netherlands: case-control study. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011;20(3):286–291.
50.
go back to reference Hazell L, Cornelius V, Hannaford P, Shakir S, Avery AJ. How do patients contribute to signal detection? A retrospective analysis of spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions in the UK’s Yellow Card Scheme. Drug Saf. 2013;36(3):199–206.CrossRefPubMed Hazell L, Cornelius V, Hannaford P, Shakir S, Avery AJ. How do patients contribute to signal detection? A retrospective analysis of spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions in the UK’s Yellow Card Scheme. Drug Saf. 2013;36(3):199–206.CrossRefPubMed
51.
go back to reference de Graaf L, van Puijenbroek EP. Serotonin reuptake inhibitors and shocklike paresthesia. J Clin Psychiatry. 2003;64(8):969–71.CrossRefPubMed de Graaf L, van Puijenbroek EP. Serotonin reuptake inhibitors and shocklike paresthesia. J Clin Psychiatry. 2003;64(8):969–71.CrossRefPubMed
52.
go back to reference Frost L, Lal S. Shock-like sensations after discontinuation of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Am J Psychiatry. 1995;152(5):810.PubMed Frost L, Lal S. Shock-like sensations after discontinuation of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Am J Psychiatry. 1995;152(5):810.PubMed
57.
go back to reference Kennedy SH, Rizvi S. Sexual dysfunction, depression, and the impact of antidepressants. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2009;29(2):157–64.CrossRefPubMed Kennedy SH, Rizvi S. Sexual dysfunction, depression, and the impact of antidepressants. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2009;29(2):157–64.CrossRefPubMed
58.
go back to reference Ekhart CG, van Puijenbroek EP. Does sexual dysfunction persist upon discontinuation of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors? Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2014;56(5):336–40.PubMed Ekhart CG, van Puijenbroek EP. Does sexual dysfunction persist upon discontinuation of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors? Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2014;56(5):336–40.PubMed
60.
go back to reference Rolfes L, Wilkes S, van Hunsel F, van Puijenbroek E, van Grootheest K. Important information regarding reporting of adverse drug reactions: a qualitative study. Int J Pharm Pract. 2014;22(3):231–3.CrossRefPubMed Rolfes L, Wilkes S, van Hunsel F, van Puijenbroek E, van Grootheest K. Important information regarding reporting of adverse drug reactions: a qualitative study. Int J Pharm Pract. 2014;22(3):231–3.CrossRefPubMed
63.
go back to reference Freifeld CC, Brownstein JS, Menone CM, et al. Digital drug safety surveillance: monitoring pharmaceutical products in twitter. Drug Saf. 2014;37(5):343–50.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Freifeld CC, Brownstein JS, Menone CM, et al. Digital drug safety surveillance: monitoring pharmaceutical products in twitter. Drug Saf. 2014;37(5):343–50.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
64.
go back to reference Banerjee AK, Okun S, Edwards IR, et al. Patient-reported outcome measures in safety event reporting: PROSPER Consortium guidance. Drug Saf. 2013;36(12):1129–49.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Banerjee AK, Okun S, Edwards IR, et al. Patient-reported outcome measures in safety event reporting: PROSPER Consortium guidance. Drug Saf. 2013;36(12):1129–49.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
65.
go back to reference Härmark L. Web-based intensive monitoring; a patient based pharmacovigilance tool [thesis]. Groningen: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen; 2012. Härmark L. Web-based intensive monitoring; a patient based pharmacovigilance tool [thesis]. Groningen: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen; 2012.
Metadata
Title
ADR Reporting by the General Public: Lessons Learnt from the Dutch and Swedish Systems
Authors
Linda Härmark
Florence van Hunsel
Birgitta Grundmark
Publication date
01-04-2015
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Drug Safety / Issue 4/2015
Print ISSN: 0114-5916
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1942
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-015-0264-1

Other articles of this Issue 4/2015

Drug Safety 4/2015 Go to the issue