Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Addiction | Study protocol

Enhancing Permanency in Children and Families (EPIC): a child welfare intervention for parental substance abuse

Authors: Bridget Freisthler, Kathryn Maguire-Jack, Susan Yoon, Elinam Dellor, Jennifer Price Wolf

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Across Ohio, parental substance abuse has contributed to a marked increase in the number of children in foster care. Children exposed to parental substance use have a higher likelihood of physical abuse and neglect, and consequently a variety of physical, psychological and cognitive problems. The Enhancing Permanency in Children and Families (EPIC) program is a collaborative effort between the Ohio State University College of Social Work, two county offices of the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services, two juvenile courts and local behavioral health agencies. The goal of EPIC is to use three evidence-based and evidence-informed practices to reduce abusive and neglectful parenting, reduce addiction severity in parents, and improve permanency outcomes for families involved with the child welfare system due to substance abuse.

Methods

EPIC is a quasi-experimental study. Under the program, child welfare-involved adults who screen positive for substances are matched with a peer recovery supporter. Participants are also incentivized to participate in family treatment drug court, medications for opioid use disorders and home-based parenting supports. Participating adults (N = 250) are matched with comparison groups from counties participating in a separate intervention (Ohio START) and to those receiving treatment as usual, resulting in a final sample of 750 adults. Primary outcomes including addiction severity, child trauma symptoms, resilience, and attachment are assessed at baseline and at program completion. Additional outcomes include timely access to treatment services, length of placement in out-of-home care and recidivism into the child welfare system.

Discussion

This intervention formalizes cross-system collaboration between child welfare, behavioral health and juvenile courts to support families affected by addiction. The use of three evidence-based or evidence-informed strategies presents the opportunity to determine specific strategies that are most effective for reducing addiction severity. Lastly, the intervention combines several sources of funding to bolster sustainability beyond the life of the Regional Partnership Grant (RPG).

Trial registration

NCT04700696. Registered January 7, 2021-retrospectively registered.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
Smith VC, Wilson CR. Families affected by parental substance use. Pediatrics. 2016;138(2):e2016575.CrossRef
3.
4.
Sedlak AJ, Mettenburg J, Basena M, Petta I, McPherson K, Greene A, et al. Fourth National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect (NIS–4): Report to Congress. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families; 2010.
5.
Eigen LD, Rowden DW. A methodology and current estimate of the number of children of alcoholics. In: Adger Jr H, Black C, Brown S, et al., editors. Children of Alcoholics: Selected Readings. Rockville: National Association for Children of Alcoholics; 1995. p. 77–97.
6.
Child Welfare League of America. Crack and other addictions: old realities and new challenges. Washington, D.C.: CWLA; 1990.
7.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Blending perspectives and building common ground. A report to congress on substance abuse and child protection. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1999.
8.
Young NK, Boles SM, Otero C. Parental substance use disorders and child maltreatment: overlap, gaps, and opportunities. Child Maltreatment. 2007;12(2):137–49.CrossRef
9.
Ammerman RT, Kolko DJ, Kirisci L, Blackson TC, Dawes MA. Child abuse potential in parents with histories of substance use disorder. Child Abuse Negl. 1999;23:1225–38.CrossRef
10.
Chaffin M, Kelleher K, Hollenberg J. Onset of physical abuse & neglect: psychiatric, substance abuse, & social risk factors from prospective community data. Child Abuse Negl. 1996;20:191–203.CrossRef
11.
Walsh C, MacMillan HL, Jamieson E. The relationship between parental substance abuse & child maltreatment: findings from the Ontario health supplement. Child Abuse Negl. 2003;27(12):1409–25.CrossRef
12.
Rudd RA, Seth P, David F, Scholl L. Increases in Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Deaths — United States, 2010–2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65:1445–52.CrossRef
13.
PCSAO. PCSAO Factbook, 14th edition. Columbus; 2019.
14.
Public Children Services Association of Ohio. PCSAO Factbook, 2017–2018. 14th ed. Columbus: Public Children Services Association of Ohio; 2019.
15.
Public Children Services Association of Ohio. PCSAO Factbook, 2015–2016. 12th ed. Columbus: Public Children Services Association of Ohio; 2017.
16.
17.
Bunger AC, Chuang E, Girth A, Lancaster KE, Gadel F, Himmeger M, et al. Establishing Cross-Systems Collaborations for Implementation: Study Protocol for Implementation Decision Support; 2020.
18.
Center for Substance Abuse Treatment. Family dependency treatment courts: addressing child abuse and neglect cases using the drug court model. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Assistance; 2004.
19.
Huebner RA, Willauer T, Posze L. The impact of sobriety treatment and recovery teams (START) on family outcomes. Fam Soc J Contemp Soc Serv Alliance Child Fam. 2013;93:196–203.
20.
21.
Oliveros A, Kaufman J. Addressing substance abuse treatment needs of parents involved with the child welfare system. Child Welfare. 2011;90(1):25–41.PubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Bruns E, Pullman M, Weathers E, Wirschem M, Murphy J. Effects of a multidisciplinary family treatment drug court on child and family outcomes: results of a quasi-experimental study. Child Maltreatment. 2012;17(3):218–30.CrossRef
23.
Burrus S, Mackin J, Finigan M. Show me the money: child welfare cost savings of family drug court. Juv Fam Court J. 2011;62(3):1–14.CrossRef
24.
Worcel S, Furrer C, Green B, Burrus S, Finnigan M. Effects of family treatment drug courts on substance abuse and child welfare outcomes. Child Abuse Rev. 2008;17:427–43.CrossRef
25.
Gifford E, Eldred L, Vernerey A, Sloan F. How does family drug treatment court participation affect child welfare outcomes? Child Abuse Negl. 2014;38(10):1659–70.CrossRef
26.
27.
Hall M, Wilfong J, Huebner R, Posze L, Willauer T. Medication-assisted treatment improves child permanency outcomes for opioid-using families in the child welfare system. J Subst Abus Treat. 2016;71:63–7.CrossRef
28.
29.
Huebner R, Willauer T, Posze L. The impact of sobriety treatment and recovery teams (START) on family outcomes. Fam Soc. 2012;93(3):196–203.CrossRef
30.
Ryan J, Perron BE, Moore A, Victor BG, Park K. Timing matters: A randomized control trial of recovery coaches in foster care. J Subst Abus Treat. 2017;77:178–84.CrossRef
31.
Ryan J, Victor B, Moore A, Mowbray O, Perron B. Recovery coaches and the stability of reunification for substance abusing families in child welfare. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2016;70:357–63.CrossRef
32.
Maher E, Marcynyszyn L, Corwin T, Hodnett R. Dosage matters: the relationship between participation in the nurturing parenting program for infants, toddlers, and preschoolers and subsequent child maltreatment. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2011;33:1426–34.CrossRef
33.
Hoffmann NG, Hunt DE, Rhodes WM, Riley KJ. UNCOPE: A brief substance dependence screen for use with arrestees. J Drug Issues. 2003;33(1):29–44.CrossRef
34.
35.
Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977;1(3):385–401.CrossRef
36.
Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983:385–96.
37.
Cohen S, Hoberman HM. Positive events and social supports as buffers of life change stress 1. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1983;13(2):99–125.CrossRef
38.
McLellan AT, Luborsky L, Cacciola J, Griffith J, Evans F, Barr HL, et al. New data from the addiction severity index. Reliability and validity in three centers. J Nerv Ment Disord. 1985;173:412–23.CrossRef
39.
40.
Dunn W, Daniels DB. Initial development of the infant/toddler sensory profile. J Early Interv. 2002;25(1):27–41.CrossRef
41.
Achenbach T. Manual for the child behavior checklist/4–18 and 1991 profile. Burlington: University of Vermont Department of Psychiatry; 1991.
42.
Conners NA, Whiteside-Mansell L, Deere D, Ledet T, Edwards MC. Measuring the potential for child maltreatment: the reliability and validity of the adult adolescent parenting inventory—2. Child Abuse Negl. 2006;30(1):39–53.CrossRef
43.
Counts JM, Buffington ES, Chang-Rios K, Rasmussen HN, Preacher KJ. The development and validation of the protective factors survey: A self-report measure of protective factors against child maltreatment. Child Abuse Negl. 2010;34(10):762–72.CrossRef
44.
Metadata
Title
Enhancing Permanency in Children and Families (EPIC): a child welfare intervention for parental substance abuse
Authors
Bridget Freisthler
Kathryn Maguire-Jack
Susan Yoon
Elinam Dellor
Jennifer Price Wolf
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10668-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Public Health 1/2021 Go to the issue

Research article

The impact of food insecurity on HIV outcomes in Senegal, West Africa: a prospective longitudinal study

Research article

Inequalities in changing mortality and life expectancy in Jiading District, Shanghai, 2002–2018

Correction

Correction to: Prevalence and socio-demographic associations of diet and physical activity risk-factors for cardiovascular disease in Bo, Sierra Leone

Research

Population-level interventions targeting risk factors of diabetes and hypertension in South Africa: a document review

Research article

Barriers to using HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and sexual behaviour after stopping PrEP: a cross-sectional study in Germany

Research

Exploring implementation of a nationwide requirement to increase physical activity in the curriculum in Danish public schools: a mixed methods study