Top

BMC Oral Health

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Research

Adhesive bond strength of monolithic zirconia ceramic finished with various surface treatments

Authors: Işıl Sarıkaya, Yeliz Hayran

Published in: BMC Oral Health | Issue 1/2023

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to investigate different surface treatments thought to increase the bond strength between zirconia ceramic and adhesive resin cement.

Methods

The samples were prepared in 15 × 10 × 2 mm dimensions by cutting off monolithic zirconia ceramic blocks (Incoris TZI; Sirona, Germany). Surface roughness measurements were made with a profilometer, the average surface roughness (Ra1) was recorded, and five different surface treatments were applied. Group 1: Control group. No surface treatment was applied. Group 2: Sandblasted with Al₂O₃ under pressure of 50 μm. Group 3: Sandblasted with 30 μm Al₂O₃ - SiOx under pressure, then tribochemical silica coating, silane bonding agent, and ceramic primer were applied. Group 4: Samples were etched in a hot acid solution containing methanol, HCl, and chloride at 100 °C. Group 5: Samples were coated in a solution containing Grade C Aluminum Nitrite at 75 °C for 15 Sects. 12,000 thermal aging was carried out to all samples. Then, samples were bonded to a composite surface (Filtek Z250) with two different types of adhesive cement (Panavia F 2.0, Rely X U200) (n = 10). A load was applied to the samples attached to the Universal Test Device for the SBS, and the SBS was recorded. The surface roughness measurements of all samples were made again, and the average surface roughness Ra2 was recorded. The data was analyzed with a two-way ANOVA test. Bonferroni correction was used for multiple comparisons of the groups. p = 0.005 was accepted as the statistically significant value.

Results

There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in the Ra1 measurements (p = 0.031). There was a statistically significant difference between the Ra2 values of Groups 4 and 5 and the Ra2 values of Groups 1,2 and 3 in the Ra2 measurements (p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the SBS values of the groups (p > 0.005). Also, there was no statistically significant difference in the SBS values of all groups for the two different cements tested (p > 0.005).

Conclusions

None of the surface treatments applied to monolithic zirconia ceramic samples increased the SBS between ceramic and adhesive resin cement.

Jang GW, Kim HS, Choe HC, Son MK. Fracture strength and mechanism of dental ceramic crown with zirconia thickness. Procedia Eng. 2011;20:1556–60.CrossRef

Sturzenegger B, Feher A, Luthy H, Schumacher M, Loeffel O, Filser F, et al. Clinical study of zirconium oxide bridges in the posterior segments fabricated with the DCM system. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 2000;110(12):131–9.PubMed

Akın H, Özkurt Z, Kırmalı O, Kazazoğlu E, Özdemir AK. Shear bond strength of resin cement to zirconia ceramic after aluminum oxide sandblasting and various laser treatments. Photomed Laser Surg. 2011;29(12):797–802.CrossRefPubMed

Gomes AL, Ramos JC, Santos-del Riego S, Montero J, Albaladejo A. Thermocycling effect on microshear bond strength to zirconia ceramic using Er: YAG and tribochemical silica coating as surface conditioning. Lasers Med Sci. 2015;30(2):787–95.CrossRefPubMed

Bona AD, Anusavice KJ. Microstructure, composition, and etching topography of dental ceramics. Int J Prosthodont. 2002;15(2):159–67.PubMed

Amaral R, Özcan M, Bottino A, Valandro LF. Microtensile bond strength of a resin cement glass infiltrated zirconia-reinforced ceramic: the effect of surface conditioning. Dent Mater. 2006;22(3):283–90.CrossRefPubMed

Zhang X, Liang W, Jiang F, Zonghua W, Zhao J, Zhou C, Wu J. Effects of air-abrasion pressure on mechanical and bonding properties of translucent zirconia. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25(4):1979–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03506-y.CrossRefPubMed

Zandparsa R, Talua NA, Finkelman MD, Schaus SE. An in vitro comparison of shear bond strength of zirconia to enamel using different surface treatments. J Prosthodont. 2014;23(2):117–23.CrossRefPubMed

Zhang Y, Lawn BR, Malament KA, Van Thompson P, Rekow ED. Damage accumulation and fatigue life of particle-abraded ceramics. Int J Prosthodontics. 2006;19(5):442–8.

10.

Thompson JY, Stoner BR, Piascik J, Smith R. Adhesion/cementation to zirconia and other non-silicate ceramics: where are we now? Dent Mater. 2011;27(1):71–82.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Liu D, Pow EHN, Tsoi JK, Matinlinna JP. Evaluation of four surface coating treatments for resin to zirconia bonding. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014;32:300–9.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Piascik J, Swift EJ, Thompson JY, Grego S, Stoner BR. Surface modification for enhanced silanation of zirconia ceramics. Dent Mater. 2009;25(9):1116–21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Akgungor G, Sen D, Aydın M. Influence of different surface treatments on the short-term bond strength and durability between a zirconia post and a composite resin core material. J Prosthet Dent. 2008;99(5):388–99.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Qeblawi DM, Munoz CA, Brewer JD, Monaco EA. The effect of zirconia surface treatment on flexural strength and shear bond strength to a resin cement. J Prosthet Dent. 2010;103(4):210–20.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Atsu SS, Kilicarslan MA, Kucukesmen HC, Aka PS. Effect of zirconium-oxide ceramic surface treatments on the bond strength to adhesive resin. J Prosthet Dent. 2006;95:430–6.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Altan B, Cinar S, Tuncelli B. Evaluation of shear bond strength of zirconia-based monolithic CAD-CAM materials to resin cement after different surface treatments. Niger J Clin Pract. 2019;22(11):1475–82. https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_157_19.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Noda M, Okuda Y, Tsuruki J, Minesaki Y, Takenouchi Y, Ban S. Surface damages of zirconia by nd: YAG dental laser irradiation. Dent Mater J. 2010;29(5):536–41.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Aboushelib MN, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Selective infiltration-etching technique for a strong and durable bond of resin cements to zirconia-based materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2007;98(5):379–88.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Ergun Kunt G, Duran I. Effects of laser treatments on surface roughness of zirconium oxide ceramics. BMC Oral Health. 2018;18(1):222.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Casucci A, Mazzitelli C, Monticelli F, Toledano M, Osorio R, Osorio E, et al. Morphological analysis of three zirconium oxide ceramics: Effect of surface treatments. Dent Mater. 2010;26(8):751–60.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Jevnikar P, Golobic M, Kocjan A, Kosmac T. The effect of nano-structured alumina coating on the bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cements to zirconia ceramics. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2012;32(11):2641–5.CrossRef

22.

Mirmohammadi H, Aboushelib MN, Salameh Z, Feilzer AJ, Kleverlaan CJ. Innovations in bonding to zirconia based ceramics: part III. Phosphate monomer resin cements. Dent Mater. 2010;26(8):786–92.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Manso AP, Silva NR, Bonfante EA, Pegoraro TA, Dias RA, Carvalho RM. Cements and adhesives for all-ceramic restorations. Dent Clin Noth Am. 2011;55(2):311–32.CrossRef

24.

Gale M, Darvell B. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent. 1999;27(2):89–99.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Rossomando KJ, Wendt SL. Thermocycling and dwell times in microleakage evaluation for bonded restorations. Dent Mater. 1995;11(1):47–51.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Jin XZ, Homaei E, Matinlinna JP, Tsoi JKH. A new concept and finite-element study on dental bond strength tests. Dent Mater. 2016;32(10):e238–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.07.005.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Özcan M, Bernasconi M. Adhesion to zirconia used for dental restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent. 2015;17(1):7–26. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a33525.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Papia E, Larsson C, du Toit M, von Vult P. Bonding between oxide ceramics and adhesive cement systems: a systematic review. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2014;102(2):395–413. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.33013.CrossRefPubMed

29.

ISO /. TS 11405:2003. Dental Materials: testing of adhesion to tooth structure. https://www.iso.org/standard/31486.html.

30.

Preis V, Weiser F, Handel G, Rosentritt M. Wear performance of monolithic dental ceramics with different surface treatments. Quint Int. 2013;44(5):393–405.

31.

Özcan M, Kerkdijk S, Valandro LF. Comparison of resin cement adhesion to Y-TZP ceramic following manufcturers’ instructions of the cements only. Clin Oral Invest. 2008;12(3):279–82.CrossRef

32.

Della Bona A, van Noort R. Shear vs. tensile bond strength of resin composite bonded to ceramic. J Dent Res. 1995;74(9):1591–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345950740091401.CrossRefPubMed

33.

Blatz MB, Sadan A, Kern M. Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89(3):268–74. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2003.50.CrossRefPubMed

34.

Valandro LF, Ozcan M, Amaral R, Vanderlei A, Bottino MA. Effect of testing methods on the bond strength of resin to zirconia-alumina ceramic: microtensile versus shear test. Dent Mater J. 2008;27(6):849–55. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.27.849.CrossRefPubMed

35.

Akay C, Çakırbay Tanış M, Şen M. Effects of Hot Chemical etching and 10-Metacryloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) monomer on the Bond Strength of Zirconia Ceramics to Resin-based cements. J Prosthodont. 2017;26(5):419–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12435.CrossRefPubMed

36.

Behr M, Proff P, Kolbeck C, Langrieger S, Kunze J, Handel G, et al. The bond strength of the resin-to-zirconia interface using different bonding concepts. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2011;4(1):2–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2010.08.00.CrossRefPubMed

37.

Seto KB, McLaren EA, Caputo AA, White SN. Fatigue behavior of the resinous cement to zirconia bond. J Prosthodont. 2013;22(7):523–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12053.CrossRefPubMed

38.

Ural Ç, Külünk T, Külünk Ş, Kurt M. The effect of laser treatment on bonding between zirconia ceramic surface and resin cement. Acta Odontol Scand. 2010;68(6):354–9. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2010.514720.CrossRefPubMed

Title: Adhesive bond strength of monolithic zirconia ceramic finished with various surface treatments
Authors: Işıl Sarıkaya
Yeliz Hayran
Publication date: 01-12-2023
Publisher: BioMed Central
Published in: BMC Oral Health / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6831
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03630-7

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Adhesive bond strength of monolithic zirconia ceramic finished with various surface treatments

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

Revolutionising dental technologies: a qualitative study on dental technicians’ perceptions of Artificial intelligence integration

Finite element analysis of the angle range in trans-inferior alveolar nerve implantation at the mandibular second molar

Assessment of oral emergency services during COVID-19: a retrospective study of 14,885 cases in Shanghai

Prediction of postoperative hypokalemia in patients with oral cancer undergoing en bloc cancer resection: a retrospective cohort study

Comprehensive positional and morphological assessments of the temporomandibular joint in adolescents with skeletal Class III malocclusion: a retrospective CBCT study

Oral status and affecting factors in Iranian ICU patients: a cross-sectional study