Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Addiction | Study protocol

Retraining automatic action tendencies for smoking using mobile phone-based approach-avoidance bias training: A study protocol for a randomized controlled study

Authors: Alla Machulska, Kristian Kleinke, Tanja Joan Eiler, Armin Grünewald, Rainer Brück, Katharina Jahn, Björn Niehaves, Carl Friedrich Gethmann, Tim Klucken

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Automatic tendencies to approach drug-related cues have been linked to the development and maintainance of harmful drug-taking behavior. Recent studies have demonstrated that these automatic approach tendencies can be targeted directly by means of cognitive bias modification (CBM). Moreover, changing those approach tendencies may enhance treatment outcomes. However, training and therapy effects tend to be rather small and adherence to the training might be impaired by time-consuming multiple laboratory training sessions. Here, we present a protocol for a randomized controlled design to improve CBM training efficiency and facilitate access to the training by providing mobile-phone-based training sessions at home to current smokers motivated to quit smoking.

Methods

Participants (n = 100) are current smokers who smoke at least six cigarettes per day for at least 6 months and are willing to quit smoking. All participants attend a brief behavioral smoking cessation intervention (TAU) and are randomly assigned either to an experimental (TAU + training) or a control group. Participants in the experimental condition are given access to a training application (app) aimed at retraining automatic approach biases for smoking cues. Participants are instructed to perform the app training outside the laboratory context on a daily basis for 14 consecutive days. Participants in the control group do not receive the training. Primary outcome measures are changes in smoking-related approach biases and reductions in daily nicotine consumption as assessed at baseline, post-training and at 6-week follow up. Secondary outcome measures include approach biases for alternative stimuli or smoking stimuli to which participants were not exposed during training, attentional and association biases, biochemical outcomes, and self-reported smoking behavior, also measured at three different time points (baseline, post-training, and follow up). After completion of the study, smokers in the control condition will receive access to the training app.

Discussion

This randomized controlled trial is the first to test the effectiveness of an app-based CBM intervention as an adjunct to a brief smoking cessation intervention in smokers motivated to quit smoking. The results of this study can inform future research in the optimization and advancement of CBM treatment for addiction.

Trial registration

Current Controlled Trials, ISRCTN15690771. Registered on 20 November 2018.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference World Health Organization. WHO global report: mortality attributable to Tobacco. Geneva: WHO Press; 2013. World Health Organization. WHO global report: mortality attributable to Tobacco. Geneva: WHO Press; 2013.
2.
go back to reference Schmitz N, Kruse J, Kugler J. Disabilities, quality of life, and mental disorders associated with smoking and nicotine dependence. Am J Psychiatr. 1999;160:1670–6.CrossRef Schmitz N, Kruse J, Kugler J. Disabilities, quality of life, and mental disorders associated with smoking and nicotine dependence. Am J Psychiatr. 1999;160:1670–6.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Rezaei S, Sari AA, Arab M, Majdzadeh R, Poorasl AM. Economic burden of smoking: a systematic review of direct and indirect costs. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2016;30:397.PubMedPubMedCentral Rezaei S, Sari AA, Arab M, Majdzadeh R, Poorasl AM. Economic burden of smoking: a systematic review of direct and indirect costs. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2016;30:397.PubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Pabst A, Kraus L, Gomes de Matos E, Piontek D. Substanzkonsum und substanzbezogene Störungen in Deutschland im Jahr 2012. Sucht. 2013;50:321–31.CrossRef Pabst A, Kraus L, Gomes de Matos E, Piontek D. Substanzkonsum und substanzbezogene Störungen in Deutschland im Jahr 2012. Sucht. 2013;50:321–31.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Hughes JR, Keely J, Naud S. Shape of the relapse curve and long-term abstinence among untreated smokers. Addiction. 2004;99:29–38.CrossRefPubMed Hughes JR, Keely J, Naud S. Shape of the relapse curve and long-term abstinence among untreated smokers. Addiction. 2004;99:29–38.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Zhou X, Nonnemaker J, Sherrill B, Gilsenan AW, Coste F, West R. Attempts to quit smoking and relapse: factors associated with success or failure from the ATTEMPT cohort study. Addict Behav. 2009;34:365–73.CrossRefPubMed Zhou X, Nonnemaker J, Sherrill B, Gilsenan AW, Coste F, West R. Attempts to quit smoking and relapse: factors associated with success or failure from the ATTEMPT cohort study. Addict Behav. 2009;34:365–73.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Cummings KM, Hyland A. Impact of nicotine replacement therapy on smoking behavior. Annu Rev Public Health. 2005;26:583–99.CrossRefPubMed Cummings KM, Hyland A. Impact of nicotine replacement therapy on smoking behavior. Annu Rev Public Health. 2005;26:583–99.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Hajek P, Stead LF, West R, Jarvis M, Lancaster T. Relapse prevention interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;1:CD003999. Hajek P, Stead LF, West R, Jarvis M, Lancaster T. Relapse prevention interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;1:CD003999.
9.
go back to reference Holmes S, Zwar N, Jiménez-Ruiz CA, Ryan PJ, Browning D, Bergmann L, Johnston JA. Bupropion as an aid to smoking cessation: a review of real-life effectiveness. Int J Clin Pract. 2004;58:285–91.CrossRefPubMed Holmes S, Zwar N, Jiménez-Ruiz CA, Ryan PJ, Browning D, Bergmann L, Johnston JA. Bupropion as an aid to smoking cessation: a review of real-life effectiveness. Int J Clin Pract. 2004;58:285–91.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Deutsch R, Strack F. Reflective and impulsive determinants of addictive behavior. In: Wiers RW, Stacy AW, editors. Handbook of implicit cognition and addiction. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2006. p. 45–57.CrossRef Deutsch R, Strack F. Reflective and impulsive determinants of addictive behavior. In: Wiers RW, Stacy AW, editors. Handbook of implicit cognition and addiction. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2006. p. 45–57.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Wiers RW, Bartholow BD, van den Wildenburg E, Thush C, Engels RCME, Sher KJ, et al. Automatic and controlled processes and the development of addictive behaviors in adolescents: a review and a model. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2007;86:263–83.CrossRefPubMed Wiers RW, Bartholow BD, van den Wildenburg E, Thush C, Engels RCME, Sher KJ, et al. Automatic and controlled processes and the development of addictive behaviors in adolescents: a review and a model. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2007;86:263–83.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Kakoschke N, Kemps E, Tiggemann M. Approach bias modification training and consumption: a review of the literature. Addict Behav. 2017;64:21–8.CrossRefPubMed Kakoschke N, Kemps E, Tiggemann M. Approach bias modification training and consumption: a review of the literature. Addict Behav. 2017;64:21–8.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Rooke SE, Hine DW, Thorsteinsson EB. Implicit cognition and substance use: a meta-analysis. Addict Behav. 2008;33:1314–28.CrossRefPubMed Rooke SE, Hine DW, Thorsteinsson EB. Implicit cognition and substance use: a meta-analysis. Addict Behav. 2008;33:1314–28.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Mucha RF, Pauli P, Angrilli A. Conditioned responses elicited by experimentally produced cues for smoking. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1998;76:259–68.CrossRefPubMed Mucha RF, Pauli P, Angrilli A. Conditioned responses elicited by experimentally produced cues for smoking. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1998;76:259–68.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Mogg K, Field M, Bradley BP. Attentional and approach biases for smoking cues in smokers. An investigation of competing theoretical views of addiction. Psychopharmacology. 2005;180:333–41.CrossRefPubMed Mogg K, Field M, Bradley BP. Attentional and approach biases for smoking cues in smokers. An investigation of competing theoretical views of addiction. Psychopharmacology. 2005;180:333–41.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Waters AJ, Shiffman S, Sayette MA, Paty JA, Gwaltney CJ, Balabanis MH. Attentional bias predicts outcome in smoking cessation. Health Psychol. 2003;22:378–87.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Waters AJ, Shiffman S, Sayette MA, Paty JA, Gwaltney CJ, Balabanis MH. Attentional bias predicts outcome in smoking cessation. Health Psychol. 2003;22:378–87.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Wiers RW, de Jong PJ. Implicit and explicit alcohol, smoking and drug-related cognitions and emotions. In: Arlsdale JZ, editor. Advances in Social Psychology Research. Hauppauge: Nova Science; 2006. p. 1–35. Wiers RW, de Jong PJ. Implicit and explicit alcohol, smoking and drug-related cognitions and emotions. In: Arlsdale JZ, editor. Advances in Social Psychology Research. Hauppauge: Nova Science; 2006. p. 1–35.
19.
go back to reference Wiers CE, Kühn S, Javadi AH, Korucuoglu O, Wiers RW, Walter H, et al. Automatic approach bias toward smoking cues is present in smokers but not in ex-smokers. Psychopharmacology. 2013;229:187–97.CrossRefPubMed Wiers CE, Kühn S, Javadi AH, Korucuoglu O, Wiers RW, Walter H, et al. Automatic approach bias toward smoking cues is present in smokers but not in ex-smokers. Psychopharmacology. 2013;229:187–97.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Rinck M, Becker ES. Approach and avoidance in fear of spiders. J Behav Ther Exp Psychol. 2007;38:105–20.CrossRef Rinck M, Becker ES. Approach and avoidance in fear of spiders. J Behav Ther Exp Psychol. 2007;38:105–20.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Machulska A, Zlomuzica A, Rinck M, Assion H-J, Margraf J. Approach bias modification in inpatient psychiatric smokers. J Psychiatr Res. 2016;76:44–51.CrossRefPubMed Machulska A, Zlomuzica A, Rinck M, Assion H-J, Margraf J. Approach bias modification in inpatient psychiatric smokers. J Psychiatr Res. 2016;76:44–51.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Wiers RW, Rinck M, Dictus M, van den Wildenberg E. Relatively strong automatic appetitive action-tendencies in male carriers of the OPRM1 G-allele. Genes Brain Behav. 2009;8:101–6.CrossRefPubMed Wiers RW, Rinck M, Dictus M, van den Wildenberg E. Relatively strong automatic appetitive action-tendencies in male carriers of the OPRM1 G-allele. Genes Brain Behav. 2009;8:101–6.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Cousijn J, Goudriaan AE, Wiers RW. Reaching out toward cannabis: approach-bias in heavy cannabis users predicts changes in cannabis use. Addiction. 2011;106:1667–74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cousijn J, Goudriaan AE, Wiers RW. Reaching out toward cannabis: approach-bias in heavy cannabis users predicts changes in cannabis use. Addiction. 2011;106:1667–74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Zhou Y, Li X, Zhang M, Zhang F, Zhu C, Shen M. Behavioral approach tendencies to heroin-related stimuli in abstinent heroin abusers. Psychopharmacology. 2012;221:171–6.CrossRefPubMed Zhou Y, Li X, Zhang M, Zhang F, Zhu C, Shen M. Behavioral approach tendencies to heroin-related stimuli in abstinent heroin abusers. Psychopharmacology. 2012;221:171–6.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Kong G, Larsen H, Cavallo DA, Becker D, Cousijn J, Salemink E, et al. Re-training automatic action tendencies to approach cigarettes among adolescent smokers: a pilot study. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2015;41:425–32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kong G, Larsen H, Cavallo DA, Becker D, Cousijn J, Salemink E, et al. Re-training automatic action tendencies to approach cigarettes among adolescent smokers: a pilot study. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2015;41:425–32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Eberl C, Wiers RW, Pawelczack S, Rinck M, Becker ES, Lindenmeyer J. Implementation of approach bias re-training in alcoholism – how many sessions are needed? Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2014;38:587–94.CrossRefPubMed Eberl C, Wiers RW, Pawelczack S, Rinck M, Becker ES, Lindenmeyer J. Implementation of approach bias re-training in alcoholism – how many sessions are needed? Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2014;38:587–94.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Beard C, Weisberg RB, Primack J. Socially anxious primary care patients’ attitudes toward cognitive bias modification (CBM): a qualitative study. Behav Cogn Psychother. 2011;40:618–33.CrossRefPubMed Beard C, Weisberg RB, Primack J. Socially anxious primary care patients’ attitudes toward cognitive bias modification (CBM): a qualitative study. Behav Cogn Psychother. 2011;40:618–33.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Schoenmakers T, de Bruin M, Lux IF, Goertz AG, Van Kerkhof DH, Wiers RW. Clinical effectiveness of attentional bias modification training in abstinent alcoholic patients. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010;109:30–6.CrossRefPubMed Schoenmakers T, de Bruin M, Lux IF, Goertz AG, Van Kerkhof DH, Wiers RW. Clinical effectiveness of attentional bias modification training in abstinent alcoholic patients. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010;109:30–6.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Chelonis JJ, Calton JL, Hart JA, Schachtman TR. Attenuation of renewal effect by extinction in multiple contexts. Learn Motiv. 1999;30:1–14.CrossRef Chelonis JJ, Calton JL, Hart JA, Schachtman TR. Attenuation of renewal effect by extinction in multiple contexts. Learn Motiv. 1999;30:1–14.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Conklin CA, Tiffany ST. Applying extinction research and theory to cue-exposure addiction treatments. Addiction. 2001;97:155–67.CrossRef Conklin CA, Tiffany ST. Applying extinction research and theory to cue-exposure addiction treatments. Addiction. 2001;97:155–67.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Gunther LM, Denniston JC, Miller RR. Conducting exposure treatment in multiple contexts can prevent relapse. Behav Res Ther. 1998;36:75–91.CrossRefPubMed Gunther LM, Denniston JC, Miller RR. Conducting exposure treatment in multiple contexts can prevent relapse. Behav Res Ther. 1998;36:75–91.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang A-G. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009;41:1149–60.CrossRefPubMed Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang A-G. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009;41:1149–60.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Wiers RW, Eberl C, Rinck M, Becker ES, Lindenmeyer J. Retraining automatic action tendencies changes alcoholic patients’ approach bias for alcohol and improves treatment outcome. Psychol Sci. 2011;22:490–7.CrossRefPubMed Wiers RW, Eberl C, Rinck M, Becker ES, Lindenmeyer J. Retraining automatic action tendencies changes alcoholic patients’ approach bias for alcohol and improves treatment outcome. Psychol Sci. 2011;22:490–7.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Miller MA, Fillmore MT. The effect of image complexity on attentional bias towards alcohol-related images in adult drinkers. Addiction. 2010;105:883–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Miller MA, Fillmore MT. The effect of image complexity on attentional bias towards alcohol-related images in adult drinkers. Addiction. 2010;105:883–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
go back to reference Plant RR, Turner G. Millisecond precision psychological research in a world of commodity computers: New hardware, new problems? Behav Res Methods. 2009;41:598–614.CrossRefPubMed Plant RR, Turner G. Millisecond precision psychological research in a world of commodity computers: New hardware, new problems? Behav Res Methods. 2009;41:598–614.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Plant RR. A reminder on millisecond timing accuracy and potential replication failure in computer-based psychology experiments: an open letter. Behav Res Methods. 2016;48:408–11.CrossRefPubMed Plant RR. A reminder on millisecond timing accuracy and potential replication failure in computer-based psychology experiments: an open letter. Behav Res Methods. 2016;48:408–11.CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Plant RR, Quinlan PT. Could millisecond timing errors in commonly used equipment be a cause of replication failure in some neuroscience studies? Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2013;13:598–614.CrossRefPubMed Plant RR, Quinlan PT. Could millisecond timing errors in commonly used equipment be a cause of replication failure in some neuroscience studies? Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2013;13:598–614.CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Stippekohl B, Winkler M, Mucha R, Pauli P, Walter B, Vaitl D, Stark R. Neural responses to begin- and end-stimuli of the smoking ritual in non-smokers, nondeprived smokers, and deprived smokers. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010;35:1209–25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Stippekohl B, Winkler M, Mucha R, Pauli P, Walter B, Vaitl D, Stark R. Neural responses to begin- and end-stimuli of the smoking ritual in non-smokers, nondeprived smokers, and deprived smokers. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010;35:1209–25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
42.
go back to reference Townshend JM, Duka T. Attentional bias associated with alcohol cues: differences between heavy and occasional social drinkers. Psychopharmacology. 2001;157:67–74.CrossRefPubMed Townshend JM, Duka T. Attentional bias associated with alcohol cues: differences between heavy and occasional social drinkers. Psychopharmacology. 2001;157:67–74.CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Greenwald AG, McGhee DE, Schwartz JLK. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998;74:1464–80.CrossRefPubMed Greenwald AG, McGhee DE, Schwartz JLK. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998;74:1464–80.CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Kahler CW, Daughters SB, Leventhal AM, Gwaltney CJ, Palfai TP. Implicit associations between smoking and social consequences among smokers in cessation treatment. Behav Res Ther. 2007;45:2066–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kahler CW, Daughters SB, Leventhal AM, Gwaltney CJ, Palfai TP. Implicit associations between smoking and social consequences among smokers in cessation treatment. Behav Res Ther. 2007;45:2066–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
45.
go back to reference Greenwald AG, Nosek BA, Banaji MR. Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003;85:197–216.CrossRefPubMed Greenwald AG, Nosek BA, Banaji MR. Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003;85:197–216.CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, Fagerström KO. The Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire. Brit J Addict. 1991;86:1119–27.CrossRef Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, Fagerström KO. The Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire. Brit J Addict. 1991;86:1119–27.CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Bleich S, Havemann-Reinecke U, Kornhuber J. Fagerström-Test für Nikotinabhängigkeit. Göttingen: Beltz Test; 2002. Bleich S, Havemann-Reinecke U, Kornhuber J. Fagerström-Test für Nikotinabhängigkeit. Göttingen: Beltz Test; 2002.
48.
go back to reference Prochaska JO, Velicer WF, DiClemente CC, Guadagnoli E, Rossi JS. Patterns of change: dynamic typology applied to smoking cessation. Multivar Behav Res. 1991;26:83–107.CrossRef Prochaska JO, Velicer WF, DiClemente CC, Guadagnoli E, Rossi JS. Patterns of change: dynamic typology applied to smoking cessation. Multivar Behav Res. 1991;26:83–107.CrossRef
49.
go back to reference Jäkle C, Keller S, Baum E, Basler HD. Scales for the measurement of self-efficacy and decisional balance in the process of behavioral change in smokers. Diagnostica. 1999;45:138–46.CrossRef Jäkle C, Keller S, Baum E, Basler HD. Scales for the measurement of self-efficacy and decisional balance in the process of behavioral change in smokers. Diagnostica. 1999;45:138–46.CrossRef
50.
go back to reference Hall SM, Havassy BE, Wasserman DA. Commitment to abstinence and acute stress in relapse to alcohol, opiates, and nicotine. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1990;58:175–81.CrossRefPubMed Hall SM, Havassy BE, Wasserman DA. Commitment to abstinence and acute stress in relapse to alcohol, opiates, and nicotine. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1990;58:175–81.CrossRefPubMed
51.
go back to reference Swanson JE, Rudman LA, Greenwald AG. Using the Implicit Association Test to investigate attitude-behavior consistency for stigmatised behavior. Cogn Emotion. 2001;15:207–30.CrossRef Swanson JE, Rudman LA, Greenwald AG. Using the Implicit Association Test to investigate attitude-behavior consistency for stigmatised behavior. Cogn Emotion. 2001;15:207–30.CrossRef
52.
go back to reference Patton JH, Stanford MS, Barratt ES. Factor structure of the Barratt impulsiveness scale. J Clin Psychol. 1995;51:768–74.CrossRefPubMed Patton JH, Stanford MS, Barratt ES. Factor structure of the Barratt impulsiveness scale. J Clin Psychol. 1995;51:768–74.CrossRefPubMed
53.
go back to reference Eysenck HJ, Eysenck SBG. Eysenck Personality Scales (EPS Adult). London: Hodder & Stoughton; 1991. Eysenck HJ, Eysenck SBG. Eysenck Personality Scales (EPS Adult). London: Hodder & Stoughton; 1991.
54.
go back to reference Fergusson D, Aaron SD, Guyatt G, Hébert P. Post-randomisation exclusions: the intention to treat principle and excluding patients from analysis. BMJ. 2002;325:652–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fergusson D, Aaron SD, Guyatt G, Hébert P. Post-randomisation exclusions: the intention to treat principle and excluding patients from analysis. BMJ. 2002;325:652–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
55.
go back to reference Mühlig S, Paulick P, Lindenmeyer J, Rinck M, Wiers RW. Applying the ‘Cognitive Bias Modification’ concept to smoking cessation – versus. Sucht. 2016;62:333–54.CrossRef Mühlig S, Paulick P, Lindenmeyer J, Rinck M, Wiers RW. Applying the ‘Cognitive Bias Modification’ concept to smoking cessation – versus. Sucht. 2016;62:333–54.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Retraining automatic action tendencies for smoking using mobile phone-based approach-avoidance bias training: A study protocol for a randomized controlled study
Authors
Alla Machulska
Kristian Kleinke
Tanja Joan Eiler
Armin Grünewald
Rainer Brück
Katharina Jahn
Björn Niehaves
Carl Friedrich Gethmann
Tim Klucken
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3835-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Trials 1/2019 Go to the issue