Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Drugs 13/2004

01-07-2004 | Adis Drug Evaluation

Adapalene

A Review of its Use in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris

Authors: John Waugh, Stuart Noble, Lesley J. Scott

Published in: Drugs | Issue 13/2004

Login to get access

Summary

Abstract

Adapalene (Differin®) is a retinoid agent indicated for the topical treatment of acne vulgaris. In clinical trials, 0.1% adapalene gel has proved to be effective in this indication and was as effective as 0.025% tretinoin gel, 0.1% tretinoin microsphere gel, 0.05% tretinoin cream and 0.1% tazarotene gel once every two days; however, the drug was less effective than once-daily 0.1% tazarotene gel. It can be used alone in mild acne or in combination with antimicrobials in inflammatory acne and has proved efficacious as maintenance treatment. Adapalene has a rapid onset of action and a particularly favourable tolerability profile compared with other retinoids. These attributes can potentially promote patient compliance, an important factor in treatment success. Adapalene is, therefore, assured of a rolein the first-line treatment of acne vulgaris.

Pharmacological Properties

Adapalene is a chemically stable derivative of naphthoic acid that binds selectively to the nuclear retinoic acid receptor (RAR) subtypes RARγ (found mainly in the epidermis) and RARβ (found in dermal fibroblasts), activating genes responsible for cellular differentiation; it does not bind to cytosolic retinoic acid binding proteins. Adapalene is thought to modulate keratinisation, differentiation and inflammation of follicular epithelial cells. This results in a reduction in microcomedones, the precursors of acne lesions.
Absorption of 0.1% adapalene gel through human skin is low. Adapalene was not detected in plasma in volunteers after topical application of either the gel or cream, nor was it detected in urine, faeces or skin. In animals, metabolism is via O-demethylation, hydroxylation and conjugation, and excretion is primarily by the biliary route. There are no known interactions with other drugs and, because of the low absorption through the skin, interaction with systemic drugs is unlikely.

Therapeutic Efficacy

Across several endpoints (including the mean percentage reduction in the number of inflammatory and noninflammatory lesions), 0.1% adapalene gel had similar efficacy to 0.025% tretinoin gel, 0.05% tretinoin cream and 0.05% isotretinoin cream as well as the newer 0.1% tretinoin microsphere gel formulation in the treatment of mild-to-moderate acne vulgaris. Data were from predominantly multicentre, randomised, single- or double-blind, parallel-group trials. After 8–12 weeks’ treatment, the percentage reductions in lesion counts were 47–75% and 38–73% for adapalene and 0.025% tretinoin gel treatment groups (inflammatory lesions), respectively, and 46–83% and 33%–83% (noninflammatory lesions). The similar efficacy of these two treatments was confirmed by two meta-analyses. The onset of action with 0.1% adapalene gel is rapid and generally appears to be similar to that with tretinoin formulations.
In two randomised, double-blind, parallel-group studies, patients with mild-tomoderate acne vulgaris receiving 0.1% tazarotene gel once daily had significantly greater reductions in inflammatory and noninflammatory lesions than 0.1% adapalene recipients. The same dosage of 0.1% adapalene gel showed similar efficacy to that of 0.1% tazarotene gel once every two days (dosage reduced to improve tolerability) in another trial of the same design.
Data indicate that 0.1% adapalene gel is effective in combination with topical clindamycin or benzoyl peroxide or oral cyclines (lymecycline, minocycline) in reducing the number of inflammatory and noninflammatory lesions in patients with mild-to-moderate or moderate to moderately severe acne vulgaris. Furthermore, 0.1% adapalene gel was effective as maintenance treatment following treatment with clindamycin plus adapalene.

Tolerability

Adapalene was generally better tolerated than comparators, particularly in the first 4 weeks of treatment. The most commonly reported adverse events in both adapalene and comparator recipients were erythema, dry skin, pruritus, desquamation and stinging/burning sensations. These were generally less severe in adapalene recipients than in the recipients of other topical retinoids.
Several randomised, intraindividual patch studies in healthy volunteers found 0.1% adapalene gel was the least irritating acne treatment when compared with various concentrations of tretinoin gel, cream, the new formulation of tretinoin (0.1% and 0.04% tretinoin microsphere gel) or with tazarotene gel.
When used as adjunctive therapy with topical clindamycin or oral lymecycline, 0.1% adapalene gel was generally well tolerated compared with gel vehicle plus the respective antibacterial agent. Overall, local cutaneous adverse events were mild in intensity.
Footnotes
1
The use of trade names is for product identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bergfeld WF. Topical retinoids in the management of acne vulgaris. J Drag Dev Clin Pract 1996 Dec; 8: 151–60 Bergfeld WF. Topical retinoids in the management of acne vulgaris. J Drag Dev Clin Pract 1996 Dec; 8: 151–60
2.
go back to reference Strasburger VC. Acne: what every pediatrician should know about treatment. Pediatr Clin North Am 1997; 44(6): 1505–23PubMedCrossRef Strasburger VC. Acne: what every pediatrician should know about treatment. Pediatr Clin North Am 1997; 44(6): 1505–23PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Gollnick H. Current concepts of the pathogenesis of acne: implications for drag treatment. Drags 2003; 63(15): 1579–96CrossRef Gollnick H. Current concepts of the pathogenesis of acne: implications for drag treatment. Drags 2003; 63(15): 1579–96CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Gollnick H, Cunliffe W, Berson D, et al. Management of acne: a report from a global alliance to improve outcomes in acne. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003 Jul; 49(1): S1–38PubMedCrossRef Gollnick H, Cunliffe W, Berson D, et al. Management of acne: a report from a global alliance to improve outcomes in acne. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003 Jul; 49(1): S1–38PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Leyden JJ. A review of the use of combination therapies for the treatment of acne vulgaris. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003 Sep; 49(3): S200–10PubMedCrossRef Leyden JJ. A review of the use of combination therapies for the treatment of acne vulgaris. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003 Sep; 49(3): S200–10PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kang S, Goldfarb MT, Weiss JS, et al. Assessment of adapalene gel for the treatment of actinic keratoses and lentigines: a randomized trial. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003 Jul; 49(1): 83–90PubMedCrossRef Kang S, Goldfarb MT, Weiss JS, et al. Assessment of adapalene gel for the treatment of actinic keratoses and lentigines: a randomized trial. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003 Jul; 49(1): 83–90PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Brogden RN, Goa KL. Adapalene: a review of its pharmacological properties and clinical potential in the management of mild to moderate acne. Drugs 1997 Mar; 53(3): 511–9PubMedCrossRef Brogden RN, Goa KL. Adapalene: a review of its pharmacological properties and clinical potential in the management of mild to moderate acne. Drugs 1997 Mar; 53(3): 511–9PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Shroot B. Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of topical adapalene. J Am Acad Dermatol 1998 Aug; 39 (2 Pt 3): S17–24PubMedCrossRef Shroot B. Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of topical adapalene. J Am Acad Dermatol 1998 Aug; 39 (2 Pt 3): S17–24PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Shroot B, Michel S. Pharmacology and chemistry of adapalene. J Am Acad Dermatol 1997; 36 (6 Suppl.): S96–103PubMedCrossRef Shroot B, Michel S. Pharmacology and chemistry of adapalene. J Am Acad Dermatol 1997; 36 (6 Suppl.): S96–103PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Anonymous. Adapalene for acne. Med Lett Drugs Ther 1997; 39(995): 19–20 Anonymous. Adapalene for acne. Med Lett Drugs Ther 1997; 39(995): 19–20
14.
go back to reference Caron D, Clucas A, Dunsire JP, et al. Radiolabelled adapalene is poorly absorbed after topical application of adapalene 0.1% gel. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venerol 1998 Sep; 11 Suppl. 2: 275–6 Caron D, Clucas A, Dunsire JP, et al. Radiolabelled adapalene is poorly absorbed after topical application of adapalene 0.1% gel. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venerol 1998 Sep; 11 Suppl. 2: 275–6
16.
go back to reference Tu P, Li GQ, Zhu XJ, et al. A comparison of adapalene gel 0.1% vs. tretinoin gel 0.025% in the treatment of acne vulgaris in China. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2001; 15 Suppl. 3: 31–6 Tu P, Li GQ, Zhu XJ, et al. A comparison of adapalene gel 0.1% vs. tretinoin gel 0.025% in the treatment of acne vulgaris in China. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2001; 15 Suppl. 3: 31–6
17.
go back to reference Ellis CN, Millikan LE, Smith EB, et al. Comparison of adapalene 0.1% solution and tretinoin 0.025% gel in the topical treatment of acne vulgaris. Br J Dermatol 1998 Oct; 139 Suppl. 52: 41–7PubMedCrossRef Ellis CN, Millikan LE, Smith EB, et al. Comparison of adapalene 0.1% solution and tretinoin 0.025% gel in the topical treatment of acne vulgaris. Br J Dermatol 1998 Oct; 139 Suppl. 52: 41–7PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Grosshans E, Marks R, Mascaro JM, et al. Evaluation of clinical efficacy and safety of adapalene 0.1% gel versus tretinoin 0.025% gel in the treatment of acne vulgaris, with particular reference to the onset of action and impact on quality of life. Br J Dermatol 1998 Oct; 139 Suppl. 52: 26–33PubMedCrossRef Grosshans E, Marks R, Mascaro JM, et al. Evaluation of clinical efficacy and safety of adapalene 0.1% gel versus tretinoin 0.025% gel in the treatment of acne vulgaris, with particular reference to the onset of action and impact on quality of life. Br J Dermatol 1998 Oct; 139 Suppl. 52: 26–33PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Cunliffe WJ, Caputo R, Dreno B, et al. Efficacy and safety comparison of adapalene (CD271) gel and tretinoin gel in the topical treatment of acne vulgaris: a European multicentre trial. J Dermatol Treat 1997; 8(3): 173–8CrossRef Cunliffe WJ, Caputo R, Dreno B, et al. Efficacy and safety comparison of adapalene (CD271) gel and tretinoin gel in the topical treatment of acne vulgaris: a European multicentre trial. J Dermatol Treat 1997; 8(3): 173–8CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Alirezai M, Meynadier J, Jablonska S, et al. Efficacy and safety comparison study of 0.1% and 0.03% adapalene gels and tretinoin gel in the topical treatment of acne [in French]. Ann Dermatol Venereol 1996; 123(3): 165–70PubMed Alirezai M, Meynadier J, Jablonska S, et al. Efficacy and safety comparison study of 0.1% and 0.03% adapalene gels and tretinoin gel in the topical treatment of acne [in French]. Ann Dermatol Venereol 1996; 123(3): 165–70PubMed
21.
go back to reference Shalita A, Weiss J, Chalker D, et al. A comparison of the efficacy and safety of adapalene gel 0.1% and tretinoin gel 0.025% in the treatment of acne vulgaris: a multicenter trial. J Am Acad Dermatol 1996 Mar; 34(3): 482–5PubMedCrossRef Shalita A, Weiss J, Chalker D, et al. A comparison of the efficacy and safety of adapalene gel 0.1% and tretinoin gel 0.025% in the treatment of acne vulgaris: a multicenter trial. J Am Acad Dermatol 1996 Mar; 34(3): 482–5PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Verschoore M, Langner A, Wolska H, et al. Efficacy and safety of CD 271 alcoholic gels in the topical treatment of acne vulgaris. Br J Dermatol 1991 Apr; 124: 368–71PubMedCrossRef Verschoore M, Langner A, Wolska H, et al. Efficacy and safety of CD 271 alcoholic gels in the topical treatment of acne vulgaris. Br J Dermatol 1991 Apr; 124: 368–71PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Cunliffe WJ, Danby FW, Dunlap F, et al. Randomised, controlled trial of the efficacy and safety of adapalene gel 0.1% and tretinoin cream 0.05% in patients with acne vulgaris. Eur J Dermatol 2002; 12(4): 350–4PubMed Cunliffe WJ, Danby FW, Dunlap F, et al. Randomised, controlled trial of the efficacy and safety of adapalene gel 0.1% and tretinoin cream 0.05% in patients with acne vulgaris. Eur J Dermatol 2002; 12(4): 350–4PubMed
24.
go back to reference Ioannides D, Rigopoulos D, Katsambas A. Topical adapalene gel 0.1% vs. isotretinoin gel 0.05% in the treatment of acne vulgaris: a randomized open-label clinical trial. Br J Dermatol 2002 Sep; 147(3): 523–7 Ioannides D, Rigopoulos D, Katsambas A. Topical adapalene gel 0.1% vs. isotretinoin gel 0.05% in the treatment of acne vulgaris: a randomized open-label clinical trial. Br J Dermatol 2002 Sep; 147(3): 523–7
25.
go back to reference Nyirady J, Grossman RM, Nighland M, et al. A comparative trial of two retinoids commonly used in the treatment of acne vulgaris. J Dermatolog Treat 2001 Sep; 12(3): 149–57PubMedCrossRef Nyirady J, Grossman RM, Nighland M, et al. A comparative trial of two retinoids commonly used in the treatment of acne vulgaris. J Dermatolog Treat 2001 Sep; 12(3): 149–57PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Thiboutot D, Gold MH, Jarratt MT, et al. Randomized controlled trial of the tolerability, safety, and efficacy of adapalene gel 0.1% and tretinoin microsphere gel 0.1% for the treatment of acne vulgaris. Cutis 2001 Oct; 68 (4 Suppl.): 10–9PubMed Thiboutot D, Gold MH, Jarratt MT, et al. Randomized controlled trial of the tolerability, safety, and efficacy of adapalene gel 0.1% and tretinoin microsphere gel 0.1% for the treatment of acne vulgaris. Cutis 2001 Oct; 68 (4 Suppl.): 10–9PubMed
27.
go back to reference Leyden J, Lowe N, Kakita L, et al. Comparison of treatment of acne vulgaris with alternate-day applications of tazarotene 0.1% gel and once-daily applications of adapalene 0.1% gel: a randomized trial. Cutis 2001 Jun; 67 (6 Suppl.): 10–6PubMed Leyden J, Lowe N, Kakita L, et al. Comparison of treatment of acne vulgaris with alternate-day applications of tazarotene 0.1% gel and once-daily applications of adapalene 0.1% gel: a randomized trial. Cutis 2001 Jun; 67 (6 Suppl.): 10–6PubMed
28.
go back to reference Webster G, Guenther L, Poulin YP, et al. A multicenter, double-blind, randomized comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of treating facial acne vulgaris once daily with tazarotene 0.1% gel or adapalne 0.1% gel. Cutis 2002; 69: 4–11PubMed Webster G, Guenther L, Poulin YP, et al. A multicenter, double-blind, randomized comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of treating facial acne vulgaris once daily with tazarotene 0.1% gel or adapalne 0.1% gel. Cutis 2002; 69: 4–11PubMed
29.
go back to reference Cunliffe WJ, Meynadier J, Alirezai M, et al. Is combined oral and topical therapy better than oral therapy alone in patients with moderate to moderately severe acne vulgaris? A comparison of the efficacy and safety of lymecycline plus adapalene gel 0.1%, versus lymecycline plus gel vehicle. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003 Sep; 49 (3 Suppl.): S218–26PubMedCrossRef Cunliffe WJ, Meynadier J, Alirezai M, et al. Is combined oral and topical therapy better than oral therapy alone in patients with moderate to moderately severe acne vulgaris? A comparison of the efficacy and safety of lymecycline plus adapalene gel 0.1%, versus lymecycline plus gel vehicle. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003 Sep; 49 (3 Suppl.): S218–26PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Wolf Jr JE, Kaplan D, Kraus SJ, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of combined topical treatment of acne vulgaris with adapalene and clindamycin: a multicenter, randomized, investigatorblinded study. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003 Sep; 49 (3 Suppl.): S211–7PubMedCrossRef Wolf Jr JE, Kaplan D, Kraus SJ, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of combined topical treatment of acne vulgaris with adapalene and clindamycin: a multicenter, randomized, investigatorblinded study. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003 Sep; 49 (3 Suppl.): S211–7PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Campo M, Zuluaga A, Escobar P, et al. A comparative study on the effectiveness of lymecicline and adapalene versus minocicline and adapalene in the treatment of acne vulgaris. Ann Dermatol Venereol 2002 Jul; 129 (Suppl.): 371 Campo M, Zuluaga A, Escobar P, et al. A comparative study on the effectiveness of lymecicline and adapalene versus minocicline and adapalene in the treatment of acne vulgaris. Ann Dermatol Venereol 2002 Jul; 129 (Suppl.): 371
32.
go back to reference Zhang J, Feng LL, Teng TY, et al. The maintenance effect of a treatment with adapalene gel 0.1% in patients with acne vulgaris previously treated with clindamycin topical solution, 1 % alone or in combination with adapalene gel, 0.1 % [poster]. The American Academy Of Dermatology 62nd Annual Meeting; 2004 Feb 6–11; Washington, DC Zhang J, Feng LL, Teng TY, et al. The maintenance effect of a treatment with adapalene gel 0.1% in patients with acne vulgaris previously treated with clindamycin topical solution, 1 % alone or in combination with adapalene gel, 0.1 % [poster]. The American Academy Of Dermatology 62nd Annual Meeting; 2004 Feb 6–11; Washington, DC
33.
go back to reference Fang L, Fu W, Gu J, et al. Efficacy and safety of benzoyl peroxide gel, 5% combined with adapalene gel, 0.1% in Chinese patients with acne vulgaris [abstract no. P0020]. Ann Dermatol Venereol 2002 Jul; 129 Suppl.: 374 Fang L, Fu W, Gu J, et al. Efficacy and safety of benzoyl peroxide gel, 5% combined with adapalene gel, 0.1% in Chinese patients with acne vulgaris [abstract no. P0020]. Ann Dermatol Venereol 2002 Jul; 129 Suppl.: 374
34.
go back to reference Campo MH, Zuluaga A, Escobar P, et al. Efficacy and safety comparison of lymecycline associated with adapalene and minocycline associated with adapalene in the treatment of acne vulgaris [poster]. 20th World Congress of Dermatology; 2002 Jul 1–5; Paris Campo MH, Zuluaga A, Escobar P, et al. Efficacy and safety comparison of lymecycline associated with adapalene and minocycline associated with adapalene in the treatment of acne vulgaris [poster]. 20th World Congress of Dermatology; 2002 Jul 1–5; Paris
35.
go back to reference Burke BM, Cunliffe WJ. The assessment of acne vulgaris: the Leeds technique. Br J Dermatol 1984 Jul; 111(1): 83–92PubMedCrossRef Burke BM, Cunliffe WJ. The assessment of acne vulgaris: the Leeds technique. Br J Dermatol 1984 Jul; 111(1): 83–92PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Jacyk WK. Adapalene in the treatment of African patients. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2001; 15 Suppl. 3: 37–42PubMedCrossRef Jacyk WK. Adapalene in the treatment of African patients. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2001; 15 Suppl. 3: 37–42PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Miyachi Y, Kawashima M, Harada S. Efficacy and safety of 0.1% and 0.03% adapalene gel or vehicle in Japanese subjects with acne [abstract no. P0049]. Ann Dermatol Venereol 2002 Jul; 129 Suppl.: S380 Miyachi Y, Kawashima M, Harada S. Efficacy and safety of 0.1% and 0.03% adapalene gel or vehicle in Japanese subjects with acne [abstract no. P0049]. Ann Dermatol Venereol 2002 Jul; 129 Suppl.: S380
38.
go back to reference Cunliffe WJ, Poncet M, Loesche C, et al. A comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of adapalene 0.1 % gel versus tretinoin 0.025% gel in patients with acne vulgaris: a meta-analysis of five randomized trials. Br J Dermatol 1998 Oct; 139 Suppl. 52: 48–56PubMedCrossRef Cunliffe WJ, Poncet M, Loesche C, et al. A comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of adapalene 0.1 % gel versus tretinoin 0.025% gel in patients with acne vulgaris: a meta-analysis of five randomized trials. Br J Dermatol 1998 Oct; 139 Suppl. 52: 48–56PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Cunliffe WJ, Caputo R, Dreno B, et al. Clinical efficacy and safety comparison of adapalene gel and tretinoin gel in the treatment of acne vulgaris: Europe and U.S. multicenter trials. J Am Acad Dermatol 1997 Jun; 36 (6 Pt 2): S126–34PubMedCrossRef Cunliffe WJ, Caputo R, Dreno B, et al. Clinical efficacy and safety comparison of adapalene gel and tretinoin gel in the treatment of acne vulgaris: Europe and U.S. multicenter trials. J Am Acad Dermatol 1997 Jun; 36 (6 Pt 2): S126–34PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Cunliffe WJ, Orfanos C, Caputo R, et al. Comparison of clinical safety and efficacy of adapalene gel and tretinoin gel in the treatment of acne vulgaris [abstract no. P139]. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 1995 Oct; 5 Suppl. 1: S152CrossRef Cunliffe WJ, Orfanos C, Caputo R, et al. Comparison of clinical safety and efficacy of adapalene gel and tretinoin gel in the treatment of acne vulgaris [abstract no. P139]. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 1995 Oct; 5 Suppl. 1: S152CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Cunliffe WJ, Gollnick H. Currents concepts in the treatment of acne vulgaris [abstract]. European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Annual Meeting; 2000 Oct 11–15; Geneva Cunliffe WJ, Gollnick H. Currents concepts in the treatment of acne vulgaris [abstract]. European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Annual Meeting; 2000 Oct 11–15; Geneva
42.
go back to reference Egan N, Loesche MC, Baker MM. Randomized, controlled, bilateral (split-face) comparison trial of the tolerability and patient preference of adapalene gel 0.1% and tretinoin microsphere gel 0.1% for the treatment of acne vulgaris. Cutis 2001 Oct; 68 (4 Suppl.): 20–4PubMed Egan N, Loesche MC, Baker MM. Randomized, controlled, bilateral (split-face) comparison trial of the tolerability and patient preference of adapalene gel 0.1% and tretinoin microsphere gel 0.1% for the treatment of acne vulgaris. Cutis 2001 Oct; 68 (4 Suppl.): 20–4PubMed
43.
go back to reference Dunlap FE, Mills OH, Tuley MR, et al. Adapalene 0.1% gel for the treatment of acne vulgaris: its superiority compared to tretinoin 0.025% cream in skin tolerance and patient preference. Br J Dermatol 1998 Oct; 139 Suppl. 52: 17–22PubMedCrossRef Dunlap FE, Mills OH, Tuley MR, et al. Adapalene 0.1% gel for the treatment of acne vulgaris: its superiority compared to tretinoin 0.025% cream in skin tolerance and patient preference. Br J Dermatol 1998 Oct; 139 Suppl. 52: 17–22PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Savin R, Berger R. A split-face study to compare the safety and efficacy of Avita™ (tretinoin cream) cream 0.025% and Differin™ (adapalene gel) gel 0.1 % in subjects with grade II or III acne vulgaris [abstract no. 065]. American Academy of Dermatology 57th Annual Meeting; 1999 Mar 19–24; New Orleans,65 Savin R, Berger R. A split-face study to compare the safety and efficacy of Avita™ (tretinoin cream) cream 0.025% and Differin™ (adapalene gel) gel 0.1 % in subjects with grade II or III acne vulgaris [abstract no. 065]. American Academy of Dermatology 57th Annual Meeting; 1999 Mar 19–24; New Orleans,65
45.
go back to reference Caron D, Sorba V, Kerrouche N, et al. Split-face comparison of adapalene 0.1% gel and tretinoin 0.025% gel in acne patients. J Am Acad Dermatol 1997 Jun; 36 (6 Pt 2): S110–2PubMedCrossRef Caron D, Sorba V, Kerrouche N, et al. Split-face comparison of adapalene 0.1% gel and tretinoin 0.025% gel in acne patients. J Am Acad Dermatol 1997 Jun; 36 (6 Pt 2): S110–2PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Verschoore M, Poncet M, Czernielewski J, et al. Adapalene 0.1% gel has low skin-irritation potential. J Am Acad Dermatol 1997 Jun; 36 (6 Pt 2): S104–9PubMedCrossRef Verschoore M, Poncet M, Czernielewski J, et al. Adapalene 0.1% gel has low skin-irritation potential. J Am Acad Dermatol 1997 Jun; 36 (6 Pt 2): S104–9PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Cunliffe WJ. European multicentre study of adapalene versus tretinoin gel [abstract]. Br J Dermatol 1996 Jul; 135 Suppl. 47: 29 Cunliffe WJ. European multicentre study of adapalene versus tretinoin gel [abstract]. Br J Dermatol 1996 Jul; 135 Suppl. 47: 29
48.
go back to reference Baker M, Tuley M, Busdiecker FL. Adapalene gel 0.1% is effective and well tolerated in acne patients in a dermatology practice setting. Cutis 2001 Oct; 68 (4 Suppl.): 41–7PubMed Baker M, Tuley M, Busdiecker FL. Adapalene gel 0.1% is effective and well tolerated in acne patients in a dermatology practice setting. Cutis 2001 Oct; 68 (4 Suppl.): 41–7PubMed
49.
go back to reference Queille-Roussel C, Poncet M, Mesaros S, et al. Comparison of the cumulative irritation potential of adapalene gel and cream with that of erythromycin/tretinoin solution and gel and erythromycin/isotretinoin gel. Clin Ther 2001 Feb; 23(2): 205–12PubMedCrossRef Queille-Roussel C, Poncet M, Mesaros S, et al. Comparison of the cumulative irritation potential of adapalene gel and cream with that of erythromycin/tretinoin solution and gel and erythromycin/isotretinoin gel. Clin Ther 2001 Feb; 23(2): 205–12PubMedCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Galvin SA, Gilbert R, Baker M, et al. Comparative tolerance of adapalene 0.1% gel and six different tretinoin formulations. Br J Dermatol 1998 Oct; 139 Suppl. 52: 34–40PubMedCrossRef Galvin SA, Gilbert R, Baker M, et al. Comparative tolerance of adapalene 0.1% gel and six different tretinoin formulations. Br J Dermatol 1998 Oct; 139 Suppl. 52: 34–40PubMedCrossRef
51.
go back to reference Caron D, Sorba V, Clucas A, et al. Skin tolerance of adapalene 0.1% gel in combination with other topical antiacne treatments. J Am Acad Dermatol 1997 Jun; 36 (6 Pt 2): S113–5PubMedCrossRef Caron D, Sorba V, Clucas A, et al. Skin tolerance of adapalene 0.1% gel in combination with other topical antiacne treatments. J Am Acad Dermatol 1997 Jun; 36 (6 Pt 2): S113–5PubMedCrossRef
52.
go back to reference Greenspan A, Loesche C, Vendetti N, et al. Cumulative irritation comparison of adapalene gel and solution with 2 tazarotene gels and 3 tretinoin formulations. Cutis 2003 Jul; 72(1): 76–81PubMed Greenspan A, Loesche C, Vendetti N, et al. Cumulative irritation comparison of adapalene gel and solution with 2 tazarotene gels and 3 tretinoin formulations. Cutis 2003 Jul; 72(1): 76–81PubMed
53.
go back to reference Toole JWP, Lockhart L, Potrebka J, et al. Comparative irritancy study among retinoid creams and gels. J Cutan Med Surg 1999 Oct; 3(6): 298–301PubMed Toole JWP, Lockhart L, Potrebka J, et al. Comparative irritancy study among retinoid creams and gels. J Cutan Med Surg 1999 Oct; 3(6): 298–301PubMed
54.
go back to reference Dosik JS, Arsonnaud S. Determination of the cumulative irritation potential of adapalene cream and gel 0.1% compared to tretinoin micro, 0.04% amd micro 0.1% after repeated applications to the skin of healthy subjects [poster]. American Academy of Dermatology 62nd Annual Meeting; 2004 Feb 6–11; Washington, DC Dosik JS, Arsonnaud S. Determination of the cumulative irritation potential of adapalene cream and gel 0.1% compared to tretinoin micro, 0.04% amd micro 0.1% after repeated applications to the skin of healthy subjects [poster]. American Academy of Dermatology 62nd Annual Meeting; 2004 Feb 6–11; Washington, DC
55.
go back to reference Jacyk WK, Mpofu P. Adapalene gel 0.1% for topical treatment of acne vulgaris in African patients. Cutis 2001 Oct; 68 (4 Suppl.): 48–54PubMed Jacyk WK, Mpofu P. Adapalene gel 0.1% for topical treatment of acne vulgaris in African patients. Cutis 2001 Oct; 68 (4 Suppl.): 48–54PubMed
56.
go back to reference Brand B, Gilbert R, Baker MD, et al. Cumulative irritancy comparison of adapalene gel 0.1% versus other retinoid products when applied in combination with topical antimicrobial agents. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003 Sep; 49 (3 Suppl.): S227–32PubMedCrossRef Brand B, Gilbert R, Baker MD, et al. Cumulative irritancy comparison of adapalene gel 0.1% versus other retinoid products when applied in combination with topical antimicrobial agents. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003 Sep; 49 (3 Suppl.): S227–32PubMedCrossRef
57.
go back to reference Cunliffe WJ, Poncet M, Loesche C, et al. A comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of adapalene 0.1 % gel versus tretinoin 0.025% in patients with acne vulgaris: a meta-analysis of five randomized trials. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venerol 1998 Sep; 11 Suppl. 2: 189CrossRef Cunliffe WJ, Poncet M, Loesche C, et al. A comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of adapalene 0.1 % gel versus tretinoin 0.025% in patients with acne vulgaris: a meta-analysis of five randomized trials. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venerol 1998 Sep; 11 Suppl. 2: 189CrossRef
59.
go back to reference Bershad SV. The modern age of acne therapy: a review of current treatment options. Mt Sinai J Med Sep–Oct 2001; 68(4–5): 279–86PubMed Bershad SV. The modern age of acne therapy: a review of current treatment options. Mt Sinai J Med Sep–Oct 2001; 68(4–5): 279–86PubMed
60.
go back to reference Goodman GJ. Acne and acne scarring: why should we treat? Med J Aust 1999; 171(2): 62–3PubMed Goodman GJ. Acne and acne scarring: why should we treat? Med J Aust 1999; 171(2): 62–3PubMed
61.
go back to reference Cotterill JA, Cunliffe WJ. Suicide in dermatalogical patients. Br J Dermatol 1997 Aug; 137(2): 246–50PubMedCrossRef Cotterill JA, Cunliffe WJ. Suicide in dermatalogical patients. Br J Dermatol 1997 Aug; 137(2): 246–50PubMedCrossRef
62.
63.
go back to reference Clark SM, Cunliffe WJ, Katsambas AD. Childhood/adolescent acne: a review of aetiology and management. Curr Paediatr 1999; 9(1): 1–6CrossRef Clark SM, Cunliffe WJ, Katsambas AD. Childhood/adolescent acne: a review of aetiology and management. Curr Paediatr 1999; 9(1): 1–6CrossRef
64.
go back to reference The treatment of acne vulgaris: an update. Merec Bull 1999; 10(8): 29–32 The treatment of acne vulgaris: an update. Merec Bull 1999; 10(8): 29–32
Metadata
Title
Adapalene
A Review of its Use in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris
Authors
John Waugh
Stuart Noble
Lesley J. Scott
Publication date
01-07-2004
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Drugs / Issue 13/2004
Print ISSN: 0012-6667
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1950
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-200464130-00005

Other articles of this Issue 13/2004

Drugs 13/2004 Go to the issue

Adis Drug Evaluation

Tinzaparin Sodium

Adis Drug Evaluation

Cefdinir